Vulnerabilites related to nicmx - fort-validator
CVE-2024-45239 (GCVE-0-2024-45239)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-08-24 00:00
Modified
2025-03-19 14:00
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- n/a
Summary
An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) an ROA or a Manifest containing a null eContent field. Fort dereferences the pointer without sanitizing it first. Because Fort is an RPKI Relying Party, a crash can lead to Route Origin Validation unavailability, which can lead to compromised routing.
References
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "metrics": [ { "cvssV3_1": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 7.5, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" } }, { "other": { "content": { "id": "CVE-2024-45239", "options": [ { "Exploitation": "none" }, { "Automatable": "yes" }, { "Technical Impact": "partial" } ], "role": "CISA Coordinator", "timestamp": "2025-03-19T13:58:31.822149Z", "version": "2.0.3" }, "type": "ssvc" } } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-476", "description": "CWE-476 NULL Pointer Dereference", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2025-03-19T14:00:52.703Z", "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP" }, "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "n/a" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) an ROA or a Manifest containing a null eContent field. Fort dereferences the pointer without sanitizing it first. Because Fort is an RPKI Relying Party, a crash can lead to Route Origin Validation unavailability, which can lead to compromised routing." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-24T22:24:30.888Z", "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "shortName": "mitre" }, "references": [ { "url": "https://nicmx.github.io/FORT-validator/CVE.html" } ] } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "assignerShortName": "mitre", "cveId": "CVE-2024-45239", "datePublished": "2024-08-24T00:00:00.000Z", "dateReserved": "2024-08-24T00:00:00.000Z", "dateUpdated": "2025-03-19T14:00:52.703Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1" }
CVE-2024-45236 (GCVE-0-2024-45236)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-08-24 00:00
Modified
2025-03-26 20:02
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- n/a
Summary
An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) a signed object containing an empty signedAttributes field. Fort accesses the set's elements without sanitizing it first. Because Fort is an RPKI Relying Party, a crash can lead to Route Origin Validation unavailability, which can lead to compromised routing.
References
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "affected": [ { "cpes": [ "cpe:2.3:a:fort_validator_project:fort_validator:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*" ], "defaultStatus": "unknown", "product": "fort_validator", "vendor": "fort_validator_project", "versions": [ { "lessThan": "1.6.3", "status": "affected", "version": "0", "versionType": "custom" } ] } ], "metrics": [ { "cvssV3_1": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 7.5, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" } }, { "other": { "content": { "id": "CVE-2024-45236", "options": [ { "Exploitation": "none" }, { "Automatable": "yes" }, { "Technical Impact": "partial" } ], "role": "CISA Coordinator", "timestamp": "2024-08-28T16:18:27.319194Z", "version": "2.0.3" }, "type": "ssvc" } } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-20", "description": "CWE-20 Improper Input Validation", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2025-03-26T20:02:04.748Z", "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP" }, "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "n/a" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) a signed object containing an empty signedAttributes field. Fort accesses the set\u0027s elements without sanitizing it first. Because Fort is an RPKI Relying Party, a crash can lead to Route Origin Validation unavailability, which can lead to compromised routing." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-24T22:24:56.680Z", "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "shortName": "mitre" }, "references": [ { "url": "https://nicmx.github.io/FORT-validator/CVE.html" } ] } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "assignerShortName": "mitre", "cveId": "CVE-2024-45236", "datePublished": "2024-08-24T00:00:00.000Z", "dateReserved": "2024-08-24T00:00:00.000Z", "dateUpdated": "2025-03-26T20:02:04.748Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1" }
CVE-2024-45234 (GCVE-0-2024-45234)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-08-24 00:00
Modified
2025-03-25 18:31
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- n/a
Summary
An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) an ROA or a Manifest containing a signedAttrs encoded in non-canonical form. This bypasses Fort's BER decoder, reaching a point in the code that panics when faced with data not encoded in DER. Because Fort is an RPKI Relying Party, a panic can lead to Route Origin Validation unavailability, which can lead to compromised routing.
