CWE-184
AllowedIncomplete List of Disallowed Inputs
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product implements a protection mechanism that relies on a list of inputs (or properties of inputs) that are not allowed by policy or otherwise require other action to neutralize before additional processing takes place, but the list is incomplete.
425 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-WCM7-94WG-H74H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-24 00:31 – Updated: 2026-05-04 21:54Duplicate Advisory
This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-6p8r-6m93-557f. This link is maintained to preserve external references.
Original Description
OpenClaw before 2026.3.28 contains an environment variable sanitization vulnerability where GIT_TEMPLATE_DIR and AWS_CONFIG_FILE are not blocked in the host-env blocklist. Attackers can exploit approved exec requests to redirect git or AWS CLI behavior through attacker-controlled configuration files to execute untrusted code or load malicious credentials.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.3.28"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-184"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-04T21:54:39Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-23T22:16:38Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Duplicate Advisory\nThis advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-6p8r-6m93-557f. This link is maintained to preserve external references.\n\n### Original Description\nOpenClaw before 2026.3.28 contains an environment variable sanitization vulnerability where GIT_TEMPLATE_DIR and AWS_CONFIG_FILE are not blocked in the host-env blocklist. Attackers can exploit approved exec requests to redirect git or AWS CLI behavior through attacker-controlled configuration files to execute untrusted code or load malicious credentials.",
"id": "GHSA-wcm7-94wg-h74h",
"modified": "2026-05-04T21:54:39Z",
"published": "2026-04-24T00:31:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-m866-6qv5-p2fg"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41332"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-code-execution-via-missing-environment-variable-blocklist"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Duplicate Advisory: OpenClaw host-env blocklist missing `GIT_TEMPLATE_DIR` and `AWS_CONFIG_FILE` allows code execution via env override",
"withdrawn": "2026-05-04T21:54:39Z"
}
GHSA-WFQ2-52F7-7QVJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-09 20:52 – Updated: 2026-01-11 14:54Fickling's assessment
runpy was added to the list of unsafe imports (https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/9a2b3f89bd0598b528d62c10a64c1986fcb09f66).
Original report
Summary
Fickling versions up to and including 0.1.6 do not treat Python’s runpy module as unsafe. Because of this, a malicious pickle that uses runpy.run_path() or runpy.run_module() is classified as SUSPICIOUS instead of OVERTLY_MALICIOUS.
If a user relies on Fickling’s output to decide whether a pickle is safe to deserialize, this misclassification can lead them to execute attacker-controlled code on their system.
This affects any workflow or product that uses Fickling as a security gate for pickle deserialization.
Details
The runpy module is missing from fickling's block list of unsafe module imports in fickling/analysis.py. This is the same root cause as CVE-2025-67748 (pty) and CVE-2025-67747 (marshal/types).
Incriminated source code:
- File: fickling/analysis.py
- Class: UnsafeImports
- Issue: The blocklist does not include runpy, runpy.run_path, runpy.run_module, or runpy._run_code
Reference to similar fix:
- PR #187 added pty to the blocklist to fix CVE-2025-67748
- PR #108 documented the blocklist approach
- The same fix pattern should be applied for runpy
How the bypass works:
1. Attacker creates a pickle using runpy.run_path() in __reduce__
2. Fickling's UnsafeImports analysis does not flag runpy as dangerous
3. Only the UnusedVariables heuristic triggers, resulting in SUSPICIOUS severity
4. The pickle should be rated OVERTLY_MALICIOUS like os.system, eval, and exec
Tested behavior (fickling 0.1.6):
| Function | Fickling Severity | RCE Capable |
|---|---|---|
| os.system | LIKELY_OVERTLY_MALICIOUS | Yes |
| eval | OVERTLY_MALICIOUS | Yes |
| exec | OVERTLY_MALICIOUS | Yes |
| runpy.run_path | SUSPICIOUS | Yes ← BYPASS |
| runpy.run_module | SUSPICIOUS | Yes ← BYPASS |
Suggested fix:
Add to the unsafe imports blocklist in fickling/analysis.py:
- runpy
- runpy.run_path
- runpy.run_module
- runpy._run_code
- runpy._run_module_code
PoC
Complete instructions, including specific configuration details, to reproduce the vulnerability.Environment: - Python 3.13.2 - fickling 0.1.6 (latest version, installed via pip)
Step 1: Create malicious pickle
import pickle import runpy
class MaliciousPayload: def reduce(self): return (runpy.run_path, ("/tmp/malicious_script.py",))
with open("malicious.pkl", "wb") as f: pickle.dump(MaliciousPayload(), f)
Step 2: Create the malicious script that will be executed
echo 'print("RCE ACHIEVED"); open("/tmp/pwned","w").write("compromised")' > /tmp/malicious_script.py
Step 3: Analyze with fickling
fickling --check-safety malicious.pkl
Expected output (if properly detected): Severity: OVERTLY_MALICIOUS
Actual output (bypass confirmed):
{
"severity": "SUSPICIOUS",
"analysis": "Variable _var0 is assigned value run_path(...) but unused afterward; this is suspicious and indicative of a malicious pickle file",
"detailed_results": {
"AnalysisResult": {
"UnusedVariables": ["_var0", "run_path(...)"]
