CWE-129
AllowedImproper Validation of Array Index
Abstraction: Variant · Status: Draft
The product uses untrusted input when calculating or using an array index, but the product does not validate or incorrectly validates the index to ensure the index references a valid position within the array.
746 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-596F-C2W8-W394
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:58 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:58The sanity_check_ckpt function in fs/f2fs/super.c in the Linux kernel before 4.12.4 does not validate the blkoff and segno arrays, which allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-10663"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-129"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-08-19T18:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The sanity_check_ckpt function in fs/f2fs/super.c in the Linux kernel before 4.12.4 does not validate the blkoff and segno arrays, which allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-596f-c2w8-w394",
"modified": "2022-05-17T01:58:14Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:58:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-10663"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/15d3042a937c13f5d9244241c7a9c8416ff6e82a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481149"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2017-08-01"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=15d3042a937c13f5d9244241c7a9c8416ff6e82a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/ChangeLog-4.12.4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100215"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-59GM-4H96-737V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:44 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:44Buffer overflow occurs when trying to convert ASCII string to Unicode string if the actual size is more than required in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-11308"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-129"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-03-17T06:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Buffer overflow occurs when trying to convert ASCII string to Unicode string if the actual size is more than required in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice \u0026 Music",
"id": "GHSA-59gm-4h96-737v",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:44:42Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:44:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-11308"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.qualcomm.com/company/product-security/bulletins/march-2021-bulletin"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-5CQ9-G28Q-5W6R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-09 09:31 – Updated: 2025-06-09 09:31A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in RT-Thread 5.1.0. This issue affects the function sys_thread_sigprocmask of the file rt-thread/components/lwp/lwp_syscall.c. The manipulation of the argument how leads to improper validation of array index.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-5868"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119",
"CWE-129"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-06-09T08:15:22Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in RT-Thread 5.1.0. This issue affects the function sys_thread_sigprocmask of the file rt-thread/components/lwp/lwp_syscall.c. The manipulation of the argument how leads to improper validation of array index.",
"id": "GHSA-5cq9-g28q-5w6r",
"modified": "2025-06-09T09:31:04Z",
"published": "2025-06-09T09:31:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-5868"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/RT-Thread/rt-thread/issues/10303"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.311627"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.311627"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.584130"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-5GHM-J624-HFM6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-15 15:31 – Updated: 2025-12-02 03:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
vxlan: Fix nexthop hash size
The nexthop code expects a 31 bit hash, such as what is returned by fib_multipath_hash() and rt6_multipath_hash(). Passing the 32 bit hash returned by skb_get_hash() can lead to problems related to the fact that 'int hash' is a negative number when the MSB is set.
In the case of hash threshold nexthop groups, nexthop_select_path_hthr() will disproportionately select the first nexthop group entry. In the case of resilient nexthop groups, nexthop_select_path_res() may do an out of bounds access in nh_buckets[], for example: hash = -912054133 num_nh_buckets = 2 bucket_index = 65535
