CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14231 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-PP4H-3VH8-RWRW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-03 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:33Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in NotFound Theme Options Z allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Theme Options Z: from n/a through 1.4.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-25121"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352",
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-03T14:15:51Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027) vulnerability in NotFound Theme Options Z allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Theme Options Z: from n/a through 1.4.",
"id": "GHSA-pp4h-3vh8-rwrw",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:33:54Z",
"published": "2025-03-03T15:31:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-25121"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/theme-options-z/vulnerability/wordpress-wp-spell-check-plugin-9-21-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability-2?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-PP4X-8G6C-R99V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-18 15:30 – Updated: 2025-11-20 15:30Windu CMS is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in file uploading functionality. Malicious attacker can craft special website, which when visited by the victim, will automatically send malicious file to the server.
The vendor was notified early about this vulnerability, but didn't respond with the details of vulnerability or vulnerable version range. Only version 4.1 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable, other versions were not tested and might also be vulnerable.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-59114"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-18T15:16:33Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Windu CMS is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in file uploading functionality. Malicious attacker can craft special website, which when visited by the victim, will automatically send malicious file to the server.\n\nThe vendor was notified early about this vulnerability, but didn\u0027t respond with the details of vulnerability or vulnerable version range. Only version 4.1 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable, other versions were not tested and might also be vulnerable.",
"id": "GHSA-pp4x-8g6c-r99v",
"modified": "2025-11-20T15:30:20Z",
"published": "2025-11-18T15:30:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-59114"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert.pl/posts/2025/11/CVE-2025-59110"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://windu.org"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-PP5P-PF9F-V3Q8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-29 06:30 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:34Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Thrive Themes Thrive Automator.This issue affects Thrive Automator: from n/a through 1.17.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-51531"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-02-29T05:15:09Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Thrive Themes Thrive Automator.This issue affects Thrive Automator: from n/a through 1.17.",
"id": "GHSA-pp5p-pf9f-v3q8",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:34:04Z",
"published": "2024-02-29T06:30:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-51531"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/thrive-automator/wordpress-thrive-automator-plugin-1-17-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-PP6P-GH63-62XR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:07 – Updated: 2024-10-15 21:30The WP Fluent Forms plugin < 3.6.67 for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery leading to stored Cross-Site Scripting and limited Privilege Escalation due to a missing nonce check in the access control function for administrative AJAX actions
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-34620"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-07-07T13:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The WP Fluent Forms plugin \u003c 3.6.67 for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery leading to stored Cross-Site Scripting and limited Privilege Escalation due to a missing nonce check in the access control function for administrative AJAX actions",
"id": "GHSA-pp6p-gh63-62xr",
"modified": "2024-10-15T21:30:32Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:07:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-34620"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/fluentform/trunk/app/Modules/Acl/Acl.php?rev=2196688"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/blog/2021/06/cross-site-request-forgery-patched-in-wp-fluent-forms"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-PP6V-GCW7-42CF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-02-24 09:30 – Updated: 2023-03-02 18:30A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in SourceCodester Sales Tracker Management System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file admin/?page=user/list. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-221734 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-0999"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-02-24T08:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in SourceCodester Sales Tracker Management System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file admin/?page=user/list. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-221734 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.",
"id": "GHSA-pp6v-gcw7-42cf",
"modified": "2023-03-02T18:30:27Z",
"published": "2023-02-24T09:30:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-0999"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/1MurasaKi/STMS_CSRF/blob/main/README.md"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.221734"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.221734"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-PPC6-PQCQ-584G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-07-12 06:33 – Updated: 2024-08-01 15:31The ContentLock WordPress plugin through 1.0.3 does not have CSRF check in place when adding emails, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin perform such action via a CSRF attack
