CWE-306
AllowedMissing Authentication for Critical Function
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.
3492 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-64X7-WH2P-524G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-10-19 12:00 – Updated: 2025-10-22 00:32Vulnerability in the Oracle Web Applications Desktop Integrator product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Upload). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.11. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Web Applications Desktop Integrator. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Web Applications Desktop Integrator. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-21587"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-10-18T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle Web Applications Desktop Integrator product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Upload). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.11. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Web Applications Desktop Integrator. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Web Applications Desktop Integrator. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).",
"id": "GHSA-64x7-wh2p-524g",
"modified": "2025-10-22T00:32:37Z",
"published": "2022-10-19T12:00:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-21587"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2022-21587"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2022.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/171208/Oracle-E-Business-Suite-EBS-Unauthenticated-Arbitrary-File-Upload.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-6573-VPM8-2VPQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-23 00:30 – Updated: 2025-12-23 00:30D-Link DSL-124 ME_1.00 contains a configuration file disclosure vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to retrieve router settings through a POST request. Attackers can send a specific POST request to the router's configuration endpoint to download a complete backup file containing sensitive network credentials and system configurations.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-53974"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-22T22:16:02Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "D-Link DSL-124 ME_1.00 contains a configuration file disclosure vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to retrieve router settings through a POST request. Attackers can send a specific POST request to the router\u0027s configuration endpoint to download a complete backup file containing sensitive network credentials and system configurations.",
"id": "GHSA-6573-vpm8-2vpq",
"modified": "2025-12-23T00:30:32Z",
"published": "2025-12-23T00:30:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53974"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://dlinkmea.com/index.php/product/details?det=dU1iNFc4cWRsdUpjWEpETFlSeFlZdz09"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.dlink.com"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51129"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/d-link-dsl-me-backup-configuration-file-disclosure-via-unauthenticated-request"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-658W-F28G-3J4H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-13 12:32 – Updated: 2024-11-13 12:32A authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Fortinet FortiClientWindows version 7.4.0, versions 7.2.4 through 7.2.0, versions 7.0.12 through 7.0.0, and 6.4.10 through 6.4.0 allows low privilege attacker to execute arbitrary code with high privilege via spoofed named pipe messages.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-47574"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-288",
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-11-13T12:15:16Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Fortinet FortiClientWindows version 7.4.0, versions 7.2.4 through 7.2.0, versions 7.0.12 through 7.0.0, and 6.4.10 through 6.4.0 allows low privilege attacker to execute arbitrary code with high privilege via spoofed named pipe messages.",
"id": "GHSA-658w-f28g-3j4h",
"modified": "2024-11-13T12:32:12Z",
"published": "2024-11-13T12:32:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47574"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-24-199"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-65P2-39GR-3M25
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-29 18:31 – Updated: 2026-06-29 18:31Gorse before 0.5.10 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the /api/dump and /api/restore endpoints that allows unauthenticated attackers to access protected functionality when admin_api_key is empty, which is the default configuration. Remote attackers can exfiltrate the entire database including user records, items, and feedback data containing personally identifiable information, or completely overwrite the dataset without authentication.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-56782"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-29T18:16:38Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Gorse before 0.5.10 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the /api/dump and /api/restore endpoints that allows unauthenticated attackers to access protected functionality when admin_api_key is empty, which is the default configuration. Remote attackers can exfiltrate the entire database including user records, items, and feedback data containing personally identifiable information, or completely overwrite the dataset without authentication.",
"id": "GHSA-65p2-39gr-3m25",
"modified": "2026-06-29T18:31:55Z",
"published": "2026-06-29T18:31:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56782"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gorse-io/gorse/issues/1292"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gorse-io/gorse/pull/1293"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gorse-io/gorse/commit/19fdcbb309fb5b609e9cc3eb10c74885b5b27da9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/gorse-unauthenticated-database-dump-and-restore-via-api-dump-and-api-restore-endpoints"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-65PG-QHHW-MXWG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-14 20:26 – Updated: 2026-05-15 23:55Vulnerability Type: Information Disclosure / Missing Authentication
Severity: Medium
Component: backend/open_webui/routers/retrieval.py — get_status() (GET /)
Affected Endpoint: GET /api/v1/retrieval/
Affected Version: Open WebUI main branch — confirmed unpatched through v0.9.2
Authentication Required: None — internet-facing with zero credentials
CVSSv3.1 Score: 5.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N)
Summary
GET /api/v1/retrieval/ returns live RAG pipeline configuration to any unauthenticated HTTP client. No Authorization header, cookie, or API key is required. Every adjacent endpoint on the same router (/embedding, /config) is correctly guarded by get_admin_user making this a targeted omission.
