ID CVE-2010-3613
Summary named in ISC BIND 9.6.2 before 9.6.2-P3, 9.6-ESV before 9.6-ESV-R3, and 9.7.x before 9.7.2-P3 does not properly handle the combination of signed negative responses and corresponding RRSIG records in the cache, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a query for cached data.
References
Vulnerable Configurations
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.6:*:*:*:esv:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.6:*:*:*:esv:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.6:r1:*:*:esv:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.6:r1:*:*:esv:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.6:r2:*:*:esv:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.6:r2:*:*:esv:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.6.2:b1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.6.2:b1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.6.2:p1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.6.2:p1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.6.2:p2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.6.2:p2:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:a1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:a1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:a2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:a2:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:a3:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:a3:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:b1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:b1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:b2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:b2:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:b3:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:b3:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:p1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:p1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:p2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:p2:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.1:b1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.1:b1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.1:p1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.1:p1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.1:p2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.1:p2:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.1:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.1:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.2:p1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.2:p1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.2:p2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.2:p2:*:*:*:*:*:*
CVSS
Base: 4.0 (as of 10-10-2018 - 20:04)
Impact:
Exploitability:
CWE CWE-264
CAPEC
  • Accessing, Modifying or Executing Executable Files
    An attack of this type exploits a system's configuration that allows an attacker to either directly access an executable file, for example through shell access; or in a possible worst case allows an attacker to upload a file and then execute it. Web servers, ftp servers, and message oriented middleware systems which have many integration points are particularly vulnerable, because both the programmers and the administrators must be in synch regarding the interfaces and the correct privileges for each interface.
  • Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files
    An attack of this type exploits a system's trust in configuration and resource files, when the executable loads the resource (such as an image file or configuration file) the attacker has modified the file to either execute malicious code directly or manipulate the target process (e.g. application server) to execute based on the malicious configuration parameters. Since systems are increasingly interrelated mashing up resources from local and remote sources the possibility of this attack occurring is high. The attack can be directed at a client system, such as causing buffer overrun through loading seemingly benign image files, as in Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-028 where specially crafted JPEG files could cause a buffer overrun once loaded into the browser. Another example targets clients reading pdf files. In this case the attacker simply appends javascript to the end of a legitimate url for a pdf (http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/danger-danger-danger/) http://path/to/pdf/file.pdf#whatever_name_you_want=javascript:your_code_here The client assumes that they are reading a pdf, but the attacker has modified the resource and loaded executable javascript into the client's browser process. The attack can also target server processes. The attacker edits the resource or configuration file, for example a web.xml file used to configure security permissions for a J2EE app server, adding role name "public" grants all users with the public role the ability to use the administration functionality. The server trusts its configuration file to be correct, but when they are manipulated, the attacker gains full control.
  • Blue Boxing
    This type of attack against older telephone switches and trunks has been around for decades. A tone is sent by an adversary to impersonate a supervisor signal which has the effect of rerouting or usurping command of the line. While the US infrastructure proper may not contain widespread vulnerabilities to this type of attack, many companies are connected globally through call centers and business process outsourcing. These international systems may be operated in countries which have not upgraded Telco infrastructure and so are vulnerable to Blue boxing. Blue boxing is a result of failure on the part of the system to enforce strong authorization for administrative functions. While the infrastructure is different than standard current applications like web applications, there are historical lessons to be learned to upgrade the access control for administrative functions.
  • Restful Privilege Elevation
    Rest uses standard HTTP (Get, Put, Delete) style permissions methods, but these are not necessarily correlated generally with back end programs. Strict interpretation of HTTP get methods means that these HTTP Get services should not be used to delete information on the server, but there is no access control mechanism to back up this logic. This means that unless the services are properly ACL'd and the application's service implementation are following these guidelines then an HTTP request can easily execute a delete or update on the server side. The attacker identifies a HTTP Get URL such as http://victimsite/updateOrder, which calls out to a program to update orders on a database or other resource. The URL is not idempotent so the request can be submitted multiple times by the attacker, additionally, the attacker may be able to exploit the URL published as a Get method that actually performs updates (instead of merely retrieving data). This may result in malicious or inadvertent altering of data on the server.
  • Target Programs with Elevated Privileges
    This attack targets programs running with elevated privileges. The attacker would try to leverage a bug in the running program and get arbitrary code to execute with elevated privileges. For instance an attacker would look for programs that write to the system directories or registry keys (such as HKLM, which stores a number of critical Windows environment variables). These programs are typically running with elevated privileges and have usually not been designed with security in mind. Such programs are excellent exploit targets because they yield lots of power when they break. The malicious user try to execute its code at the same level as a privileged system call.
  • Manipulating Input to File System Calls
    An attacker manipulates inputs to the target software which the target software passes to file system calls in the OS. The goal is to gain access to, and perhaps modify, areas of the file system that the target software did not intend to be accessible.