which leads to the following panic:
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffc900025910c8 PGD 100000067 P4D 100000067 PUD 10026b067 PMD 0 Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 4 PID: 856 Comm: kworker/4:3 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc2+ #34 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: ipv6_addrconf addrconf_dad_work RIP: 0010:nexthop_select_path+0x197/0xbf0 Code: c1 e4 05 be 08 00 00 00 4c 8b 35 a4 14 7e 01 4e 8d 6c 25 00 4a 8d 7c 25 08 48 01 dd e8 c2 25 15 ff 49 8d 7d 08 e8 39 13 15 ff <4d> 89 75 08 48 89 ef e8 7d 12 15 ff 48 8b 5d 00 e8 14 55 2f 00 85 RSP: 0018:ffff88810c36f260 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000000002000c0 RCX: ffffffffaf02dd77 RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffffc900025910c8 RBP: ffffc900025910c0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: fffff520004b2219 R10: ffffc900025910cf R11: 31392d2068736168 R12: 00000000002000c0 R13: ffffc900025910c0 R14: 00000000fffef608 R15: ffff88811840e900 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8881f7000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffc900025910c8 CR3: 0000000129d00000 CR4: 0000000000750ee0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: ? __die+0x23/0x70 ? page_fault_oops+0x1ee/0x5c0 ? __pfx_is_prefetch.constprop.0+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_page_fault_oops+0x10/0x10 ? search_bpf_extables+0xfe/0x1c0 ? fixup_exception+0x3b/0x470 ? exc_page_fault+0xf6/0x110 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 ? nexthop_select_path+0x197/0xbf0 ? nexthop_select_path+0x197/0xbf0 ? lock_is_held_type+0xe7/0x140 vxlan_xmit+0x5b2/0x2340 ? __lock_acquire+0x92b/0x3370 ? __pfx_vxlan_xmit+0x10/0x10 ? __pfxlockacquire+0x10/0x10 ? pfx_register_lock_class+0x10/0x10 ? skb_network_protocol+0xce/0x2d0 ? dev_hard_start_xmit+0xca/0x350 ? __pfx_vxlan_xmit+0x10/0x10 dev_hard_start_xmit+0xca/0x350 __dev_queue_xmit+0x513/0x1e20 ? __pfxdevqueue_xmit+0x10/0x10 ? pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x44/0x90 ? skb_push+0x4c/0x80 ? eth_header+0x81/0xe0 ? __pfx_eth_header+0x10/0x10 ? neigh_resolve_output+0x215/0x310 ? ip6_finish_output2+0x2ba/0xc90 ip6_finish_output2+0x2ba/0xc90 ? lock_release+0x236/0x3e0 ? ip6_mtu+0xbb/0x240 ? __pfx_ip6_finish_output2+0x10/0x10 ? find_held_lock+0x83/0xa0 ? lock_is_held_type+0xe7/0x140 ip6_finish_output+0x1ee/0x780 ip6_output+0x138/0x460 ? __pfx_ip6_output+0x10/0x10 ? __pfxlockacquire+0x10/0x10 ? pfx_ip6_finish_output+0x10/0x10 NF_HOOK.constprop.0+0xc0/0x420 ? __pfx_NF_HOOK.constprop.0+0x10/0x10 ? ndisc_send_skb+0x2c0/0x960 ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0x93/0x110 ? lock_is_held_type+0xe7/0x140 ndisc_send_skb+0x4be/0x960 ? __pfx_ndisc_send_skb+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x65/0x90 ? find_held_lock+0x83/0xa0 ndisc_send_ns+0xb0/0x110 ? __pfx_ndisc_send_ns+0x10/0x10 addrconf_dad_work+0x631/0x8e0 ? lock_acquire+0x180/0x3f0 ? __pfx_addrconf_dad_work+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x24/0x90 process_one_work+0x582/0x9c0 ? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_do_raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x24/0x90 worker_thread+0x93/0x630 ? __kthread_parkme+0xdc/0x100 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x1a5/0x1e0 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x60
---truncated---
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-53192"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-129"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-15T14:15:41Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nvxlan: Fix nexthop hash size\n\nThe nexthop code expects a 31 bit hash, such as what is returned by\nfib_multipath_hash() and rt6_multipath_hash(). Passing the 32 bit hash\nreturned by skb_get_hash() can lead to problems related to the fact that\n\u0027int hash\u0027 is a negative number when the MSB is set.