CVE-2015-3230
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2015-10-29 20:00
Modified
2024-08-06 05:39
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
389 Directory Server (formerly Fedora Directory Server) before 1.3.3.12 does not enforce the nsSSL3Ciphers preference when creating an sslSocket, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact by requesting to use a disabled cipher.
References
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T05:39:32.036Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48194"
},
{
"name": "FEDORA-2015-15128",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_FEDORA",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-October/168985.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230996"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/releases/release-1-3-3-12.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2015-10-08T00:00:00",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "389 Directory Server (formerly Fedora Directory Server) before 1.3.3.12 does not enforce the nsSSL3Ciphers preference when creating an sslSocket, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact by requesting to use a disabled cipher."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2015-10-29T19:57:01",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48194"
},
{
"name": "FEDORA-2015-15128",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_FEDORA"
],
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-October/168985.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230996"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/releases/release-1-3-3-12.html"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2015-3230",
"datePublished": "2015-10-29T20:00:00",
"dateReserved": "2015-04-10T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T05:39:32.036Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2015-3230\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2015-10-29T20:59:00.087\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T02:28:57.343\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"389 Directory Server (formerly Fedora Directory Server) before 1.3.3.12 does not enforce the nsSSL3Ciphers preference when creating an sslSocket, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact by requesting to use a disabled cipher.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"389 Directory Server (anteriormente Fedora Directory Server) en versiones anteriores a 1.3.3.12 no hace cumplir la preferencia nsSSL3Ciphers cuando crean un sslSocket, lo que permite a atacantes remotos tener un impacto no especificado mediante la petici\u00f3n de utilizar un cifrado deshabilitado.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":6.4,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-254\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:fedoraproject:389_directory_server:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"1.3.3.10\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"D55DA2AE-B217-41DF-A14F-8282D1B3808D\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/releases/release-1-3-3-12.html\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-October/168985.html\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230996\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48194\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/releases/release-1-3-3-12.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-October/168985.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230996\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48194\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.