CWE-280
AllowedImproper Handling of Insufficient Permissions or Privileges
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product does not handle or incorrectly handles when it has insufficient privileges to access resources or functionality as specified by their permissions. This may cause it to follow unexpected code paths that may leave the product in an invalid state.
279 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-5C4F-9PQ9-6C77
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-12 15:14 – Updated: 2026-08-12 15:14Impact
Affected versions of Winter CMS did not enforce per-template-type permission checks in the CMS section's AJAX handlers. The CMS controller (Cms\Controllers\Index) used OR-logic across its five permissions (cms.manage_pages, cms.manage_partials, cms.manage_layouts, cms.manage_content, cms.manage_assets) to control access to the section as a whole, but individual handlers such as onSave(), onDelete(), and onDeleteTemplates() did not verify that the authenticated user holds the specific permission corresponding to the requested template type.
This allowed a backend user with any single Theme Editor permission (e.g. cms.manage_pages) to craft AJAX requests targeting template types outside their authorized scope — for example, deleting layouts, modifying partials, or reading content files.
In addition, the AssetList widget was registered for all users who passed the controller gate regardless of whether they held the cms.manage_assets permission, and its onUpload() handler was missing the validateRequestTheme() call that is present on all other mutating handlers in the same widget. This allowed unauthorized file uploads into the active theme's asset directory.
To actively exploit this security issue, an attacker would need access to the Backend with a user account with any of the following permissions:
cms.manage_pagescms.manage_partialscms.manage_layoutscms.manage_contentcms.manage_assets
The Winter CMS maintainers strongly recommend that all Winter CMS sites that rely on granular CMS permission assignments (specifically users with only access to cms.manage_content to only be able to edit content files through the Theme Editor) to update immediately.
Patches
Per-template-type permission checks are now enforced on all Theme Editor AJAX handlers, the AssetList widget is only registered for users with the cms.manage_assets permission, and onUpload() now includes theme validation consistent with the other mutating handlers.
This security issue has been fixed as of v1.2.13.
Workarounds
If users cannot upgrade, they may apply the following changes to their Winter CMS installation manually to resolve this issue:
- In
modules/cms/controllers/Index.php, wrap each widget registration in the constructor with the correspondinghasAccess()check, and add avalidateRequestType()call to theindex_onOpenTemplate(),onSave(),onCreateTemplate(),onDeleteTemplates(),onDelete(),onCommit(), andonReset()handlers that verifies the user holds the permission for the requested template type. - In
modules/cms/widgets/AssetList.php, add a$this->validateRequestTheme()call at the top of theonUpload()method.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.2.12"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "winter/wn-cms-module"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.2.13"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-32639"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-280"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-12T15:14:47Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nAffected versions of Winter CMS did not enforce per-template-type permission checks in the CMS section\u0027s AJAX handlers. The CMS controller (`Cms\\Controllers\\Index`) used OR-logic across its five permissions (`cms.manage_pages`, `cms.manage_partials`, `cms.manage_layouts`, `cms.manage_content`, `cms.manage_assets`) to control access to the section as a whole, but individual handlers such as `onSave()`, `onDelete()`, and `onDeleteTemplates()` did not verify that the authenticated user holds the specific permission corresponding to the requested template type.\n\nThis allowed a backend user with any single Theme Editor permission (e.g. `cms.manage_pages`) to craft AJAX requests targeting template types outside their authorized scope \u2014 for example, deleting layouts, modifying partials, or reading content files.\n\nIn addition, the `AssetList` widget was registered for all users who passed the controller gate regardless of whether they held the `cms.manage_assets` permission, and its `onUpload()` handler was missing the `validateRequestTheme()` call that is present on all other mutating handlers in the same widget. This allowed unauthorized file uploads into the active theme\u0027s asset directory.\n\nTo actively exploit this security issue, an attacker would need access to the Backend with a user account with any of the following permissions:\n\n- `cms.manage_pages`\n- `cms.manage_partials`\n- `cms.manage_layouts`\n- `cms.manage_content`\n- `cms.manage_assets`\n\nThe Winter CMS maintainers strongly recommend that all Winter CMS sites that rely on granular CMS permission assignments (specifically users with only access to `cms.manage_content` to only be able to edit content files through the Theme Editor) to update immediately.\n\n### Patches\n\nPer-template-type permission checks are now enforced on all Theme Editor AJAX handlers, the `AssetList` widget is only registered for users with the `cms.manage_assets` permission, and `onUpload()` now includes theme validation consistent with the other mutating handlers.\n\nThis security issue has been fixed as of v1.2.13.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nIf users cannot upgrade, they may apply the following changes to their Winter CMS installation manually to resolve this issue:\n\n1. In `modules/cms/controllers/Index.php`, wrap each widget registration in the constructor with the corresponding `hasAccess()` check, and add a `validateRequestType()` call to the `index_onOpenTemplate()`, `onSave()`, `onCreateTemplate()`, `onDeleteTemplates()`, `onDelete()`, `onCommit()`, and `onReset()` handlers that verifies the user holds the permission for the requested template type.\n2. In `modules/cms/widgets/AssetList.php`, add a `$this-\u003evalidateRequestTheme()` call at the top of the `onUpload()` method.",