References
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "metrics": [ { "cvssV3_1": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 7.5, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" } }, { "other": { "content": { "id": "CVE-2024-45234", "options": [ { "Exploitation": "none" }, { "Automatable": "no" }, { "Technical Impact": "partial" } ], "role": "CISA Coordinator", "timestamp": "2024-08-28T16:14:24.554371Z", "version": "2.0.3" }, "type": "ssvc" } } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-295", "description": "CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2025-03-25T18:31:47.109Z", "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP" }, "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "n/a" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) an ROA or a Manifest containing a signedAttrs encoded in non-canonical form. This bypasses Fort\u0027s BER decoder, reaching a point in the code that panics when faced with data not encoded in DER. Because Fort is an RPKI Relying Party, a panic can lead to Route Origin Validation unavailability, which can lead to compromised routing." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-24T22:25:12.481Z", "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "shortName": "mitre" }, "references": [ { "url": "https://nicmx.github.io/FORT-validator/CVE.html" } ] } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "assignerShortName": "mitre", "cveId": "CVE-2024-45234", "datePublished": "2024-08-24T00:00:00.000Z", "dateReserved": "2024-08-24T00:00:00.000Z", "dateUpdated": "2025-03-25T18:31:47.109Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1" }
CVE-2024-45237 (GCVE-0-2024-45237)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-08-24 00:00
Modified
2024-08-26 19:36
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- n/a
Summary
An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) a resource certificate containing a Key Usage extension composed of more than two bytes of data. Fort writes this string into a 2-byte buffer without properly sanitizing its length, leading to a buffer overflow.
References
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "affected": [ { "cpes": [ "cpe:2.3:a:fort_validator_project:fort_validator:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*" ], "defaultStatus": "unknown", "product": "fort_validator", "vendor": "fort_validator_project", "versions": [ { "lessThan": "1.6.3", "status": "affected", "version": "0", "versionType": "custom" } ] } ], "metrics": [ { "cvssV3_1": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 9.8, "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1" } }, { "other": { "content": { "id": "CVE-2024-45237", "options": [ { "Exploitation": "none" }, { "Automatable": "yes" }, { "Technical Impact": "total" } ], "role": "CISA Coordinator", "timestamp": "2024-08-26T19:34:16.750921Z", "version": "2.0.3" }, "type": "ssvc" } } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-120", "description": "CWE-120 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (\u0027Classic Buffer Overflow\u0027)", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-26T19:36:05.023Z", "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP" }, "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "n/a" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) a resource certificate containing a Key Usage extension composed of more than two bytes of data. Fort writes this string into a 2-byte buffer without properly sanitizing its length, leading to a buffer overflow." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-24T22:24:49.963270", "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "shortName": "mitre" }, "references": [ { "url": "https://nicmx.github.io/FORT-validator/CVE.html" } ] } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "assignerShortName": "mitre", "cveId": "CVE-2024-45237", "datePublished": "2024-08-24T00:00:00", "dateReserved": "2024-08-24T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-26T19:36:05.023Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1" }
CVE-2024-56375 (GCVE-0-2024-56375)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-12-22 00:00
Modified
2025-01-06 17:29
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-191 - Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound)
Summary
An integer underflow was discovered in Fort 1.6.3 and 1.6.4 before 1.6.5. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) a Manifest RPKI object containing an empty fileList. Fort dereferences (and, shortly afterwards, writes to) this array during a shuffle attempt, before the validation that would normally reject it when empty. This out-of-bounds access is caused by an integer underflow that causes the surrounding loop to iterate infinitely. Because the product is permanently stuck attempting to overshuffle an array that doesn't actually exist, a crash is nearly guaranteed.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
nicmx | fort-validator |
Version: 1.6.3 ≤ |
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "metrics": [ { "cvssV3_1": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 7.5, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" } }, { "other": { "content": { "id": "CVE-2024-56375", "options": [ { "Exploitation": "none" }, { "Automatable": "yes" }, { "Technical Impact": "partial" } ], "role": "CISA Coordinator", "timestamp": "2024-12-24T02:12:07.458757Z", "version": "2.0.3" }, "type": "ssvc" } } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-191", "description": "CWE-191 Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound)", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2025-01-06T17:29:19.791Z", "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP" }, "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "defaultStatus": "unaffected", "product": "fort-validator", "vendor": "nicmx", "versions": [ { "lessThan": "1.6.5", "status": "affected", "version": "1.6.3", "versionType": "semver" } ] } ], "cpeApplicability": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:nicmx:fort-validator:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "versionEndExcluding": "1.6.5", "versionStartIncluding": "1.6.3", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "An integer underflow was discovered in Fort 1.6.3 and 1.6.4 before 1.6.5. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) a Manifest RPKI object containing an empty fileList. Fort dereferences (and, shortly afterwards, writes to) this array during a shuffle attempt, before the validation that would normally reject it when empty. This out-of-bounds access is caused by an integer underflow that causes the surrounding loop to iterate infinitely. Because the product is permanently stuck attempting to overshuffle an array that doesn\u0027t actually exist, a crash is nearly guaranteed." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-191", "description": "CWE-191 Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound)", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-12-26T05:35:52.559Z", "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "shortName": "mitre" }, "references": [ { "url": "https://nicmx.github.io/FORT-validator/CVE.html" }, { "url": "https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/154" } ], "x_generator": { "engine": "enrichogram 0.0.1" } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "assignerShortName": "mitre", "cveId": "CVE-2024-56375", "datePublished": "2024-12-22T00:00:00", "dateReserved": "2024-12-22T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2025-01-06T17:29:19.791Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1" }
