CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14303 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-FQH5-5GJ6-JJX8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-02 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:32Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ritesh Sanap Advanced What should we write next about allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Advanced What should we write next about: from n/a through 1.0.3.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-53789"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-02T14:15:19Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ritesh Sanap Advanced What should we write next about allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Advanced What should we write next about: from n/a through 1.0.3.",
"id": "GHSA-fqh5-5gj6-jjx8",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:32:40Z",
"published": "2024-12-02T15:31:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53789"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/advanced-what-should-we-write-about-next/vulnerability/wordpress-advanced-what-should-we-write-next-about-plugin-1-0-3-csrf-to-stored-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FQH7-G3Q7-CJ68
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-10 09:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:34Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ShareThis ShareThis Dashboard for Google Analytics. This issue affects ShareThis Dashboard for Google Analytics: from n/a through 3.2.2.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-32282"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-10T08:15:21Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ShareThis ShareThis Dashboard for Google Analytics. This issue affects ShareThis Dashboard for Google Analytics: from n/a through 3.2.2.",
"id": "GHSA-fqh7-g3q7-cj68",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:34:39Z",
"published": "2025-04-10T09:30:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-32282"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/googleanalytics/vulnerability/wordpress-sharethis-dashboard-for-google-analytics-plugin-3-2-2-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FQHM-FJJV-7Q8X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-07-28 00:00 – Updated: 2022-12-13 13:57openstack-heat Plugin 1.5 and earlier does not perform permission checks in methods implementing form validation.
This form validation methods do not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.jenkins-ci.plugins:openstack-heat"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "1.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-36911"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-08-10T17:27:09Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-07-27T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "openstack-heat Plugin 1.5 and earlier does not perform permission checks in methods implementing form validation.\n\nThis form validation methods do not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.",
"id": "GHSA-fqhm-fjjv-7q8x",
"modified": "2022-12-13T13:57:33Z",
"published": "2022-07-28T00:00:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-36911"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/openstack-heat-plugin"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2022-07-27/#SECURITY-2105%20(1)"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/07/27/1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "CSRF vulnerability in Jenkins openstack-heat Plugin"
}
GHSA-FQJ8-WMFW-C4M4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:19 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:19Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Subuser module before 6.x-1.8 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that switch the user to a subuser via unspecified vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-4486"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2012-11-02T15:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Subuser module before 6.x-1.8 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that switch the user to a subuser via unspecified vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-fqj8-wmfw-c4m4",
"modified": "2022-05-17T05:19:28Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T05:19:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-4486"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://drupal.org/node/1700550"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://drupal.org/node/1700584"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/10/04/6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/10/07/1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-FQPP-WX48-C63R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-03 15:32 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:33Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in DigiTimber DigiTimber cPanel Integration allows Stored XSS. This issue affects DigiTimber cPanel Integration: from n/a through 1.4.6.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-22690"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-03T15:15:19Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in DigiTimber DigiTimber cPanel Integration allows Stored XSS. This issue affects DigiTimber cPanel Integration: from n/a through 1.4.6.",
"id": "GHSA-fqpp-wx48-c63r",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:33:31Z",
"published": "2025-02-03T15:32:02Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22690"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/digitimber-cpanel-integration/vulnerability/wordpress-digitimber-cpanel-integration-plugin-1-4-6-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FQPX-XFJR-2QR9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-16 00:00 – Updated: 2022-11-30 20:20Extended Choice Parameter Plugin 346.vd87693c5a_86c and earlier does not perform a permission check on form validation methods. This allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL.
Additionally, these form validation methods do not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 346.vd87693c5a"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.jenkins-ci.plugins:extended-choice-parameter"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "356.va_90a_94ca_62ec"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-27204"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-11-30T20:20:51Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-03-15T17:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Extended Choice Parameter Plugin 346.vd87693c5a_86c and earlier does not perform a permission check on form validation methods. This allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL.\n\nAdditionally, these form validation methods do not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.",
"id": "GHSA-fqpx-xfjr-2qr9",
"modified": "2022-11-30T20:20:51Z",
"published": "2022-03-16T00:00:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-27204"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/extended-choice-parameter-plugin/commit/eff9472b64f68749e5272aa59b68e561fb4ab4cd"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/extended-choice-parameter-plugin"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2022-03-15/#SECURITY-1350"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/03/15/2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "CSRF vulnerability and missing permission checks in Jenkins Extended Choice Parameter Plugin allow SSRF"
}
GHSA-FQR4-Q363-G7GM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-20 00:31 – Updated: 2026-02-28 00:31Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OpenText™ Web Site Management Server allows Cross Site Request Forgery. The vulnerability could make a user, with active session inside the product, click on a page that contains this malicious HTML triggering to perform changes unconsciously.
This issue affects Web Site Management Server: 16.7.0, 16.7.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-13671"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-02-19T23:16:14Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OpenText\u2122 Web Site Management Server allows Cross Site Request Forgery. The vulnerability could\u00a0make a user, with active session inside the product, click on a page that contains this malicious HTML triggering to perform changes unconsciously.\n\nThis issue affects Web Site Management Server: 16.7.0, 16.7.1.",
"id": "GHSA-fqr4-q363-g7gm",
"modified": "2026-02-28T00:31:01Z",
"published": "2026-02-20T00:31:53Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-13671"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/MarioTesoro/vulnerability-research/blob/main/CVE-2025-13671/README.md"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.opentext.com/csm/en?id=ot_kb_unauthenticated\u0026sysparm_article=KB0854846"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:P/AU:N/R:U/V:D/RE:H/U:Red",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-FQV8-7PV4-8QP3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:54 – Updated: 2022-05-17 03:54Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Decisions module for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that remove individual voters via unspecified vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-4383"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-06-15T14:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Decisions module for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that remove individual voters via unspecified vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-fqv8-7pv4-8qp3",
"modified": "2022-05-17T03:54:01Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:54:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-4383"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.drupal.org/node/2459349"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/04/25/6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/74344"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-FQWV-R262-9XM8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:33 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:33Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the XML Pack in IBM InfoSphere Information Server 8.5.x through 8.5 FP3, 8.7.x through 8.7 FP2, and 9.1.x through 9.1.2.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-4057"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-03-16T14:06:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the XML Pack in IBM InfoSphere Information Server 8.5.x through 8.5 FP3, 8.7.x through 8.7 FP2, and 9.1.x through 9.1.2.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.",
"id": "GHSA-fqwv-r262-9xm8",
"modified": "2022-05-17T01:33:28Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:33:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-4057"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/86546"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1JR48815"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1JR49200"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1JR49206"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21666684"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/66154"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-FR29-VWW3-Q54M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 00:52 – Updated: 2022-05-14 00:52Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the optionsPageRequest function in admin.php in WP Fastest Cache plugin before 0.8.3.5 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that call the (1) saveOption, (2) deleteCache, (3) deleteCssAndJsCache, or (4) addCacheTimeout method via the wpFastestCachePage parameter in the WpFastestCacheOptions/ page.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-4089"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-09-19T15:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the optionsPageRequest function in admin.php in WP Fastest Cache plugin before 0.8.3.5 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that call the (1) saveOption, (2) deleteCache, (3) deleteCssAndJsCache, or (4) addCacheTimeout method via the wpFastestCachePage parameter in the WpFastestCacheOptions/ page.",
"id": "GHSA-fr29-vww3-q54m",
"modified": "2022-05-14T00:52:10Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T00:52:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-4089"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-fastest-cache/#developers"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpvulndb.com/vulnerabilities/9756"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/05/26/20"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.