}
}
}
Step 4: Prove RCE by loading the pickle
import pickle pickle.load(open("malicious.pkl", "rb"))
Check: ls /tmp/pwned <-- file exists, proving code execution
Pickle disassembly (evidence):
0: \x80 PROTO 4
2: \x95 FRAME 92
11: \x8c SHORT_BINUNICODE 'runpy' 18: \x94 MEMOIZE (as 0) 19: \x8c SHORT_BINUNICODE 'run_path' 29: \x94 MEMOIZE (as 1) 30: \x93 STACK_GLOBAL 31: \x94 MEMOIZE (as 2) 32: \x8c SHORT_BINUNICODE '/tmp/malicious_script.py' ... 100: R REDUCE 101: \x94 MEMOIZE (as 5) 102: . STOP
Impact
Vulnerability Type: Incomplete blocklist leading to safety check bypass (CWE-184) and arbitrary code execution via insecure deserialization (CWE-502).
Who is impacted: Any user or system that relies on fickling to vet pickle files for security issues before loading them. This includes:
Attack scenario: An attacker uploads a malicious ML model or pickle file to a model repository. The victim's pipeline uses fickling to scan uploads. Fickling rates the file as "SUSPICIOUS" (not "OVERTLY_MALICIOUS"), so the file is not rejected. When the victim loads the model, arbitrary code executes on their system.
Severity: HIGH
- The attacker achieves arbitrary code execution
- The security control (fickling) is specifically designed to prevent this
- The bypass requires no special conditions beyond crafting the pickle with runpy
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.1.6"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "fickling"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.1.7"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-22606"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-184",
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-01-09T20:52:40Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-10T02:15:49Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "# Fickling\u0027s assessment\n\n`runpy` was added to the list of unsafe imports (https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/9a2b3f89bd0598b528d62c10a64c1986fcb09f66).\n\n# Original report\n\n### Summary\nFickling versions up to and including 0.1.6 do not treat Python\u2019s runpy module as unsafe. Because of this, a malicious pickle that uses runpy.run_path() or runpy.run_module() is classified as SUSPICIOUS instead of OVERTLY_MALICIOUS.\n\nIf a user relies on Fickling\u2019s output to decide whether a pickle is safe to deserialize, this misclassification can lead them to execute attacker-controlled code on their system.\n\nThis affects any workflow or product that uses Fickling as a security gate for pickle deserialization.\n\n### Details\nThe `runpy` module is missing from fickling\u0027s block list of unsafe module imports in `fickling/analysis.py`. This is the same root cause as CVE-2025-67748 (pty) and CVE-2025-67747 (marshal/types).\n\nIncriminated source code:\n- File: `fickling/analysis.py`\n- Class: `UnsafeImports`\n- Issue: The blocklist does not include `runpy`, `runpy.run_path`, `runpy.run_module`, or `runpy._run_code`\n\nReference to similar fix:\n- PR #187 added `pty` to the blocklist to fix CVE-2025-67748\n- PR #108 documented the blocklist approach\n- The same fix pattern should be applied for `runpy`\n\nHow the bypass works:\n1. Attacker creates a pickle using `runpy.run_path()` in `__reduce__`\n2. Fickling\u0027s `UnsafeImports` analysis does not flag `runpy` as dangerous\n3. Only the `UnusedVariables` heuristic triggers, resulting in `SUSPICIOUS` severity\n4. The pickle should be rated `OVERTLY_MALICIOUS` like `os.system`, `eval`, and `exec`\n\nTested behavior (fickling 0.1.6):\n\n| Function | Fickling Severity | RCE Capable |\n|-------------------|----------------------------|-------------|\n| os.system | LIKELY_OVERTLY_MALICIOUS | Yes |\n| eval | OVERTLY_MALICIOUS | Yes |\n| exec | OVERTLY_MALICIOUS | Yes |\n| runpy.run_path | SUSPICIOUS | Yes \u2190 BYPASS |\n| runpy.run_module | SUSPICIOUS | Yes \u2190 BYPASS |\n\nSuggested fix:\nAdd to the unsafe imports blocklist in `fickling/analysis.py`:\n- runpy\n- runpy.run_path\n- runpy.run_module\n- runpy._run_code\n- runpy._run_module_code\n\n### PoC\n_Complete