"id": "GHSA-5c4f-9pq9-6c77",
"modified": "2026-08-12T15:14:47Z",
"published": "2026-08-12T15:14:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/wintercms/winter/security/advisories/GHSA-5c4f-9pq9-6c77"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/wintercms/winter"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/wintercms/winter/releases/tag/v1.2.13"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Winter: Broken access control in `Cms\\Controllers\\Index` allows cross-template actions and unauthorized asset uploads"
}
GHSA-5GGP-FMJ8-FXVF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-06 21:30 – Updated: 2024-12-06 21:30Ruijie Reyee OS versions 2.206.x up to but not including 2.320.x could allow MQTT clients connecting with device credentials to send messages to some topics. Attackers with device credentials could issue commands to other devices on behalf of Ruijie's cloud.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-46874"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-280"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-06T19:15:12Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Ruijie Reyee OS versions 2.206.x up to but not including 2.320.x could allow MQTT clients connecting with device credentials to send messages to some topics. Attackers with device credentials could issue commands to other devices on behalf of Ruijie\u0027s cloud.",
"id": "GHSA-5ggp-fmj8-fxvf",
"modified": "2024-12-06T21:30:39Z",
"published": "2024-12-06T21:30:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46874"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-24-338-01"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-5GW4-7CFM-H82Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-12 15:30 – Updated: 2026-01-12 15:30APTIOV contains a vulnerability in BIOS where a user may cause “Improper Handling of Insufficient Permissions or Privileges” by local access. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to escalation of authorization and potentially impact Integrity and Availability.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-58770"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-280"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-12T15:15:53Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "APTIOV contains a vulnerability in BIOS where a user may cause \u201cImproper Handling of Insufficient Permissions or Privileges\u201d by local access. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to escalation of authorization and potentially impact Integrity and Availability.",
"id": "GHSA-5gw4-7cfm-h82q",
"modified": "2026-01-12T15:30:35Z",
"published": "2025-12-12T15:30:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-58770"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://go.ami.com/hubfs/Security%20Advisories/2025/AMI-SA-2025009.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-5M5W-J5F9-R7RR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-07 06:30 – Updated: 2025-04-07 06:30Memory write permission bypass vulnerability in the kernel futex module Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-31172"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-280"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-07T04:15:20Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Memory write permission bypass vulnerability in the kernel futex module\nImpact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality.",
"id": "GHSA-5m5w-j5f9-r7rr",
"modified": "2025-04-07T06:30:28Z",
"published": "2025-04-07T06:30:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-31172"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://consumer.huawei.com/en/support/bulletin/2025/4"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5MWG-54J5-6CH5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-31 18:31 – Updated: 2026-04-03 21:31A security audit identified a privilege escalation vulnerability in Operations Agent(<=OA 12.29) on Windows. Under specific conditions Operations Agent may run executables from specific writeable locations.Thanks to Manuel Rickli & Philippe Leiser of Oneconsult AG for reporting this vulnerability
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-2123"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-280"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-31T18:16:46Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A security audit identified a privilege escalation\nvulnerability in Operations Agent(\u003c=OA 12.29) on Windows. Under specific conditions\nOperations Agent may run executables from specific writeable locations.Thanks to Manuel Rickli \u0026 Philippe Leiser of\nOneconsult AG for reporting this vulnerability",
"id": "GHSA-5mwg-54j5-6ch5",
"modified": "2026-04-03T21:31:39Z",
"published": "2026-03-31T18:31:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-2123"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://portal.microfocus.com/s/article/KM000046068"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-5WF4-QCH9-828F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-16 21:31 – Updated: 2024-08-28 18:31In convertToComponentName of DreamService.java, there is a possible way to launch arbitrary protected activities due to intent redirection. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-0015"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-280"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-02-16T19:15:08Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In convertToComponentName of DreamService.java, there is a possible way to launch arbitrary protected activities due to intent redirection. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.",
"id": "GHSA-5wf4-qch9-828f",
"modified": "2024-08-28T18:31:52Z",