CVE-2024-56170 (GCVE-0-2024-56170)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-12-18 00:00
Modified
2024-12-26 19:07
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- n/a
Summary
A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI manifests are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify. Assuming everything else is correct, the most recent version of a manifest should be prioritized over other versions, to prevent replays, accidental or otherwise. Manifests contain the manifestNumber and thisUpdate fields, which can be used to gauge the relevance of a given manifest, when compared to other manifests. The former is a serial-like sequential number, and the latter is the date on which the manifest was created. However, the product does not compare the up-to-dateness of the most recently fetched manifest against the cached manifest. As such, it's prone to a rollback to a previous version if it's served a valid outdated manifest. This leads to outdated route origin validation.
References
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "metrics": [ { "cvssV3_1": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 5.3, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "LOW", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N", "version": "3.1" } }, { "other": { "content": { "id": "CVE-2024-56170", "options": [ { "Exploitation": "none" }, { "Automatable": "yes" }, { "Technical Impact": "partial" } ], "role": "CISA Coordinator", "timestamp": "2024-12-26T18:55:44.273329Z", "version": "2.0.3" }, "type": "ssvc" } } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-346", "description": "CWE-346 Origin Validation Error", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-12-26T19:07:44.267Z", "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP" }, "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "n/a" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI manifests are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify. Assuming everything else is correct, the most recent version of a manifest should be prioritized over other versions, to prevent replays, accidental or otherwise. Manifests contain the manifestNumber and thisUpdate fields, which can be used to gauge the relevance of a given manifest, when compared to other manifests. The former is a serial-like sequential number, and the latter is the date on which the manifest was created. However, the product does not compare the up-to-dateness of the most recently fetched manifest against the cached manifest. As such, it\u0027s prone to a rollback to a previous version if it\u0027s served a valid outdated manifest. This leads to outdated route origin validation." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-12-18T04:31:13.545026", "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "shortName": "mitre" }, "references": [ { "url": "https://nicmx.github.io/FORT-validator/CVE.html" } ] } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "assignerShortName": "mitre", "cveId": "CVE-2024-56170", "datePublished": "2024-12-18T00:00:00", "dateReserved": "2024-12-18T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-12-26T19:07:44.267Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1" }
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-08-24 23:15
Modified
2025-03-26 20:15
Severity ?
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) a signed object containing an empty signedAttributes field. Fort accesses the set's elements without sanitizing it first. Because Fort is an RPKI Relying Party, a crash can lead to Route Origin Validation unavailability, which can lead to compromised routing.
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
cve@mitre.org | https://nicmx.github.io/FORT-validator/CVE.html | Patch, Third Party Advisory |
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
nicmx | fort-validator | * |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:nicmx:fort-validator:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "1B6DF9BD-7BC4-4AFF-8E93-6810EC99D678", "versionEndExcluding": "1.6.3", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) a signed object containing an empty signedAttributes field. Fort accesses the set\u0027s elements without sanitizing it first. Because Fort is an RPKI Relying Party, a crash can lead to Route Origin Validation unavailability, which can lead to compromised routing." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "Se descubri\u00f3 un problema en Fort antes de la versi\u00f3n 1.6.3. Un repositorio RPKI malicioso que desciende de un Trust Anchor (confiable) puede servir (a trav\u00e9s de rsync o RRDP) un objeto firmado que contenga un campo firmadoAttributes vac\u00edo. Fort accede a los elementos del decorado sin desinfectarlo previamente. Debido a que Fort es una parte de confianza de RPKI, una falla puede provocar que la validaci\u00f3n del origen de la ruta no est\u00e9 disponible, lo que puede comprometer el enrutamiento." } ], "id": "CVE-2024-45236", "lastModified": "2025-03-26T20:15:20.903", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 7.5, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" }, { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 7.5, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "type": "Secondary" } ] }, "published": "2024-08-24T23:15:04.187", "references": [ { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": [ "Patch", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://nicmx.github.io/FORT-validator/CVE.html" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" }, { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-20" } ], "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "type": "Secondary" } ] }
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-08-24 23:15
Modified
2025-03-19 14:15
Severity ?