\n\nIn the case of hash threshold nexthop groups, nexthop_select_path_hthr()\nwill disproportionately select the first nexthop group entry. In the case\nof resilient nexthop groups, nexthop_select_path_res() may do an out of\nbounds access in nh_buckets[], for example:\n hash = -912054133\n num_nh_buckets = 2\n bucket_index = 65535\n\nwhich leads to the following panic:\n\nBUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffc900025910c8\nPGD 100000067 P4D 100000067 PUD 10026b067 PMD 0\nOops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI\nCPU: 4 PID: 856 Comm: kworker/4:3 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc2+ #34\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014\nWorkqueue: ipv6_addrconf addrconf_dad_work\nRIP: 0010:nexthop_select_path+0x197/0xbf0\nCode: c1 e4 05 be 08 00 00 00 4c 8b 35 a4 14 7e 01 4e 8d 6c 25 00 4a 8d 7c 25 08 48 01 dd e8 c2 25 15 ff 49 8d 7d 08 e8 39 13 15 ff \u003c4d\u003e 89 75 08 48 89 ef e8 7d 12 15 ff 48 8b 5d 00 e8 14 55 2f 00 85\nRSP: 0018:ffff88810c36f260 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000000002000c0 RCX: ffffffffaf02dd77\nRDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffffc900025910c8\nRBP: ffffc900025910c0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: fffff520004b2219\nR10: ffffc900025910cf R11: 31392d2068736168 R12: 00000000002000c0\nR13: ffffc900025910c0 R14: 00000000fffef608 R15: ffff88811840e900\nFS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8881f7000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: ffffc900025910c8 CR3: 0000000129d00000 CR4: 0000000000750ee0\nPKRU: 55555554\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n ? __die+0x23/0x70\n ? page_fault_oops+0x1ee/0x5c0\n ? __pfx_is_prefetch.constprop.0+0x10/0x10\n ? __pfx_page_fault_oops+0x10/0x10\n ? search_bpf_extables+0xfe/0x1c0\n ? fixup_exception+0x3b/0x470\n ? exc_page_fault+0xf6/0x110\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30\n ? nexthop_select_path+0x197/0xbf0\n ? nexthop_select_path+0x197/0xbf0\n ? lock_is_held_type+0xe7/0x140\n vxlan_xmit+0x5b2/0x2340\n ? __lock_acquire+0x92b/0x3370\n ? __pfx_vxlan_xmit+0x10/0x10\n ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10\n ? __pfx_register_lock_class+0x10/0x10\n ? skb_network_protocol+0xce/0x2d0\n ? dev_hard_start_xmit+0xca/0x350\n ? __pfx_vxlan_xmit+0x10/0x10\n dev_hard_start_xmit+0xca/0x350\n __dev_queue_xmit+0x513/0x1e20\n ? __pfx___dev_queue_xmit+0x10/0x10\n ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10\n ? mark_held_locks+0x44/0x90\n ? skb_push+0x4c/0x80\n ? eth_header+0x81/0xe0\n ? __pfx_eth_header+0x10/0x10\n ? neigh_resolve_output+0x215/0x310\n ? ip6_finish_output2+0x2ba/0xc90\n ip6_finish_output2+0x2ba/0xc90\n ? lock_release+0x236/0x3e0\n ? ip6_mtu+0xbb/0x240\n ? __pfx_ip6_finish_output2+0x10/0x10\n ? find_held_lock+0x83/0xa0\n ? lock_is_held_type+0xe7/0x140\n ip6_finish_output+0x1ee/0x780\n ip6_output+0x138/0x460\n ? __pfx_ip6_output+0x10/0x10\n ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10\n ? __pfx_ip6_finish_output+0x10/0x10\n NF_HOOK.constprop.0+0xc0/0x420\n ? __pfx_NF_HOOK.constprop.0+0x10/0x10\n ? ndisc_send_skb+0x2c0/0x960\n ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10\n ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0x93/0x110\n ? lock_is_held_type+0xe7/0x140\n ndisc_send_skb+0x4be/0x960\n ? __pfx_ndisc_send_skb+0x10/0x10\n ? mark_held_locks+0x65/0x90\n ? find_held_lock+0x83/0xa0\n ndisc_send_ns+0xb0/0x110\n ? __pfx_ndisc_send_ns+0x10/0x10\n addrconf_dad_work+0x631/0x8e0\n ? lock_acquire+0x180/0x3f0\n ? __pfx_addrconf_dad_work+0x10/0x10\n ? mark_held_locks+0x24/0x90\n process_one_work+0x582/0x9c0\n ? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10\n ? __pfx_do_raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10\n ? mark_held_locks+0x24/0x90\n worker_thread+0x93/0x630\n ? __kthread_parkme+0xdc/0x100\n ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10\n kthread+0x1a5/0x1e0\n ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n ret_from_fork+0x34/0x60\n \n---truncated---",
"id": "GHSA-5ghm-j624-hfm6",
"modified": "2025-12-02T03:31:36Z",
"published": "2025-09-15T15:31:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53192"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0756384fb1bd38adb2ebcfd1307422f433a1d772"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/23c195ce6f4aec86e1c9e1ea1c800381c4b465c7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/32ef2c0c6cf11a076f0280a7866b9abc47821e19"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b8717658dff8b471cbfc124bf9b5ca4229579ed"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c650597647ecb318d02372277bdfd866c6829f78"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5H68-Q459-XXM7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-19 03:31 – Updated: 2024-11-27 15:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: dvb-core: add missing buffer index check
dvb_vb2_expbuf() didn't check if the given buffer index was for a valid buffer. Add this check.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-50291"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-129"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-11-19T02:16:31Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmedia: dvb-core: add missing buffer index check\n\ndvb_vb2_expbuf() didn\u0027t check if the given buffer index was\nfor a valid buffer. Add this check.",
