CWE-682

Incorrect Calculation

The product performs a calculation that generates incorrect or unintended results that are later used in security-critical decisions or resource management.

CVE-2025-54427 (GCVE-0-2025-54427)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-07-28 20:20 – Updated: 2025-07-28 20:38
VLAI
Title
Polkadot Frontier contains missing `check_inherent` for `note_min_gas_price_target` inflates gas price
Summary
Polkadot Frontier is an Ethereum and EVM compatibility layer for Polkadot and Substrate. The extrinsic note_min_gas_price_target is an inherent extrinsic, meaning only the block producer can call it. To ensure correctness, the ProvideInherent trait should be implemented for each inherent, which includes the check_inherent call. This allows other nodes to verify if the input (in this case, the target value) is correct. However, prior to commit a754b3d, the check_inherent function has not been implemented for note_min_gas_price_target. This lets the block producer set the target value without verification. The target is then used to set the MinGasPrice, which has an upper and lower bound defined in the on_initialize hook. The block producer can set the target to the upper bound. Which also increases the upper and lower bounds for the next block. Over time, this could result in continuously raising the gas price, making contract execution too expensive and ineffective for users. An attacker could use this flaw to manipulate the gas price, potentially leading to significantly inflated transaction fees. Such manipulation could render contract execution prohibitively expensive for users, effectively resulting in a denial-of-service condition for the network. This is fixed in version a754b3d.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-682 - Incorrect Calculation
  • CWE-754 - Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
Assigner
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
polkadot-evm frontier Affected: < a754b3d
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-54427",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-07-28T20:37:48.613335Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-07-28T20:38:02.249Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "frontier",
          "vendor": "polkadot-evm",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c a754b3d"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Polkadot Frontier is an Ethereum and EVM compatibility layer for Polkadot and Substrate. The extrinsic note_min_gas_price_target is an inherent extrinsic, meaning only the block producer can call it. To ensure correctness, the ProvideInherent trait should be implemented for each inherent, which includes the check_inherent call. This allows other nodes to verify if the input (in this case, the target value) is correct. However, prior to commit a754b3d, the check_inherent function has not been implemented for note_min_gas_price_target. This lets the block producer set the target value without verification. The target is then used to set the MinGasPrice, which has an upper and lower bound defined in the on_initialize hook. The block producer can set the target to the upper bound. Which also increases the upper and lower bounds for the next block. Over time, this could result in continuously raising the gas price, making contract execution too expensive and ineffective for users. An attacker could use this flaw to manipulate the gas price, potentially leading to significantly inflated transaction fees. Such manipulation could render contract execution prohibitively expensive for users, effectively resulting in a denial-of-service condition for the network. This is fixed in version a754b3d."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 6.9,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-682",
              "description": "CWE-682: Incorrect Calculation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-754",
              "description": "CWE-754: Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-07-28T20:20:04.064Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/polkadot-evm/frontier/security/advisories/GHSA-r6rj-gmqh-cv94",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/polkadot-evm/frontier/security/advisories/GHSA-r6rj-gmqh-cv94"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/polkadot-evm/frontier/commit/a754b3dc6e1b6da98f71aea7bb1fa08677b24186",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/polkadot-evm/frontier/commit/a754b3dc6e1b6da98f71aea7bb1fa08677b24186"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://dotpal.io/assets/files/frontier-srlabs-2505-718c3bfa5df9fed1862fed05de506859.pdf",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://dotpal.io/assets/files/frontier-srlabs-2505-718c3bfa5df9fed1862fed05de506859.pdf"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-r6rj-gmqh-cv94",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Polkadot Frontier contains missing `check_inherent` for `note_min_gas_price_target` inflates gas price"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-54427",
    "datePublished": "2025-07-28T20:20:04.064Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-07-21T23:18:10.282Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-07-28T20:38:02.249Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

