CWE-262
Not Using Password Aging
The product does not have a mechanism in place for managing password aging.
CVE-2025-58435 (GCVE-0-2025-58435)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
- CWE-262 - Not Using Password Aging
| ▼ | URL | Tags |
|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/OSC/ondemand/security/advisories/GHSA-7vh8-mw9f-5r99 | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-58435",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-10T13:54:14.049896Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-10T13:54:22.197Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "ondemand",
"vendor": "OSC",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 3.1.15"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.0.0-0.rc1, \u003c 4.0.7"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Open OnDemand is an open-source HPC portal. Prior to versions 3.1.15 and 4.0.7, noVNC interactive applications did not correctly rotate the password when TurboVNC was higher than version 3.1.2. The likelihood of exploitation is low as a user would need to share their link to an active desktop session and the other user would need to be authenticated to the portal. But obtaining the link would allow that user to perform any actions as the original user and access their data. Open OnDemand 3.1.15 and 4.0.7 have patched this vulnerability and correctly rotate passwords for any version of TurboVNC. As a workaround, downgrade TurboVNC to a version lower than 3.1.2."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 4.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-262",
"description": "CWE-262: Not Using Password Aging",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-09T19:43:47.379Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/OSC/ondemand/security/advisories/GHSA-7vh8-mw9f-5r99",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/OSC/ondemand/security/advisories/GHSA-7vh8-mw9f-5r99"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-7vh8-mw9f-5r99",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Open OnDemand didn\u0027t rotate password for VNC batch_connect"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-58435",
"datePublished": "2025-09-09T19:43:47.379Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-09-01T20:03:06.532Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-10T13:54:22.197Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-60010 (GCVE-0-2025-60010)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
5.3 (Medium) - CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/RE:M
- CWE-262 - Not Using Password Aging
| ▼ | URL | Tags |
|---|---|---|
| https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA103168 | vendor-advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▼ | Juniper Networks | Junos OS |
Version: 0 ≤ Version: 23.2 ≤ Version: 23.4 ≤ Version: 24.2 ≤ Version: 24.4 ≤ |
||||||
|
|||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-60010",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-09T18:48:49.916110Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-09T19:46:35.043Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Junos OS",
"vendor": "Juniper Networks",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "22.4R3-S8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "23.2R2-S4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "23.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "23.4R2-S5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "23.4",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "24.2R2-S1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "24.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "24.4R1-S3, 24.4R2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "24.4",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Junos OS Evolved",
"vendor": "Juniper Networks",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "22.4R3-S8-EVO",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "23.2R2-S4-EVO",
"status": "affected",
"version": "23.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "23.4R2-S5-EVO",
"status": "affected",
"version": "23.4",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "24.2R2-S1-EVO",
"status": "affected",
"version": "24.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "24.4R1-S3-EVO, 24.4R2-EVO",
"status": "affected",
"version": "24.4",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "This issue only affect systems where radius server is configured and refer to as follows:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003ctt\u003e[ system radius-server \u0026lt;IP address\u0026gt; ... ]\u003cbr\u003e[ system radius-options password-protocol mschap-v2 ]\u003cbr\u003e[ system authentication-order ... radius ... ]\u003c/tt\u003e"
}
],
