CVE-2018-1046
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2018-07-16 20:00
Modified
2024-08-05 03:44
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
0.15%
(0.52729)
Summary
pdns before version 4.1.2 is vulnerable to a buffer overflow in dnsreplay. In the dnsreplay tool provided with PowerDNS Authoritative, replaying a specially crafted PCAP file can trigger a stack-based buffer overflow, leading to a crash and potentially arbitrary code execution. This buffer overflow only occurs when the -ecs-stamp option of dnsreplay is used.
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
secalert@redhat.com | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-1046 | Issue Tracking, Patch, Third Party Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-1046 | Issue Tracking, Patch, Third Party Advisory |
{ containers: { adp: [ { providerMetadata: { dateUpdated: "2024-08-05T03:44:11.842Z", orgId: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", shortName: "CVE", }, references: [ { tags: [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred", ], url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-1046", }, ], title: "CVE Program Container", }, ], cna: { affected: [ { product: "pdns", vendor: "[UNKNOWN]", versions: [ { status: "affected", version: "pdns 4.1.2", }, ], }, ], datePublic: "2018-07-16T00:00:00", descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "pdns before version 4.1.2 is vulnerable to a buffer overflow in dnsreplay. In the dnsreplay tool provided with PowerDNS Authoritative, replaying a specially crafted PCAP file can trigger a stack-based buffer overflow, leading to a crash and potentially arbitrary code execution. This buffer overflow only occurs when the -ecs-stamp option of dnsreplay is used.", }, ], metrics: [ { cvssV3_0: { attackComplexity: "HIGH", attackVector: "LOCAL", availabilityImpact: "HIGH", baseScore: 7, baseSeverity: "HIGH", confidentialityImpact: "HIGH", integrityImpact: "HIGH", privilegesRequired: "NONE", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "REQUIRED", vectorString: "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", version: "3.0", }, }, ], problemTypes: [ { descriptions: [ { cweId: "CWE-121", description: "CWE-121", lang: "en", type: "CWE", }, ], }, ], providerMetadata: { dateUpdated: "2018-07-16T19:57:01", orgId: "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", shortName: "redhat", }, references: [ { tags: [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", ], url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-1046", }, ], x_legacyV4Record: { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "secalert@redhat.com", ID: "CVE-2018-1046", STATE: "PUBLIC", }, affects: { vendor: { vendor_data: [ { product: { product_data: [ { product_name: "pdns", version: { version_data: [ { version_value: "pdns 4.1.2", }, ], }, }, ], }, vendor_name: "[UNKNOWN]", }, ], }, }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "eng", value: "pdns before version 4.1.2 is vulnerable to a buffer overflow in dnsreplay. In the dnsreplay tool provided with PowerDNS Authoritative, replaying a specially crafted PCAP file can trigger a stack-based buffer overflow, leading to a crash and potentially arbitrary code execution. This buffer overflow only occurs when the -ecs-stamp option of dnsreplay is used.", }, ], }, impact: { cvss: [ [ { vectorString: "7.0/CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", version: "3.0", }, ], ], }, problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "eng", value: "CWE-121", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-1046", refsource: "CONFIRM", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-1046", }, ], }, }, }, }, cveMetadata: { assignerOrgId: "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", assignerShortName: "redhat", cveId: "CVE-2018-1046", datePublished: "2018-07-16T20:00:00", dateReserved: "2017-12-04T00:00:00", dateUpdated: "2024-08-05T03:44:11.842Z", state: "PUBLISHED", }, dataType: "CVE_RECORD", dataVersion: "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { nvd: "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2018-1046\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2018-07-16T20:29:00.317\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T03:59:03.720\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"pdns before version 4.1.2 is vulnerable to a buffer overflow in dnsreplay. In the dnsreplay tool provided with PowerDNS Authoritative, replaying a specially crafted PCAP file can trigger a stack-based buffer overflow, leading to a crash and potentially arbitrary code execution. This buffer overflow only occurs when the -ecs-stamp option of dnsreplay is used.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"pdnsen versiones anteriores a la 4.1.2 es vulnerable a un desbordamiento de búfer en dnsreplay. En la herramienta dnsreplay provista con PowerDNS Authoritative, la reproducción de un archivo PCAP especialmente manipulado puede desencadenar un desbordamiento de búfer basado en pila, lo que conduce a un cierre inesperado y a una potencial ejecución de código arbitrario. Este desbordamiento de búfer solo ocurre cuando se emplea la opción -ecs-stamp de dnsreplay.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":7.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.8,\"impactScore\":5.9}],\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":7.0,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.0,\"impactScore\":5.9}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C\",\"baseScore\":9.3,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":10.0,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":true}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-121\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-787\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:powerdns:pdns:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"4.1.2\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"9B821DB0-83E9-40C1-BDC6-80BC67A3E2A9\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-1046\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-1046\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}", }, }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.