CVE-2022-23035 (GCVE-0-2022-23035)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2022-01-25 13:46
Modified
2024-08-03 03:28
Severity ?
CWE
  • unknown
Summary
Insufficient cleanup of passed-through device IRQs The management of IRQs associated with physical devices exposed to x86 HVM guests involves an iterative operation in particular when cleaning up after the guest's use of the device. In the case where an interrupt is not quiescent yet at the time this cleanup gets invoked, the cleanup attempt may be scheduled to be retried. When multiple interrupts are involved, this scheduling of a retry may get erroneously skipped. At the same time pointers may get cleared (resulting in a de-reference of NULL) and freed (resulting in a use-after-free), while other code would continue to assume them to be valid.
References
security@xen.orghttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/25/4Mailing List, Patch, Third Party Advisory
security@xen.orghttps://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OMR6UBGJW6JKND7IILGQ2CU35EQPF3E3/
security@xen.orghttps://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-23Third Party Advisory
security@xen.orghttps://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5117Third Party Advisory
security@xen.orghttps://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-395.txtVendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/25/4Mailing List, Patch, Third Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OMR6UBGJW6JKND7IILGQ2CU35EQPF3E3/
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-23Third Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5117Third Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-395.txtVendor Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Xen xen Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T03:28:43.301Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-395.txt"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20220125 Xen Security Advisory 395 v2 (CVE-2022-23035) - Insufficient cleanup of passed-through device IRQs",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/25/4"
          },
          {
            "name": "FEDORA-2022-0cc3916e08",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_FEDORA",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OMR6UBGJW6JKND7IILGQ2CU35EQPF3E3/"
          },
          {
            "name": "DSA-5117",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_DEBIAN",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5117"
          },
          {
            "name": "GLSA-202208-23",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_GENTOO",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-23"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "xen",
          "vendor": "Xen",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "unknown",
              "version": "consult Xen advisory XSA-395"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "{\u0027credit_data\u0027: {\u0027description\u0027: {\u0027description_data\u0027: [{\u0027lang\u0027: \u0027eng\u0027, \u0027value\u0027: \u0027This issue was discovered by Julien Grall of Amazon.\u0027}]}}}"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Insufficient cleanup of passed-through device IRQs The management of IRQs associated with physical devices exposed to x86 HVM guests involves an iterative operation in particular when cleaning up after the guest\u0027s use of the device. In the case where an interrupt is not quiescent yet at the time this cleanup gets invoked, the cleanup attempt may be scheduled to be retried. When multiple interrupts are involved, this scheduling of a retry may get erroneously skipped. At the same time pointers may get cleared (resulting in a de-reference of NULL) and freed (resulting in a use-after-free), while other code would continue to assume them to be valid."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "other": {
            "content": {
              "description": {
                "description_data": [
                  {
                    "lang": "eng",
                    "value": "The precise impact is system specific, but would typically be a Denial\nof Service (DoS) affecting the entire host.  Privilege escalation and\ninformation leaks cannot be ruled out."
                  }
                ]
              }
            },
            "type": "unknown"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "unknown",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2022-08-14T20:07:16",
        "orgId": "23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f",
        "shortName": "XEN"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-395.txt"
        },
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20220125 Xen Security Advisory 395 v2 (CVE-2022-23035) - Insufficient cleanup of passed-through device IRQs",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/25/4"
        },
        {
          "name": "FEDORA-2022-0cc3916e08",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_FEDORA"
          ],
          "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OMR6UBGJW6JKND7IILGQ2CU35EQPF3E3/"
        },
        {
          "name": "DSA-5117",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_DEBIAN"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5117"
        },
        {
          "name": "GLSA-202208-23",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_GENTOO"
          ],
          "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-23"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "security@xen.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2022-23035",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "xen",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_affected": "?",
                            "version_value": "consult Xen advisory XSA-395"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "Xen"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "configuration": {
          "configuration_data": {
            "description": {
              "description_data": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "Xen versions 4.6 and later are vulnerable.  Xen versions 4.5 and earlier\nare not vulnerable.\n\nOnly x86 HVM guests with one or more passed-through physical devices\nusing (together) multiple physical interupts can leverage the\nvulnerability.  x86 PV guests cannot leverage the vulnerability.  x86\nHVM guests without passed-through devices or with a passed-through\ndevice using just a single physical interrupt also cannot leverage the\nvulnerability.  Device pass-through is unsupported for x86 PVH guests\nand all Arm guests."
