CVE-2025-5115 (GCVE-0-2025-5115)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-08-20 19:07
Modified
2025-08-21 10:36
Severity ?
7.7 (High) - CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H
CWE
  • CWE-400 - Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Summary
In Eclipse Jetty, versions <=9.4.57, <=10.0.25, <=11.0.25, <=12.0.21, <=12.1.0.alpha2, an HTTP/2 client may trigger the server to send RST_STREAM frames, for example by sending frames that are malformed or that should not be sent in a particular stream state, therefore forcing the server to consume resources such as CPU and memory. For example, a client can open a stream and then send WINDOW_UPDATE frames with window size increment of 0, which is illegal. Per specification https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9113.html#name-window_update , the server should send a RST_STREAM frame. The client can now open another stream and send another bad WINDOW_UPDATE, therefore causing the server to consume more resources than necessary, as this case does not exceed the max number of concurrent streams, yet the client is able to create an enormous amount of streams in a short period of time. The attack can be performed with other conditions (for example, a DATA frame for a closed stream) that cause the server to send a RST_STREAM frame. Links: * https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Eclipse Jetty Eclipse Jetty Version: >=9.3.0   ≤ <=9.4.57
Version: >=10.0.0   ≤ <=10.0.25
Version: >=11.0.0   ≤ <=11.0.25
Version: >=12.0.0   ≤ <=12.0.21
Version: >=12.1.0.alpha0   ≤ <=12.1.0.alpha2
 Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-5115",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-08-20T19:28:04.700843Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-08-20T19:28:12.942Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "pkg:maven/org.eclipse.jetty.http2/http2-common",
          "product": "Eclipse Jetty",
          "repo": "https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project",
          "vendor": "Eclipse Jetty",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "\u003c=9.4.57",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e=9.3.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "\u003c=10.0.25",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e=10.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "\u003c=11.0.25",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e=11.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "\u003c=12.0.21",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e=12.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "\u003c=12.1.0.alpha2",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e=12.1.0.alpha0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn Eclipse Jetty, versions \u0026lt;=9.4.57, \u0026lt;=10.0.25, \u0026lt;=11.0.25, \u0026lt;=12.0.21, \u0026lt;=12.1.0.alpha2, an HTTP/2 client may trigger the server to send RST_STREAM frames, for example by sending frames that are malformed or that should not be sent in a particular stream state, therefore forcing the server to consume resources such as CPU and memory.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor example, a client can open a stream and then send WINDOW_UPDATE frames with window size increment of 0, which is illegal.\nPer specification\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9113.html#name-window_update\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e, the server should send a RST_STREAM frame.\nThe client can now open another stream and send another bad WINDOW_UPDATE, therefore causing the server to consume more resources than necessary, as this case does not exceed the max number of concurrent streams, yet the client is able to create an enormous amount of streams in a short period of time.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe attack can be performed with other conditions (for example, a DATA frame for a closed stream) that cause the server to send a RST_STREAM frame.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h\"\u003ehttps://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "In Eclipse Jetty, versions \u003c=9.4.57, \u003c=10.0.25, \u003c=11.0.25, \u003c=12.0.21, \u003c=12.1.0.alpha2, an HTTP/2 client may trigger the server to send RST_STREAM frames, for example by sending frames that are malformed or that should not be sent in a particular stream state, therefore forcing the server to consume resources such as CPU and memory.\n\n\nFor example, a client can open a stream and then send WINDOW_UPDATE frames with window size increment of 0, which is illegal.\nPer specification  https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9113.html#name-window_update , the server should send a RST_STREAM frame.\nThe client can now open another stream and send another bad WINDOW_UPDATE, therefore causing the server to consume more resources than necessary, as this case does not exceed the max number of concurrent streams, yet the client is able to create an enormous amount of streams in a short period of time.\n\n\nThe attack can be performed with other conditions (for example, a DATA frame for a closed stream) that cause the server to send a RST_STREAM frame.\n\n\n\nLinks:\n\n\n\n  *   https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h"
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 7.7,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-400",
              "description": "CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-08-21T10:36:49.477Z",
        "orgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c",
        "shortName": "eclipse"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "issue-tracking"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/pull/13449"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "release-notes"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-12.1.0"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "release-notes"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-12.0.25"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "release-notes"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-11.0.26"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "release-notes"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-10.0.26"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "release-notes"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-9.4.58.v20250814"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "MadeYouReset HTTP/2 vulnerability",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c",
    "assignerShortName": "eclipse",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-5115",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-20T19:07:11.546Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-05-23T08:55:59.861Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-08-21T10:36:49.477Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-5115\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"published\":\"2025-08-20T20:15:33.377\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-08-22T18:09:17.710\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In Eclipse Jetty, versions \u003c=9.4.57, \u003c=10.0.25, \u003c=11.0.25, \u003c=12.0.21, \u003c=12.1.0.alpha2, an HTTP/2 client may trigger the server to send RST_STREAM frames, for example by sending frames that are malformed or that should not be sent in a particular stream state, therefore forcing the server to consume resources such as CPU and memory.\\n\\n\\nFor example, a client can open a stream and then send WINDOW_UPDATE frames with window size increment of 0, which is illegal.\\nPer specification  https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9113.html#name-window_update , the server should send a RST_STREAM frame.\\nThe client can now open another stream and send another bad WINDOW_UPDATE, therefore causing the server to consume more resources than necessary, as this case does not exceed the max number of concurrent streams, yet the client is able to create an enormous amount of streams in a short period of time.