instructions, including specific configuration details, to reproduce the vulnerability._**Environment:**\n- Python 3.13.2\n- fickling 0.1.6 (latest version, installed via pip)\n\nStep 1: Create malicious pickle\n\nimport pickle\nimport runpy\n\nclass MaliciousPayload:\n def __reduce__(self):\n return (runpy.run_path, (\"/tmp/malicious_script.py\",))\n\nwith open(\"malicious.pkl\", \"wb\") as f:\n pickle.dump(MaliciousPayload(), f)\n\nStep 2: Create the malicious script that will be executed\n\necho \u0027print(\"RCE ACHIEVED\"); open(\"/tmp/pwned\",\"w\").write(\"compromised\")\u0027 \u003e /tmp/malicious_script.py\n\nStep 3: Analyze with fickling\n\nfickling --check-safety malicious.pkl\n\nExpected output (if properly detected):\nSeverity: OVERTLY_MALICIOUS\n\nActual output (bypass confirmed):\n{\n \"severity\": \"SUSPICIOUS\",\n \"analysis\": \"Variable `_var0` is assigned value `run_path(...)` but unused afterward; this is suspicious and indicative of a malicious pickle file\",\n \"detailed_results\": {\n \"AnalysisResult\": {\n \"UnusedVariables\": [\"_var0\", \"run_path(...)\"]\n }\n }\n}\n\nStep 4: Prove RCE by loading the pickle\n\nimport pickle\npickle.load(open(\"malicious.pkl\", \"rb\"))\n# Check: ls /tmp/pwned \u003c-- file exists, proving code execution\n\nPickle disassembly (evidence):\n\n 0: \\x80 PROTO 4\n 2: \\x95 FRAME 92\n 11: \\x8c SHORT_BINUNICODE \u0027runpy\u0027\n 18: \\x94 MEMOIZE (as 0)\n 19: \\x8c SHORT_BINUNICODE \u0027run_path\u0027\n 29: \\x94 MEMOIZE (as 1)\n 30: \\x93 STACK_GLOBAL\n 31: \\x94 MEMOIZE (as 2)\n 32: \\x8c SHORT_BINUNICODE \u0027/tmp/malicious_script.py\u0027\n ...\n 100: R REDUCE\n 101: \\x94 MEMOIZE (as 5)\n 102: . STOP\n \n### Impact\n\nVulnerability Type:\nIncomplete blocklist leading to safety check bypass (CWE-184) and arbitrary code execution via insecure deserialization (CWE-502).\n\nWho is impacted:\nAny user or system that relies on fickling to vet pickle files for security issues before loading them. This includes:\n\nAttack scenario:\nAn attacker uploads a malicious ML model or pickle file to a model repository. The victim\u0027s pipeline uses fickling to scan uploads. Fickling rates the file as \"SUSPICIOUS\" (not \"OVERTLY_MALICIOUS\"), so the file is not rejected. When the victim loads the model, arbitrary code executes on their system.\n\nSeverity: HIGH\n- The attacker achieves arbitrary code execution\n- The security control (fickling) is specifically designed to prevent this\n- The bypass requires no special conditions beyond crafting the pickle with `runpy`",
"id": "GHSA-wfq2-52f7-7qvj",
"modified": "2026-01-11T14:54:44Z",
"published": "2026-01-09T20:52:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/security/advisories/GHSA-565g-hwwr-4pp3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/security/advisories/GHSA-r7v6-mfhq-g3m2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/security/advisories/GHSA-wfq2-52f7-7qvj"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22606"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/pull/108"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/pull/187"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/pull/195"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/9a2b3f89bd0598b528d62c10a64c1986fcb09f66"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/blob/977b0769c13537cd96549c12bb537f05464cf09c/test/test_bypasses.py#L87"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/releases/tag/v0.1.7"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Fickling has a bypass via runpy.run_path() and runpy.run_module()"
}
GHSA-WPC6-37G7-8Q4W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-07 18:14 – Updated: 2026-05-06 21:22Summary
Before OpenClaw 2026.3.31, exec allowlist matching could treat shell init-file wrapper invocations as if the approved script itself were being executed. Shell options such as --rcfile, --init-file, and --startup-file could therefore inherit allowlist trust from a matched script path even though the shell loaded attacker-chosen initialization first.