Root Cause
backend/open_webui/routers/retrieval.py:262
@router.get('/')
async def get_status(request: Request): # ← no Depends(get_verified_user)
return {
'status': True,
'CHUNK_SIZE': request.app.state.config.CHUNK_SIZE,
'CHUNK_OVERLAP': request.app.state.config.CHUNK_OVERLAP,
'RAG_TEMPLATE': request.app.state.config.RAG_TEMPLATE,
'RAG_EMBEDDING_ENGINE': request.app.state.config.RAG_EMBEDDING_ENGINE,
'RAG_EMBEDDING_MODEL': request.app.state.config.RAG_EMBEDDING_MODEL,
'RAG_RERANKING_MODEL': request.app.state.config.RAG_RERANKING_MODEL,
'RAG_EMBEDDING_BATCH_SIZE': request.app.state.config.RAG_EMBEDDING_BATCH_SIZE,
'ENABLE_ASYNC_EMBEDDING': request.app.state.config.ENABLE_ASYNC_EMBEDDING,
'RAG_EMBEDDING_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS': request.app.state.config.RAG_EMBEDDING_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS,
}
Compare with every adjacent endpoint on the same router:
@router.get('/embedding')
async def get_embedding_config(request: Request, user=Depends(get_admin_user)): # ✅
@router.get('/config')
async def get_rag_config(request: Request, user=Depends(get_admin_user)): # ✅
Proof Of Concept — No Token Required
curl -s http://TARGET/api/v1/retrieval/
{
"status": true,
"CHUNK_SIZE": 1000,
"CHUNK_OVERLAP": 100,
"RAG_TEMPLATE": "### Task:\nRespond to the user query using the provided context...\n<context>\n{{CONTEXT}}\n</context>",
"RAG_EMBEDDING_ENGINE": "",
"RAG_EMBEDDING_MODEL": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2",
"RAG_RERANKING_MODEL": "",
"RAG_EMBEDDING_BATCH_SIZE": 1,
"ENABLE_ASYNC_EMBEDDING": true,
"RAG_EMBEDDING_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS": 0
}
Disclosed Information and Its Value to an Attacker
| Field | What it reveals |
|---|---|
RAG_EMBEDDING_ENGINE |
Backend type (OpenAI, Ollama, Azure, etc.) |
RAG_EMBEDDING_MODEL |
Exact model name — reveals embedding model |
RAG_RERANKING_MODEL |
Reranker in use — reveals reranker |
RAG_TEMPLATE |
RAG template — exposes the RAG template |
CHUNK_SIZE / CHUNK_OVERLAP |
Chunking parameters — enables exact reconstruction of how documents are split and retrieved |
Attack Scenario
- Attacker sends one unauthenticated HTTP GET to
/api/v1/retrieval/. - Response reveals the embedding model and chunking parameters.
- Attacker uses the exact chunk size/overlap to craft RAG poisoning payloads that are guaranteed to be retrieved.
Impact
- RAG template disclosure
- Infrastructure fingerprinting — embedding engine and model name reveal the AI stack to an internet scanner
- RAG attack surface mapping — chunk parameters enable precise calculation of retrieval boundaries
- Zero-effort recon — no brute force, no credentials, no rate-limit concern. Single request from any IP.