CVE-2025-59047 (GCVE-0-2025-59047)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-09-11 18:03 – Updated: 2025-09-11 18:22
VLAI
Title
matrix-sdk-base has panic in the `RoomMember::normalized_power_level()` method
Summary
matrix-sdk-base is the base component to build a Matrix client library. In matrix-sdk-base before 0.14.1, calling the `RoomMember::normalized_power_level()` method can cause a panic if a room member has a power level of `Int::Min`. The issue is fixed in matrix-sdk-base 0.14.1. The affected method isn’t used internally, so avoiding calling `RoomMember::normalized_power_level()` prevents the panic.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
matrix-org matrix-rust-sdk Affected: < 0.14.1
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-59047",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-09-11T18:20:03.606727Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-09-11T18:22:28.636Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "matrix-rust-sdk",
          "vendor": "matrix-org",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 0.14.1"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "matrix-sdk-base is the base component to build a Matrix client library. In matrix-sdk-base before 0.14.1, calling the `RoomMember::normalized_power_level()` method can cause a panic if a room member has a power level of `Int::Min`. The issue is fixed in matrix-sdk-base 0.14.1. The affected method isn\u2019t used internally, so avoiding calling `RoomMember::normalized_power_level()` prevents the panic."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 2.7,
            "baseSeverity": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-682",
              "description": "CWE-682: Incorrect Calculation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-09-11T18:03:50.361Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-rust-sdk/security/advisories/GHSA-qhj8-q5r6-8q6j",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-rust-sdk/security/advisories/GHSA-qhj8-q5r6-8q6j"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-rust-sdk/pull/5635",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-rust-sdk/pull/5635"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-rust-sdk/commit/ce3b67f801446387972ff120e907ca828a9f1207",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-rust-sdk/commit/ce3b67f801446387972ff120e907ca828a9f1207"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-rust-sdk/releases/tag/matrix-sdk-base-0.14.1",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-rust-sdk/releases/tag/matrix-sdk-base-0.14.1"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-qhj8-q5r6-8q6j",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "matrix-sdk-base has panic in the `RoomMember::normalized_power_level()` method"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-59047",
    "datePublished": "2025-09-11T18:03:50.361Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-09-08T16:19:26.172Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-09-11T18:22:28.636Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