Impact
This issue only applied when exec allowlist or allow-always behavior was enabled and the attacker could steer a shell-wrapper command shape that used init-file options. The result was a narrower allowlist bypass, not generic arbitrary command execution from an untrusted boundary.
Affected Packages / Versions
- Package:
openclaw(npm) - Affected versions:
< 2026.3.31 - Patched versions:
>= 2026.3.31 - Latest published npm version:
2026.4.1
Fix Commit(s)
0c8375424620e12777ef24c162eedc7e9fcfd7e3— reject shell init-file script matches
Release Process Note
The fix shipped in OpenClaw 2026.3.31 on March 31, 2026. The current published npm release 2026.4.1 from April 1, 2026 also contains the fix.
Thanks @cyjhhh for reporting.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.3.31"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-41392"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-184"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-07T18:14:35Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-28T19:37:42Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nBefore OpenClaw 2026.3.31, exec allowlist matching could treat shell init-file wrapper invocations as if the approved script itself were being executed. Shell options such as `--rcfile`, `--init-file`, and `--startup-file` could therefore inherit allowlist trust from a matched script path even though the shell loaded attacker-chosen initialization first.\n\n## Impact\n\nThis issue only applied when exec allowlist or allow-always behavior was enabled and the attacker could steer a shell-wrapper command shape that used init-file options. The result was a narrower allowlist bypass, not generic arbitrary command execution from an untrusted boundary.\n\n## Affected Packages / Versions\n\n- Package: `openclaw` (npm)\n- Affected versions: `\u003c 2026.3.31`\n- Patched versions: `\u003e= 2026.3.31`\n- Latest published npm version: `2026.4.1`\n\n## Fix Commit(s)\n\n- `0c8375424620e12777ef24c162eedc7e9fcfd7e3` \u2014 reject shell init-file script matches\n\n## Release Process Note\n\nThe fix shipped in OpenClaw `2026.3.31` on March 31, 2026. The current published npm release `2026.4.1` from April 1, 2026 also contains the fix.\n\nThanks @cyjhhh for reporting.",
"id": "GHSA-wpc6-37g7-8q4w",
"modified": "2026-05-06T21:22:43Z",
"published": "2026-04-07T18:14:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-wpc6-37g7-8q4w"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41392"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/0c8375424620e12777ef24c162eedc7e9fcfd7e3"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-exec-allowlist-bypass-via-shell-init-file-options"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "OpenClaw: Shell init-file options could satisfy exec allowlist script matching"
}
GHSA-WRR6-P5R6-474M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-16 21:31 – Updated: 2026-06-18 20:10Duplicate Advisory
This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-cwpp-5962-q4f6. This link is maintained to preserve external references.