"id": "GHSA-5h68-q459-xxm7",
"modified": "2024-11-27T15:31:45Z",
"published": "2024-11-19T03:31:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50291"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/721c37af0355cc0b540909c57fd7930dc99c72d8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fa88dc7db176c79b50adb132a56120a1d4d9d18b"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5H7M-MQ92-GGC6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-01-13 00:30 – Updated: 2023-01-24 18:30An Improper Validation of Array Index vulnerability in the Advanced Forwarding Toolkit Manager daemon (aftmand) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). On the PTX10008 and PTX10016 platforms running Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved, when a specific SNMP MIB is queried this will cause a PFE crash and the FPC will go offline and not automatically recover. A system restart is required to get the affected FPC in an operational state again. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 22.1 version 22.1R2 and later versions; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R3; 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R2. Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved 21.3-EVO version 21.3R3-EVO and later versions; 21.4-EVO version 21.4R1-S2-EVO, 21.4R2-EVO and later versions prior to 21.4R2-S1-EVO; 22.1-EVO version 22.1R2-EVO and later versions prior to 22.1R3-EVO; 22.2-EVO versions prior to 22.2R1-S1-EVO, 22.2R2-EVO.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-22401"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-129"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-01-13T00:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An Improper Validation of Array Index vulnerability in the Advanced Forwarding Toolkit Manager daemon (aftmand) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). On the PTX10008 and PTX10016 platforms running Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved, when a specific SNMP MIB is queried this will cause a PFE crash and the FPC will go offline and not automatically recover. A system restart is required to get the affected FPC in an operational state again. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 22.1 version 22.1R2 and later versions; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R3; 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R2. Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved 21.3-EVO version 21.3R3-EVO and later versions; 21.4-EVO version 21.4R1-S2-EVO, 21.4R2-EVO and later versions prior to 21.4R2-S1-EVO; 22.1-EVO version 22.1R2-EVO and later versions prior to 22.1R3-EVO; 22.2-EVO versions prior to 22.2R1-S1-EVO, 22.2R2-EVO.",
"id": "GHSA-5h7m-mq92-ggc6",
"modified": "2023-01-24T18:30:31Z",
"published": "2023-01-13T00:30:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-22401"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://kb.juniper.net/JSA70197"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5HG4-MC2H-M4MM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-12-22 21:30 – Updated: 2025-04-15 21:31If array shift operations are not used, the Garbage Collector may have become confused about valid objects. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 101.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-31745"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-129"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-12-22T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "If array shift operations are not used, the Garbage Collector may have become confused about valid objects. This vulnerability affects Firefox \u003c 101.",
"id": "GHSA-5hg4-mc2h-m4mm",
"modified": "2025-04-15T21:31:24Z",
"published": "2022-12-22T21:30:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-31745"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1760944"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-20"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5HJJ-FVQ6-8J36
