CVE-2010-2522
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2010-07-13 17:00
Modified
2024-08-07 02:39
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
The mipv6 daemon in UMIP 0.4 does not verify that netlink messages originated in the kernel, which allows local users to spoof netlink socket communication via a crafted unicast message.
References
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T02:39:37.220Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "name": "[oss-security] 20100707 Re: patch for remote buffer overflows and local message spoofing in mipv6 daemon", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/07/4" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20100706 patch for remote buffer overflows and local message spoofing in mipv6 daemon", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/06/5" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20100708 Re: patch for remote buffer overflows and local message spoofing in mipv6 daemon", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/09/1" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20100707 Re: patch for remote buffer overflows and local message spoofing in mipv6 daemon", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=127850299910685\u0026w=2" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20100708 Re: patch for remote buffer overflows and local message spoofing in mipv6 daemon", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=127859390815405\u0026w=2" }, { "name": "SUSE-SR:2010:019", "tags": [ "vendor-advisory", "x_refsource_SUSE", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-10/msg00006.html" }, { "name": "41524", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_refsource_BID", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/41524" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "n/a" } ] } ], "datePublic": "2009-10-24T00:00:00", "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "The mipv6 daemon in UMIP 0.4 does not verify that netlink messages originated in the kernel, which allows local users to spoof netlink socket communication via a crafted unicast message." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2011-01-15T10:00:00", "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "shortName": "redhat" }, "references": [ { "name": "[oss-security] 20100707 Re: patch for remote buffer overflows and local message spoofing in mipv6 daemon", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/07/4" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20100706 patch for remote buffer overflows and local message spoofing in mipv6 daemon", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/06/5" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20100708 Re: patch for remote buffer overflows and local message spoofing in mipv6 daemon", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/09/1" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20100707 Re: patch for remote buffer overflows and local message spoofing in mipv6 daemon", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST" ], "url": "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=127850299910685\u0026w=2" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20100708 Re: patch for remote buffer overflows and local message spoofing in mipv6 daemon", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST" ], "url": "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=127859390815405\u0026w=2" }, { "name": "SUSE-SR:2010:019", "tags": [ "vendor-advisory", "x_refsource_SUSE" ], "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-10/msg00006.html" }, { "name": "41524", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_refsource_BID" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/41524" } ] } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "assignerShortName": "redhat", "cveId": "CVE-2010-2522", "datePublished": "2010-07-13T17:00:00", "dateReserved": "2010-06-30T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T02:39:37.220Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2010-2522\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2010-07-13T17:30:04.187\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T01:16:49.900\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The mipv6 daemon in UMIP 0.4 does not verify that netlink messages originated in the kernel, which allows local users to spoof netlink socket communication via a crafted unicast message.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"El demonio mipv6 en UMIP v0.4 no verifica los mensajes netlink originados en el kernel, lo que permite a usuarios locales falsificar la comunicaci\u00f3n con el socket netlink a trav\u00e9s de mensajes unicast manipulados.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N\",\"baseScore\":2.1,\"accessVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\",\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-264\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:linux-ipv6:umip:0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"DBADED00-3C2B-4E97-A91C-EEB9016F6F0D\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-10/msg00006.html\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=127850299910685\u0026w=2\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=127859390815405\u0026w=2\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/06/5\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/07/4\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/09/1\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/41524\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-10/msg00006.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=127850299910685\u0026w=2\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=127859390815405\u0026w=2\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/06/5\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/07/4\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/09/1\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/41524\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.