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) an ROA or a Manifest containing a null eContent field. Fort dereferences the pointer without sanitizing it first. Because Fort is an RPKI Relying Party, a crash can lead to Route Origin Validation unavailability, which can lead to compromised routing.
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
cve@mitre.org | https://nicmx.github.io/FORT-validator/CVE.html | Third Party Advisory |
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
nicmx | fort-validator | * |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:nicmx:fort-validator:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "1B6DF9BD-7BC4-4AFF-8E93-6810EC99D678", "versionEndExcluding": "1.6.3", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) an ROA or a Manifest containing a null eContent field. Fort dereferences the pointer without sanitizing it first. Because Fort is an RPKI Relying Party, a crash can lead to Route Origin Validation unavailability, which can lead to compromised routing." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "Se descubri\u00f3 un problema en Fort antes de la versi\u00f3n 1.6.3. Un repositorio RPKI malicioso que desciende de un Trust Anchor (confiable) puede servir (a trav\u00e9s de rsync o RRDP) un ROA o un Manifiesto que contenga un campo de contenido electr\u00f3nico nulo. Fort elimina la referencia al puntero sin desinfectarlo primero. Debido a que Fort es una parte de confianza de RPKI, una falla puede provocar que la validaci\u00f3n del origen de la ruta no est\u00e9 disponible, lo que puede comprometer el enrutamiento." } ], "id": "CVE-2024-45239", "lastModified": "2025-03-19T14:15:36.867", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 7.5, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" }, { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 7.5, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "type": "Secondary" } ] }, "published": "2024-08-24T23:15:04.353", "references": [ { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://nicmx.github.io/FORT-validator/CVE.html" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-476" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" }, { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-476" } ], "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "type": "Secondary" } ] }
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-12-18 05:15
Modified
2025-04-22 15:35
Severity ?
Summary
A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI manifests are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify. Assuming everything else is correct, the most recent version of a manifest should be prioritized over other versions, to prevent replays, accidental or otherwise. Manifests contain the manifestNumber and thisUpdate fields, which can be used to gauge the relevance of a given manifest, when compared to other manifests. The former is a serial-like sequential number, and the latter is the date on which the manifest was created. However, the product does not compare the up-to-dateness of the most recently fetched manifest against the cached manifest. As such, it's prone to a rollback to a previous version if it's served a valid outdated manifest. This leads to outdated route origin validation.
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
cve@mitre.org | https://nicmx.github.io/FORT-validator/CVE.html | Vendor Advisory |
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
nicmx | fort-validator | * |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:nicmx:fort-validator:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "A7AF0CB2-A742-4215-8885-81068A9382B3", "versionEndIncluding": "1.6.6", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI manifests are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify. Assuming everything else is correct, the most recent version of a manifest should be prioritized over other versions, to prevent replays, accidental or otherwise. Manifests contain the manifestNumber and thisUpdate fields, which can be used to gauge the relevance of a given manifest, when compared to other manifests. The former is a serial-like sequential number, and the latter is the date on which the manifest was created. However, the product does not compare the up-to-dateness of the most recently fetched manifest against the cached manifest. As such, it\u0027s prone to a rollback to a previous version if it\u0027s served a valid outdated manifest. This leads to outdated route origin validation." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "Se descubri\u00f3 un problema de integridad de validaci\u00f3n en Fort hasta 1.6.4 antes de 2.0.0. Los manifiestos RPKI son listas de archivos relevantes que los clientes deben verificar. Suponiendo que todo lo dem\u00e1s sea correcto, se debe priorizar la versi\u00f3n m\u00e1s reciente de un manifiesto sobre otras versiones, para evitar repeticiones, accidentales o de otro tipo. Los manifiestos contienen los campos manifestNumber y thisUpdate, que se pueden usar para medir la relevancia de un manifiesto determinado, en comparaci\u00f3n con otros manifiestos. El primero es un n\u00famero secuencial de tipo serial y el segundo es la fecha en la que se cre\u00f3 el manifiesto. Sin embargo, el producto no compara la actualidad del manifiesto obtenido m\u00e1s recientemente con el manifiesto almacenado en cach\u00e9. Como tal, es propenso a una reversi\u00f3n a una versi\u00f3n anterior si se entreg\u00f3 un manifiesto desactualizado v\u00e1lido. Esto conduce a una validaci\u00f3n de origen de ruta desactualizada." } ], "id": "CVE-2024-56170", "lastModified": "2025-04-22T15:35:05.487", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 5.3, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "LOW", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 1.4, "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "type": "Secondary" } ] }, "published": "2024-12-18T05:15:09.093", "references": [ { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://nicmx.github.io/FORT-validator/CVE.html" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org", "vulnStatus": "Analyzed", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-346" } ], "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "type": "Secondary" } ] }
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-08-24 23:15
Modified
2024-08-27 15:48
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
9.8 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
9.8 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) a resource certificate containing a Key Usage extension composed of more than two bytes of data. Fort writes this string into a 2-byte buffer without properly sanitizing its length, leading to a buffer overflow.