CVE-2026-1229 (GCVE-0-2026-1229)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-24 07:58 – Updated: 2026-02-24 15:10
VLAI
Title
Incorrect calculation in CIRCL secp384r1 CombinedMult
Summary
The CombinedMult function in the CIRCL ecc/p384 package (secp384r1 curve) produces an incorrect value for specific inputs. The issue is fixed by using complete addition formulas. ECDH and ECDSA signing relying on this curve are not affected. The bug was fixed in v1.6.3 https://github.com/cloudflare/circl/releases/tag/v1.6.3 .
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Cloudflare CIRCL Affected: CIRCL up to version 1.6.2 , < 1.6.3 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Credits
Guido Vranken
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-1229",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-02-24T15:04:09.395394Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-02-24T15:10:21.738Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "platforms": [
            "Go"
          ],
          "product": "CIRCL",
          "repo": "https://github.com/cloudflare/circl",
          "vendor": "Cloudflare",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "1.6.3",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "CIRCL up to version 1.6.2",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Guido Vranken"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe CombinedMult function in the CIRCL ecc/p384 package (secp384r1 curve) produces an incorrect value for specific inputs. The issue is fixed by using complete addition formulas.\u003cbr\u003eECDH and ECDSA signing relying on this curve are not affected.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe bug was fixed in \u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://github.com/cloudflare/circl/releases/tag/v1.6.3\"\u003ev1.6.3\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The CombinedMult function in the CIRCL ecc/p384 package (secp384r1 curve) produces an incorrect value for specific inputs. The issue is fixed by using complete addition formulas.\nECDH and ECDSA signing relying on this curve are not affected.\n\nThe bug was fixed in  v1.6.3 https://github.com/cloudflare/circl/releases/tag/v1.6.3 ."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "YES",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NEGLIGIBLE",
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 2.9,
            "baseSeverity": "LOW",
            "exploitMaturity": "PROOF_OF_CONCEPT",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "AMBER",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:P/S:N/AU:Y/U:Amber",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-682",
              "description": "CWE-682 Incorrect Calculation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-02-24T07:58:54.406Z",
        "orgId": "a22f1246-ba21-4bb4-a601-ad51614c1513",
        "shortName": "cloudflare"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/cloudflare/circl"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "Incorrect calculation in CIRCL secp384r1 CombinedMult",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a22f1246-ba21-4bb4-a601-ad51614c1513",
    "assignerShortName": "cloudflare",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-1229",
    "datePublished": "2026-02-24T07:58:54.406Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-01-20T13:09:57.206Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-02-24T15:10:21.738Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-21911 (GCVE-0-2026-21911)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-15 20:23 – Updated: 2026-01-15 20:51
VLAI
Title
Junos OS Evolved: Flapping management interface causes MAC learning on label-switched interfaces to stop
Summary
An Incorrect Calculation vulnerability in the Layer 2 Control Protocol Daemon (l2cpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated network-adjacent attacker flapping the management interface to cause the learning of new MACs over label-switched interfaces (LSI) to stop while generating a flood of logs, resulting in high CPU usage. When the issue is seen, the following log message will be generated: op:1 flag:0x6 mac:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx bd:2 ifl:13302 reason:0(REASON_NONE) i-op:6(INTRNL_OP_HW_FORCE_DELETE) status:10 lstatus:10 err:26(GETIFBD_VALIDATE_FAILED) err-reason 4(IFBD_VALIDATE_FAIL_EPOCH_MISMATCH) hw_wr:0x4 ctxsync:0 fwdsync:0 rtt-id:51 p_ifl:0 fwd_nh:0 svlbnh:0 event:- smask:0x100000000 dmask:0x0 mplsmask 0x1 act:0x5800 extf:0x0 pfe-id 0 hw-notif-ifl 13302 programmed-ifl 4294967295 pseudo-vtep underlay-ifl-idx 0 stack:GET_MAC, ALLOCATE_MAC, GET_IFL, GET_IFF, GET_IFBD, STOP, This issue affects Junos OS Evolved:  * all versions before 21.4R3-S7-EVO,  * from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S4-EVO,  * from 22.3 before 22.3R3-S3-EVO,  * from 22.4 before 22.4R3-S2-EVO,  * from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S1-EVO,  * from 23.4 before 23.4R1-S2-EVO, 23.4R2-EVO.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved Affected: 0 , < 21.4R3-S7-EVO (semver)
Affected: 22.2 , < 22.2R3-S4-EVO (semver)
Affected: 22.3 , < 22.3R3-S3-EVO (semver)
Affected: 22.4 , < 22.4R3-S2-EVO (semver)
Affected: 23.2 , < 23.2R2-S1-EVO (semver)
Affected: 23.4 , < 23.4R1-S2-EVO, 23.4R2-EVO (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-01-14 17:00
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-21911",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-01-15T20:51:26.965443Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-01-15T20:51:32.531Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Junos OS Evolved",
