CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14173 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-X25H-F84X-WH4M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-30 00:00 – Updated: 2023-10-27 17:00Jenkins RocketChat Notifier Plugin 1.4.10 and earlier does not perform a permission check in a method implementing form validation.
This allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credential.
Additionally, this form validation method does not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.
RocketChat Notifier Plugin 1.5.0 requires POST requests and Overall/Administer permission for the affected form validation method.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.jenkins-ci.plugins:rocketchatnotifier"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.5.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-28138"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-11-29T22:03:56Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-03-29T13:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Jenkins RocketChat Notifier Plugin 1.4.10 and earlier does not perform a permission check in a method implementing form validation.\n\nThis allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credential.\n\nAdditionally, this form validation method does not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.\n\nRocketChat Notifier Plugin 1.5.0 requires POST requests and Overall/Administer permission for the affected form validation method.",
"id": "GHSA-x25h-f84x-wh4m",
"modified": "2023-10-27T17:00:43Z",
"published": "2022-03-30T00:00:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-28138"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/rocketchatnotifier-plugin"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2022-03-29/#SECURITY-2241"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/03/29/1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "CSRF vulnerability in Jenkins RocketChat Notifier Plugin"
}
GHSA-X263-HP5C-P2RJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-04-02 21:30 – Updated: 2023-04-03 22:54OctoPerf Load Testing Plugin Plugin 4.5.2 and earlier does not perform permission checks in several HTTP endpoints.
This allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to a previously configured Octoperf server using attacker-specified credentials.
Additionally, these endpoints do not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.
OctoPerf Load Testing Plugin Plugin 4.5.3 requires POST requests and the appropriate permissions for the affected HTTP endpoints.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.jenkinsci.plugins:octoperf"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.5.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-28674"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-04-03T22:54:26Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2023-04-02T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "OctoPerf Load Testing Plugin Plugin 4.5.2 and earlier does not perform permission checks in several HTTP endpoints.\n\nThis allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to a previously configured Octoperf server using attacker-specified credentials.\n\nAdditionally, these endpoints do not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.\n\nOctoPerf Load Testing Plugin Plugin 4.5.3 requires POST requests and the appropriate permissions for the affected HTTP endpoints.",
"id": "GHSA-x263-hp5c-p2rj",
"modified": "2023-04-03T22:54:26Z",
"published": "2023-04-02T21:30:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-28674"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2023-03-21/#SECURITY-3067%20(4)"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Jenkins OctoPerf Load Testing Plugin vulnerable to Cross-site Request Forgery"
}
GHSA-X27F-W33X-PQQR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 01:33 – Updated: 2022-05-14 01:33SAP Manufacturing Integration and Intelligence, versions 15.0, 15.1 and 15.2, (Illuminator Servlet) currently does not provide Anti-XSRF tokens. This might lead to XSRF attacks in case the data is being posted to the Servlet from an external application.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-0267"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-02-15T18:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "SAP Manufacturing Integration and Intelligence, versions 15.0, 15.1 and 15.2, (Illuminator Servlet) currently does not provide Anti-XSRF tokens. This might lead to XSRF attacks in case the data is being posted to the Servlet from an external application.",
"id": "GHSA-x27f-w33x-pqqr",
"modified": "2022-05-14T01:33:23Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T01:33:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-0267"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://launchpad.support.sap.com/#/notes/2686535"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=510922943"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106990"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-X286-R6H6-3GG7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:50 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:50Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in authcfg.cgi in Accoria Web Server (aka Rock Web Server) 1.4.7 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create user accounts.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-2268"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-06-15T14:30:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in authcfg.cgi in Accoria Web Server (aka Rock Web Server) 1.4.7 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create user accounts.",
"id": "GHSA-x286-r6h6-3gg7",
"modified": "2022-05-17T05:50:13Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T05:50:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-2268"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ioactive.com/pdfs/AccoriaWebServer.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/245081"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-X298-H85X-H99Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:10 – Updated: 2022-10-25 19:00Several AJAX actions available in the Workreap WordPress theme before 2.2.2 lacked CSRF protections, as well as allowing insecure direct object references that were not validated. This allows an attacker to trick a logged in user to submit a POST request to the vulnerable site, potentially modifying or deleting arbitrary objects on the target site.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-24500"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284",