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-01 06:31 – Updated: 2026-07-09 06:31An out-of-bounds heap write exists in the RAR5 recovery-volume (.rev) parser in WinRAR and UnRAR (RecVolumes5::ReadHeader in recvol5.cpp). The RecItems vector is sized only when the first .rev file in a set is processed; subsequent .rev files supply an independent RecNum value that is validated against that file's own TotalCount field but never against the actual size of RecItems. A crafted set of two or more .rev files can therefore write an attacker-controlled 32-bit value (the header's RevCRC field) to RecItems[RecNum] at an attacker-controlled offset up to 65534 * sizeof(RecVolItem) bytes past the allocation, corrupting adjacent heap objects. Triggering requires the victim to run a recovery/test operation on an attacker-supplied .rev set (for example 'unrar t x.part1.rev', WinRAR 'Repair archive', or auto-recovery when extracting a volume set with a missing .rar part). This is the RAR5-path sibling of CVE-2023-40477 (which was fixed in the RAR3 path only in WinRAR 6.23). Fixed in WinRAR / RAR 7.23.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-14191"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-129"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-01T04:16:58Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An out-of-bounds heap write exists in the RAR5 recovery-volume (.rev) parser in WinRAR and UnRAR (RecVolumes5::ReadHeader in recvol5.cpp). The RecItems vector is sized only when the first .rev file in a set is processed; subsequent .rev files supply an independent RecNum value that is validated against that file\u0027s own TotalCount field but never against the actual size of RecItems. A crafted set of two or more .rev files can therefore write an attacker-controlled 32-bit value (the header\u0027s RevCRC field) to RecItems[RecNum] at an attacker-controlled offset up to 65534 * sizeof(RecVolItem) bytes past the allocation, corrupting adjacent heap objects. Triggering requires the victim to run a recovery/test operation on an attacker-supplied .rev set (for example \u0027unrar t x.part1.rev\u0027, WinRAR \u0027Repair archive\u0027, or auto-recovery when extracting a volume set with a missing .rar part). This is the RAR5-path sibling of CVE-2023-40477 (which was fixed in the RAR3 path only in WinRAR 6.23). Fixed in WinRAR / RAR 7.23.",
"id": "GHSA-5hjj-fvq6-8j36",
"modified": "2026-07-09T06:31:59Z",
"published": "2026-07-01T06:31:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-40477"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-14191"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.rarlab.com/download.htm"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.securin.io/zero-days/cve-2026-14191-winrar-unrar-rar5-recovery-volume-rev-out-of-bounds-heap-write-in-recvolumes5-readheader"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5JJF-R37W-227G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:25 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:25In Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Mobile MDM9615, MDM9625, MDM9635M, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 400, SD 617, SD 800, and SD 820, in the time daemon, unauthorized users can potentially modify system time and cause an array index to be out-of-bound.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-10044"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-129"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-04-18T14:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Mobile MDM9615, MDM9625, MDM9635M, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 400, SD 617, SD 800, and SD 820, in the time daemon, unauthorized users can potentially modify system time and cause an array index to be out-of-bound.",
"id": "GHSA-5jjf-r37w-227g",
"modified": "2022-05-14T03:25:29Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:25:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-10044"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2018-04-01"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103671"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-5JV8-H7QH-RF5P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-23 21:39 – Updated: 2026-04-23 21:39Summary
An unchecked array index in the pod informer's podGCFromPod() function causes a controller-wide panic when a workflow pod carries a malformed workflows.argoproj.io/pod-gc-strategy annotation. Because the panic occurs inside an informer goroutine (outside the controller's recover() scope), it crashes the entire controller process. The poisoned pod persists across restarts, causing a crash loop that halts all workflow processing until the pod is manually deleted.
Details
podGCFromPod() splits the annotation value on "/" and unconditionally accesses parts[1]:
func podGCFromPod(pod *apiv1.Pod) wfv1.PodGC {
if val, ok := pod.Annotations[common.AnnotationKeyPodGCStrategy]; ok {
parts := strings.Split(val, "/")
return wfv1.PodGC{Strategy: wfv1.PodGCStrategy(parts[0]), DeleteDelayDuration: parts[1]}
}
return wfv1.PodGC{Strategy: wfv1.PodGCOnPodNone}
}
If the annotation value contains no "/", parts has length 1 and parts[1] panics with index out of range.