Access
VectorComplexityAuthentication
NETWORK LOW SINGLE
Impact
ConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
NONE NONE PARTIAL
assigner via4 cve@mitre.org
cvss-vector via4 AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
non_vulnerable_configuration via4
    oval via4
    accepted 2015-04-20T04:00:30.708-04:00
    class vulnerability
    contributors
    • name Yamini Mohan R
      organization Hewlett-Packard
    • name Sushant Kumar Singh
      organization Hewlett-Packard
    • name Sushant Kumar Singh
      organization Hewlett-Packard
    • name Prashant Kumar
      organization Hewlett-Packard
    • name Mike Cokus
      organization The MITRE Corporation
    description named in ISC BIND 9.6.2 before 9.6.2-P3, 9.6-ESV before 9.6-ESV-R3, and 9.7.x before 9.7.2-P3 does not properly handle the combination of signed negative responses and corresponding RRSIG records in the cache, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a query for cached data.
    family unix
    id oval:org.mitre.oval:def:12601
    status accepted
    submitted 2011-07-28T13:32:59.000-05:00
    title HP-UX Running BIND, Remote Denial of Service (DoS)
    version 44
    redhat via4
    advisories
    • bugzilla
      id 658974
      title CVE-2010-3613 bind: failure to clear existing RRSIG records when a NO DATA is negatively cached could DoS named
      oval
      AND
      • comment Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 is installed
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhba:tst:20070304001
      • OR
        • AND
          • comment bind is earlier than 20:9.2.4-30.el4_8.6
            oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20101000002
          • comment bind is signed with Red Hat master key
            oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20070044003
        • AND
          • comment bind-chroot is earlier than 20:9.2.4-30.el4_8.6
            oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20101000004
          • comment bind-chroot is signed with Red Hat master key
            oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20070044009
        • AND
          • comment bind-devel is earlier than 20:9.2.4-30.el4_8.6
            oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20101000006
          • comment bind-devel is signed with Red Hat master key
            oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20070044005
        • AND
          • comment bind-libs is earlier than 20:9.2.4-30.el4_8.6
            oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20101000010
          • comment bind-libs is signed with Red Hat master key
            oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20070044007
        • AND
          • comment bind-utils is earlier than 20:9.2.4-30.el4_8.6
            oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20101000008
          • comment bind-utils is signed with Red Hat master key
            oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20070044011
      rhsa
      id RHSA-2010:1000
      released 2010-12-20
      severity Important
      title RHSA-2010:1000: bind security update (Important)
    • rhsa
      id RHSA-2010:0975
    • rhsa
      id RHSA-2010:0976
    rpms
    • bind-32:9.7.0-5.P2.el6_0.1
    • bind-chroot-32:9.7.0-5.P2.el6_0.1
    • bind-devel-32:9.7.0-5.P2.el6_0.1
    • bind-libs-32:9.7.0-5.P2.el6_0.1
    • bind-sdb-32:9.7.0-5.P2.el6_0.1
    • bind-utils-32:9.7.0-5.P2.el6_0.1
    • bind-30:9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3
    • bind-chroot-30:9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3
    • bind-devel-30:9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3
    • bind-libbind-devel-30:9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3
    • bind-libs-30:9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3
    • bind-sdb-30:9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3
    • bind-utils-30:9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3
    • caching-nameserver-30:9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3
    • bind-20:9.2.4-30.el4_8.6
    • bind-chroot-20:9.2.4-30.el4_8.6
    • bind-devel-20:9.2.4-30.el4_8.6
    • bind-libs-20:9.2.4-30.el4_8.6
    • bind-utils-20:9.2.4-30.el4_8.6
    refmap via4
    apple APPLE-SA-2011-10-12-3
    bid 45133
    bugtraq 20110308 VMSA-2011-0004 VMware ESX/ESXi SLPD denial of service vulnerability and ESX third party updates for Service Console packages bind, pam, and rpm.
    cert-vn VU#706148
    confirm
    debian DSA-2130
    fedora
    • FEDORA-2010-18469
    • FEDORA-2010-18521
    hp
    • HPSBUX02655
    • SSRT100353
    mandriva MDVSA-2010:253
    mlist [security-announce] 20110307 VMSA-2011-0004 VMware ESX/ESXi SLPD denial of service vulnerability and ESX third party updates for Service Console packages bind, pam, and rpm
    netbsd NetBSD-SA2011-001
    osvdb 69558
    sectrack 1024817
    secunia
    • 42374
    • 42459
    • 42522
    • 42671
    • 42707
    • 43141
    slackware SSA:2010-350-01
    ubuntu USN-1025-1
    vupen
    • ADV-2010-3102
    • ADV-2010-3103
    • ADV-2010-3138
    • ADV-2010-3139
    • ADV-2010-3140
    • ADV-2011-0267
    • ADV-2011-0606
    vulnerable_product via4
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.6:*:*:*:esv:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.6:r1:*:*:esv:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.6:r2:*:*:esv:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.6.2:b1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.6.2:p1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.6.2:p2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:a1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:a2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:a3:*:*:*:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:b1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:b2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:b3:*:*:*:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:p1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:p2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.1:b1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.1:p1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.1:p2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.1:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.2:p1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    • cpe:2.3:a:isc:bind:9.7.2:p2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    Last major update 10-10-2018 - 20:04
    Published 06-12-2010 - 13:44
    Back to Top