CERTA-2012-ALE-001

Vulnerability from certfr_alerte - Published: - Updated:

Une vulnérabilité sur certains boîtiers Cisco IronPort permet à un attaquant d'exécuter du code arbitraire à distance.

Description

Certains boîtiers Cisco IronPort utilisent une version vulnérable du démon telnetd. Ce démon est actif par défaut sur l'interface d'administration. Cette vulnérabilité permet à un attaquant d'exécuter du code arbitraire à distance.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

None
Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
Cisco N/A Cisco IronPort Email Security Appliance, C-series et M-Series, versions antérieures à la version 7.6.0 ;
Cisco N/A Cisco IronPort Security Management Appliance, M-Series, versions antérieures à la version 7.8.0.
References

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [
    {
      "description": "Cisco IronPort Email Security Appliance, C-series et M-Series, versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 la version 7.6.0 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Cisco",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Cisco IronPort Security Management Appliance, M-Series, versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 la version 7.8.0.",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Cisco",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "affected_systems_content": null,
  "closed_at": "2013-02-05",
  "content": "## Description\n\nCertains bo\u00eetiers Cisco IronPort utilisent une version vuln\u00e9rable du\nd\u00e9mon telnetd. Ce d\u00e9mon est actif par d\u00e9faut sur l\u0027interface\nd\u0027administration. Cette vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 permet \u00e0 un attaquant d\u0027ex\u00e9cuter\ndu code arbitraire \u00e0 distance.\n\n  \n  \n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2011-4862",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-4862"
    }
  ],
  "links": [
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Cisco 20120126-ironport du 26 janvier    2012 :",
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20120126-ironport"
    }
  ],
  "reference": "CERTA-2012-ALE-001",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale ;",
      "revision_date": "2012-02-01T00:00:00.000000"
    },
    {
      "description": "fermeture de l\u0027alerte, suite \u00e0 la correction par l\u0027\u00e9diteur.",
      "revision_date": "2013-02-05T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 sur certains bo\u00eetiers Cisco IronPort permet \u00e0 un\nattaquant d\u0027ex\u00e9cuter du code arbitraire \u00e0 distance.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans Cisco IronPort",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Cisco 20120126-ironport du 26 janvier 2012",
      "url": null
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.