CWE-289
AllowedAuthentication Bypass by Alternate Name
Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete
The product performs authentication based on the name of a resource being accessed, or the name of the actor performing the access, but it does not properly check all possible names for that resource or actor.
70 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-C244-P6M5-VQJ6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-09 12:30 – Updated: 2026-02-11 19:48Impact
Authentication Bypass: A vulnerability exists in Apache Shiro that allows authentication bypass for static files when served from a case-insensitive filesystem (such as the default configuration on macOS or Windows).
The issue arises when Shiro's URL filters are configured with lower-case rules (a common default), but the underlying operating system treats mixed-case filenames as identical. An attacker can access protected static resources by varying the capitalization of the filename in the request (e.g., requesting /SECRET.TXT to bypass a rule for /secret.txt).
This issue specifically affects static file handling and does not impact dynamic resource paths that are case-sensitive.
Patches
Users should upgrade to Apache Shiro 2.1.0 or later.
Important Configuration Note: Version 2.1.0 introduces a new configuration parameter to handle case-insensitivity, which must be enabled manually to resolve the issue:
- shiro.ini:
ini filterChainResolver.caseInsensitive = true - Spring Boot (application.properties):
properties shiro.caseInsensitive=true
Note: Apache Shiro 3.0.0 (upcoming) will enable this setting by default.
Workarounds
- Ensure that the filesystem hosting the application is case-sensitive (e.g., Linux/Unix).
- Manually configure all Shiro filter chains to handle all possible case variations of protected filenames (not recommended due to complexity).
Resources
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.0.6"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.shiro:shiro-spring"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.1.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-23903"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-289"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-02-11T19:48:43Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-02-09T10:15:57Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\n**Authentication Bypass:**\nA vulnerability exists in Apache Shiro that allows authentication bypass for static files when served from a case-insensitive filesystem (such as the default configuration on macOS or Windows).\n\nThe issue arises when Shiro\u0027s URL filters are configured with lower-case rules (a common default), but the underlying operating system treats mixed-case filenames as identical. An attacker can access protected static resources by varying the capitalization of the filename in the request (e.g., requesting `/SECRET.TXT` to bypass a rule for `/secret.txt`).\n\nThis issue specifically affects static file handling and does not impact dynamic resource paths that are case-sensitive.\n\n### Patches\nUsers should upgrade to Apache Shiro **2.1.0** or later.\n\n**Important Configuration Note:**\nVersion 2.1.0 introduces a new configuration parameter to handle case-insensitivity, which must be enabled manually to resolve the issue:\n\n* **shiro.ini:**\n ```ini\n filterChainResolver.caseInsensitive = true\n ```\n* **Spring Boot (application.properties):**\n ```properties\n shiro.caseInsensitive=true\n ```\n\n*Note: Apache Shiro 3.0.0 (upcoming) will enable this setting by default.*\n\n### Workarounds\n* Ensure that the filesystem hosting the application is case-sensitive (e.g., Linux/Unix).\n* Manually configure all Shiro filter chains to handle all possible case variations of protected filenames (not recommended due to complexity).\n\n### Resources\n* [CVE-2026-23903](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23903)\n* [Mailing List Announcement](https://lists.apache.org/thread/5jjf0hnjcol58z2m5y255c7scz1lnp8k)\n* [OSS-Security List](http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/02/08/1)",
"id": "GHSA-c244-p6m5-vqj6",
"modified": "2026-02-11T19:48:43Z",
"published": "2026-02-09T12:30:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23903"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/shiro/commit/3b9638b957495004599aeaf24ba8949e309f26e8"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/shiro"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/5jjf0hnjcol58z2m5y255c7scz1lnp8k"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/02/08/1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Apache Shiro has an Authentication Bypass"
}
GHSA-CG23-QF8F-62RR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-13 18:29 – Updated: 2024-11-14 23:55Description
When consuming a persisted remember-me cookie, Symfony does not check if the username persisted in the database matches the username attached with the cookie, leading to authentication bypass.