          "vendor": "Juniper Networks",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "21.4R3-S7-EVO",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "22.2R3-S4-EVO",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "22.2",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "22.3R3-S3-EVO",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "22.3",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "22.4R3-S2-EVO",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "22.4",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "23.2R2-S1-EVO",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "23.2",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "23.4R1-S2-EVO, 23.4R2-EVO",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "23.4",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "configurations": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "This issue affects label-switched interfaces configured for VPLS. For example:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003ctt\u003e[routing-instances \u0026lt;name\u0026gt; instance-type vpls]\u003cbr\u003e[routing-instances \u0026lt;name\u0026gt; protocols vpls]\u003c/tt\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "This issue affects label-switched interfaces configured for VPLS. For example:\n\n[routing-instances \u003cname\u003e instance-type vpls]\n[routing-instances \u003cname\u003e protocols vpls]"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-01-14T17:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eAn Incorrect Calculation vulnerability in the Layer 2 Control\n\n\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eProtocol \u003c/span\u003e\n\n Daemon (l2cpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated network-adjacent attacker flapping the management interface to cause the learning of new MACs over label-switched interfaces (LSI) to stop while generating a\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003eflood of logs, resulting in high CPU usage.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eWhen the issue is seen, the following log message will be generated:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003ctt\u003eop:1 flag:0x6 mac:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx bd:2 ifl:13302 reason:0(REASON_NONE) i-op:6(INTRNL_OP_HW_FORCE_DELETE) status:10 lstatus:10 err:26(GETIFBD_VALIDATE_FAILED) err-reason 4(IFBD_VALIDATE_FAIL_EPOCH_MISMATCH) hw_wr:0x4 ctxsync:0 fwdsync:0  rtt-id:51 p_ifl:0  fwd_nh:0 svlbnh:0 event:- smask:0x100000000 dmask:0x0 mplsmask 0x1 act:0x5800 extf:0x0 pfe-id 0 hw-notif-ifl 13302 programmed-ifl 4294967295 pseudo-vtep underlay-ifl-idx 0 stack:GET_MAC, ALLOCATE_MAC, GET_IFL, GET_IFF, GET_IFBD, STOP,\u003c/tt\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Junos OS Evolved:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eall versions before 21.4R3-S7-EVO,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003efrom 22.2 before 22.2R3-S4-EVO,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003efrom 22.3 before 22.3R3-S3-EVO,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003efrom 22.4 before 22.4R3-S2-EVO,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003efrom 23.2 before 23.2R2-S1-EVO,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003efrom 23.4 before 23.4R1-S2-EVO, 23.4R2-EVO.\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "An Incorrect Calculation vulnerability in the Layer 2 Control\n\nProtocol \n\n Daemon (l2cpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated network-adjacent attacker flapping the management interface to cause the learning of new MACs over label-switched interfaces (LSI) to stop while generating a\u00a0flood of logs, resulting in high CPU usage.\n\nWhen the issue is seen, the following log message will be generated:\n\nop:1 flag:0x6 mac:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx bd:2 ifl:13302 reason:0(REASON_NONE) i-op:6(INTRNL_OP_HW_FORCE_DELETE) status:10 lstatus:10 err:26(GETIFBD_VALIDATE_FAILED) err-reason 4(IFBD_VALIDATE_FAIL_EPOCH_MISMATCH) hw_wr:0x4 ctxsync:0 fwdsync:0  rtt-id:51 p_ifl:0  fwd_nh:0 svlbnh:0 event:- smask:0x100000000 dmask:0x0 mplsmask 0x1 act:0x5800 extf:0x0 pfe-id 0 hw-notif-ifl 13302 programmed-ifl 4294967295 pseudo-vtep underlay-ifl-idx 0 stack:GET_MAC, ALLOCATE_MAC, GET_IFL, GET_IFF, GET_IFBD, STOP, \n\n\nThis issue affects Junos OS Evolved:\u00a0\n\n  *  all versions before 21.4R3-S7-EVO,\u00a0\n  *  from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S4-EVO,\u00a0\n  *  from 22.3 before 22.3R3-S3-EVO,\u00a0\n  *  from 22.4 before 22.4R3-S2-EVO,\u00a0\n  *  from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S1-EVO,\u00a0\n  *  from 23.4 before 23.4R1-S2-EVO, 23.4R2-EVO."
        }
      ],
      "exploits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Juniper SIRT is not aware of any malicious exploitation of this vulnerability."
            }
          ],
          "value": "Juniper SIRT is not aware of any malicious exploitation of this vulnerability."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 6.5,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "YES",
            "Recovery": "AUTOMATIC",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "ADJACENT",
            "baseScore": 7.1,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "AMBER",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "CONCENTRATED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/AU:Y/R:A/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "MODERATE"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-682",
              "description": "CWE-682 Incorrect Calculation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-01-15T20:23:54.924Z",
        "orgId": "8cbe9d5a-a066-4c94-8978-4b15efeae968",
        "shortName": "juniper"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA106010"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://kb.juniper.net/JSA106010"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "The following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue: 21.4R3-S7-EVO, 22.2R3-S4-EVO, 22.3R3-S3-EVO, 22.4R3-S2-EVO, 23.2R2-S1-EVO, 23.4R1-S2-EVO, 23.4R2-EVO, 24.2R1-EVO, and all subsequent releases."
            }
          ],
          "value": "The following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue: 21.4R3-S7-EVO, 22.2R3-S4-EVO, 22.3R3-S3-EVO, 22.4R3-S2-EVO, 23.2R2-S1-EVO, 23.4R1-S2-EVO, 23.4R2-EVO, 24.2R1-EVO, and all subsequent releases."
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "JSA106010",
        "defect": [
          "1802153"
        ],
        "discovery": "USER"
      },
      "title": "Junos OS Evolved: Flapping management interface causes MAC learning on label-switched interfaces to stop",
      "workarounds": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "There are no known workarounds for this issue.\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "There are no known workarounds for this issue."
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8cbe9d5a-a066-4c94-8978-4b15efeae968",
    "assignerShortName": "juniper",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-21911",
