Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-400

Discouraged

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Abstraction: Class · Status: Draft

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

5417 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-MHPQ-9638-X6PW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-12-20 20:31 – Updated: 2026-02-03 17:53
VLAI
Summary
Duplicate Advisory: Denial of service when decrypting attack controlled input in github.com/dvsekhvalnov/jose2go
Details

Duplicate Advisory

This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-6294-6rgp-fr7r. This link is maintained to preserve external references.

Original Description

An attacker controlled input of a PBES2 encrypted JWE blob can have a very large p2c value that, when decrypted, produces a denial-of-service.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/dvsekhvalnov/jose2go"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.5.1-0.20231206184617-48ba0b76bc88"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2023-12-20T20:31:57Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Duplicate Advisory\nThis advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-6294-6rgp-fr7r. This link is maintained to preserve external references.\n\n## Original Description\n\nAn attacker controlled input of a PBES2 encrypted JWE blob can have a very large p2c value that, when decrypted, produces a denial-of-service.",
  "id": "GHSA-mhpq-9638-x6pw",
  "modified": "2026-02-03T17:53:34Z",
  "published": "2023-12-20T20:31:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/dvsekhvalnov/jose2go/issues/31"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/dvsekhvalnov/jose2go/commit/a4584e9dd7128608fedbc67892eba9697f0d5317"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/dvsekhvalnov/jose2go"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.blackhat.com/us-23/briefings/schedule/#three-new-attacks-against-json-web-tokens-31695"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Duplicate Advisory: Denial of service when decrypting attack controlled input in github.com/dvsekhvalnov/jose2go",
  "withdrawn": "2026-02-03T17:53:34Z"
}

GHSA-MHPV-HFP2-2648

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:05 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:05
VLAI
Details

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R series CPU modules (R00/01/02CPU all versions, R04/08/16/32/120(EN)CPU all versions, R08/16/32/120SFCPU all versions, R08/16/32/120PCPU all versions, R08/16/32/120PSFCPU all versions) allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to prevent legitimate clients from connecting to the MELSOFT transmission port (TCP/IP) by not closing a connection properly, which may lead to a denial of service (DoS) condition.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-20591"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-06-11T16:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R series CPU modules (R00/01/02CPU all versions, R04/08/16/32/120(EN)CPU all versions, R08/16/32/120SFCPU all versions, R08/16/32/120PCPU all versions, R08/16/32/120PSFCPU all versions) allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to prevent legitimate clients from connecting to the MELSOFT transmission port (TCP/IP) by not closing a connection properly, which may lead to a denial of service (DoS) condition.",
  "id": "GHSA-mhpv-hfp2-2648",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T19:05:05Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T19:05:05Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-20591"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://jvn.jp/vu/JVNVU98060539/index.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.mitsubishielectric.com/en/psirt/vulnerability/pdf/2021-003_en.pdf"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-MJ35-2RGF-CV8P

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-03 16:46 – Updated: 2025-04-04 01:10
VLAI
Summary
OpenID Connect client Atom Exhaustion in provider configuration worker ets table location
Details

Impact

DOS by Atom exhaustion is possible by calling oidcc_provider_configuration_worker:get_provider_configuration/1 or oidcc_provider_configuration_worker:get_jwks/1.

Since the name is usually provided as a static value in the application using oidcc, this is unlikely to be exploited.

Details

Example to illustrate the vulnerability.

{ok, Claims} =
  oidcc:retrieve_userinfo(
    Token,
    myapp_oidcc_config_provider,
    <<"client_id">>,
    <<"client_secret">>,
    #{}
  )

The vulnerability is present in oidcc_provider_configuration_worker:get_ets_table_name/1. The function get_ets_table_name is calling erlang:list_to_atom/1.

https://github.com/erlef/oidcc/blob/018dbb53dd752cb1e331637d8e0e6a489ba1fae9/src/oidcc_provider_configuration_worker.erl#L385-L388

There might be a case (Very highly improbable) where the 2nd argument of oidcc_provider_configuration_worker:get_*/1 is called with a different atom each time which eventually leads to the atom table filling up and the node crashing.

Patches

Patched in 3.0.2, 3.1.2 & 3.2.0-beta.3

Workarounds

Make sure only valid provider configuration worker names are passed to the functions.

