CVE-2024-5814
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-08-27 18:38
Modified
2024-08-27 19:21
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
A malicious TLS1.2 server can force a TLS1.3 client with downgrade capability to use a ciphersuite that it did not agree to and achieve a successful connection. This is because, aside from the extensions, the client was skipping fully parsing the server hello. https://doi.org/10.46586/tches.v2024.i1.457-500
References
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:wolfssl:wolfssl:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "wolfssl",
"vendor": "wolfssl",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.70",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-5814",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-08-27T19:18:34.533190Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-284",
"description": "CWE-284 Improper Access Control",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-27T19:21:04.561Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "wolfSSL",
"programFiles": [
"src/tls13.c"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl",
"vendor": "wolfSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.7.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "Release"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Armin Najafabadi"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Per Allansson"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-07-08T17:30:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eA malicious TLS1.2 server can force a TLS1.3 client with downgrade capability to use a ciphersuite that it did not agree to and achieve a successful connection. This is because, aside from the extensions, the client was skipping fully parsing the server hello.\u003c/span\u003e\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://doi.org/10.46586/tches.v2024.i1.457-500\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A malicious TLS1.2 server can force a TLS1.3 client with downgrade capability to use a ciphersuite that it did not agree to and achieve a successful connection. This is because, aside from the extensions, the client was skipping fully parsing the server hello. https://doi.org/10.46586/tches.v2024.i1.457-500"
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Information Disclosure"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "YES",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 5.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "GREEN",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
"valueDensity": "DIFFUSE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/AU:Y/V:D/RE:M/U:Green",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "MODERATE"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-27T18:38:08.974Z",
"orgId": "50d2cd11-d01a-48ed-9441-5bfce9d63b27",
"shortName": "wolfSSL"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/blob/master/ChangeLog.md#add_later"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Update wolfSSL to 5.7.2.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Update wolfSSL to 5.7.2."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Unverifed Ciphersuite used on a client-side TLS1.3 Downgrade",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "On client side, use the wolfSSL methods for specific protocol versions instead of the downgrade API.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "On client side, use the wolfSSL methods for specific protocol versions instead of the downgrade API."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "50d2cd11-d01a-48ed-9441-5bfce9d63b27",
"assignerShortName": "wolfSSL",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-5814",
"datePublished": "2024-08-27T18:38:08.974Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-06-10T19:48:59.670Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-27T19:21:04.561Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-5814\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"facts@wolfssl.com\",\"published\":\"2024-08-27T19:15:17.980\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-08-28T12:57:39.090\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"A malicious TLS1.2 server can force a TLS1.3 client with downgrade capability to use a ciphersuite that it did not agree to and achieve a successful connection. This is because, aside from the extensions, the client was skipping fully parsing the server hello. https://doi.org/10.46586/tches.v2024.i1.457-500\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Un servidor TLS1.2 malicioso puede obligar a un cliente TLS1.3 con capacidad de degradaci\u00f3n a utilizar un conjunto de cifrado con el que no estuvo de acuerdo y lograr una conexi\u00f3n exitosa. Esto se debe a que, aparte de las extensiones, el cliente se saltaba por completo el an\u00e1lisis del saludo del servidor. https://doi.org/10.46586/tches.v2024.i1.457-500\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"facts@wolfssl.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:X/V:D/RE:M/U:Green\",\"baseScore\":5.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"ACTIVE\",\"vulnerableSystemConfidentiality\":\"LOW\",\"vulnerableSystemIntegrity\":\"NONE\",\"vulnerableSystemAvailability\":\"NONE\",\"subsequentSystemConfidentiality\":\"NONE\",\"subsequentSystemIntegrity\":\"NONE\",\"subsequentSystemAvailability\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnerableSystemConfidentiality\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnerableSystemIntegrity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnerableSystemAvailability\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubsequentSystemConfidentiality\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubsequentSystemIntegrity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubsequentSystemAvailability\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"automatable\":\"YES\",\"recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"DIFFUSE\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"MODERATE\",\"providerUrgency\":\"GREEN\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-284\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/blob/master/ChangeLog.md#add_later\",\"source\":\"facts@wolfssl.com\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.