Resolution
The PersistentRememberMeHandler class now ensures the submitted username is the cookie owner.
The patch for this issue is available here for branch 5.4.
Credits
We would like to thank Moritz Rauch - Pentryx AG for reporting the issue and Jérémy Derussé for providing the fix.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "symfony/security-http"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "5.3.0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.4.47"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "symfony/security-http"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "6.0.0-BETA1"
},
{
"fixed": "6.4.15"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "symfony/security-http"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "7.0.0-BETA1"
},
{
"fixed": "7.1.8"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-51996"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-287",
"CWE-289"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-11-13T18:29:04Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-11-13T17:15:11Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Description\n\nWhen consuming a persisted remember-me cookie, Symfony does not check if the username persisted in the database matches the username attached with the cookie, leading to authentication bypass.\n\n### Resolution\n\nThe `PersistentRememberMeHandler` class now ensures the submitted username is the cookie owner.\n\nThe patch for this issue is available [here](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/commit/81354d392c5f0b7a52bcbd729d6f82501e94135a) for branch 5.4.\n\n### Credits\n\nWe would like to thank Moritz Rauch - Pentryx AG for reporting the issue and J\u00e9r\u00e9my Deruss\u00e9 for providing the fix.",
"id": "GHSA-cg23-qf8f-62rr",
"modified": "2024-11-14T23:55:43Z",
"published": "2024-11-13T18:29:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/symfony/symfony/security/advisories/GHSA-cg23-qf8f-62rr"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-51996"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/symfony/symfony/commit/81354d392c5f0b7a52bcbd729d6f82501e94135a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/security-advisories/blob/master/symfony/security-http/CVE-2024-51996.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/security-advisories/blob/master/symfony/symfony/CVE-2024-51996.yaml"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/symfony/symfony"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://symfony.com/cve-2024-51996"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Symfony has an Authentication Bypass via RememberMe"
}
GHSA-CV5F-6R7G-8Q4W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-31 15:30 – Updated: 2025-03-31 15:30Unraid 7.0.0 before 7.0.1 allows remote users to access the Unraid WebGUI and web console as root without authentication if a container is running in Host networking mode with Use Tailscale enabled.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-29266"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-289"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-31T13:15:43Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Unraid 7.0.0 before 7.0.1 allows remote users to access the Unraid WebGUI and web console as root without authentication if a container is running in Host networking mode with Use Tailscale enabled.",
"id": "GHSA-cv5f-6r7g-8q4w",
"modified": "2025-03-31T15:30:44Z",
"published": "2025-03-31T15:30:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-29266"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.unraid.net/unraid-os/release-notes/7.0.1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://edac.dev/security/CVE-2025-29266"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/unraid/webgui"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FV2H-753J-9G39
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-09-20 23:01 – Updated: 2024-10-11 15:37Impact
When a response is processed, the issuer of the Identity Provider is not sufficiently validated. This could allow a malicious identity provider to craft a Saml2 response that is processed as if issued by another identity provider. It is also possible for a malicious end user to cause stored state intended for one identity provider to be used when processing the response from another provider.
An application is impacted if they rely on any of these features in their authentication/authorization logic: * the issuer of the generated identity and claims * items in the stored request state (AuthenticationProperties)
Patches
Patched in version 2.9.2 and 1.0.3. All previous versions are vulnerable.
Workarounds
The AcsCommandResultCreated notification can be used to add the validation required if an upgrade to patched packages is not possible.