The code was introduced in #14129 and affects versions:
- 3.6.x: v3.6.5 through v3.6.19 (backport in #14263)
- 3.7.x: v3.7.0-rc1 through v3.7.12
- 4.x: v4.0.0-rc1 through v4.0.3
- Not affected: v3.6.4 and earlier
PoC
Apply this workflow to a cluster running the Argo Workflows controller:
kubectl apply -n argo -f - <<'EOF'
apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1
kind: Workflow
metadata:
name: crash-podgc
spec:
entrypoint: main
serviceAccountName: default
podGC:
strategy: OnPodCompletion
podMetadata:
annotations:
workflows.argoproj.io/pod-gc-strategy: "NoSlash"
templates:
- name: main
container:
image: alpine:3.18
command: [echo, "hello"]
EOF
Within seconds the controller crashes. The controller pod will show CrashLoopBackOff with increasing restart count. Controller logs show:
panic: runtime error: index out of range [1] with length 1
goroutine 291 [running]:
github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4/workflow/controller/pod.podGCFromPod(...)
/home/runner/work/argo-workflows/argo-workflows/workflow/controller/pod/controller.go:176
github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4/workflow/controller/pod.(*Controller).commonPodEvent(...)
/home/runner/work/argo-workflows/argo-workflows/workflow/controller/pod/controller.go:197
github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4/workflow/controller/pod.(*Controller).addPodEvent(...)
/home/runner/work/argo-workflows/argo-workflows/workflow/controller/pod/controller.go:246
Recovery requires deleting the poisoned workflow:
kubectl delete workflow -n argo crash-podgc
Impact
Any user who can submit workflows can crash the Argo Workflows controller and keep it down indefinitely. This is a denial-of-service against all workflows in the cluster. No workflows can make progress while the controller is crash-looping. The attacker needs only create permission on Workflow resources, which is the baseline permission for any Argo Workflows user.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.0.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.7.0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.7.14"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.6.5"
},
{
"last_affected": "3.6.19"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-40886"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-129"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-23T21:39:21Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-23T19:17:28Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nAn unchecked array index in the pod informer\u0027s `podGCFromPod()` function causes a controller-wide panic when a workflow pod carries a malformed `workflows.argoproj.io/pod-gc-strategy` annotation. Because the panic occurs inside an informer goroutine (outside the controller\u0027s `recover()` scope), it crashes the entire controller process. The poisoned pod persists across restarts, causing a crash loop that halts all workflow processing until the pod is manually deleted.\n\n### Details\n\n`podGCFromPod()` splits the annotation value on \"/\" and unconditionally accesses `parts[1]`:\n\n```go\nfunc podGCFromPod(pod *apiv1.Pod) wfv1.PodGC {\n if val, ok := pod.Annotations[common.AnnotationKeyPodGCStrategy]; ok {\n parts := strings.Split(val, \"/\")\n return wfv1.PodGC{Strategy: wfv1.PodGCStrategy(parts[0]), DeleteDelayDuration: parts[1]}\n }\n return wfv1.PodGC{Strategy: wfv1.PodGCOnPodNone}\n}\n```\n\nIf the annotation value contains no \"/\", `parts` has length 1 and `parts[1]` panics with index out of range.\n\nThe code was introduced in [#14129](https://github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/issues/14129) and affects versions:\n\n - 3.6.x: v3.6.5 through v3.6.19 (backport in [#14263](https://github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/issues/14263))\n - 3.7.x: v3.7.0-rc1 through v3.7.12\n - 4.x: v4.0.0-rc1 through v4.0.3\n - Not affected: v3.6.4 and earlier\n\n### PoC\n\nApply this workflow to a cluster running the Argo Workflows controller:\n\n```bash\nkubectl apply -n argo -f - \u003c\u003c\u0027EOF\u0027\napiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1\nkind: Workflow\nmetadata:\n name: crash-podgc\nspec:\n entrypoint: main\n serviceAccountName: default\n podGC:\n strategy: OnPodCompletion\n podMetadata:\n annotations:\n workflows.argoproj.io/pod-gc-strategy: \"NoSlash\"\n templates:\n - name: main\n container:\n image: alpine:3.18\n command: [echo, \"hello\"]\nEOF\n```\n\nWithin seconds the controller crashes. The controller pod will show `CrashLoopBackOff` with increasing restart count. Controller logs show:\n\n```\npanic: runtime error: index out of range [1] with length 1\n\ngoroutine 291 [running]:\ngithub.