Original Description
OpenClaw before 2026.5.26 contains an exec allowlist bypass vulnerability allowing authenticated operators to execute wrapper-level side effects outside allowlisted command intent. Attackers can craft command requests that bypass allowlist validation by leveraging transparent command wrappers to perform unintended operations.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "2026.5.22"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-184"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-18T20:10:14Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-16T19:17:01Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "## Duplicate Advisory\n\nThis advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of\u00a0GHSA-cwpp-5962-q4f6. This link is maintained to preserve external references.\n\n## Original Description\n\nOpenClaw before 2026.5.26 contains an exec allowlist bypass vulnerability allowing authenticated operators to execute wrapper-level side effects outside allowlisted command intent. Attackers can craft command requests that bypass allowlist validation by leveraging transparent command wrappers to perform unintended operations.",
"id": "GHSA-wrr6-p5r6-474m",
"modified": "2026-06-18T20:10:14Z",
"published": "2026-06-16T21:31:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-cwpp-5962-q4f6"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53848"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-exec-allowlist-bypass-via-transparent-command-wrappers"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Duplicate Advisory: Exec allowlist could miss side effects from transparent command wrappers",
"withdrawn": "2026-06-18T20:10:14Z"
}
GHSA-WVP2-4QQP-4H3R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-04 21:13 – Updated: 2026-08-04 21:13Impact
When making an external request, it is possible to bypass the IP filter that ensures the request isn't going to an internal service using an IPv6 literal which maps to a private IPv4 address.
Vulnerable versions
This vulnerability is present in Ghost from v6.0.9 up to v6.21.0.
Patches
v6.21.1 contains a fix for this issue.
How to update
For self-hosters using Docker, find Docker's official Ghost image here. Updating a Docker-based Ghost instance is documented here.
If your Ghost is a Ghost-CLI install see our documentation on updating it to the latest version here.
References
Ghost thanks l3tchupkt for disclosing this vulnerability responsibly.
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, email us at security@ghost.org.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 6.21.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "ghost"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "6.0.9"
},
{
"fixed": "6.21.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-53944"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-184",
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-04T21:13:16Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-24T19:17:11Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nWhen making an external request, it is possible to bypass the IP filter that ensures the request isn\u0027t going to an internal service using an IPv6 literal which maps to a private IPv4 address.\n\n### Vulnerable versions\n\nThis vulnerability is present in Ghost from v6.0.9 up to v6.21.0.\n\n### Patches\n\nv6.21.1 contains a fix for this issue.\n\n### How to update\n\nFor self-hosters using Docker, find [Docker\u0027s official Ghost image here](https://hub.docker.com/_/ghost). Updating a Docker-based Ghost instance [is documented here](https://docs.ghost.org/install/docker#updating-ghost). \n\nIf your Ghost is a Ghost-CLI install see our documentation on [updating it to the latest version here](https://docs.ghost.org/update). \n\n### References\n\nGhost thanks [l3tchupkt](http://github.com/l3tchupkt) for disclosing this vulnerability responsibly.\n\n### For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory, email us at [security@ghost.org](mailto:security@ghost.org).",
"id": "GHSA-wvp2-4qqp-4h3r",
"modified": "2026-08-04T21:13:16Z",
"published": "2026-08-04T21:13:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/security/advisories/GHSA-wvp2-4qqp-4h3r"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53944"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/pull/26749"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/commit/9b7f2212970fade08ecbec543b405190471e38d4"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/releases/tag/v6.21.1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Ghost: Private IP filtering bypass to make server-side requests to internal services"
}
GHSA-WVPG-4WRH-5889
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-16 20:00 – Updated: 2025-10-16 20:00Impact
Wrong usage of the PHP array_search() allows bypass of validation.
Patches
The problem has been patched in versions: - v4.4.1 for PrestaShop 1.7 (build number: 7.4.4.1) - v4.4.1 for PrestaShop 8 (build number: 8.4.4.1) - v5.0.5 for PrestaShop 1.7 (build number: 7.5.0.5) - v5.0.5 for PrestaShop 8 (build number: 8.5.0.5) - v5.0.5 for PrestaShop 9 (build number: 9.5.0.5)
Read the Versioning policy to learn more about the build number.