References

  • https://erlef.github.io/security-wg/secure_coding_and_deployment_hardening/atom_exhaustion.html
  • https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31209
  • https://euvd.enisa.europa.eu/enisa/EUVD-2024-1249
  • https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-mj35-2rgf-cv8p
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Hex",
        "name": "oidcc"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "3.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.0.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Hex",
        "name": "oidcc"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "3.1.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.1.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Hex",
        "name": "oidcc"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "3.2.0-beta.1"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.2.0-beta.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-31209"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-04-03T16:46:30Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-04-04T16:15:09Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\nDOS by Atom exhaustion is possible by calling `oidcc_provider_configuration_worker:get_provider_configuration/1` or `oidcc_provider_configuration_worker:get_jwks/1`.\n\nSince the name is usually provided as a static value in the application using `oidcc`, this is unlikely to be exploited.\n\n### Details\n\nExample to illustrate the vulnerability.\n\n```erlang\n{ok, Claims} =\n  oidcc:retrieve_userinfo(\n    Token,\n    myapp_oidcc_config_provider,\n    \u003c\u003c\"client_id\"\u003e\u003e,\n    \u003c\u003c\"client_secret\"\u003e\u003e,\n    #{}\n  )\n```\n\nThe vulnerability is present in `oidcc_provider_configuration_worker:get_ets_table_name/1`.\nThe function `get_ets_table_name` is calling `erlang:list_to_atom/1`.\n\nhttps://github.com/erlef/oidcc/blob/018dbb53dd752cb1e331637d8e0e6a489ba1fae9/src/oidcc_provider_configuration_worker.erl#L385-L388\n\nThere might be a case (Very highly improbable) where the 2nd argument of\n`oidcc_provider_configuration_worker:get_*/1` is called with a different atom each time which eventually leads to\nthe atom table filling up and the node crashing.\n\n### Patches\n\nPatched in `3.0.2`, `3.1.2` \u0026 `3.2.0-beta.3`\n\n### Workarounds\n\nMake sure only valid provider configuration worker names are passed to the functions.\n\n### References\n\n* https://erlef.github.io/security-wg/secure_coding_and_deployment_hardening/atom_exhaustion.html\n* https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31209\n* https://euvd.enisa.europa.eu/enisa/EUVD-2024-1249\n* https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-mj35-2rgf-cv8p",
  "id": "GHSA-mj35-2rgf-cv8p",
  "modified": "2025-04-04T01:10:32Z",
  "published": "2024-04-03T16:46:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/erlef/oidcc/security/advisories/GHSA-mj35-2rgf-cv8p"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-31209"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/erlef/oidcc/commit/2f304d877c7e0613d6fd952d7feacbf40dbc355c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/erlef/oidcc/commit/48171fb62688fb4eec1ead0884aa501e0aa68649"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/erlef/oidcc/commit/ac458ed88dc292aad6fa7343f6a53e73c560fb1a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://erlef.github.io/security-wg/secure_coding_and_deployment_hardening/atom_exhaustion.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/erlef/oidcc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/erlef/oidcc/blob/018dbb53dd752cb1e331637d8e0e6a489ba1fae9/src/oidcc_provider_configuration_worker.erl#L385-L388"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "OpenID Connect client Atom Exhaustion in provider configuration worker ets table location"
}

GHSA-MJ4R-2HFC-F8P6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-07 00:20 – Updated: 2026-05-14 20:41
VLAI
Summary
Netty Lz4FrameDecoder is vulnerable to resource exhaustion
Details

Summary

Lz4FrameDecoder allocates a ByteBuf of size decompressedLength (up to 32 MB per block) before LZ4 runs. A peer only needs a 21-byte header plus compressedLength payload bytes - 22 bytes if compressedLength == 1 - to force that allocation.

Details

io.netty.handler.codec.compression.Lz4FrameDecoder#decode Header fields are trusted for sizing. On the compressed path, after readableBytes >= compressedLength, the decoder does ctx.alloc().buffer(decompressedLength, decompressedLength) then decompresses.