"value": "This issue only affect systems where radius server is configured and refer to as follows:\n\n[ system radius-server \u003cIP address\u003e ... ]\n[ system radius-options password-protocol mschap-v2 ]\n[ system authentication-order ... radius ... ]"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-10-08T16:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A password aging vulnerability in the RADIUS client of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an authenticated, network-based attacker to access the device without enforcing the required password change.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cp\u003eAffected devices allow logins by users for whom the RADIUS server has responded with a reject and required the user to change the password as their password was expired. Therefore the policy mandating the password change is not enforced.\u003cbr\u003eThis does not allow users to login with a wrong password, but only with the correct but expired one.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eJunos OS:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eall versions before 22.4R3-S8,\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S4,\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S5,\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e24.2 versions before 24.2R2-S1,\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e24.4 versions before 24.4R1-S3, 24.4R2;\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eJunos OS Evolved:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eall versions before 22.4R3-S8-EVO,\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S4-EVO,\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S5-EVO,\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e24.2 versions before 24.2R2-S1-EVO,\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e24.4 versions before 24.4R1-S3-EVO, 24.4R2-EVO.\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A password aging vulnerability in the RADIUS client of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an authenticated, network-based attacker to access the device without enforcing the required password change.\n\nAffected devices allow logins by users for whom the RADIUS server has responded with a reject and required the user to change the password as their password was expired. Therefore the policy mandating the password change is not enforced.\nThis does not allow users to login with a wrong password, but only with the correct but expired one.\n\n\n\n\nThis issue affects:\n\nJunos OS:\u00a0\n\n\n\n * all versions before 22.4R3-S8,\n * 23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S4,\n * 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S5,\n * 24.2 versions before 24.2R2-S1,\n * 24.4 versions before 24.4R1-S3, 24.4R2;\n\n\n\n\nJunos OS Evolved:\n\n\n\n * all versions before 22.4R3-S8-EVO,\n * 23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S4-EVO,\n * 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S5-EVO,\n * 24.2 versions before 24.2R2-S1-EVO,\n * 24.4 versions before 24.4R1-S3-EVO, 24.4R2-EVO."
}
],
"exploits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Juniper SIRT is not aware of any malicious exploitation of this vulnerability."
}
],
"value": "Juniper SIRT is not aware of any malicious exploitation of this vulnerability."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/RE:M",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "MODERATE"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-262",
"description": "CWE-262 Not Using Password Aging",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-09T16:20:28.121Z",
"orgId": "8cbe9d5a-a066-4c94-8978-4b15efeae968",
"shortName": "juniper"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA103168"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "The following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue:\u003cbr\u003eJunos OS Evolved: 22.4R3-S8-EVO, 23.2R2-S4-EVO, 23.4R2-S5-EVO, 24.2R2-S1-EVO, 24.4R1-S3-EVO, 24.4R2-EVO, 25.2R1-EVO,\u0026nbsp;and all subsequent releases;\u003cbr\u003eJunos OS: 22.4R3-S8, 23.2R2-S4, 23.4R2-S5, 24.2R2-S1, 24.4R1-S3, 24.4R2, 25.2R1, and all subsequent releases."
}
],
"value": "The following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue:\nJunos OS Evolved: 22.4R3-S8-EVO, 23.2R2-S4-EVO, 23.4R2-S5-EVO, 24.2R2-S1-EVO, 24.4R1-S3-EVO, 24.4R2-EVO, 25.2R1-EVO,\u00a0and all subsequent releases;\nJunos OS: 22.4R3-S8, 23.2R2-S4, 23.4R2-S5, 24.2R2-S1, 24.4R1-S3, 24.4R2, 25.2R1, and all subsequent releases."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "JSA103168",
"defect": [
"1862890"
],
"discovery": "USER"
},
"title": "Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved: Device allows login for user with expired password",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "There are no known workarounds for this issue."
}
],
"value": "There are no known workarounds for this issue."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8cbe9d5a-a066-4c94-8978-4b15efeae968",
"assignerShortName": "juniper",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-60010",
"datePublished": "2025-10-09T16:20:28.121Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-09-23T18:19:06.961Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-09T19:46:35.043Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- As part of a product's design, require users to change their passwords regularly and avoid reusing previous passwords.
Mitigation
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- Developers might disable clipboard paste operations into password fields as a way to discourage users from pasting a password into a clipboard. However, this might encourage users to choose less-secure passwords that are easier to type, and it can reduce the usability of password managers [REF-1294].
CAPEC-16: Dictionary-based Password Attack
["An attacker tries each of the words in a dictionary as passwords to gain access to the system via some user's account. If the password chosen by the user was a word within the dictionary, this attack will be successful (in the absence of other mitigations). This is a specific instance of the password brute forcing attack pattern.", "Dictionary Attacks differ from similar attacks such as Password Spraying (CAPEC-565) and Credential Stuffing (CAPEC-600), since they leverage unknown username/password combinations and don't care about inducing account lockouts."]