    "datePublished": "2026-01-15T20:23:54.924Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-01-05T17:32:48.710Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-01-15T20:51:32.531Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-24783 (GCVE-0-2026-24783)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-27 22:04 – Updated: 2026-01-28 21:09
VLAI
Title
soroban-fixed-point-math has Incorrect Rounding and Overflow Handling in Signed Fixed-Point Math with Negatives
Summary
soroban-fixed-point-math is a fixed-point math library for Soroban smart contacts. In versions 1.3.0 and 1.4.0, the `mulDiv(x, y, z)` function incorrectly handled cases where both the intermediate product $x * y$ and the divisor $z$ were negative. The logic assumed that if the intermediate product was negative, the final result must also be negative, neglecting the sign of $z$. This resulted in rounding being applied in the wrong direction for cases where both $x * y$ and $z$ were negative. The functions most at risk are `fixed_div_floor` and `fixed_div_ceil`, as they often use non-constant numbers as the divisor $z$ in `mulDiv`. This error is present in all signed `FixedPoint` and `SorobanFixedPoint` implementations, including `i64`, `i128`, and `I256`. Versions 1.3.1 and 1.4.1 contain a patch. No known workarounds for this issue are available.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
script3 soroban-fixed-point-math Affected: = 1.4.0
Affected: = 1.3.0
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-24783",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-01-28T21:08:58.618891Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-01-28T21:09:12.428Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "soroban-fixed-point-math",
          "vendor": "script3",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "= 1.4.0"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "= 1.3.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "soroban-fixed-point-math is a fixed-point math library for Soroban smart contacts. In versions 1.3.0 and 1.4.0, the `mulDiv(x, y, z)` function incorrectly handled cases where both the intermediate product $x * y$ and the divisor $z$ were negative. The logic assumed that if the intermediate product was negative, the final result must also be negative, neglecting the sign of $z$. This resulted in rounding being applied in the wrong direction for cases where both $x * y$ and $z$ were negative. The functions most at risk are `fixed_div_floor` and `fixed_div_ceil`, as they often use non-constant numbers as the divisor $z$ in `mulDiv`.  This error is present in all signed `FixedPoint` and `SorobanFixedPoint` implementations, including `i64`, `i128`, and `I256`. Versions 1.3.1 and 1.4.1 contain a patch. No known workarounds for this issue are available."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-682",
              "description": "CWE-682: Incorrect Calculation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-01-27T22:04:18.006Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/script3/soroban-fixed-point-math/security/advisories/GHSA-x5m4-43jf-hh65",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/script3/soroban-fixed-point-math/security/advisories/GHSA-x5m4-43jf-hh65"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/script3/soroban-fixed-point-math/commit/c9233f7094198a49ed66a4d75786a8a3755c936a",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/script3/soroban-fixed-point-math/commit/c9233f7094198a49ed66a4d75786a8a3755c936a"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/script3/soroban-fixed-point-math/releases/tag/v1.3.1",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/script3/soroban-fixed-point-math/releases/tag/v1.3.1"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/script3/soroban-fixed-point-math/releases/tag/v1.4.1",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/script3/soroban-fixed-point-math/releases/tag/v1.4.1"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-x5m4-43jf-hh65",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "soroban-fixed-point-math has Incorrect Rounding and Overflow Handling in Signed Fixed-Point Math with Negatives"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-24783",
    "datePublished": "2026-01-27T22:04:18.006Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-01-26T21:06:47.869Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-01-28T21:09:12.428Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-25634 (GCVE-0-2026-25634)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-06 20:21 – Updated: 2026-02-06 20:53
VLAI
Title
iccDEV memcpy-param-overlap in CIccTagMultiProcessElement::Apply()
Summary
iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools that allow for the interaction, manipulation, and application of ICC color management profiles. Prior to 2.3.1.4, SrcPixel and DestPixel stack buffers overlap in CIccTagMultiProcessElement::Apply() int IccTagMPE.cpp. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.1.4.
SSVC
Exploitation: poc Automatable: no Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-119 - Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
  • CWE-123 - Write-what-where Condition
  • CWE-628 - Function Call with Incorrectly Specified Arguments
  • CWE-682 - Incorrect Calculation
Assigner
Impacted products
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-25634",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-02-06T20:52:49.613885Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-02-06T20:53:17.123Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "iccDEV",
          "vendor": "InternationalColorConsortium",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 2.3.1.4"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools that allow for the interaction, manipulation, and application of ICC color management profiles. Prior to 2.3.1.4, SrcPixel and DestPixel stack buffers overlap in CIccTagMultiProcessElement::Apply() int IccTagMPE.cpp. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.1.4."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "LOCAL",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 7.8,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-119",
              "description": "CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-123",
              "description": "CWE-123: Write-what-where Condition",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-628",
