CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14300 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-G73V-4C9J-8G2P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-19 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:35Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in awcode AWcode Toolkit allows Stored XSS. This issue affects AWcode Toolkit: from n/a through 1.0.18.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-48238"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-19T15:15:26Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in awcode AWcode Toolkit allows Stored XSS. This issue affects AWcode Toolkit: from n/a through 1.0.18.",
"id": "GHSA-g73v-4c9j-8g2p",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:35:08Z",
"published": "2025-05-19T15:31:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-48238"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/awcode-toolkit/vulnerability/wordpress-awcode-toolkit-plugin-1-0-18-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G758-JG83-J6JJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-10 03:32 – Updated: 2026-08-05 15:32A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been reported to affect Notification Center. The remote attackers can then exploit the vulnerability to gain privileges or hijack user identities.
We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: Notification Center 1.10.0.3291 and later
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-58468"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-10T03:16:24Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been reported to affect Notification Center. The remote attackers can then exploit the vulnerability to gain privileges or hijack user identities.\n\nWe have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version:\nNotification Center 1.10.0.3291 and later",
"id": "GHSA-g758-jg83-j6jj",
"modified": "2026-08-05T15:32:02Z",
"published": "2026-06-10T03:32:02Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-58468"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.qnap.com/en/security-advisory/qsa-26-13"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-G75H-MGX2-C5RQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-28 12:30 – Updated: 2026-02-10 21:31Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the application they are logged into. This vulnerability is possible due to the lack of proper CSRF token implementation. Among other things, it is possible, using a POST request to delete all commands via '/delete_all_commands?sid='.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-59894"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-28T12:15:50Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the application they are logged into. This vulnerability is possible due to the lack of proper CSRF token implementation. Among other things, it is possible, using a POST request to delete all commands via \u0027/delete_all_commands?sid=\u0027.",
"id": "GHSA-g75h-mgx2-c5rq",
"modified": "2026-02-10T21:31:27Z",
"published": "2026-01-28T12:30:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-59894"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.incibe.es/en/incibe-cert/notices/aviso/multiple-vulnerabilities-flexense-products"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-G77G-VJJM-X83J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:26 – Updated: 2023-09-22 21:06Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in cal2.jsp in the calendar examples application in Apache Tomcat 4.1.31 allows remote attackers to add events as arbitrary users via the time and description parameters.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.tomcat:tomcat"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "4.1.31"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-4724"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-09-22T21:06:56Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2007-09-05T19:17:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in cal2.jsp in the calendar examples application in Apache Tomcat 4.1.31 allows remote attackers to add events as arbitrary users via the time and description parameters.",
"id": "GHSA-g77g-vjjm-x83j",
"modified": "2023-09-22T21:06:56Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T18:26:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-4724"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20070911063436/http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3094"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20081006123851/http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2007-09/0040.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20200526022330/http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/478491/100/0/threaded"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "Apache Tomcat Example Application CSRF and XSS Vulnerabilities"
}
GHSA-G77Q-MPV6-8W22
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:28 – Updated: 2022-05-17 03:28Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the CheckUser extension for MediaWiki allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of certain users for requests that retrieve sensitive user information via unspecified vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-2940"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-04-13T14:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the CheckUser extension for MediaWiki allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of certain users for requests that retrieve sensitive user information via unspecified vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-g77q-mpv6-8w22",
"modified": "2022-05-17T03:28:18Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:28:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-2940"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/mediawiki-announce/2015-March/000175.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T85858"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201510-05"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:200"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/04/01/1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/04/07/3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/73477"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-G785-V6V4-8R5M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:15 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:15Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities on the Cisco Unity Express with software before 8.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors, aka Bug ID CSCue35910.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-1120"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2013-02-06T12:05:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities on the Cisco Unity Express with software before 8.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors, aka Bug ID CSCue35910.",
"id": "GHSA-g785-v6v4-8r5m",
"modified": "2022-05-17T05:15:45Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T05:15:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-1120"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityNotice/CVE-2013-1120"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-G78H-3X72-CMGM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-08-16 12:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 06:59The Tiempo.com WordPress plugin through 0.1.2 does not have CSRF check when deleting its shortcode, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins delete arbitrary shortcode via a CSRF attack
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-2271"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-08-16T12:15:12Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Tiempo.com WordPress plugin through 0.1.2 does not have CSRF check when deleting its shortcode, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins delete arbitrary shortcode via a CSRF attack",
"id": "GHSA-g78h-3x72-cmgm",
"modified": "2024-04-04T06:59:23Z",
"published": "2023-08-16T12:30:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-2271"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/31512f33-c310-4b36-b665-19293097cc8b"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G79M-HF4C-FQ9F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:11 – Updated: 2022-09-03 00:00CSRF in admin/manage-tickets.php in Chadha PHPKB Standard Multi-Language 9 allows attackers to delete a ticket via a crafted request.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-10489"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-03-12T14:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "CSRF in admin/manage-tickets.php in Chadha PHPKB Standard Multi-Language 9 allows attackers to delete a ticket via a crafted request.",
"id": "GHSA-g79m-hf4c-fq9f",
"modified": "2022-09-03T00:00:20Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:11:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-10489"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://antoniocannito.it/phpkb3#cross-site-request-forgery-when-deleting-a-ticket-cve-2020-10489"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://antoniocannito.it/?p=343#csrf12"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G79X-678M-87HV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:44 – Updated: 2022-05-17 04:44Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Technicolor (formerly Thomson) TC7200 STD6.01.12 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) perform a factory reset via a request to goform/system/factory, (2) disable advanced options via a request to goform/advanced/options, (3) remove ip-filters via the IpFilterAddressDelete1 parameter to goform/advanced/ip-filters, or (4) remove firewall settings via the cbFirewall parameter to goform/advanced/firewall.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-0621"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-01-08T15:30:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Technicolor (formerly Thomson) TC7200 STD6.01.12 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) perform a factory reset via a request to goform/system/factory, (2) disable advanced options via a request to goform/advanced/options, (3) remove ip-filters via the IpFilterAddressDelete1 parameter to goform/advanced/ip-filters, or (4) remove firewall settings via the cbFirewall parameter to goform/advanced/firewall.",
"id": "GHSA-g79x-678m-87hv",
"modified": "2022-05-17T04:44:51Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:44:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-0621"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/30667"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-G7GH-G93W-C35Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-22 00:24 – Updated: 2024-04-03 23:05A Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the administrator functions in WebsiteBaker 2.8.1 and earlier due to inadequate confirmation for sensitive transactions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-2934"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-01-14T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the administrator functions in WebsiteBaker 2.8.1 and earlier due to inadequate confirmation for sensitive transactions.",
"id": "GHSA-g7gh-g93w-c35q",
"modified": "2024-04-03T23:05:57Z",
"published": "2022-04-22T00:24:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-2934"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/08/19/13"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.