PoC

The test below demonstrates how an attacker sending 22 bytes will force the server to allocate 32MB

    @Test
    void test() throws Exception {
        EventLoopGroup workerGroup = new MultiThreadIoEventLoopGroup(NioIoHandler.newFactory());
        try {
            AtomicReference<Throwable> serverError = new AtomicReference<>();
            CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(1);

            ServerBootstrap server = new ServerBootstrap()
                    .group(workerGroup)
                    .channel(NioServerSocketChannel.class)
                    .childHandler(new ChannelInitializer<SocketChannel>() {
                        @Override
                        protected void initChannel(SocketChannel ch) {
                            ch.pipeline()
                                    .addLast(new Lz4FrameDecoder())
                                    .addLast(new ChannelInboundHandlerAdapter() {
                                        @Override
                                        public void exceptionCaught(ChannelHandlerContext ctx, Throwable cause) {
                                            if (cause instanceof DecoderException) {
                                                serverError.set(cause.getCause());
                                            } else {
                                                serverError.set(cause);
                                            }
                                            latch.countDown();
                                        }
                                    });
                        }
                    });

            ChannelFuture serverChannel = server.bind(0).sync();

            Bootstrap client = new Bootstrap()
                    .group(workerGroup)
                    .channel(NioSocketChannel.class)
                    .handler(new ChannelInboundHandlerAdapter() {
                        @Override
                        public void channelActive(ChannelHandlerContext ctx) {
                            ByteBuf buf = ctx.alloc().buffer(22, 22);
                            buf.writeLong(MAGIC_NUMBER);
                            buf.writeByte(BLOCK_TYPE_COMPRESSED | 0x0F);
                            buf.writeIntLE(1);
                            buf.writeIntLE(1 << 25);
                            buf.writeIntLE(0);
                            buf.writeByte(0);

                            ctx.writeAndFlush(buf);

                            ctx.fireChannelActive();
                        }
                    });

            ChannelFuture clientChannel = client.connect(serverChannel.channel().localAddress()).sync();

            assertTrue(latch.await(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS));

            assertInstanceOf(IndexOutOfBoundsException.class, serverError.get());

            clientChannel.channel().close();
            serverChannel.channel().close();
        } finally {
            workerGroup.shutdownGracefully();
        }
    }

Impact

Untrusted senders without per-channel / aggregate limits can stress memory with many small requests.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.2.12.Final"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "io.netty:netty-codec-compression"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.2.13.Final"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.1.132.Final"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "io.netty:netty-codec"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.1.133.Final"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-42583"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400",
      "CWE-770"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-07T00:20:35Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-13T19:17:23Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nLz4FrameDecoder allocates a ByteBuf of size `decompressedLength` (up to 32 MB per block) before LZ4 runs. A peer only needs a 21-byte header plus `compressedLength` payload bytes - 22 bytes if `compressedLength == 1` - to force that allocation.\n\n### Details\nio.netty.handler.codec.compression.Lz4FrameDecoder#decode\nHeader fields are trusted for sizing. On the compressed path, after `readableBytes \u003e= compressedLength`, the decoder does `ctx.alloc().buffer(decompressedLength, decompressedLength)` then decompresses.\n\n### PoC\nThe test below demonstrates how an attacker sending 22 bytes will force the server to allocate 32MB\n\n```java\n    @Test\n    void test() throws Exception {\n        EventLoopGroup workerGroup = new MultiThreadIoEventLoopGroup(NioIoHandler.newFactory());\n        try {\n            AtomicReference\u003cThrowable\u003e serverError = new AtomicReference\u003c\u003e();\n            CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(1);\n\n            ServerBootstrap server = new ServerBootstrap()\n                    .group(workerGroup)\n                    .channel(NioServerSocketChannel.class)\n                    .childHandler(new ChannelInitializer\u003cSocketChannel\u003e() {\n                        @Override\n                        protected void initChannel(SocketChannel ch) {\n                            ch.pipeline()\n                                    .addLast(new Lz4FrameDecoder())\n                                    .addLast(new ChannelInboundHandlerAdapter() {\n                                        @Override\n                                        public void exceptionCaught(ChannelHandlerContext ctx, Throwable cause) {\n                                            if (cause instanceof DecoderException) {\n                                                serverError.set(cause.getCause());\n                                            } else {\n                                                serverError.set(cause);\n                                            }\n                                            latch.countDown();\n                                        }\n                                    });\n                        }\n                    });\n\n            ChannelFuture serverChannel = server.bind(0).sync();\n\n            Bootstrap client = new Bootstrap()\n                    .group(workerGroup)\n                    .channel(NioSocketChannel.class)\n                    .handler(new ChannelInboundHandlerAdapter() {\n                        @Override\n                        public void channelActive(ChannelHandlerContext ctx) {\n                            ByteBuf buf = ctx.alloc().buffer(22, 22);\n                            buf.writeLong(MAGIC_NUMBER);\n                            buf.writeByte(BLOCK_TYPE_COMPRESSED | 0x0F);\n                            buf.writeIntLE(1);\n                            buf.writeIntLE(1 \u003c\u003c 25);\n                            buf.writeIntLE(0);\n                            buf.writeByte(0);\n\n                            ctx.writeAndFlush(buf);\n\n                            ctx.fireChannelActive();\n                        }\n                    });\n\n            ChannelFuture clientChannel = client.connect(serverChannel.channel().localAddress()).sync();\n\n            assertTrue(latch.await(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS));\n\n            assertInstanceOf(IndexOutOfBoundsException.class, serverError.get());\n\n            clientChannel.channel().close();\n            serverChannel.channel().close();\n        } finally {\n            workerGroup.shutdownGracefully();\n        }\n    }\n```\n\n### Impact\nUntrusted senders without per-channel / aggregate limits can stress memory with many small requests.",
  "id": "GHSA-mj4r-2hfc-f8p6",
  "modified": "2026-05-14T20:41:13Z",
  "published": "2026-05-07T00:20:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-mj4r-2hfc-f8p6"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42583"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/netty/netty"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Netty Lz4FrameDecoder is vulnerable to resource exhaustion "
}