References
The patch is linked to https://github.com/Sustainsys/Saml2/issues/712 and https://github.com/Sustainsys/Saml2/issues/713
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "Sustainsys.Saml2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.0.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "Sustainsys.Saml2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.9.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "Kentor.AuthServices"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "0.23.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-41890"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-289",
"CWE-294"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-09-20T23:01:52Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2023-09-19T15:15:52Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\nWhen a response is processed, the issuer of the Identity Provider is not sufficiently validated. This could allow a malicious identity provider to craft a Saml2 response that is processed as if issued by another identity provider. It is also possible for a malicious end user to cause stored state intended for one identity provider to be used when processing the response from another provider.\n\nAn application is impacted if they rely on any of these features in their authentication/authorization logic:\n* the issuer of the generated identity and claims\n* items in the stored request state (AuthenticationProperties)\n\n### Patches\nPatched in version 2.9.2 and 1.0.3. All previous versions are vulnerable.\n\n### Workarounds\nThe `AcsCommandResultCreated` notification can be used to add the validation required if an upgrade to patched packages is not possible.\n\n### References\nThe patch is linked to https://github.com/Sustainsys/Saml2/issues/712 and https://github.com/Sustainsys/Saml2/issues/713\n",
"id": "GHSA-fv2h-753j-9g39",
"modified": "2024-10-11T15:37:58Z",
"published": "2023-09-20T23:01:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Sustainsys/Saml2/security/advisories/GHSA-fv2h-753j-9g39"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-41890"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Sustainsys/Saml2/issues/712"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Sustainsys/Saml2/issues/713"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/Sustainsys/Saml2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Sustainsys.Saml2 Insufficient Identity Provider Issuer Validation"
}
GHSA-G57M-HR98-5M89
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-26 03:31 – Updated: 2026-08-10 15:33A flaw in Node.js TLS hostname handling can cause Node.js unicode dot separator handling can lead to tls wildcard-depth authentication bypass due to resolver and verifier hostname normalization mismat.
This can lead to confidentiality impact or bypass of the intended security boundary under affected configurations.
This vulnerability affects all supported release lines: Node.js 22, Node.js 24, and Node.js 26.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-48618"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-176",
"CWE-289"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-26T02:16:52Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A flaw in Node.js TLS hostname handling can cause Node.js unicode dot separator handling can lead to tls wildcard-depth authentication bypass due to resolver and verifier hostname normalization mismat.\n\nThis can lead to confidentiality impact or bypass of the intended security boundary under affected configurations.\n\nThis vulnerability affects all supported release lines: **Node.js 22**, **Node.js 24**, and **Node.js 26**.",
"id": "GHSA-g57m-hr98-5m89",
"modified": "2026-08-10T15:33:29Z",
"published": "2026-06-26T03:31:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-48618"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-48618.json"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/june-2026-security-releases"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2493337"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-48618"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:9455"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:7378"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:52399"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:41947"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:39868"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:39246"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:35892"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:35891"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:35842"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:35841"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30172"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:29012"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:28727"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G7CR-9H7Q-4QXQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-12 14:21 – Updated: 2026-04-06 22:45OpenClaw's Microsoft Teams plugin widened group sender authorization when a team/channel route allowlist was configured but groupAllowFrom was empty. Before the fix, a matching route allowlist entry could cause the message handler to synthesize wildcard sender authorization for that route, allowing any sender in the matched team/channel to bypass the intended groupPolicy: "allowlist" sender check.
This does not affect default unauthenticated access, but it does weaken a documented Teams group authorization boundary and can allow unauthorized group senders to trigger replies in allowlisted Teams routes.
Affected Packages / Versions
- Package:
openclaw(npm) - Latest published vulnerable version:
2026.3.7 - Affected range:
<= 2026.3.7 - Fixed in released version:
2026.3.8
Fix Commit(s)
88aee9161e0e6d32e810a25711e32a808a1777b2
Release Verification
- Verified fixed in GitHub release
v2026.3.8published on March 9, 2026. - Verified
npm view openclaw versionresolves to2026.3.8. - Verified the release contains the regression test covering the Teams route-allowlist sender-bypass case and that the test passes against the
v2026.3.8tree.
