ID CVE-2017-7468
Summary In curl and libcurl 7.52.0 to and including 7.53.1, libcurl would attempt to resume a TLS session even if the client certificate had changed. That is unacceptable since a server by specification is allowed to skip the client certificate check on resume, and may instead use the old identity which was established by the previous certificate (or no certificate). libcurl supports by default the use of TLS session id/ticket to resume previous TLS sessions to speed up subsequent TLS handshakes. They are used when for any reason an existing TLS connection couldn't be kept alive to make the next handshake faster. This flaw is a regression and identical to CVE-2016-5419 reported on August 3rd 2016, but affecting a different version range.
References
Vulnerable Configurations
  • cpe:2.3:a:haxx:libcurl:7.52.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:haxx:libcurl:7.52.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:haxx:libcurl:7.52.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:haxx:libcurl:7.52.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:haxx:libcurl:7.53.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:haxx:libcurl:7.53.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:haxx:libcurl:7.53.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:haxx:libcurl:7.53.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
CVSS
Base: 5.0 (as of 09-10-2019 - 23:29)
Impact:
Exploitability:
CWE CWE-295
CAPEC
  • Creating a Rogue Certification Authority Certificate
    An adversary exploits a weakness in the MD5 hash algorithm (weak collision resistance) to generate a certificate signing request (CSR) that contains collision blocks in the "to be signed" part. The adversary specially crafts two different, but valid X.509 certificates that when hashed with the MD5 algorithm would yield the same value. The adversary then sends the CSR for one of the certificates to the Certification Authority which uses the MD5 hashing algorithm. That request is completely valid and the Certificate Authority issues an X.509 certificate to the adversary which is signed with its private key. An adversary then takes that signed blob and inserts it into another X.509 certificate that the attacker generated. Due to the MD5 collision, both certificates, though different, hash to the same value and so the signed blob works just as well in the second certificate. The net effect is that the adversary's second X.509 certificate, which the Certification Authority has never seen, is now signed and validated by that Certification Authority. To make the attack more interesting, the second certificate could be not just a regular certificate, but rather itself a signing certificate. Thus the adversary is able to start their own Certification Authority that is anchored in its root of trust in the legitimate Certification Authority that has signed the attackers' first X.509 certificate. If the original Certificate Authority was accepted by default by browsers, so will now the Certificate Authority set up by the adversary and of course any certificates that it signs. So the adversary is now able to generate any SSL certificates to impersonate any web server, and the user's browser will not issue any warning to the victim. This can be used to compromise HTTPS communications and other types of systems where PKI and X.509 certificates may be used (e.g., VPN, IPSec).
Access
VectorComplexityAuthentication
NETWORK LOW NONE
Impact
ConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
NONE PARTIAL NONE
cvss-vector via4 AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
refmap via4
bid 97962
confirm
gentoo GLSA-201709-14
sectrack 1038341
Last major update 09-10-2019 - 23:29
Published 16-07-2018 - 13:29
Last modified 09-10-2019 - 23:29
Back to Top