GHSA-MJ4R-RR6H-Q62G

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-10 15:31 – Updated: 2025-04-14 15:31
VLAI
Details

An issue in sqlite v.3.49.0 allows an attacker to cause a denial of service via the SQLITE_DBCONFIG_LOOKASIDE component

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-29088"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190",
      "CWE-400"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-04-10T14:15:27Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An issue in sqlite v.3.49.0 allows an attacker to cause a denial of service via the SQLITE_DBCONFIG_LOOKASIDE component",
  "id": "GHSA-mj4r-rr6h-q62g",
  "modified": "2025-04-14T15:31:56Z",
  "published": "2025-04-10T15:31:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-29088"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sqlite/sqlite/commit/56d2fd008b108109f489339f5fd55212bb50afd4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gist.github.com/ylwango613/d3883fb9f6ba8a78086356779ce88248"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://sqlite.org/forum/forumpost/48f365daec"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://sqlite.org/releaselog/3_49_1.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.sqlite.org/cves.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-MJ6P-JGGH-HR8W

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-01-17 00:30 – Updated: 2025-06-20 21:31
VLAI
Details

Vulnerability in the MySQL Server product of Oracle MySQL (component: Server: Optimizer). Supported versions that are affected are 8.0.35 and prior and 8.2.0 and prior. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise MySQL Server. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of MySQL Server. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-20961"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-01-16T22:15:43Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Vulnerability in the MySQL Server product of Oracle MySQL (component: Server: Optimizer).  Supported versions that are affected are 8.0.35 and prior and  8.2.0 and prior. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise MySQL Server.  Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of MySQL Server. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Availability impacts).  CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).",
  "id": "GHSA-mj6p-jggh-hr8w",
  "modified": "2025-06-20T21:31:42Z",
  "published": "2024-01-17T00:30:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-20961"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240201-0003"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2024.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-MJ87-HWQH-73PJ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-15 19:45 – Updated: 2026-04-24 20:51
VLAI
Summary
python-multipart affected by Denial of Service via large multipart preamble or epilogue data
Details

Summary

A denial of service vulnerability exists when parsing crafted multipart/form-data requests with large preamble or epilogue sections.

Details

Two inefficient multipart parsing paths could be abused with attacker-controlled input.

Before the first multipart boundary, the parser handled leading CR and LF bytes inefficiently while searching for the start of the first part. After the closing boundary, the parser continued processing trailing epilogue data instead of discarding it immediately. As a result, parsing time could grow with the size of crafted data placed before the first boundary or after the closing boundary.

Impact

An attacker can send oversized malformed multipart bodies that consume excessive CPU time during request parsing, reducing request-handling capacity and delaying legitimate requests. This issue degrades availability but does not typically result in a complete denial of service for the entire application.

