CWE-580
Weakness Allowedclone() Method Without super.clone()
Abstraction: Variant · Status: Draft
The product contains a clone() method that does not call super.clone() to obtain the new object.
Mapping guidance
This CWE entry is at the Variant level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
Modes of introduction
Detection methods
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Effectiveness: High
Content history
Submitted by members of the CWE community to extend early CWE versions
updated Potential_Mitigations, Time_of_Introduction
updated Relationships, Other_Notes
updated Description, Other_Notes, Potential_Mitigations
updated Description
updated Demonstrative_Examples
updated Common_Consequences
updated Common_Consequences
updated Relationships
updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Description
updated Detection_Factors, Relationships
updated Mapping_Notes
updated Weakness_Ordinalities
updated Common_Consequences, Description, Potential_Mitigations
0 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
No vulnerabilities reference this CWE.
Mitigation
All implementations of clone() should obtain the new object by calling super.clone().
Mitigation
In some cases, you can eliminate the clone method altogether and use copy constructors.
No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.