Recommended Fix
Add get_verified_user dependency (or get_admin_user for stricter control):
# BEFORE (vulnerable)
@router.get('/')
async def get_status(request: Request):
# AFTER
@router.get('/')
async def get_status(request: Request, user=Depends(get_verified_user)):
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "open-webui"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.9.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-45397"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-14T20:26:34Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-15T21:16:37Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "**Vulnerability Type:** Information Disclosure / Missing Authentication \n**Severity:** Medium \n**Component:** `backend/open_webui/routers/retrieval.py` \u2014 `get_status()` (`GET /`) \n**Affected Endpoint:** `GET /api/v1/retrieval/` \n**Affected Version:** Open WebUI `main` branch \u2014 confirmed unpatched through **v0.9.2** \n**Authentication Required:** None \u2014 internet-facing with zero credentials \n**CVSSv3.1 Score:** 5.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N)\n\n---\n\n## Summary\n\n`GET /api/v1/retrieval/` returns live RAG pipeline configuration to any unauthenticated HTTP client. No `Authorization` header, cookie, or API key is required. Every adjacent endpoint on the same router (`/embedding`, `/config`) is correctly guarded by `get_admin_user` making this a targeted omission.\n\n---\n\n## Root Cause\n\n`backend/open_webui/routers/retrieval.py:262`\n\n```python\n@router.get(\u0027/\u0027)\nasync def get_status(request: Request): # \u2190 no Depends(get_verified_user)\n return {\n \u0027status\u0027: True,\n \u0027CHUNK_SIZE\u0027: request.app.state.config.CHUNK_SIZE,\n \u0027CHUNK_OVERLAP\u0027: request.app.state.config.CHUNK_OVERLAP,\n \u0027RAG_TEMPLATE\u0027: request.app.state.config.RAG_TEMPLATE,\n \u0027RAG_EMBEDDING_ENGINE\u0027: request.app.state.config.RAG_EMBEDDING_ENGINE,\n \u0027RAG_EMBEDDING_MODEL\u0027: request.app.state.config.RAG_EMBEDDING_MODEL,\n \u0027RAG_RERANKING_MODEL\u0027: request.app.state.config.RAG_RERANKING_MODEL,\n \u0027RAG_EMBEDDING_BATCH_SIZE\u0027: request.app.state.config.RAG_EMBEDDING_BATCH_SIZE,\n \u0027ENABLE_ASYNC_EMBEDDING\u0027: request.app.state.config.ENABLE_ASYNC_EMBEDDING,\n \u0027RAG_EMBEDDING_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS\u0027: request.app.state.config.RAG_EMBEDDING_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS,\n }\n```\n\nCompare with every adjacent endpoint on the same router:\n\n```python\n@router.get(\u0027/embedding\u0027)\nasync def get_embedding_config(request: Request, user=Depends(get_admin_user)): # \u2705\n\n@router.get(\u0027/config\u0027)\nasync def get_rag_config(request: Request, user=Depends(get_admin_user)): # \u2705\n```\n\n---\n\n## Proof Of Concept \u2014 No Token Required\n\n```bash\ncurl -s http://TARGET/api/v1/retrieval/\n```\n\n```json\n{\n \"status\": true,\n \"CHUNK_SIZE\": 1000,\n \"CHUNK_OVERLAP\": 100,\n \"RAG_TEMPLATE\": \"### Task:\\nRespond to the user query using the provided context...\\n\u003ccontext\u003e\\n{{CONTEXT}}\\n\u003c/context\u003e\",\n \"RAG_EMBEDDING_ENGINE\": \"\",\n \"RAG_EMBEDDING_MODEL\": \"sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2\",\n \"RAG_RERANKING_MODEL\": \"\",\n \"RAG_EMBEDDING_BATCH_SIZE\": 1,\n \"ENABLE_ASYNC_EMBEDDING\": true,\n \"RAG_EMBEDDING_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS\": 0\n}\n```\n\n---\n\n## Disclosed Information and Its Value to an Attacker\n\n| Field | What it reveals |\n|---|---|\n| `RAG_EMBEDDING_ENGINE` | Backend type (OpenAI, Ollama, Azure, etc.) |\n| `RAG_EMBEDDING_MODEL` | Exact model name \u2014 reveals embedding model |\n| `RAG_RERANKING_MODEL` | Reranker in use \u2014 reveals reranker |\n| `RAG_TEMPLATE` | **RAG template** \u2014 exposes the RAG template |\n| `CHUNK_SIZE` / `CHUNK_OVERLAP` | Chunking parameters \u2014 enables exact reconstruction of how documents are split and retrieved |\n\n---\n\n## Attack Scenario\n\n1. Attacker sends one unauthenticated HTTP GET to `/api/v1/retrieval/`.\n2. Response reveals the embedding model and chunking parameters.\n3. Attacker uses the exact chunk size/overlap to craft RAG poisoning payloads that are guaranteed to be retrieved.\n\n---\n\n## Impact\n\n1. **RAG template disclosure**\n2. **Infrastructure fingerprinting** \u2014 embedding engine and model name reveal the AI stack to an internet scanner\n3. **RAG attack surface mapping** \u2014 chunk parameters enable precise calculation of retrieval boundaries\n4. **Zero-effort recon** \u2014 no brute force, no credentials, no rate-limit concern. Single request from any IP.\n\n---\n\n## Recommended Fix\n\nAdd `get_verified_user` dependency (or `get_admin_user` for stricter control):\n\n```python\n# BEFORE (vulnerable)\n@router.get(\u0027/\u0027)\nasync def get_status(request: Request):\n\n\n# AFTER\n@router.get(\u0027/\u0027)\nasync def get_status(request: Request, user=Depends(get_verified_user)):\n```",
"id": "GHSA-65pg-qhhw-mxwg",
"modified": "2026-05-15T23:55:19Z",
"published": "2026-05-14T20:26:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/security/advisories/GHSA-65pg-qhhw-mxwg"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45397"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/releases/tag/v0.9.5"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Open WebUI Vulnerable to Unauthenticated RAG Configuration Disclosure"
}