Mitigation

Upgrade to version 0.0.26 or later, which skips ahead to the next boundary candidate when processing leading CR/LF data and immediately discards epilogue data after the closing boundary.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "python-multipart"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.0.26"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-40347"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400",
      "CWE-834"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-15T19:45:44Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-18T00:16:38Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nA denial of service vulnerability exists when parsing crafted `multipart/form-data` requests with large preamble or epilogue sections.\n\n### Details\n\nTwo inefficient multipart parsing paths could be abused with attacker-controlled input.\n\nBefore the first multipart boundary, the parser handled leading CR and LF bytes inefficiently while searching for the start of the first part. After the closing boundary, the parser continued processing trailing epilogue data instead of discarding it immediately. As a result, parsing time could grow with the size of crafted data placed before the first boundary or after the closing boundary.\n\n### Impact\n\nAn attacker can send oversized malformed multipart bodies that consume excessive CPU time during request parsing, reducing request-handling capacity and delaying legitimate requests. This issue degrades availability but does not typically result in a complete denial of service for the entire application.\n\n### Mitigation\n\nUpgrade to version `0.0.26` or later, which skips ahead to the next boundary candidate when processing leading CR/LF data and immediately discards epilogue data after the closing boundary.",
  "id": "GHSA-mj87-hwqh-73pj",
  "modified": "2026-04-24T20:51:11Z",
  "published": "2026-04-15T19:45:44Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Kludex/python-multipart/security/advisories/GHSA-mj87-hwqh-73pj"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-40347"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/Kludex/python-multipart"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Kludex/python-multipart/releases/tag/0.0.26"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "python-multipart affected by Denial of Service via large multipart preamble or epilogue data"
}

GHSA-MJ97-4C6J-MRCP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:28 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:28
VLAI
Details

kittoframework kitto version 0.5.1 is vulnerable to memory exhaustion in the router resulting in DoS

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-1000064"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-07-17T13:18:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "kittoframework kitto version 0.5.1 is vulnerable to memory exhaustion in the router resulting in DoS",
  "id": "GHSA-mj97-4c6j-mrcp",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T02:28:10Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T02:28:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-1000064"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://elixirforum.com/t/kitto-a-framework-for-interactive-dashboards/2089/13"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-MJ9H-GC79-CHG3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-01 00:00 – Updated: 2022-04-06 00:01
VLAI
Details

totolink EX300_v2, ver V4.0.3c.140_B20210429 and A720R ,ver V4.1.5cu.470_B20200911 have an issue which causes uncontrolled resource consumption.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-43662"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-03-31T00:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "totolink EX300_v2, ver V4.0.3c.140_B20210429 and A720R ,ver V4.1.5cu.470_B20200911 have an issue which causes uncontrolled resource consumption.",
  "id": "GHSA-mj9h-gc79-chg3",
  "modified": "2022-04-06T00:01:41Z",
  "published": "2022-04-01T00:00:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-43662"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/chibataiki/iot-vuls/blob/main/totolink/dos.md"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-MJGV-6QMW-8JWC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-08-22 21:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 07:05
VLAI
Details

An issue was discovered in function zzip_disk_entry_to_file_header in mmapped.c in zziplib 0.13.69, which will lead to a denial-of-service.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-18770"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-08-22T19:15:55Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in function zzip_disk_entry_to_file_header in mmapped.c in zziplib 0.13.69, which will lead to a denial-of-service.",
  "id": "GHSA-mjgv-6qmw-8jwc",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T07:05:32Z",
  "published": "2023-08-22T21:30:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-18770"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gdraheim/zziplib/issues/69"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:
  • The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.
  • The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.
  • recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, or
  • uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed.
Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.

Mitigation
Implementation

Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.

CAPEC-147: XML Ping of the Death

An attacker initiates a resource depletion attack where a large number of small XML messages are delivered at a sufficiently rapid rate to cause a denial of service or crash of the target. Transactions such as repetitive SOAP transactions can deplete resources faster than a simple flooding attack because of the additional resources used by the SOAP protocol and the resources necessary to process SOAP messages. The transactions used are immaterial as long as they cause resource utilization on the target. In other words, this is a normal flooding attack augmented by using messages that will require extra processing on the target.

CAPEC-227: Sustained Client Engagement

An adversary attempts to deny legitimate users access to a resource by continually engaging a specific resource in an attempt to keep the resource tied up as long as possible. The adversary's primary goal is not to crash or flood the target, which would alert defenders; rather it is to repeatedly perform actions or abuse algorithmic flaws such that a given resource is tied up and not available to a legitimate user. By carefully crafting a requests that keep the resource engaged through what is seemingly benign requests, legitimate users are limited or completely denied access to the resource.

CAPEC-492: Regular Expression Exponential Blowup

An adversary may execute an attack on a program that uses a poor Regular Expression(Regex) implementation by choosing input that results in an extreme situation for the Regex. A typical extreme situation operates at exponential time compared to the input size. This is due to most implementations using a Nondeterministic Finite Automaton(NFA) state machine to be built by the Regex algorithm since NFA allows backtracking and thus more complex regular expressions.