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
cve@mitre.org | https://nicmx.github.io/FORT-validator/CVE.html | Patch, Third Party Advisory |
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
nicmx | fort-validator | * |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:nicmx:fort-validator:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "1B6DF9BD-7BC4-4AFF-8E93-6810EC99D678", "versionEndExcluding": "1.6.3", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) a resource certificate containing a Key Usage extension composed of more than two bytes of data. Fort writes this string into a 2-byte buffer without properly sanitizing its length, leading to a buffer overflow." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "Se descubri\u00f3 un problema en Fort antes de la versi\u00f3n 1.6.3. Un repositorio RPKI malicioso que desciende de un Trust Anchor (confiable) puede servir (a trav\u00e9s de rsync o RRDP) un certificado de recurso que contenga una extensi\u00f3n de uso de clave compuesta por m\u00e1s de dos bytes de datos. Fort escribe esta cadena en un b\u00fafer de 2 bytes sin desinfectar adecuadamente su longitud, lo que provoca un desbordamiento del b\u00fafer." } ], "id": "CVE-2024-45237", "lastModified": "2024-08-27T15:48:34.030", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 9.8, "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 5.9, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" }, { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 9.8, "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 5.9, "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "type": "Secondary" } ] }, "published": "2024-08-24T23:15:04.243", "references": [ { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": [ "Patch", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://nicmx.github.io/FORT-validator/CVE.html" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org", "vulnStatus": "Analyzed", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-120" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" }, { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-120" } ], "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "type": "Secondary" } ] }
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-08-24 23:15
Modified
2025-03-25 19:15
Severity ?
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) an ROA or a Manifest containing a signedAttrs encoded in non-canonical form. This bypasses Fort's BER decoder, reaching a point in the code that panics when faced with data not encoded in DER. Because Fort is an RPKI Relying Party, a panic can lead to Route Origin Validation unavailability, which can lead to compromised routing.
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
cve@mitre.org | https://nicmx.github.io/FORT-validator/CVE.html | Third Party Advisory |
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
nicmx | fort-validator | * |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:nicmx:fort-validator:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "1B6DF9BD-7BC4-4AFF-8E93-6810EC99D678", "versionEndExcluding": "1.6.3", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) an ROA or a Manifest containing a signedAttrs encoded in non-canonical form. This bypasses Fort\u0027s BER decoder, reaching a point in the code that panics when faced with data not encoded in DER. Because Fort is an RPKI Relying Party, a panic can lead to Route Origin Validation unavailability, which can lead to compromised routing." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "Se descubri\u00f3 un problema en Fort antes de la versi\u00f3n 1.6.3. Un repositorio RPKI malicioso que desciende de un ancla de confianza (confiable) puede servir (a trav\u00e9s de rsync o RRDP) un ROA o un manifiesto que contenga atributos firmados codificados en forma no can\u00f3nica. Esto evita el decodificador BER de Fort, llegando a un punto en el c\u00f3digo que entra en p\u00e1nico cuando se enfrenta a datos no codificados en DER. Debido a que Fort es una parte de confianza de RPKI, un p\u00e1nico puede provocar que la validaci\u00f3n del origen de la ruta no est\u00e9 disponible, lo que puede comprometer el enrutamiento." } ], "id": "CVE-2024-45234", "lastModified": "2025-03-25T19:15:45.247", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 7.5, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" }, { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 7.5, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "type": "Secondary" } ] }, "published": "2024-08-24T23:15:04.037", "references": [ { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://nicmx.github.io/FORT-validator/CVE.html" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" }, { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-295" } ], "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "type": "Secondary" } ] }