GHSA-662C-WHX5-Q24F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-29 21:30 – Updated: 2025-10-09 18:30Vasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) Virtual Appliance Host prior to version 22.0.1049 and Application prior to version 20.0.2786 (VA/SaaS deployments) expose internal Docker containers through the gw Docker instance. The gateway publishes a /meta endpoint which lists every micro‑service container together with version information. These containers are reachable directly over HTTP/HTTPS without any access‑control list (ACL), authentication or rate‑limiting. Consequently, any attacker on the LAN or the Internet can enumerate all internal services and their versions, interact with the exposed APIs of each microservice as an unauthenticated user, or issue malicious requests that may lead to information disclosure, privilege escalation within the container, or denial‑of‑service of the entire appliance. The root cause is the absence of authentication and network‑level restrictions on the API‑gateway’s proxy to internal Docker containers, effectively turning the internal service mesh into a public attack surface. This vulnerability has been identified by the vendor as: V-2024-030 — Exposed Internal Docker Instance (LAN).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-34218"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-29T21:15:35Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Vasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) Virtual Appliance Host prior to version 22.0.1049\u00a0and Application prior to version 20.0.2786\u00a0(VA/SaaS deployments)\u00a0expose internal Docker containers through the gw\u00a0Docker instance. The gateway publishes a /meta endpoint\u00a0which lists every micro\u2011service container together with version information.\u00a0These containers are reachable directly over HTTP/HTTPS\u00a0without any access\u2011control list (ACL), authentication or rate\u2011limiting.\u00a0Consequently, any attacker on the LAN or the Internet can enumerate all internal services and their versions, interact with the exposed APIs of each microservice as an unauthenticated user, or issue malicious requests that may lead to information disclosure, privilege escalation within the container, or denial\u2011of\u2011service of the entire appliance.\u00a0The root cause is the absence of authentication and network\u2011level restrictions on the API\u2011gateway\u2019s proxy to internal Docker containers, effectively turning the internal service mesh into a public attack surface.\u00a0This vulnerability has been identified by the vendor as: V-2024-030 \u2014 Exposed Internal Docker Instance (LAN).",
"id": "GHSA-662c-whx5-q24f",
"modified": "2025-10-09T18:30:26Z",
"published": "2025-09-29T21:30:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-34218"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://help.printerlogic.com/saas/Print/Security/Security-Bulletins.htm"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://help.printerlogic.com/va/Print/Security/Security-Bulletins.htm"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pierrekim.github.io/blog/2025-04-08-vasion-printerlogic-83-vulnerabilities.html#va-exposed-docker-instances"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/vasion-print-printerlogic-exposed-internal-docker-instance"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-662H-8M8R-WFRP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-02 12:30 – Updated: 2024-10-02 12:30An unauthenticated remote attacker may use the devices traffic capture without authentication to grab plaintext administrative credentials.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-35294"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-10-02T11:15:10Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An unauthenticated remote attacker may use the devices traffic capture without authentication to grab plaintext administrative credentials.",
"id": "GHSA-662h-8m8r-wfrp",
"modified": "2024-10-02T12:30:33Z",
"published": "2024-10-02T12:30:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35294"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.schneider-elektronik.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/SAR-202405-2.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-668G-FP7V-3973
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-06-28 21:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 05:16An unauthenticated attacker within BLE proximity can remotely connect to a 7-Eleven LED Message Cup, Hello Cup 1.3.1 for Android, and bypass the application's client-side chat censor filter.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-34761"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-06-28T20:15:09Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An unauthenticated attacker within BLE proximity can remotely connect to a 7-Eleven LED Message Cup, Hello Cup 1.3.1 for Android, and bypass the application\u0027s client-side chat censor filter.",
"id": "GHSA-668g-fp7v-3973",
"modified": "2024-04-04T05:16:08Z",
"published": "2023-06-28T21:30:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-34761"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/actuator/7-Eleven-Bluetooth-Smart-Cup-Jailbreak"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/actuator/cve/blob/main/CVE-2023-34761"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-66J6-79MP-77P6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:36 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:36The official ghost docker images before 2.16.1-alpine (Alpine specific) contain a blank password for a root user. System using the ghost docker container deployed by affected versions of the docker image may allow a remote attacker to achieve root access with a blank password.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-35185"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-12-17T01:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "The official ghost docker images before 2.16.1-alpine (Alpine specific) contain a blank password for a root user. System using the ghost docker container deployed by affected versions of the docker image may allow a remote attacker to achieve root access with a blank password.",
"id": "GHSA-66j6-79mp-77p6",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:36:45Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:36:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-35185"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/koharin/koharin2/blob/main/CVE-2020-35185"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-66V8-C34P-JMRM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-24 09:30 – Updated: 2026-04-24 09:30A client holding only a read JWT scope can still register itself as a signal provider through the production kuksa.val.v2 OpenProviderStream API by sending ProvideSignalRequest.
