GHSA-v7vq-3x77-87vg
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-06-16 23:10
Modified
2022-06-16 23:10
Severity ?
4.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Summary
Token bruteforcing.
Details

Impact

What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?

Authenticated requests to the notebook server with ContentsManager.allow_hidden = False only prevented listing the contents of hidden directories, not accessing individual hidden files or files in hidden directories (i.e. hidden files were 'hidden' but not 'inaccessible'). This could lead to notebook configurations allowing authenticated access to files that may reasonably be expected to be disallowed.

Because fully authenticated requests are required, this is of relatively low impact. But if a server's root directory contains sensitive files whose only protection from the server is being hidden (e.g. ~/.ssh while serving $HOME), then any authenticated requests could access files if their names are guessable. Such contexts also necessarily have full access to the server and therefore execution permissions, which also generally grants access to all the same files. So this does not generally result in any privilege escalation or increase in information access, only an additional, unintended means by which the files could be accessed.

Patches

Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?

notebook 6.4.12

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

  • Do not run the notebook server in a directory with hidden files, use subdirectories
  • Use a custom ContentsManager with additional checks for self.is_hidden(path) prior to completing actions

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue in example link to repo * Email us at example email address

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "notebook"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "6.4.12"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-29238"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-425"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-06-16T23:10:10Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-06-14T18:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n_What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_\n\nAuthenticated requests to the notebook server with `ContentsManager.allow_hidden = False` only prevented listing the contents of hidden directories, not accessing individual hidden files or files in hidden directories (i.e. hidden files were \u0027hidden\u0027 but not \u0027inaccessible\u0027). This could lead to notebook configurations allowing authenticated access to files that may reasonably be expected to be disallowed.\n\nBecause fully authenticated requests are required, this is of relatively low impact. But if a server\u0027s root directory contains sensitive files whose only protection from the server is being hidden (e.g. `~/.ssh` while serving $HOME), then any authenticated requests could access files if their names are guessable. Such contexts also necessarily have full access to the server and therefore execution permissions, which also generally grants access to all the same files. So this does not generally result in any privilege escalation or increase in information access, only an additional, unintended _means_ by which the files could be accessed.\n\n### Patches\n_Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_\n\nnotebook 6.4.12\n\n### Workarounds\n_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_\n\n- Do not run the notebook server in a directory with hidden files, use subdirectories\n- Use a custom ContentsManager with additional checks for `self.is_hidden(path)` prior to completing actions\n\n### References\n_Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Open an issue in [example link to repo](http://example.com)\n* Email us at [example email address](mailto:example@example.com)\n",
  "id": "GHSA-v7vq-3x77-87vg",
  "modified": "2022-06-16T23:10:10Z",
  "published": "2022-06-16T23:10:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/jupyter/notebook/security/advisories/GHSA-v7vq-3x77-87vg"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-29238"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/jupyter/notebook"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/notebook/PYSEC-2022-212.yaml"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Token bruteforcing."
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.