CERTA-2003-AVI-136

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:

None

Description

Sous Solaris 9, le serveur FTP (in.ftpd) est basé sur le code du serveur WU-ftpd.

La faille décrite dans l'avis CERTA-2003-AVI-132 est également présente dans le serveur in.ftpd.

Solution

Appliquez le correctif de l'éditeur :

Bulletin de sécurité #56121 de Sun :

http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fsalert%2F56121

Solaris 9 (plates-formes SPARC et i386).

Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
References

Show details on source website

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [],
  "affected_systems_content": "\u003cp\u003eSolaris 9 (plates-formes SPARC et  i386).\u003c/p\u003e",
  "content": "## Description\n\nSous Solaris 9, le serveur FTP (in.ftpd) est bas\u00e9 sur le code du serveur\nWU-ftpd.\n\nLa faille d\u00e9crite dans l\u0027avis CERTA-2003-AVI-132 est \u00e9galement pr\u00e9sente\ndans le serveur in.ftpd.\n\n## Solution\n\nAppliquez le correctif de l\u0027\u00e9diteur :  \n\nBulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 \\#56121 de Sun :\n\n    http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fsalert%2F56121\n",
  "cves": [],
  "links": [
    {
      "title": "Avis CERTA-2003-AVI-132 du CERTA :",
      "url": "http://www.certa.ssi.gouv.fr/site/CERTA-2003-AVI-132/index.html"
    }
  ],
  "reference": "CERTA-2003-AVI-136",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2003-08-18T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
    }
  ],
  "summary": null,
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 du serveur in.ftpd sous Solaris 9",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 #56121 de Sun",
      "url": null
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…