              "description": "CWE-628: Function Call with Incorrectly Specified Arguments",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-682",
              "description": "CWE-682: Incorrect Calculation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-02-06T20:21:40.108Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/security/advisories/GHSA-35rg-jcmp-583h",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/security/advisories/GHSA-35rg-jcmp-583h"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/issues/577",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/issues/577"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/pull/579",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/pull/579"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/commit/9206e0b8684e4cf4186d9ae768f16760bc1af9ff",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/commit/9206e0b8684e4cf4186d9ae768f16760bc1af9ff"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/releases/tag/v2.3.1.4",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/InternationalColorConsortium/iccDEV/releases/tag/v2.3.1.4"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-35rg-jcmp-583h",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "iccDEV memcpy-param-overlap in CIccTagMultiProcessElement::Apply()"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-25634",
    "datePublished": "2026-02-06T20:21:40.108Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-02-04T05:15:41.790Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-02-06T20:53:17.123Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-28410 (GCVE-0-2026-28410)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-05 20:11 – Updated: 2026-03-06 17:54
VLAI
Title
The Graph: Revocable vesting contracts allows early access to locked tokens
Summary
The Graph is an indexing protocol for querying networks like Ethereum, IPFS, Polygon, and other blockchains. Prior to version 3.0.0, a flaw in the token vesting contracts allows users to access tokens that should still be locked according to their vesting schedule. This issue has been patched in version 3.0.0.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
graphprotocol contracts Affected: < 3.0.0
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-28410",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-03-06T17:54:52.003897Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-03-06T17:54:59.280Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "contracts",
          "vendor": "graphprotocol",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 3.0.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The Graph is an indexing protocol for querying networks like Ethereum, IPFS, Polygon, and other blockchains. Prior to version 3.0.0, a flaw in the token vesting contracts allows users to access tokens that should still be locked according to their vesting schedule. This issue has been patched in version 3.0.0."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 5.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-284",
              "description": "CWE-284: Improper Access Control",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-682",
              "description": "CWE-682: Incorrect Calculation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-03-05T20:11:54.254Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/graphprotocol/contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qx35-rc5x-x39r",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/graphprotocol/contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qx35-rc5x-x39r"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/graphprotocol/contracts/commit/91224ed83eeff3fc3afea01f5ed269373d9bf773",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/graphprotocol/contracts/commit/91224ed83eeff3fc3afea01f5ed269373d9bf773"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-qx35-rc5x-x39r",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "The Graph: Revocable vesting contracts allows early access to locked tokens"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-28410",
    "datePublished": "2026-03-05T20:11:54.254Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-02-27T15:33:57.289Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-03-06T17:54:59.280Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-33487 (GCVE-0-2026-33487)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-26 17:17 – Updated: 2026-03-30 11:16
VLAI
Title
goxmldsig has validateSignature Loop Variable Capture Signature Bypass
Summary
goxmlsig provides XML Digital Signatures implemented in Go. Prior to version 1.6.0, the `validateSignature` function in `validate.go` goes through the references in the `SignedInfo` block to find one that matches the signed element's ID. In Go versions before 1.22, or when `go.mod` uses an older version, there is a loop variable capture issue. The code takes the address of the loop variable `_ref` instead of its value. As a result, if more than one reference matches the ID or if the loop logic is incorrect, the `ref` pointer will always end up pointing to the last element in the `SignedInfo.References` slice after the loop. goxmlsig version 1.6.0 contains a patch.
SSVC
Exploitation: poc Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-347 - Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
  • CWE-682 - Incorrect Calculation
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
russellhaering goxmldsig Affected: < 1.6.0
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-33487",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-03-30T11:16:13.379400Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-03-30T11:16:34.970Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "goxmldsig",
          "vendor": "russellhaering",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 1.6.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "goxmlsig provides XML Digital Signatures implemented in Go. Prior to version 1.6.0, the `validateSignature` function in `validate.go` goes through the references in the `SignedInfo` block to find one that matches the signed element\u0027s ID. In Go versions before 1.22, or when `go.mod` uses an older version, there is a loop variable capture issue. The code takes the address of the loop variable `_ref` instead of its value. As a result, if more than one reference matches the ID or if the loop logic is incorrect, the `ref` pointer will always end up pointing to the last element in the `SignedInfo.References` slice after the loop. goxmlsig version 1.6.0 contains a patch."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-347",
