ID CVE-2011-1581
Summary The bond_select_queue function in drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.39, when a network device with a large number of receive queues is installed but the default tx_queues setting is used, does not properly restrict queue indexes, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (BUG and system crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact by sending network traffic.
References
Vulnerable Configurations
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.16
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.16
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.11
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.11
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.12
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.12
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.13
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.13
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.14
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.14
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.15
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.15
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.21
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.21
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.18
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.18
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.17
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.17
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.20
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.20
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.19
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.19
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.12
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.12
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.13
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.13
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.11
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.11
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.14
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.14
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.12
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.12
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.11
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.11
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.61
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.61
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.62
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.62
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.52
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.52
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.51
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.51
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.50
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.50
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.49
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.49
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.48
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.48
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.47
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.47
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.46
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.46
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.45
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.45
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.60
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.60
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.59
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.59
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.58
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.58
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.57
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.57
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.56
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.56
  • Linux Kernel 2.16.55
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.55
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.54
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.54
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.53
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.53
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.33
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.33
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.34
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.34
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.35
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.35
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.36
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.36
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.29
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.29
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.30
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.30
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.31
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.31
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.32
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.32
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.41
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.41
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.42
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.42
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.43
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.43
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.44
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.44
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.37
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.37
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.38
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.38
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.39
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.39
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.40
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.40
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.18
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.18
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.17
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.17
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.20
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.20
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.19
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.19
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.14
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.14
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.13
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.13
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.16
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.16
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.15
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.15
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.26
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.26
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.25
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.25
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.28
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.28
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.27
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.27
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.22
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.22
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.21
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.21
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.24
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.24
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.23
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.23
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.12
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.12
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.11
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.11
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.8.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.8.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.0
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.0
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.6
  • linux Kernel 2.6.31 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31:rc7
  • linux Kernel 2.6.31 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.11
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.11
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.12
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.12
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27 Release Candidate 9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27:rc9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.20
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.20
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.23
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.23
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.24
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.24
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.12
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.12
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.11
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.11
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.22
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.22
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.34
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.34
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.33
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.33
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.36
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.36
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.35
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.35
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.37
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.37
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.11
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.11
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.12
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.12
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.13
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.13
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.14
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.14
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.15
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.15
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.16
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.16
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.17
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.17
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.18
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.18
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.19
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.19
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.20
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.20
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.16
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.15
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.17
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.17
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.16
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.16
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.11
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.11
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.13
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.13
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.12
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.12
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23 release candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.14
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.14
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.16
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.16
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.22
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.22
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.21
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.21
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.20
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.20
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.19
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.19
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.14
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.14
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.15
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.15
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.17
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.17
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.18
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.18
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.11
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.11
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.12
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.12
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.13
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.13
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.20
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.20
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.19
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.19
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.18
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.18
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.17
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.17
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.16
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.16
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.15
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.15
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.14
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.14
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.13
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.13
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.12
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.12
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.11
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.11
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.14
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.14
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.13
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.13
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.21
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.21
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.25
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.25
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.26
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.26
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.27
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.27
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.28
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.28
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.29
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.29
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.30
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.30
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.31
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.31
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.32
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.32
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.13
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.13
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.14
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.14
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.15
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.15
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.16
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.16
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.17
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.17
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.18
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.18
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.19
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.19
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.40
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.40
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.38
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.38
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.39
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.39
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.41
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.41
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.42
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.42
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.43
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.43
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.44
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.44
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.45
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.45
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.46
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.46
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.47
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.47
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.48
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.48
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.49
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.49
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.50
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.50
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.51
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.51
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.52
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.52
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.53
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.53
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.54
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.54
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.55
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.55
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.56
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.56
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.57
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.57
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.21
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.21
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.22
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.22
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.23
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.23
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.24
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.24
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.25
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.25
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.26
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.26
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.27
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.27
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.1 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.1:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.1 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.1:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.1 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.1:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.2 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.2:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.2 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.2:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.2 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.2:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.3 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.3:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.3 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.3:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.3 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.3:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.3 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.3:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.4 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.4:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.4 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.4:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.4 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.4:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.5 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.5:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.5 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.5:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.5 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.5:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.6 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.6:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.6 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.6:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.6 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.6:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.7 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.7:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.7 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.7:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.7 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.7:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.8 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.8:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.8 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.8:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.8 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.8:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.8 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.8:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.9 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.9:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.9 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.9:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.9 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.9:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.9 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.9:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.10 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.10:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.10 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.10:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.10 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.10:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23 Release Candidate 9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23:rc9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25 Release Candidate 9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25:rc9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26 Release Candidate 9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26:rc9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28 Release Candidate 9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28:rc9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30:rc8
  • linux Kernel 2.6.31 Release Candidate 9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31:rc9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38.7
CVSS
Base: 4.6 (as of 26-05-2011 - 15:00)
Impact:
Exploitability:
CWE CWE-20
CAPEC
  • Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables
    This attack pattern involves causing a buffer overflow through manipulation of environment variables. Once the attacker finds that they can modify an environment variable, they may try to overflow associated buffers. This attack leverages implicit trust often placed in environment variables.