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-08-09T10:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Several AJAX actions available in the Workreap WordPress theme before 2.2.2 lacked CSRF protections, as well as allowing insecure direct object references that were not validated. This allows an attacker to trick a logged in user to submit a POST request to the vulnerable site, potentially modifying or deleting arbitrary objects on the target site.",
"id": "GHSA-x298-h85x-h99q",
"modified": "2022-10-25T19:00:31Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:10:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-24500"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://jetpack.com/2021/07/07/multiple-vulnerabilities-in-workreap-theme"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/0c4b5ecc-54d0-45ec-9f92-b2ca3cadbe56"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-X2CQ-24WC-G3F9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-01 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:34Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in alextselegidis Easy!Appointments allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Easy!Appointments: from n/a through 1.4.2.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-31828"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-01T15:16:22Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in alextselegidis Easy!Appointments allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Easy!Appointments: from n/a through 1.4.2.",
"id": "GHSA-x2cq-24wc-g3f9",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:34:21Z",
"published": "2025-04-01T15:31:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-31828"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/easyappointments/vulnerability/wordpress-easy-appointments-plugin-1-4-2-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-to-settings-change-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-X2F7-HH2H-82C7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-19 18:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:32Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Creative Motion Disable Admin Notices individually allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Disable Admin Notices individually: from n/a through 1.3.5.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-52420"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-11-19T17:15:55Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Creative Motion Disable Admin Notices individually allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Disable Admin Notices individually: from n/a through 1.3.5.",
"id": "GHSA-x2f7-hh2h-82c7",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:32:34Z",
"published": "2024-11-19T18:31:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-52420"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/disable-admin-notices/vulnerability/wordpress-disable-admin-notices-individually-plugin-1-3-5-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/disable-admin-notices/wordpress-disable-admin-notices-individually-plugin-1-3-5-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-X2FW-RVP7-JWXC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-20 12:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:32Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Edush Maxim GoogleDrive folder list allows Stored XSS.This issue affects GoogleDrive folder list: from n/a through 2.2.2.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-49335"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-10-20T10:15:03Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Edush Maxim GoogleDrive folder list allows Stored XSS.This issue affects GoogleDrive folder list: from n/a through 2.2.2.",
"id": "GHSA-x2fw-rvp7-jwxc",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:32:07Z",
"published": "2024-10-20T12:30:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49335"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/googledrive-folder-list/vulnerability/wordpress-googledrive-folder-list-plugin-2-2-2-csrf-to-stored-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/googledrive-folder-list/wordpress-googledrive-folder-list-plugin-2-2-2-csrf-to-stored-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-X2GQ-6C9P-44P8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-13 03:32 – Updated: 2026-01-13 03:32Due to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SAP Fiori App Intercompany Balance Reconciliation an attacker could execute state?changing actions using an inappropriate request type, this deviation from expected request semantics may allow an attacker to trigger unintended actions on behalf of an authenticated user causing low impact on integrity of the system. This has no impact on confidentiality and availability.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-0493"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-13T02:15:51Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Due to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SAP Fiori App Intercompany Balance Reconciliation an attacker could execute state?changing actions using an inappropriate request type, this deviation from expected request semantics may allow an attacker to trigger unintended actions on behalf of an authenticated user causing low impact on integrity of the system. This has no impact on confidentiality and availability.",
"id": "GHSA-x2gq-6c9p-44p8",
"modified": "2026-01-13T03:32:08Z",
"published": "2026-01-13T03:32:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-0493"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://me.sap.com/notes/3655229"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://url.sap/sapsecuritypatchday"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-X2M8-4X5H-2R66
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-03-27 15:30 – Updated: 2023-03-31 03:30Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Pankaj Jha WordPress Ping Optimizer plugin <= 2.35.1.2.3 versions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-30705"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-03-27T14:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Pankaj Jha WordPress Ping Optimizer plugin \u003c= 2.35.1.2.3 versions.",
"id": "GHSA-x2m8-4x5h-2r66",
"modified": "2023-03-31T03:30:31Z",
"published": "2023-03-27T15:30:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-30705"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/wordpress-ping-optimizer/wordpress-ping-optimizer-plugin-2-35-1-2-3-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.