              "description": "CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-682",
              "description": "CWE-682: Incorrect Calculation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-03-26T17:17:51.101Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/russellhaering/goxmldsig/security/advisories/GHSA-479m-364c-43vc",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/russellhaering/goxmldsig/security/advisories/GHSA-479m-364c-43vc"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-479m-364c-43vc",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "goxmldsig has validateSignature Loop Variable Capture Signature Bypass"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-33487",
    "datePublished": "2026-03-26T17:17:51.101Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-03-20T16:16:48.971Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-03-30T11:16:34.970Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-44074 (GCVE-0-2026-44074)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-21 08:14 – Updated: 2026-05-21 12:35
VLAI
Title
Bitwise OR of errno values
Summary
Netatalk 2.1.0 through 4.4.2 combines multiple errno values using bitwise OR, resulting in incorrect error codes when multiple error conditions occur simultaneously, which may allow a remote attacker to cause a minor service disruption via conditions that trigger incorrect error-handling paths.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Netatalk Netatalk Affected: 2.1.0 , ≤ 4.4.2 (semver)
Unaffected: 4.5.0 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-05-13 00:00
Credits
Arjun Basnet from Securin
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-44074",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-05-21T12:31:04.918196Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-05-21T12:35:55.243Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Netatalk",
          "vendor": "Netatalk",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "4.4.2",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2.1.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "4.5.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Arjun Basnet from Securin"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Netatalk 2.1.0 through 4.4.2 combines multiple errno values using bitwise OR, resulting in incorrect error codes when multiple error conditions occur simultaneously, which may allow a remote attacker to cause a minor service disruption via conditions that trigger incorrect error-handling paths."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 3.7,
            "baseSeverity": "LOW",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-682",
              "description": "Incorrect Calculation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-05-21T08:23:42.792Z",
        "orgId": "33c584b5-0579-4c06-b2a0-8d8329fcab9c",
        "shortName": "securin"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Netatalk Security Advisory CVE-2026-44074",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://netatalk.io/security/CVE-2026-44074"
        }
      ],
      "title": "Bitwise OR of errno values"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "33c584b5-0579-4c06-b2a0-8d8329fcab9c",
    "assignerShortName": "securin",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-44074",
    "datePublished": "2026-05-21T08:14:38.297Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-05T07:25:20.197Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-05-21T12:35:55.243Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-44498 (GCVE-0-2026-44498)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-08 15:09 – Updated: 2026-05-14 21:32
VLAI
Title
ZEBRA: Block Validator Undercounts Coinbase and P2SH Sigops
Summary
ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to version 4.4.0, Zebra's block validator undercounts transparent signature operations against the 20000-sigop block limit (MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS), allowing it to accept blocks that zcashd rejects with bad-blk-sigops. A miner who produces such a block can split the network: Zebra nodes follow the offending chain while zcashd nodes do not. This issue has been patched in version 4.4.0.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
ZcashFoundation zebra Affected: < 4.4.0
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-44498",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-05-13T16:11:06.609059Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-05-14T21:32:52.062Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "zebra",
          "vendor": "ZcashFoundation",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 4.4.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to version 4.4.0, Zebra\u0027s block validator undercounts transparent signature operations against the 20000-sigop block limit (MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS), allowing it to accept blocks that zcashd rejects with bad-blk-sigops. A miner who produces such a block can split the network: Zebra nodes follow the offending chain while zcashd nodes do not. This issue has been patched in version 4.4.0."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 9.2,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-682",
              "description": "CWE-682: Incorrect Calculation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-05-08T15:09:09.919Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/security/advisories/GHSA-jv4h-j224-23cc",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/security/advisories/GHSA-jv4h-j224-23cc"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/releases/tag/v4.4.0",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/releases/tag/v4.4.0"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-jv4h-j224-23cc",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "ZEBRA: Block Validator Undercounts Coinbase and P2SH Sigops"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-44498",
    "datePublished": "2026-05-08T15:09:09.919Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-06T18:28:20.886Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-05-14T21:32:52.062Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