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4/workflow/controller/pod.podGCFromPod(...)\n /home/runner/work/argo-workflows/argo-workflows/workflow/controller/pod/controller.go:176\ngithub.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4/workflow/controller/pod.(*Controller).commonPodEvent(...)\n /home/runner/work/argo-workflows/argo-workflows/workflow/controller/pod/controller.go:197\ngithub.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4/workflow/controller/pod.(*Controller).addPodEvent(...)\n /home/runner/work/argo-workflows/argo-workflows/workflow/controller/pod/controller.go:246\n```\n\nRecovery requires deleting the poisoned workflow:\n\n```\nkubectl delete workflow -n argo crash-podgc\n```\n\n### Impact\n\nAny user who can submit workflows can crash the Argo Workflows controller and keep it down indefinitely. This is a denial-of-service against all workflows in the cluster. No workflows can make progress while the controller is crash-looping. The attacker needs only `create` permission on Workflow resources, which is the baseline permission for any Argo Workflows user.",
"id": "GHSA-5jv8-h7qh-rf5p",
"modified": "2026-04-23T21:39:21Z",
"published": "2026-04-23T21:39:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/security/advisories/GHSA-5jv8-h7qh-rf5p"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-40886"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Argo Workflows: Unchecked annotation parsing in pod informer crashes Argo Workflows Controller"
}
Mitigation MIT-7
Strategy: Input Validation
Use an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).
Mitigation MIT-15
- For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
- Even though client-side checks provide minimal benefits with respect to server-side security, they are still useful. First, they can support intrusion detection. If the server receives input that should have been rejected by the client, then it may be an indication of an attack. Second, client-side error-checking can provide helpful feedback to the user about the expectations for valid input. Third, there may be a reduction in server-side processing time for accidental input errors, although this is typically a small savings.
Mitigation MIT-3
Strategy: Language Selection
- Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, Ada allows the programmer to constrain the values of a variable and languages such as Java and Ruby will allow the programmer to handle exceptions when an out-of-bounds index is accessed.
Mitigation MIT-11
Strategy: Environment Hardening
- Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.
- Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as "rebasing" (for Windows) and "prelinking" (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.
- For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].
Mitigation MIT-12
Strategy: Environment Hardening
- Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (using hardware NX or XD bits) or the equivalent techniques that simulate this feature in software, such as PaX [REF-60] [REF-61]. These techniques ensure that any instruction executed is exclusively at a memory address that is part of the code segment.
- For more information on these techniques see D3-PSEP (Process Segment Execution Prevention) from D3FEND [REF-1336].
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- When accessing a user-controlled array index, use a stringent range of values that are within the target array. Make sure that you do not allow negative values to be used. That is, verify the minimum as well as the maximum of the range of acceptable values.
Mitigation MIT-35
Be especially careful to validate all input when invoking code that crosses language boundaries, such as from an interpreted language to native code. This could create an unexpected interaction between the language boundaries. Ensure that you are not violating any of the expectations of the language with which you are interfacing. For example, even though Java may not be susceptible to buffer overflows, providing a large argument in a call to native code might trigger an overflow.
Mitigation MIT-17
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
Mitigation MIT-22
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
- Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.
- OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
CAPEC-100: Overflow Buffers
Buffer Overflow attacks target improper or missing bounds checking on buffer operations, typically triggered by input injected by an adversary. As a consequence, an adversary is able to write past the boundaries of allocated buffer regions in memory, causing a program crash or potentially redirection of execution as per the adversaries' choice.