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-6023"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-07-12T06:15:05Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The ContentLock WordPress plugin through 1.0.3 does not have CSRF check in place when adding emails, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin perform such action via a CSRF attack",
"id": "GHSA-ppc6-pqcq-584g",
"modified": "2024-08-01T15:31:55Z",
"published": "2024-07-12T06:33:49Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-6023"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/6e812189-2980-453d-931d-1f785e8dbcc0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-PPCW-XW3X-C247
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-08 15:31 – Updated: 2024-06-08 15:31Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Analytify.This issue affects Analytify: from n/a through 5.2.3.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-35689"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-06-08T15:15:51Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Analytify.This issue affects Analytify: from n/a through 5.2.3.",
"id": "GHSA-ppcw-xw3x-c247",
"modified": "2024-06-08T15:31:19Z",
"published": "2024-06-08T15:31:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35689"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/wp-analytify/wordpress-analytify-plugin-5-2-3-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-PPFW-543C-9Q84
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:16 – Updated: 2025-10-22 03:30Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in D-Link DIR-600 router (rev. Bx) with firmware before 2.17b02 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) create an administrator account or (2) enable remote management via a crafted configuration module to hedwig.cgi, (3) activate new configuration settings via a SETCFG,SAVE,ACTIVATE action to pigwidgeon.cgi, or (4) send a ping via a ping action to diagnostic.php.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-100005"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-01-13T11:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in D-Link DIR-600 router (rev. Bx) with firmware before 2.17b02 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) create an administrator account or (2) enable remote management via a crafted configuration module to hedwig.cgi, (3) activate new configuration settings via a SETCFG,SAVE,ACTIVATE action to pigwidgeon.cgi, or (4) send a ping via a ping action to diagnostic.php.",
"id": "GHSA-ppfw-543c-9q84",
"modified": "2025-10-22T03:30:41Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:16:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-100005"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/91794"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2014-100005"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://resources.infosecinstitute.com/csrf-unauthorized-remote-admin-access"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/57304"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityadvisories.dlink.com/security/publication.aspx?name=SAP10018"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-PPHR-R45W-J4JP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-24 09:30 – Updated: 2026-06-24 09:30The Bulk SEO Image plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to and including 1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the plugin's settings page handler BulkSeoImage(), which dispatches to launchbulk() / BulkSeoImageGo() whenever the request contains $_POST['bulkseoimage']. No wp_nonce_field() is emitted in the form and no check_admin_referer()/wp_verify_nonce() is performed before bulk-overwriting the _wp_attachment_image_alt post meta for every image attached to every published post and/or page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bulk-overwrite image ALT-text metadata across the site via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-11997"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-24T07:16:26Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Bulk SEO Image plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to and including 1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the plugin\u0027s settings page handler BulkSeoImage(), which dispatches to launchbulk() / BulkSeoImageGo() whenever the request contains $_POST[\u0027bulkseoimage\u0027]. No wp_nonce_field() is emitted in the form and no check_admin_referer()/wp_verify_nonce() is performed before bulk-overwriting the _wp_attachment_image_alt post meta for every image attached to every published post and/or page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bulk-overwrite image ALT-text metadata across the site via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-pphr-r45w-j4jp",
"modified": "2026-06-24T09:30:45Z",
"published": "2026-06-24T09:30:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-11997"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/bulk-seo-image/tags/1.1/bulk-seo-image.php#L11"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/bulk-seo-image/tags/1.1/bulk-seo-image.php#L147"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/bulk-seo-image/tags/1.1/bulk-seo-image.php#L76"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/ef176a6c-33d1-45d6-8a1d-3df1e8eb2170?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-PPJ4-7GJH-F85R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-19 18:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:32Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Themefuse ThemeFuse Maintenance Mode allows Stored XSS.This issue affects ThemeFuse Maintenance Mode: from n/a through 1.1.3.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-51645"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-11-19T17:15:20Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Themefuse ThemeFuse Maintenance Mode allows Stored XSS.This issue affects ThemeFuse Maintenance Mode: from n/a through 1.1.3.",
"id": "GHSA-ppj4-7gjh-f85r",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:32:29Z",
"published": "2024-11-19T18:31:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-51645"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/themefuse-maintenance-mode/vulnerability/wordpress-themefuse-maintenance-mode-plugin-1-1-3-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/themefuse-maintenance-mode/wordpress-themefuse-maintenance-mode-plugin-1-1-3-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.