Thanks @zpbrent for reporting.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2026.3.7"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.3.8"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-34506"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-289"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-12T14:21:35Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "OpenClaw\u0027s Microsoft Teams plugin widened group sender authorization when a team/channel route allowlist was configured but `groupAllowFrom` was empty. Before the fix, a matching route allowlist entry could cause the message handler to synthesize wildcard sender authorization for that route, allowing any sender in the matched team/channel to bypass the intended `groupPolicy: \"allowlist\"` sender check.\n\nThis does not affect default unauthenticated access, but it does weaken a documented Teams group authorization boundary and can allow unauthorized group senders to trigger replies in allowlisted Teams routes.\n\n## Affected Packages / Versions\n\n- Package: `openclaw` (npm)\n- Latest published vulnerable version: `2026.3.7`\n- Affected range: `\u003c= 2026.3.7`\n- Fixed in released version: `2026.3.8`\n\n## Fix Commit(s)\n\n- `88aee9161e0e6d32e810a25711e32a808a1777b2`\n\n## Release Verification\n\n- Verified fixed in GitHub release `v2026.3.8` published on March 9, 2026.\n- Verified `npm view openclaw version` resolves to `2026.3.8`.\n- Verified the release contains the regression test covering the Teams route-allowlist sender-bypass case and that the test passes against the `v2026.3.8` tree.\n\nThanks @zpbrent for reporting.",
"id": "GHSA-g7cr-9h7q-4qxq",
"modified": "2026-04-06T22:45:49Z",
"published": "2026-03-12T14:21:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-g7cr-9h7q-4qxq"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34506"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/88aee9161e0e6d32e810a25711e32a808a1777b2"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-sender-allowlist-bypass-in-microsoft-teams-plugin-via-route-allowlist-configuration"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "OpenClaw\u0027s MS Teams sender allowlist bypass when route allowlist is configured and sender allowlist is empty"
}
GHSA-H2P8-37QR-QFR9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-20 18:30 – Updated: 2025-12-24 00:30A vulnerability was found in the Cryostat HTTP API. Cryostat's HTTP API binds to all network interfaces, allowing possible external visibility and access to the API port if Network Policies are disabled, allowing an unauthenticated, malicious attacker to jeopardize the environment.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-8415"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-289"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-08-20T17:15:37Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability was found in the Cryostat HTTP API. Cryostat\u0027s HTTP API binds to all network interfaces, allowing possible external visibility and access to the API port if Network Policies are disabled, allowing an unauthenticated, malicious attacker to jeopardize the environment.",
"id": "GHSA-h2p8-37qr-qfr9",
"modified": "2025-12-24T00:30:12Z",
"published": "2025-08-20T18:30:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-8415"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/cryostatio/cryostat/pull/1001"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:14919"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-8415"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2385773"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/cryostatio/cryostat/releases/tag/v4.0.2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-HHW8-PPCX-3FJJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-08-14 06:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 06:54The Dataprobe iBoot PDU running firmware version 1.43.03312023 or earlier is vulnerable to authentication bypass in the REST API due to the mishandling of special characters when parsing credentials.Successful exploitation allows the malicious agent to obtain a valid authorization token and read information relating to the state of the relays and power distribution.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-3263"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-287",
"CWE-289"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-08-14T05:15:09Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The Dataprobe iBoot PDU running firmware version 1.43.03312023 or earlier is vulnerable to authentication bypass in the REST API due to the mishandling of special characters when parsing credentials.Successful exploitation allows the malicious agent to obtain a valid authorization token and read information relating to the state of the relays and power distribution.",
"id": "GHSA-hhw8-ppcx-3fjj",
"modified": "2024-04-04T06:54:35Z",
"published": "2023-08-14T06:30:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-3263"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.trellix.com/en-us/about/newsroom/stories/research/the-threat-lurking-in-data-centers.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-MWXV-35WR-4VVJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-03 18:54 – Updated: 2026-03-20 21:12Summary
Gateway plugin route auth protection for /api/channels could be bypassed using encoded dot-segment traversal (for example ..%2f) in path variants that plugin handlers normalize.