Credits
Léo CUNÉAZ reported this issue.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "prestashop/ps_checkout"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.4.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "prestashop/ps_checkout"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "5.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.0.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-61924"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-184"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-10-16T20:00:47Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-10-16T18:15:39Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "### Impact\nWrong usage of the PHP `array_search()` allows bypass of validation.\n\n### Patches\nThe problem has been patched in versions:\n- v4.4.1 for PrestaShop 1.7 (build number: 7.4.4.1)\n- v4.4.1 for PrestaShop 8 (build number: 8.4.4.1)\n- v5.0.5 for PrestaShop 1.7 (build number: 7.5.0.5)\n- v5.0.5 for PrestaShop 8 (build number: 8.5.0.5)\n- v5.0.5 for PrestaShop 9 (build number: 9.5.0.5)\n\nRead the [Versioning policy](https://github.com/PrestaShopCorp/ps_checkout/wiki/Versioning) to learn more about the build number.\n\n### Credits\n[L\u00e9o CUN\u00c9AZ](https://github.com/inem0o) reported this issue.",
"id": "GHSA-wvpg-4wrh-5889",
"modified": "2025-10-16T20:00:47Z",
"published": "2025-10-16T20:00:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/PrestaShopCorp/ps_checkout/security/advisories/GHSA-wvpg-4wrh-5889"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-61924"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/PrestaShopCorp/ps_checkout"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "PrestaShop Checkout Target PayPal merchant account hijacking from backoffice"
}
GHSA-X2RH-RHM8-CV8V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-01 00:34 – Updated: 2026-07-01 00:34n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-56777"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-184"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-30T23:17:32Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.",
"id": "GHSA-x2rh-rhm8-cv8v",
"modified": "2026-07-01T00:34:14Z",
"published": "2026-07-01T00:34:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/security/advisories/GHSA-jwm3-qcfw-c5pp"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56777"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/n8n-ast-validator-bypass-in-python-code-node"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-X3F8-2W95-HW4M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-01 21:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 21:30ChangeDetection.io versions prior to 0.54.7 contain a protection bypass vulnerability in the SafeXPath3Parser implementation that allows attackers to read arbitrary local files by using unblocked XPath 3.0/3.1 functions such as json-doc() and similar file-access primitives. Attackers can exploit the incomplete blocklist of dangerous XPath functions to access sensitive data from the local filesystem.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-35000"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-184"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-01T19:16:33Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "ChangeDetection.io versions prior to 0.54.7 contain a protection bypass vulnerability in the SafeXPath3Parser implementation that allows attackers to read arbitrary local files by using unblocked XPath 3.0/3.1 functions such as json-doc() and similar file-access primitives. Attackers can exploit the incomplete blocklist of dangerous XPath functions to access sensitive data from the local filesystem.",
"id": "GHSA-x3f8-2w95-hw4m",
"modified": "2026-04-01T21:30:30Z",
"published": "2026-04-01T21:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-35000"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dgtlmoon/changedetection.io/commit/dadc804567a51f803cd6715f7885c11a247915f6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dgtlmoon/changedetection.io/releases/tag/0.54.7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/changedetection-io-safexpath3parser-bypass-arbitrary-file-read"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-X4XW-XV9J-3C3Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-15 18:32 – Updated: 2026-09-15 18:32IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway <= v1.0.4 IBM mcp-context-forge could allow an authenticated user to bypass protection mechanisms due to incomplete recursive inspection of nested payload content.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-11918"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-184"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-15T18:17:12Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway \u003c= v1.0.4 IBM mcp-context-forge could allow an authenticated user to bypass protection mechanisms due to incomplete recursive inspection of nested payload content.",
"id": "GHSA-x4xw-xv9j-3c3q",
"modified": "2026-09-15T18:32:34Z",
"published": "2026-09-15T18:32:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-11918"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7285720"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-X742-88JJ-7HV9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-19 03:30 – Updated: 2026-03-20 13:40Duplicate Advisory
This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-48wf-g7cp-gr3m. This link is maintained to preserve external references.