- Obtain any valid token with only read scope.
- Connect to the normal production gRPC API (kuksa.val.v2).
- Open OpenProviderStream.
- Send ProvideSignalRequest for a target signal ID.
- Wait for the broker to forward GetProviderValueRequest.
- Reply with attacker-controlled GetProviderValueResponse.
- Other clients performing GetValue / GetValues for that signal receive forged data.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-6272"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-24T09:16:04Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A client holding only a read JWT scope can still register itself as a signal provider through the production kuksa.val.v2 OpenProviderStream API by sending ProvideSignalRequest.\n\n1. Obtain any valid token with only read scope.\n2. Connect to the normal production gRPC API (kuksa.val.v2).\n3. Open OpenProviderStream.\n4. Send ProvideSignalRequest for a target signal ID.\n5. Wait for the broker to forward GetProviderValueRequest.\n6. Reply with attacker-controlled GetProviderValueResponse.\n7. Other clients performing GetValue / GetValues for that signal receive forged data.",
"id": "GHSA-66v8-c34p-jmrm",
"modified": "2026-04-24T09:30:30Z",
"published": "2026-04-24T09:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-6272"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignment/-/issues/98"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
Mitigation
- Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Identify which of these areas require a proven user identity, and use a centralized authentication capability.
- Identify all potential communication channels, or other means of interaction with the software, to ensure that all channels are appropriately protected, including those channels that are assumed to be accessible only by authorized parties. Developers sometimes perform authentication at the primary channel, but open up a secondary channel that is assumed to be private. For example, a login mechanism may be listening on one network port, but after successful authentication, it may open up a second port where it waits for the connection, but avoids authentication because it assumes that only the authenticated party will connect to the port.
- In general, if the software or protocol allows a single session or user state to persist across multiple connections or channels, authentication and appropriate credential management need to be used throughout.
Mitigation MIT-15
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation
- Where possible, avoid implementing custom, "grow-your-own" authentication routines and consider using authentication capabilities as provided by the surrounding framework, operating system, or environment. These capabilities may avoid common weaknesses that are unique to authentication; support automatic auditing and tracking; and make it easier to provide a clear separation between authentication tasks and authorization tasks.
- In environments such as the World Wide Web, the line between authentication and authorization is sometimes blurred. If custom authentication routines are required instead of those provided by the server, then these routines must be applied to every single page, since these pages could be requested directly.
Mitigation MIT-4.5
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using libraries with authentication capabilities such as OpenSSL or the ESAPI Authenticator [REF-45].
Mitigation
When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to require strong authentication for users who should be allowed to access the data [REF-1297] [REF-1298] [REF-1302].
CAPEC-12: Choosing Message Identifier
This pattern of attack is defined by the selection of messages distributed via multicast or public information channels that are intended for another client by determining the parameter value assigned to that client. This attack allows the adversary to gain access to potentially privileged information, and to possibly perpetrate other attacks through the distribution means by impersonation. If the channel/message being manipulated is an input rather than output mechanism for the system, (such as a command bus), this style of attack could be used to change the adversary's identifier to more a privileged one.
CAPEC-166: Force the System to Reset Values
An attacker forces the target into a previous state in order to leverage potential weaknesses in the target dependent upon a prior configuration or state-dependent factors. Even in cases where an attacker may not be able to directly control the configuration of the targeted application, they may be able to reset the configuration to a prior state since many applications implement reset functions.
CAPEC-216: Communication Channel Manipulation
An adversary manipulates a setting or parameter on communications channel in order to compromise its security. This can result in information exposure, insertion/removal of information from the communications stream, and/or potentially system compromise.
CAPEC-36: Using Unpublished Interfaces or Functionality
An adversary searches for and invokes interfaces or functionality that the target system designers did not intend to be publicly available. If interfaces fail to authenticate requests, the attacker may be able to invoke functionality they are not authorized for.
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.