  • Server Side Include (SSI) Injection
    An attacker can use Server Side Include (SSI) Injection to send code to a web application that then gets executed by the web server. Doing so enables the attacker to achieve similar results to Cross Site Scripting, viz., arbitrary code execution and information disclosure, albeit on a more limited scale, since the SSI directives are nowhere near as powerful as a full-fledged scripting language. Nonetheless, the attacker can conveniently gain access to sensitive files, such as password files, and execute shell commands.
  • Cross Zone Scripting
    An attacker is able to cause a victim to load content into their web-browser that bypasses security zone controls and gain access to increased privileges to execute scripting code or other web objects such as unsigned ActiveX controls or applets. This is a privilege elevation attack targeted at zone-based web-browser security. In a zone-based model, pages belong to one of a set of zones corresponding to the level of privilege assigned to that page. Pages in an untrusted zone would have a lesser level of access to the system and/or be restricted in the types of executable content it was allowed to invoke. In a cross-zone scripting attack, a page that should be assigned to a less privileged zone is granted the privileges of a more trusted zone. This can be accomplished by exploiting bugs in the browser, exploiting incorrect configuration in the zone controls, through a cross-site scripting attack that causes the attackers' content to be treated as coming from a more trusted page, or by leveraging some piece of system functionality that is accessible from both the trusted and less trusted zone. This attack differs from "Restful Privilege Escalation" in that the latter correlates to the inadequate securing of RESTful access methods (such as HTTP DELETE) on the server, while cross-zone scripting attacks the concept of security zones as implemented by a browser.
  • Cross Site Scripting through Log Files
    An attacker may leverage a system weakness where logs are susceptible to log injection to insert scripts into the system's logs. If these logs are later viewed by an administrator through a thin administrative interface and the log data is not properly HTML encoded before being written to the page, the attackers' scripts stored in the log will be executed in the administrative interface with potentially serious consequences. This attack pattern is really a combination of two other attack patterns: log injection and stored cross site scripting.
  • Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
    An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
  • Object Relational Mapping Injection
    An attacker leverages a weakness present in the database access layer code generated with an Object Relational Mapping (ORM) tool or a weakness in the way that a developer used a persistence framework to inject his or her own SQL commands to be executed against the underlying database. The attack here is similar to plain SQL injection, except that the application does not use JDBC to directly talk to the database, but instead it uses a data access layer generated by an ORM tool or framework (e.g. Hibernate). While most of the time code generated by an ORM tool contains safe access methods that are immune to SQL injection, sometimes either due to some weakness in the generated code or due to the fact that the developer failed to use the generated access methods properly, SQL injection is still possible.
  • SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter Tampering
    An attacker modifies the parameters of the SOAP message that is sent from the service consumer to the service provider to initiate a SQL injection attack. On the service provider side, the SOAP message is parsed and parameters are not properly validated before being used to access a database in a way that does not use parameter binding, thus enabling the attacker to control the structure of the executed SQL query. This pattern describes a SQL injection attack with the delivery mechanism being a SOAP message.
  • Subverting Environment Variable Values
    The attacker directly or indirectly modifies environment variables used by or controlling the target software. The attacker's goal is to cause the target software to deviate from its expected operation in a manner that benefits the attacker.
