GHSA-pj73-v5mw-pm9j
Vulnerability from github
There is a vulnerability in ActiveSupport if the new bytesplice method is called on a SafeBuffer with untrusted user input. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2023-28120.
Versions Affected: All. Not affected: None Fixed Versions: 7.0.4.3, 6.1.7.3
Impact
ActiveSupport uses the SafeBuffer string subclass to tag strings as html_safe after they have been sanitized. When these strings are mutated, the tag is should be removed to mark them as no longer being html_safe.
Ruby 3.2 introduced a new bytesplice method which ActiveSupport did not yet understand to be a mutation. Users on older versions of Ruby are likely unaffected.
All users running an affected release and using bytesplice should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.
Workarounds
Avoid calling bytesplice on a SafeBuffer (html_safe) string with untrusted user input.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "RubyGems", "name": "activesupport" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "7.0.0" }, { "fixed": "7.0.4.3" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "RubyGems", "name": "activesupport" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "6.1.7.3" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2023-28120" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-79" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2023-03-15T21:36:01Z", "nvd_published_at": "2025-01-09T01:15:07Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "There is a vulnerability in ActiveSupport if the new bytesplice method is called on a SafeBuffer with untrusted user input.\nThis vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2023-28120.\n\nVersions Affected: All. Not affected: None Fixed Versions: 7.0.4.3, 6.1.7.3\n\n# Impact\n\nActiveSupport uses the SafeBuffer string subclass to tag strings as html_safe after they have been sanitized.\nWhen these strings are mutated, the tag is should be removed to mark them as no longer being html_safe.\n\nRuby 3.2 introduced a new bytesplice method which ActiveSupport did not yet understand to be a mutation.\nUsers on older versions of Ruby are likely unaffected.\n\nAll users running an affected release and using bytesplice should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.\n\n# Workarounds\n\nAvoid calling bytesplice on a SafeBuffer (html_safe) string with untrusted user input.\n", "id": "GHSA-pj73-v5mw-pm9j", "modified": "2025-01-09T15:37:10Z", "published": "2023-03-15T21:36:01Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-28120" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/3cf23c3f891e2e81c977ea4ab83b62bc2a444b70" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://discuss.rubyonrails.org/t/cve-2023-28120-possible-xss-security-vulnerability-in-safebuffer-bytesplice/82469" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/activesupport/CVE-2023-28120.yml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UPV6PVCX4VDJHLFFT42EXBBSGAWZICOW" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZE5W4MH6IE4DV7GELDK6ISCSTFLHKSYO" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240202-0006" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5389" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [], "summary": "Possible XSS Security Vulnerability in SafeBuffer#bytesplice" }
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.