CAPEC-49: Password Brute Forcing
An adversary tries every possible value for a password until they succeed. A brute force attack, if feasible computationally, will always be successful because it will essentially go through all possible passwords given the alphabet used (lower case letters, upper case letters, numbers, symbols, etc.) and the maximum length of the password.
CAPEC-509: Kerberoasting
Through the exploitation of how service accounts leverage Kerberos authentication with Service Principal Names (SPNs), the adversary obtains and subsequently cracks the hashed credentials of a service account target to exploit its privileges. The Kerberos authentication protocol centers around a ticketing system which is used to request/grant access to services and to then access the requested services. As an authenticated user, the adversary may request Active Directory and obtain a service ticket with portions encrypted via RC4 with the private key of the authenticated account. By extracting the local ticket and saving it disk, the adversary can brute force the hashed value to reveal the target account credentials.
CAPEC-55: Rainbow Table Password Cracking
An attacker gets access to the database table where hashes of passwords are stored. They then use a rainbow table of pre-computed hash chains to attempt to look up the original password. Once the original password corresponding to the hash is obtained, the attacker uses the original password to gain access to the system.
CAPEC-555: Remote Services with Stolen Credentials
This pattern of attack involves an adversary that uses stolen credentials to leverage remote services such as RDP, telnet, SSH, and VNC to log into a system. Once access is gained, any number of malicious activities could be performed.
CAPEC-560: Use of Known Domain Credentials
An adversary guesses or obtains (i.e. steals or purchases) legitimate credentials (e.g. userID/password) to achieve authentication and to perform authorized actions under the guise of an authenticated user or service.
CAPEC-561: Windows Admin Shares with Stolen Credentials
An adversary guesses or obtains (i.e. steals or purchases) legitimate Windows administrator credentials (e.g. userID/password) to access Windows Admin Shares on a local machine or within a Windows domain.
CAPEC-565: Password Spraying
In a Password Spraying attack, an adversary tries a small list (e.g. 3-5) of common or expected passwords, often matching the target's complexity policy, against a known list of user accounts to gain valid credentials. The adversary tries a particular password for each user account, before moving onto the next password in the list. This approach assists the adversary in remaining undetected by avoiding rapid or frequent account lockouts. The adversary may then reattempt the process with additional passwords, once enough time has passed to prevent inducing a lockout.
CAPEC-600: Credential Stuffing
An adversary tries known username/password combinations against different systems, applications, or services to gain additional authenticated access. Credential Stuffing attacks rely upon the fact that many users leverage the same username/password combination for multiple systems, applications, and services.
CAPEC-652: Use of Known Kerberos Credentials
An adversary obtains (i.e. steals or purchases) legitimate Kerberos credentials (e.g. Kerberos service account userID/password or Kerberos Tickets) with the goal of achieving authenticated access to additional systems, applications, or services within the domain.
CAPEC-653: Use of Known Operating System Credentials
An adversary guesses or obtains (i.e. steals or purchases) legitimate operating system credentials (e.g. userID/password) to achieve authentication and to perform authorized actions on the system, under the guise of an authenticated user or service. This applies to any Operating System.
CAPEC-70: Try Common or Default Usernames and Passwords
An adversary may try certain common or default usernames and passwords to gain access into the system and perform unauthorized actions. An adversary may try an intelligent brute force using empty passwords, known vendor default credentials, as well as a dictionary of common usernames and passwords. Many vendor products come preconfigured with default (and thus well-known) usernames and passwords that should be deleted prior to usage in a production environment. It is a common mistake to forget to remove these default login credentials. Another problem is that users would pick very simple (common) passwords (e.g. "secret" or "password") that make it easier for the attacker to gain access to the system compared to using a brute force attack or even a dictionary attack using a full dictionary.