"published": "2024-02-16T21:31:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-0015"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://android.googlesource.com/platform/frameworks/base/+/2ce1b7fd37273ea19fbbb6daeeaa6212357b9a70"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2024-01-01"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5WR6-6XQ7-GXJ9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-08-16 15:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 06:59Dell PowerScale OneFS 8.2x -9.5x contains a privilege escalation vulnerability. A local attacker with high privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability, to bypass mode protections and gain elevated privileges.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-32489"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-280"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-08-16T14:15:11Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "\nDell PowerScale OneFS 8.2x -9.5x contains a privilege escalation vulnerability. A local attacker with high privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability, to bypass mode protections and gain elevated privileges. \u00a0\n\n",
"id": "GHSA-5wr6-6xq7-gxj9",
"modified": "2024-04-04T06:59:36Z",
"published": "2023-08-16T15:30:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-32489"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000216717/dsa-2023-269-security-update-for-dell-powerscale-onefs-for-multiple-security-vulnerabilities"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5XP9-26PV-GH7V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-10 18:32 – Updated: 2025-06-10 18:32A improper handling of insufficient permissions or privileges in Fortinet FortiPAM 1.4.0 through 1.4.1, 1.3.0, 1.2.0, 1.1.0 through 1.1.2, 1.0.0 through 1.0.3, FortiSRA 1.4.0 through 1.4.1 allows attacker to improper access control via specially crafted HTTP requests
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-22256"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-280"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-06-10T17:21:08Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A improper handling of insufficient permissions or privileges in Fortinet FortiPAM 1.4.0 through 1.4.1, 1.3.0, 1.2.0, 1.1.0 through 1.1.2, 1.0.0 through 1.0.3, FortiSRA 1.4.0 through 1.4.1 allows attacker to improper access control via specially crafted HTTP requests",
"id": "GHSA-5xp9-26pv-gh7v",
"modified": "2025-06-10T18:32:27Z",
"published": "2025-06-10T18:32:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22256"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-25-008"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5XWH-RF6V-6CJ6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-10 21:32 – Updated: 2026-07-13 21:31Kernel software installed and running inside a Host VM may post improper commands to the GPU Firmware to trigger a GPU register access which can lead to privilege escalation.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-45196"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-280"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-10T21:16:54Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Kernel software installed and running inside a Host VM may post improper commands to the GPU Firmware to trigger a GPU register access which can lead to privilege escalation.",
"id": "GHSA-5xwh-rf6v-6cj6",
"modified": "2026-07-13T21:31:17Z",
"published": "2026-07-10T21:32:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45196"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.imaginationtech.com/gpu-driver-vulnerabilities"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-642H-MX8Q-47P2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-11-15 12:00 – Updated: 2022-11-21 23:47The Asset Libraries module in Liferay Portal 7.3.5 through 7.4.3.28, and Liferay DXP 7.3 before update 8, and DXP 7.4 before update 29 does not properly check permissions of asset libraries, which allows remote authenticated users to view asset libraries via the UI.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 7.4.3.28"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "com.liferay.portal:release.portal.bom"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "7.3.5"
},
{
"fixed": "7.4.3.48"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-42126"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-280",
"CWE-284"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-11-21T23:47:59Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-11-15T01:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Asset Libraries module in Liferay Portal 7.3.5 through 7.4.3.28, and Liferay DXP 7.3 before update 8, and DXP 7.4 before update 29 does not properly check permissions of asset libraries, which allows remote authenticated users to view asset libraries via the UI.",
"id": "GHSA-642h-mx8q-47p2",
"modified": "2022-11-21T23:47:59Z",
"published": "2022-11-15T12:00:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-42126"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://issues.liferay.com/browse/LPE-17593"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://portal.liferay.dev/learn/security/known-vulnerabilities/-/asset_publisher/HbL5mxmVrnXW/content/cve-2022-42126"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://liferay.com"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Missing permissions check in Liferay Portal"
}
Mitigation MIT-46
Strategy: Separation of Privilege
- Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
- Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
Mitigation
Always check to see if you have successfully accessed a resource or system functionality, and use proper error handling if it is unsuccessful. Do this even when you are operating in a highly privileged mode, because errors or environmental conditions might still cause a failure. For example, environments with highly granular permissions/privilege models, such as Windows or Linux capabilities, can cause unexpected failures.
No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.