CWE-178
Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity
The product does not properly account for differences in case sensitivity when accessing or determining the properties of a resource, leading to inconsistent results.
CVE-2025-4035 (GCVE-0-2025-4035)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-04-29 12:56
Modified
2025-07-29 08:15
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-178 - Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity
Summary
A flaw was found in libsoup. When handling cookies, libsoup clients mistakenly allow cookies to be set for public suffix domains if the domain contains at least two components and includes an uppercase character. This bypasses public suffix protections and could allow a malicious website to set cookies for domains it does not own, potentially leading to integrity issues such as session fixation.
References
| ▼ | URL | Tags |
|---|---|---|
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:8128 | vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT | |
| https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-4035 | vdb-entry, x_refsource_REDHAT | |
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2362651 | issue-tracking, x_refsource_REDHAT |
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▼ | Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 |
Unaffected: 0:3.6.5-3.el10_0.6 < * cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-4035",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-29T13:18:15.799218Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-29T13:18:21.297Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10.0"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "libsoup3",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0:3.6.5-3.el10_0.6",
"versionType": "rpm"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "libsoup",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "libsoup",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "libsoup",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "libsoup",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Red Hat would like to thank Jan R\u00f3\u017ca\u0144ski for reporting this issue."
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in libsoup. When handling cookies, libsoup clients mistakenly allow cookies to be set for public suffix domains if the domain contains at least two components and includes an uppercase character. This bypasses public suffix protections and could allow a malicious website to set cookies for domains it does not own, potentially leading to integrity issues such as session fixation."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Moderate"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-178",
"description": "Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-29T08:15:38.915Z",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "RHSA-2025:8128",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:8128"
},
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-4035"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2362651",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2362651"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-04-28T05:38:56.188000+00:00",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-04-28T00:00:00+00:00",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "Libsoup: cookie domain validation bypass via uppercase characters in libsoup",
"x_redhatCweChain": "CWE-178: Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-4035",
"datePublished": "2025-04-29T12:56:22.726Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-28T06:04:50.855Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-29T08:15:38.915Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-46701 (GCVE-0-2025-46701)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-05-29 19:06
Modified
2025-08-08 11:51
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-178 - Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity
Summary
Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity vulnerability in Apache Tomcat's GCI servlet allows security constraint bypass of security constraints that apply to the pathInfo component of a URI mapped to the CGI servlet.
This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.6, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.40, from 9.0.0.M1 through 9.0.104.
The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are
known to be affected: 8.5.0 though 8.5.100. Other, older, EOL versions
may also be affected.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.7, 10.1.41 or 9.0.105, which fixes the issue.
References
| ▼ | URL | Tags |
|---|---|---|
| https://lists.apache.org/thread/xhqqk9w5q45srcdqhogdk04lhdscv30j | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache Tomcat |
Version: 11.0.0-M1 ≤ 11.0.6 Version: 10.1.0-M1 ≤ 10.1.40 Version: 9.0.0.M1 ≤ 9.0.104 Version: 8.5.0 ≤ 8.5.100 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-29T22:03:08.967Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/05/29/4"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-46701",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-05-30T14:58:21.998219Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-30T14:58:31.063Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Apache Tomcat",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "11.0.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "11.0.0-M1",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "10.1.40",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.1.0-M1",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "9.0.104",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.0.0.M1",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.5.100",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "8.5.0",
"status": "unknown",
"version": "3",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Greg K (https://github.com/gregk4sec)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eImproper Handling of Case Sensitivity vulnerability in Apache Tomcat\u0027s GCI servlet allows security constraint bypass of security constraints that apply to the pathInfo component of a URI mapped to the CGI servlet.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.6, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.40, from 9.0.0.M1 through 9.0.104.\u003cbr\u003eThe following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are \nknown to be affected: 8.5.0 though 8.5.100. Other, older, EOL versions \nmay also be affected.\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.7, 10.1.41 or 9.0.105, which fixes the issue.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity vulnerability in Apache Tomcat\u0027s GCI servlet allows security constraint bypass of security constraints that apply to the pathInfo component of a URI mapped to the CGI servlet.\n\nThis issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.6, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.40, from 9.0.0.M1 through 9.0.104.\nThe following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are \nknown to be affected: 8.5.0 though 8.5.100. Other, older, EOL versions \nmay also be affected.\n\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.7, 10.1.41 or 9.0.105, which fixes the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "low"
},
"type": "Textual description of severity"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-178",
"description": "CWE-178 Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-08T11:51:50.768Z",
"orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"shortName": "apache"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/xhqqk9w5q45srcdqhogdk04lhdscv30j"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Apache Tomcat: Security constraint bypass for CGI scripts",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"assignerShortName": "apache",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-46701",
"datePublished": "2025-05-29T19:06:04.289Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-28T12:28:07.568Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-08T11:51:50.768Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Mitigation ID: MIT-44
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Input Validation
Description:
- Avoid making decisions based on names of resources (e.g. files) if those resources can have alternate names.
Mitigation ID: MIT-5
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
Description:
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
Mitigation ID: MIT-20
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
Description:
- Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked.
No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.