CVE-2018-4301
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-01-07 23:26
Modified
2025-01-08 17:26
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
This issue is fixed in SCSSU-201801. A potential stack based buffer overflow existed in GemaltoKeyHandle.cpp.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
▼ | Apple | Smart Card Services |
Version: unspecified < 201801 |
|
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "metrics": [ { "cvssV3_1": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 9.8, "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1" } }, { "other": { "content": { "id": "CVE-2018-4301", "options": [ { "Exploitation": "none" }, { "Automatable": "yes" }, { "Technical Impact": "total" } ], "role": "CISA Coordinator", "timestamp": "2025-01-08T17:25:46.629246Z", "version": "2.0.3" }, "type": "ssvc" } } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-120", "description": "CWE-120 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (\u0027Classic Buffer Overflow\u0027)", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2025-01-08T17:26:16.041Z", "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP" }, "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "Smart Card Services", "vendor": "Apple", "versions": [ { "lessThan": "201801", "status": "affected", "version": "unspecified", "versionType": "custom" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "This issue is fixed in SCSSU-201801. A potential stack based buffer overflow existed in GemaltoKeyHandle.cpp." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "description": "A potential stack based buffer overflow existed in GemaltoKeyHandle.cpp", "lang": "en" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2025-01-07T23:26:58.979Z", "orgId": "286789f9-fbc2-4510-9f9a-43facdede74c", "shortName": "apple" }, "references": [ { "url": "https://smartcardservices.github.io/security/" } ] } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "286789f9-fbc2-4510-9f9a-43facdede74c", "assignerShortName": "apple", "cveId": "CVE-2018-4301", "datePublished": "2025-01-07T23:26:58.979Z", "dateReserved": "2018-01-02T00:00:00.000Z", "dateUpdated": "2025-01-08T17:26:16.041Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2018-4301\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"product-security@apple.com\",\"published\":\"2025-01-08T00:15:24.030\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-01-08T18:15:12.493\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"This issue is fixed in SCSSU-201801. A potential stack based buffer overflow existed in GemaltoKeyHandle.cpp.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Este problema se solucion\u00f3 en SCSSU-201801. Exist\u00eda un posible desbordamiento de b\u00fafer basado en pila en GemaltoKeyHandle.cpp.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":9.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":5.9}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-120\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://smartcardservices.github.io/security/\",\"source\":\"product-security@apple.com\"}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.