CVE-2021-32773
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2021-07-19 23:55
Modified
2024-08-03 23:33
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
Racket is a general-purpose programming language and an ecosystem for language-oriented programming. In versions prior to 8.2, code evaluated using the Racket sandbox could cause system modules to incorrectly use attacker-created modules instead of their intended dependencies. This could allow system functions to be controlled by the attacker, giving access to facilities intended to be restricted. This problem is fixed in Racket version 8.2. A workaround is available, depending on system settings. For systems that provide arbitrary Racket evaluation, external sandboxing such as containers limit the impact of the problem. For multi-user evaluation systems, such as the `handin-server` system, it is not possible to work around this problem and upgrading is required.
References
{ containers: { adp: [ { providerMetadata: { dateUpdated: "2024-08-03T23:33:55.527Z", orgId: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", shortName: "CVE", }, references: [ { tags: [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred", ], url: "https://github.com/racket/racket/security/advisories/GHSA-cgrw-p7p7-937c", }, { tags: [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred", ], url: "https://github.com/racket/racket/commit/6ca4ffeca1e5877d44f835760ad89f18488d97e1", }, ], title: "CVE Program Container", }, ], cna: { affected: [ { product: "racket", vendor: "racket", versions: [ { status: "affected", version: "< 8.2", }, ], }, ], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "Racket is a general-purpose programming language and an ecosystem for language-oriented programming. In versions prior to 8.2, code evaluated using the Racket sandbox could cause system modules to incorrectly use attacker-created modules instead of their intended dependencies. This could allow system functions to be controlled by the attacker, giving access to facilities intended to be restricted. This problem is fixed in Racket version 8.2. A workaround is available, depending on system settings. For systems that provide arbitrary Racket evaluation, external sandboxing such as containers limit the impact of the problem. For multi-user evaluation systems, such as the `handin-server` system, it is not possible to work around this problem and upgrading is required.", }, ], metrics: [ { cvssV3_1: { attackComplexity: "HIGH", attackVector: "NETWORK", availabilityImpact: "NONE", baseScore: 6.1, baseSeverity: "MEDIUM", confidentialityImpact: "NONE", integrityImpact: "HIGH", privilegesRequired: "NONE", scope: "CHANGED", userInteraction: "REQUIRED", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N", version: "3.1", }, }, ], problemTypes: [ { descriptions: [ { cweId: "CWE-441", description: "CWE-441: Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy')", lang: "en", type: "CWE", }, ], }, ], providerMetadata: { dateUpdated: "2021-07-19T23:55:11", orgId: "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa", shortName: "GitHub_M", }, references: [ { tags: [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", ], url: "https://github.com/racket/racket/security/advisories/GHSA-cgrw-p7p7-937c", }, { tags: [ "x_refsource_MISC", ], url: "https://github.com/racket/racket/commit/6ca4ffeca1e5877d44f835760ad89f18488d97e1", }, ], source: { advisory: "GHSA-cgrw-p7p7-937c", discovery: "UNKNOWN", }, title: "Confused deputy attack in sandbox module resolution", x_legacyV4Record: { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "security-advisories@github.com", ID: "CVE-2021-32773", STATE: "PUBLIC", TITLE: "Confused deputy attack in sandbox module resolution", }, affects: { vendor: { vendor_data: [ { product: { product_data: [ { product_name: "racket", version: { version_data: [ { version_value: "< 8.2", }, ], }, }, ], }, vendor_name: "racket", }, ], }, }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "eng", value: "Racket is a general-purpose programming language and an ecosystem for language-oriented programming. In versions prior to 8.2, code evaluated using the Racket sandbox could cause system modules to incorrectly use attacker-created modules instead of their intended dependencies. This could allow system functions to be controlled by the attacker, giving access to facilities intended to be restricted. This problem is fixed in Racket version 8.2. A workaround is available, depending on system settings. For systems that provide arbitrary Racket evaluation, external sandboxing such as containers limit the impact of the problem. For multi-user evaluation systems, such as the `handin-server` system, it is not possible to work around this problem and upgrading is required.", }, ], }, impact: { cvss: { attackComplexity: "HIGH", attackVector: "NETWORK", availabilityImpact: "NONE", baseScore: 6.1, baseSeverity: "MEDIUM", confidentialityImpact: "NONE", integrityImpact: "HIGH", privilegesRequired: "NONE", scope: "CHANGED", userInteraction: "REQUIRED", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N", version: "3.1", }, }, problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "eng", value: "CWE-441: Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy')", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "https://github.com/racket/racket/security/advisories/GHSA-cgrw-p7p7-937c", refsource: "CONFIRM", url: "https://github.com/racket/racket/security/advisories/GHSA-cgrw-p7p7-937c", }, { name: "https://github.com/racket/racket/commit/6ca4ffeca1e5877d44f835760ad89f18488d97e1", refsource: "MISC", url: "https://github.com/racket/racket/commit/6ca4ffeca1e5877d44f835760ad89f18488d97e1", }, ], }, source: { advisory: "GHSA-cgrw-p7p7-937c", discovery: "UNKNOWN", }, }, }, }, cveMetadata: { assignerOrgId: "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa", assignerShortName: "GitHub_M", cveId: "CVE-2021-32773", datePublished: "2021-07-19T23:55:11", dateReserved: "2021-05-12T00:00:00", dateUpdated: "2024-08-03T23:33:55.527Z", state: "PUBLISHED", }, dataType: "CVE_RECORD", dataVersion: "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { nvd: "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2021-32773\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2021-07-20T00:15:08.883\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T06:07:42.763\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Racket is a general-purpose programming language and an ecosystem for language-oriented programming. In versions prior to 8.2, code evaluated using the Racket sandbox could cause system modules to incorrectly use attacker-created modules instead of their intended dependencies. This could allow system functions to be controlled by the attacker, giving access to facilities intended to be restricted. This problem is fixed in Racket version 8.2. A workaround is available, depending on system settings. For systems that provide arbitrary Racket evaluation, external sandboxing such as containers limit the impact of the problem. For multi-user evaluation systems, such as the `handin-server` system, it is not possible to work around this problem and upgrading is required.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Racket es un lenguaje de programación de propósito general y un ecosistema para la programación orientada al lenguaje. En versiones anteriores a 8.2, el código evaluado usando el sandbox de Racket podía causar que los módulos del sistema usaran incorrectamente módulos creados por el atacante en lugar de sus dependencias previstas. Esto podía permitir que las funciones del sistema fueran controladas por el atacante, dando acceso a instalaciones que se pretendía restringir. Este problema se ha corregido en la versión 8.2 de Racket. Hay una solución disponible, dependiendo de la configuración del sistema. Para los sistemas que proporcionan una evaluación arbitraria de Racket, los sandboxs externos, como los contenedores, limitan el impacto del problema. Para los sistemas de evaluación multiusuario, como el sistema \\\"handin-server\\\", no es posible solucionar este problema y es requerida una actualización\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":6.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.6,\"impactScore\":4.0},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-441\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-610\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:racket-lang:racket:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"8.2\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B0BC1E7F-0154-4881-8B4E-D1C426BA55B4\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/racket/racket/commit/6ca4ffeca1e5877d44f835760ad89f18488d97e1\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/racket/racket/security/advisories/GHSA-cgrw-p7p7-937c\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/racket/racket/commit/6ca4ffeca1e5877d44f835760ad89f18488d97e1\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/racket/racket/security/advisories/GHSA-cgrw-p7p7-937c\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}", }, }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.