Vulnerability from bitnami_vulndb
Published
2024-03-06 10:52
Modified
2025-05-20 10:02
Summary
Improper Input Validation in etcd
Details
In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, a large slice causes panic in decodeRecord method. The size of a record is stored in the length field of a WAL file and no additional validation is done on this data. Therefore, it is possible to forge an extremely large frame size that can unintentionally panic at the expense of any RAFT participant trying to decode the WAL.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Bitnami",
"name": "etcd",
"purl": "pkg:bitnami/etcd"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.3.23"
},
{
"introduced": "3.4.0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.4.10"
}
],
"type": "SEMVER"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-15106"
],
"database_specific": {
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:etcd:etcd:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"severity": "Medium"
},
"details": "In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, a large slice causes panic in decodeRecord method. The size of a record is stored in the length field of a WAL file and no additional validation is done on this data. Therefore, it is possible to forge an extremely large frame size that can unintentionally panic at the expense of any RAFT participant trying to decode the WAL.",
"id": "BIT-etcd-2020-15106",
"modified": "2025-05-20T10:02:07.006Z",
"published": "2024-03-06T10:52:40.894Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/security/advisories/GHSA-p4g4-wgrh-qrg2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/L6B6R43Y7M3DCHWK3L3UVGE2K6WWECMP/"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-15106"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.5.0",
"summary": "Improper Input Validation in etcd"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…