Mitigation

Phase: Implementation

Description:

  • Understand your programming language's underlying representation and how it interacts with numeric calculation. Pay close attention to byte size discrepancies, precision, signed/unsigned distinctions, truncation, conversion and casting between types, "not-a-number" calculations, and how your language handles numbers that are too large or too small for its underlying representation.
Mitigation ID: MIT-8

Phase: Implementation

Strategy: Input Validation

Description:

  • Perform input validation on any numeric input by ensuring that it is within the expected range. Enforce that the input meets both the minimum and maximum requirements for the expected range.
Mitigation

Phase: Implementation

Description:

  • Use the appropriate type for the desired action. For example, in C/C++, only use unsigned types for values that could never be negative, such as height, width, or other numbers related to quantity.
Mitigation

Phase: Architecture and Design

Strategy: Language Selection

Description:

  • Use languages, libraries, or frameworks that make it easier to handle numbers without unexpected consequences.
  • Examples include safe integer handling packages such as SafeInt (C++) or IntegerLib (C or C++).
Mitigation

Phase: Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

Description:

  • Use languages, libraries, or frameworks that make it easier to handle numbers without unexpected consequences.
  • Examples include safe integer handling packages such as SafeInt (C++) or IntegerLib (C or C++).
Mitigation ID: MIT-26

Phase: Implementation

Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening

Description:

  • Examine compiler warnings closely and eliminate problems with potential security implications, such as signed / unsigned mismatch in memory operations, or use of uninitialized variables. Even if the weakness is rarely exploitable, a single failure may lead to the compromise of the entire system.
CAPEC-128: Integer Attacks

An attacker takes advantage of the structure of integer variables to cause these variables to assume values that are not expected by an application. For example, adding one to the largest positive integer in a signed integer variable results in a negative number. Negative numbers may be illegal in an application and the application may prevent an attacker from providing them directly, but the application may not consider that adding two positive numbers can create a negative number do to the structure of integer storage formats.

CAPEC-129: Pointer Manipulation

This attack pattern involves an adversary manipulating a pointer within a target application resulting in the application accessing an unintended memory location. This can result in the crashing of the application or, for certain pointer values, access to data that would not normally be possible or the execution of arbitrary code. Since pointers are simply integer variables, Integer Attacks may often be used in Pointer Attacks.

Back to CWE stats page