CVE-2024-1544
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-08-27 18:44
Modified
2024-08-27 19:14
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
Generating the ECDSA nonce k samples a random number r and then
truncates this randomness with a modular reduction mod n where n is the
order of the elliptic curve. Meaning k = r mod n. The division used
during the reduction estimates a factor q_e by dividing the upper two
digits (a digit having e.g. a size of 8 byte) of r by the upper digit of
n and then decrements q_e in a loop until it has the correct size.
Observing the number of times q_e is decremented through a control-flow
revealing side-channel reveals a bias in the most significant bits of
k. Depending on the curve this is either a negligible bias or a
significant bias large enough to reconstruct k with lattice reduction
methods. For SECP160R1, e.g., we find a bias of 15 bits.
References
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "metrics": [ { "other": { "content": { "id": "CVE-2024-1544", "options": [ { "Exploitation": "none" }, { "Automatable": "no" }, { "Technical Impact": "partial" } ], "role": "CISA Coordinator", "timestamp": "2024-08-27T19:14:00.889289Z", "version": "2.0.3" }, "type": "ssvc" } } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-27T19:14:35.190Z", "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP" }, "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "defaultStatus": "unknown", "product": "wolfSSL", "programFiles": [ "wolfcrypt/src/ecc.c" ], "vendor": "wolfSSL", "versions": [ { "lessThanOrEqual": "5.6.4", "status": "affected", "version": "0", "versionType": "Release" } ] } ], "credits": [ { "lang": "en", "type": "finder", "user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000", "value": "Florian Sieck, Luca Wilke and Thomas Eisenbarth from Universit\u00e4t zu L\u00fcbeck" } ], "datePublic": "2024-07-08T17:30:00.000Z", "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "supportingMedia": [ { "base64": false, "type": "text/html", "value": "Generating the ECDSA nonce k samples a random number r and then \u003cbr\u003etruncates this randomness with a modular reduction mod n where n is the \u003cbr\u003eorder of the elliptic curve. Meaning k = r mod n. The division used \u003cbr\u003eduring the reduction estimates a factor q_e by dividing the upper two \u003cbr\u003edigits (a digit having e.g. a size of 8 byte) of r by the upper digit of \u003cbr\u003en and then decrements q_e in a loop until it has the correct size. \u003cbr\u003eObserving the number of times q_e is decremented through a control-flow \u003cbr\u003erevealing side-channel reveals a bias in the most significant bits of \u003cbr\u003ek. Depending on the curve this is either a negligible bias or a \u003cbr\u003esignificant bias large enough to reconstruct k with lattice reduction \u003cbr\u003emethods. For SECP160R1, e.g., we find a bias of 15 bits." } ], "value": "Generating the ECDSA nonce k samples a random number r and then \ntruncates this randomness with a modular reduction mod n where n is the \norder of the elliptic curve. Meaning k = r mod n. The division used \nduring the reduction estimates a factor q_e by dividing the upper two \ndigits (a digit having e.g. a size of 8 byte) of r by the upper digit of \nn and then decrements q_e in a loop until it has the correct size. \nObserving the number of times q_e is decremented through a control-flow \nrevealing side-channel reveals a bias in the most significant bits of \nk. Depending on the curve this is either a negligible bias or a \nsignificant bias large enough to reconstruct k with lattice reduction \nmethods. For SECP160R1, e.g., we find a bias of 15 bits." } ], "impacts": [ { "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Information Disclosure" } ] } ], "metrics": [ { "cvssV3_1": { "attackComplexity": "HIGH", "attackVector": "LOCAL", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 4.1, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "HIGH", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "version": "3.1" }, "format": "CVSS", "scenarios": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "GENERAL" } ] } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-203", "description": "CWE-203 Observable Discrepancy", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-27T18:44:52.770Z", "orgId": "50d2cd11-d01a-48ed-9441-5bfce9d63b27", "shortName": "wolfSSL" }, "references": [ { "url": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/releases/tag/v5.7.2-stable" } ], "source": { "discovery": "EXTERNAL" }, "title": "ECDSA nonce bias caused by truncation", "x_generator": { "engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev" } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "50d2cd11-d01a-48ed-9441-5bfce9d63b27", "assignerShortName": "wolfSSL", "cveId": "CVE-2024-1544", "datePublished": "2024-08-27T18:44:52.770Z", "dateReserved": "2024-02-15T17:38:16.603Z", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-27T19:14:35.190Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-1544\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"facts@wolfssl.com\",\"published\":\"2024-08-27T19:15:16.547\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-08-28T12:57:39.090\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Generating the ECDSA nonce k samples a random number r and then \\ntruncates this randomness with a modular reduction mod n where n is the \\norder of the elliptic curve. Meaning k = r mod n. The division used \\nduring the reduction estimates a factor q_e by dividing the upper two \\ndigits (a digit having e.g. a size of 8 byte) of r by the upper digit of \\nn and then decrements q_e in a loop until it has the correct size. \\nObserving the number of times q_e is decremented through a control-flow \\nrevealing side-channel reveals a bias in the most significant bits of \\nk. Depending on the curve this is either a negligible bias or a \\nsignificant bias large enough to reconstruct k with lattice reduction \\nmethods. For SECP160R1, e.g., we find a bias of 15 bits.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Generar el nonce k ECDSA muestra un n\u00famero aleatorio r y luego trunca esta aleatoriedad con una reducci\u00f3n modular mod n donde n es el orden de la curva el\u00edptica. Significado k = r mod n. La divisi\u00f3n utilizada durante la reducci\u00f3n estima un factor q_e dividiendo los dos d\u00edgitos superiores (un d\u00edgito que tiene, por ejemplo, un tama\u00f1o de 8 bytes) de r por el d\u00edgito superior de n y luego disminuye q_e en un bucle hasta que tenga el tama\u00f1o correcto. Observar el n\u00famero de veces que q_e disminuye a trav\u00e9s de un canal lateral revelador de flujo de control revela un sesgo en los bits m\u00e1s significativos de k. Dependiendo de la curva, esto es un sesgo insignificante o un sesgo significativo lo suficientemente grande como para reconstruir k con m\u00e9todos de reducci\u00f3n de celos\u00eda. Para SECP160R1, por ejemplo, encontramos un sesgo de 15 bits.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"facts@wolfssl.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"HIGH\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":0.5,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"facts@wolfssl.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-203\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/releases/tag/v5.7.2-stable\",\"source\":\"facts@wolfssl.com\"}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.