Affected Packages / Versions
- Package: npm
openclaw - Latest published vulnerable version:
2026.2.25 - Vulnerable version range:
<= 2026.2.25 - Patched version:
2026.2.26(planned next release)
Impact
Under affected versions, crafted alternate paths could bypass gateway auth checks for protected plugin channel routes when plugin handlers decode/canonicalize the incoming path and then route to /api/channels/... handlers.
Fix Commit(s)
258d615c45527ffda37cecd08cd268f97461bde0
Release Process Note
patched_versions is pre-set to the planned next release (2026.2.26). After npm publish, maintainers only need to publish the advisory.
OpenClaw thanks @zpbrent for reporting.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2026.2.25"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.2.26"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-32036"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-22",
"CWE-289"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-03T18:54:35Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-19T22:16:39Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\nGateway plugin route auth protection for `/api/channels` could be bypassed using encoded dot-segment traversal (for example `..%2f`) in path variants that plugin handlers normalize.\n\n### Affected Packages / Versions\n- Package: npm `openclaw`\n- Latest published vulnerable version: `2026.2.25`\n- Vulnerable version range: `\u003c= 2026.2.25`\n- Patched version: `2026.2.26` (planned next release)\n\n### Impact\nUnder affected versions, crafted alternate paths could bypass gateway auth checks for protected plugin channel routes when plugin handlers decode/canonicalize the incoming path and then route to `/api/channels/...` handlers.\n\n### Fix Commit(s)\n- `258d615c45527ffda37cecd08cd268f97461bde0`\n\n### Release Process Note\n`patched_versions` is pre-set to the planned next release (`2026.2.26`). After npm publish, maintainers only need to publish the advisory.\n\nOpenClaw thanks @zpbrent for reporting.",
"id": "GHSA-mwxv-35wr-4vvj",
"modified": "2026-03-20T21:12:44Z",
"published": "2026-03-03T18:54:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-mwxv-35wr-4vvj"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-32036"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/258d615c45527ffda37cecd08cd268f97461bde0"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-authentication-bypass-via-encoded-dot-segment-traversal-in-api-channels"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "OpenClaw has gateway plugin auth bypass via encoded dot-segment traversal in protected /api/channels paths"
}
GHSA-PCHF-49FH-W34R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-21 23:02 – Updated: 2026-01-23 15:46Impact
What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?
This issue impacts every Soft Serve instance.
A critical authentication bypass allows an attacker to impersonate any user (including Admin) by "offering" the victim's public key during the SSH handshake before authenticating with their own valid key. This occurs because the user identity is stored in the session context during the "offer" phase and is not cleared if that specific authentication attempt fails.
Patches
Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?
Yes, please upgrade to version 0.11.3 as soon as possible.
Workarounds
Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?
You need to upgrade
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.11.2"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.11.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-24058"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-289"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-01-21T23:02:07Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-22T22:16:21Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\n_What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_\n\nThis issue impacts every Soft Serve instance.\n\nA critical authentication bypass allows an attacker to impersonate any user (including Admin) by \"offering\" the victim\u0027s public key during the SSH handshake before authenticating with their own valid key. This occurs because the user identity is stored in the session context during the \"offer\" phase and is not cleared if that specific authentication attempt fails.\n\n### Patches\n_Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_\n\nYes, please upgrade to version 0.11.3 as soon as possible.\n\n### Workarounds\n_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_\n\nYou need to upgrade",
"id": "GHSA-pchf-49fh-w34r",
"modified": "2026-01-23T15:46:52Z",
"published": "2026-01-21T23:02:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/security/advisories/GHSA-pchf-49fh-w34r"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-24058"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/commit/8539f9ad39918b67d612a35785a2b4326efc8741"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/releases/tag/v0.11.3"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Soft Serve Affected by an Authentication Bypass"
}
Mitigation MIT-44
Strategy: Input Validation
Avoid making decisions based on names of resources (e.g. files) if those resources can have alternate names.
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
Mitigation MIT-20
Strategy: Input Validation
Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked.
No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.