\\n\\n\\nThe attack can be performed with other conditions (for example, a DATA frame for a closed stream) that cause the server to send a RST_STREAM frame.\\n\\n\\n\\nLinks:\\n\\n\\n\\n  *   https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"En Eclipse Jetty, versiones \u0026lt;=9.4.57, \u0026lt;=10.0.25, \u0026lt;=11.0.25, \u0026lt;=12.0.21, \u0026lt;=12.1.0.alpha2, un cliente HTTP/2 puede provocar que el servidor env\u00ede tramas RST_STREAM, por ejemplo, enviando tramas con formato incorrecto o que no deber\u00edan enviarse en un estado de flujo espec\u00edfico, lo que obliga al servidor a consumir recursos como CPU y memoria. Por ejemplo, un cliente puede abrir un flujo y luego enviar tramas WINDOW_UPDATE con un incremento de tama\u00f1o de ventana de 0, lo cual es ilegal. Seg\u00fan la especificaci\u00f3n https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9113.html#name-window_update, el servidor debe enviar una trama RST_STREAM. El cliente ahora puede abrir otra transmisi\u00f3n y enviar otra WINDOW_UPDATE incorrecta, lo que provoca que el servidor consuma m\u00e1s recursos de los necesarios. En este caso, no se supera el n\u00famero m\u00e1ximo de transmisiones simult\u00e1neas, pero el cliente puede crear una enorme cantidad de transmisiones en poco tiempo. El ataque puede ejecutarse con otras condiciones (por ejemplo, una trama DATA para una transmisi\u00f3n cerrada) que provocan que el servidor env\u00ede una trama RST_STREAM. Enlaces: * https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":7.7,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-400\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/pull/13449\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-10.0.26\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-11.0.26\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-12.0.25\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-12.1.0\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-9.4.58.v20250814\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-5115\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-08-20T19:28:04.700843Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-08-20T19:28:07.991Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"MadeYouReset HTTP/2 vulnerability\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV4_0\": {\"Safety\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"version\": \"4.0\", \"Recovery\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"baseScore\": 7.7, \"Automatable\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"valueDensity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H\", \"providerUrgency\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\": \"NOT_DEFINED\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"repo\": \"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project\", \"vendor\": \"Eclipse Jetty\", \"product\": \"Eclipse Jetty\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e=9.3.0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"\u003c=9.4.57\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e=10.0.0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"\u003c=10.0.25\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e=11.0.0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"\u003c=11.0.25\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e=12.0.0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"\u003c=12.0.21\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e=12.1.0.alpha0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"\u003c=12.1.0.alpha2\"}], \"packageName\": \"pkg:maven/org.eclipse.jetty.http2/http2-common\", \"collectionURL\": \"https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2\", \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h\", \"tags\": [\"issue-tracking\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/pull/13449\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-12.1.0\", \"tags\": [\"release-notes\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-12.0.25\", \"tags\": [\"release-notes\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-11.0.26\", \"tags\": [\"release-notes\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-10.0.26\", \"tags\": [\"release-notes\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-9.4.58.v20250814\", \"tags\": [\"release-notes\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 0.2.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"In Eclipse Jetty, versions \u003c=9.4.57, \u003c=10.0.25, \u003c=11.0.25, \u003c=12.0.21, \u003c=12.1.0.alpha2, an HTTP/2 client may trigger the server to send RST_STREAM frames, for example by sending frames that are malformed or that should not be sent in a particular stream state, therefore forcing the server to consume resources such as CPU and memory.\\n\\n\\nFor example, a client can open a stream and then send WINDOW_UPDATE frames with window size increment of 0, which is illegal.\\nPer specification  https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9113.html#name-window_update , the server should send a RST_STREAM frame.\\nThe client can now open another stream and send another bad WINDOW_UPDATE, therefore causing the server to consume more resources than necessary, as this case does not exceed the max number of concurrent streams, yet the client is able to create an enormous amount of streams in a short period of time.\\n\\n\\nThe attack can be performed with other conditions (for example, a DATA frame for a closed stream) that cause the server to send a RST_STREAM frame.\\n\\n\\n\\nLinks:\\n\\n\\n\\n  *   https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn Eclipse Jetty, versions \u0026lt;=9.4.57, \u0026lt;=10.0.25, \u0026lt;=11.0.25, \u0026lt;=12.0.21, \u0026lt;=12.1.0.alpha2, an HTTP/2 client may trigger the server to send RST_STREAM frames, for example by sending frames that are malformed or that should not be sent in a particular stream state, therefore forcing the server to consume resources such as CPU and memory.\u003c/p\u003e\\n\u003cp\u003eFor example, a client can open a stream and then send WINDOW_UPDATE frames with window size increment of 0, which is illegal.\\nPer specification\u003ca target=\\\"_blank\\\" rel=\\\"nofollow\\\" href=\\\"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9113.html#name-window_update\\\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e, the server should send a RST_STREAM frame.\\nThe client can now open another stream and send another bad WINDOW_UPDATE, therefore causing the server to consume more resources than necessary, as this case does not exceed the max number of concurrent streams, yet the client is able to create an enormous amount of streams in a short period of time.\u003c/p\u003e\\n\u003cp\u003eThe attack can be performed with other conditions (for example, a DATA frame for a closed stream) that cause the server to send a RST_STREAM frame.\u003c/p\u003e\\n\\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\\n\u003cul\u003e\\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca target=\\\"_blank\\\" rel=\\\"nofollow\\\" href=\\\"https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h\\\"\u003ehttps://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-mmxm-8w33-wc4h\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-400\", \"description\": \"CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c\", \"shortName\": \"eclipse\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-08-21T10:36:49.477Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-5115\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-08-21T10:36:49.477Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-05-23T08:55:59.861Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-08-20T19:07:11.546Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"eclipse\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.