                }
              ]
            }
          }
        },
        "credit": {
          "credit_data": {
            "description": {
              "description_data": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "This issue was discovered by Julien Grall of Amazon."
                }
              ]
            }
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "Insufficient cleanup of passed-through device IRQs The management of IRQs associated with physical devices exposed to x86 HVM guests involves an iterative operation in particular when cleaning up after the guest\u0027s use of the device. In the case where an interrupt is not quiescent yet at the time this cleanup gets invoked, the cleanup attempt may be scheduled to be retried. When multiple interrupts are involved, this scheduling of a retry may get erroneously skipped. At the same time pointers may get cleared (resulting in a de-reference of NULL) and freed (resulting in a use-after-free), while other code would continue to assume them to be valid."
            }
          ]
        },
        "impact": {
          "impact_data": {
            "description": {
              "description_data": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "The precise impact is system specific, but would typically be a Denial\nof Service (DoS) affecting the entire host.  Privilege escalation and\ninformation leaks cannot be ruled out."
                }
              ]
            }
          }
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "unknown"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-395.txt",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-395.txt"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20220125 Xen Security Advisory 395 v2 (CVE-2022-23035) - Insufficient cleanup of passed-through device IRQs",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/25/4"
            },
            {
              "name": "FEDORA-2022-0cc3916e08",
              "refsource": "FEDORA",
              "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OMR6UBGJW6JKND7IILGQ2CU35EQPF3E3/"
            },
            {
              "name": "DSA-5117",
              "refsource": "DEBIAN",
              "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5117"
            },
            {
              "name": "GLSA-202208-23",
              "refsource": "GENTOO",
              "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-23"
            }
          ]
        },
        "workaround": {
          "workaround_data": {
            "description": {
              "description_data": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "There is no mitigation (other than not passing through to x86 HVM guests\nPCI devices with, overall, more than a single physical interrupt)."
                }
              ]
            }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f",
    "assignerShortName": "XEN",
    "cveId": "CVE-2022-23035",
    "datePublished": "2022-01-25T13:46:03",
    "dateReserved": "2022-01-10T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T03:28:43.301Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2022-23035\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@xen.org\",\"published\":\"2022-01-25T14:15:09.053\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T06:47:51.253\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Insufficient cleanup of passed-through device IRQs The management of IRQs associated with physical devices exposed to x86 HVM guests involves an iterative operation in particular when cleaning up after the guest\u0027s use of the device. In the case where an interrupt is not quiescent yet at the time this cleanup gets invoked, the cleanup attempt may be scheduled to be retried. When multiple interrupts are involved, this scheduling of a retry may get erroneously skipped. At the same time pointers may get cleared (resulting in a de-reference of NULL) and freed (resulting in a use-after-free), while other code would continue to assume them to be valid.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Un saneo insuficiente de las IRQs de dispositivos pasados. La administraci\u00f3n de las IRQs asociadas a dispositivos f\u00edsicos expuestos a hu\u00e9spedes x86 HVM implica una operaci\u00f3n iterativa en particular cuando es limpiada despu\u00e9s del uso del dispositivo por parte del hu\u00e9sped. En el caso de que una interrupci\u00f3n no est\u00e9 quieta todav\u00eda en el momento en que es invocado este saneo, el intento de saneo puede ser programado para ser reintentado. Cuando se presentan varias interrupciones involucradas, esta programaci\u00f3n de un reintento puede omitirse err\u00f3neamente. Al mismo tiempo, los punteros pueden ser borrados (resultando en una desreferencia de NULL) y liberados (resultando en un uso de memoria previamente liberada), mientras que otro c\u00f3digo continuar\u00eda asumiendo que son v\u00e1lidos\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":4.6,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"PHYSICAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":0.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C\",\"baseScore\":4.7,\"accessVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":3.4,\"impactScore\":6.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-459\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:xen:xen:*:*:*:*:*:*:x86:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"4.6.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"4B8D71AF-016B-49EF-AE2B-95DEDE3BE3C3\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:34:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A930E247-0B43-43CB-98FF-6CE7B8189835\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:11.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"FA6FEEC2-9F11-4643-8827-749718254FED\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/25/4\",\"source\":\"security@xen.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OMR6UBGJW6JKND7IILGQ2CU35EQPF3E3/\",\"source\":\"security@xen.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-23\",\"source\":\"security@xen.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5117\",\"source\":\"security@xen.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-395.txt\",\"source\":\"security@xen.org\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/25/4\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OMR6UBGJW6JKND7IILGQ2CU35EQPF3E3/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-23\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5117\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-395.txt\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.