Original Description
OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.23 contain an allowlist bypass vulnerability in system.run guardrails that allows authenticated operators to execute unintended commands. When /usr/bin/env is allowlisted, attackers can use env -S to bypass policy analysis and execute shell wrapper payloads at runtime.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c 2026.2.23"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-184"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-20T13:40:16Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-19T02:16:04Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Duplicate Advisory\n\nThis advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-48wf-g7cp-gr3m. This link is maintained to preserve external references.\n\n## Original Description\nOpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.23 contain an allowlist bypass vulnerability in system.run guardrails that allows authenticated operators to execute unintended commands. When /usr/bin/env is allowlisted, attackers can use env -S to bypass policy analysis and execute shell wrapper payloads at runtime.",
"id": "GHSA-x742-88jj-7hv9",
"modified": "2026-03-20T13:40:16Z",
"published": "2026-03-19T03:30:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-48wf-g7cp-gr3m"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31992"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/3f923e831364d83d0f23499ee49961de334cf58b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/a1c4bf07c6baad3ef87a0e710fe9aef127b1f606"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-allowlist-exec-guard-bypass-via-env-s"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Duplicate Advisory: allowlist exec-guard bypass via env -S",
"withdrawn": "2026-03-20T13:40:16Z"
}
Mitigation
Strategy: Input Validation
Do not rely exclusively on detecting disallowed inputs. There are too many variants to encode a character, especially when different environments are used, so there is a high likelihood of missing some variants. Only use detection of disallowed inputs as a mechanism for detecting suspicious activity. Ensure that you are using other protection mechanisms that only identify "good" input - such as lists of allowed inputs - and ensure that you are properly encoding your outputs.
CAPEC-120: Double Encoding
The adversary utilizes a repeating of the encoding process for a set of characters (that is, character encoding a character encoding of a character) to obfuscate the payload of a particular request. This may allow the adversary to bypass filters that attempt to detect illegal characters or strings, such as those that might be used in traversal or injection attacks. Filters may be able to catch illegal encoded strings, but may not catch doubly encoded strings. For example, a dot (.), often used in path traversal attacks and therefore often blocked by filters, could be URL encoded as %2E. However, many filters recognize this encoding and would still block the request. In a double encoding, the % in the above URL encoding would be encoded again as %25, resulting in %252E which some filters might not catch, but which could still be interpreted as a dot (.) by interpreters on the target.
CAPEC-15: Command Delimiters
An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or denylist input validation, as opposed to allowlist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or denylist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
CAPEC-182: Flash Injection
An attacker tricks a victim to execute malicious flash content that executes commands or makes flash calls specified by the attacker. One example of this attack is cross-site flashing, an attacker controlled parameter to a reference call loads from content specified by the attacker.
CAPEC-3: Using Leading 'Ghost' Character Sequences to Bypass Input Filters
Some APIs will strip certain leading characters from a string of parameters. An adversary can intentionally introduce leading "ghost" characters (extra characters that don't affect the validity of the request at the API layer) that enable the input to pass the filters and therefore process the adversary's input. This occurs when the targeted API will accept input data in several syntactic forms and interpret it in the equivalent semantic way, while the filter does not take into account the full spectrum of the syntactic forms acceptable to the targeted API.
CAPEC-43: Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: <parser1> --> <input validator> --> <parser2>. In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
CAPEC-6: Argument Injection
An attacker changes the behavior or state of a targeted application through injecting data or command syntax through the targets use of non-validated and non-filtered arguments of exposed services or methods.
CAPEC-71: Using Unicode Encoding to Bypass Validation Logic
An attacker may provide a Unicode string to a system component that is not Unicode aware and use that to circumvent the filter or cause the classifying mechanism to fail to properly understanding the request. That may allow the attacker to slip malicious data past the content filter and/or possibly cause the application to route the request incorrectly.
CAPEC-73: User-Controlled Filename
An attack of this type involves an adversary inserting malicious characters (such as a XSS redirection) into a filename, directly or indirectly that is then used by the target software to generate HTML text or other potentially executable content. Many websites rely on user-generated content and dynamically build resources like files, filenames, and URL links directly from user supplied data. In this attack pattern, the attacker uploads code that can execute in the client browser and/or redirect the client browser to a site that the attacker owns. All XSS attack payload variants can be used to pass and exploit these vulnerabilities.
CAPEC-85: AJAX Footprinting
This attack utilizes the frequent client-server roundtrips in Ajax conversation to scan a system. While Ajax does not open up new vulnerabilities per se, it does optimize them from an attacker point of view. A common first step for an attacker is to footprint the target environment to understand what attacks will work. Since footprinting relies on enumeration, the conversational pattern of rapid, multiple requests and responses that are typical in Ajax applications enable an attacker to look for many vulnerabilities, well-known ports, network locations and so on. The knowledge gained through Ajax fingerprinting can be used to support other attacks, such as XSS.