  • Format String Injection
    An attacker includes formatting characters in a string input field on the target application. Most applications assume that users will provide static text and may respond unpredictably to the presence of formatting character. For example, in certain functions of the C programming languages such as printf, the formatting character %s will print the contents of a memory location expecting this location to identify a string and the formatting character %n prints the number of DWORD written in the memory. An attacker can use this to read or write to memory locations or files, or simply to manipulate the value of the resulting text in unexpected ways. Reading or writing memory may result in program crashes and writing memory could result in the execution of arbitrary code if the attacker can write to the program stack.
  • LDAP Injection
    An attacker manipulates or crafts an LDAP query for the purpose of undermining the security of the target. Some applications use user input to create LDAP queries that are processed by an LDAP server. For example, a user might provide their username during authentication and the username might be inserted in an LDAP query during the authentication process. An attacker could use this input to inject additional commands into an LDAP query that could disclose sensitive information. For example, entering a * in the aforementioned query might return information about all users on the system. This attack is very similar to an SQL injection attack in that it manipulates a query to gather additional information or coerce a particular return value.
  • Relative Path Traversal
    An attacker exploits a weakness in input validation on the target by supplying a specially constructed path utilizing dot and slash characters for the purpose of obtaining access to arbitrary files or resources. An attacker modifies a known path on the target in order to reach material that is not available through intended channels. These attacks normally involve adding additional path separators (/ or \) and/or dots (.), or encodings thereof, in various combinations in order to reach parent directories or entirely separate trees of the target's directory structure.
  • Client-side Injection-induced Buffer Overflow
    This type of attack exploits a buffer overflow vulnerability in targeted client software through injection of malicious content from a custom-built hostile service.
  • Variable Manipulation
    An attacker manipulates variables used by an application to perform a variety of possible attacks. This can either be performed through the manipulation of function call parameters or by manipulating external variables, such as environment variables, that are used by an application. Changing variable values is usually undertaken as part of another attack; for example, a path traversal (inserting relative path modifiers) or buffer overflow (enlarging a variable value beyond an application's ability to store it).
  • Embedding Scripts in Non-Script Elements
    This attack is a form of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) where malicious scripts are embedded in elements that are not expected to host scripts such as image tags (<img>), comments in XML documents (< !-CDATA->), etc. These tags may not be subject to the same input validation, output validation, and other content filtering and checking routines, so this can create an opportunity for an attacker to tunnel through the application's elements and launch a XSS attack through other elements. As with all remote attacks, it is important to differentiate the ability to launch an attack (such as probing an internal network for unpatched servers) and the ability of the remote attacker to collect and interpret the output of said attack.
  • Flash Injection
    An attacker tricks a victim to execute malicious flash content that executes commands or makes flash calls specified by the attacker. One example of this attack is cross-site flashing, an attacker controlled parameter to a reference call loads from content specified by the attacker.
  • Cross-Site Scripting Using Alternate Syntax
    The attacker uses alternate forms of keywords or commands that result in the same action as the primary form but which may not be caught by filters. For example, many keywords are processed in a case insensitive manner. If the site's web filtering algorithm does not convert all tags into a consistent case before the comparison with forbidden keywords it is possible to bypass filters (e.g., incomplete black lists) by using an alternate case structure. For example, the "script" tag using the alternate forms of "Script" or "ScRiPt" may bypass filters where "script" is the only form tested. Other variants using different syntax representations are also possible as well as using pollution meta-characters or entities that are eventually ignored by the rendering engine. The attack can result in the execution of otherwise prohibited functionality.
  • Exploiting Trust in Client (aka Make the Client Invisible)
    An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities in client/server communication channel authentication and data integrity. It leverages the implicit trust a server places in the client, or more importantly, that which the server believes is the client. An attacker executes this type of attack by placing themselves in the communication channel between client and server such that communication directly to the server is possible where the server believes it is communicating only with a valid client. There are numerous variations of this type of attack.
  • XML Nested Payloads
    Applications often need to transform data in and out of the XML format by using an XML parser. It may be possible for an attacker to inject data that may have an adverse effect on the XML parser when it is being processed. By nesting XML data and causing this data to be continuously self-referential, an attacker can cause the XML parser to consume more resources while processing, causing excessive memory consumption and CPU utilization. An attacker's goal is to leverage parser failure to his or her advantage. In most cases this type of an attack will result in a denial of service due to an application becoming unstable, freezing, or crash. However it may be possible to cause a crash resulting in arbitrary code execution, leading to a jump from the data plane to the control plane [R.230.1].
  • XML Oversized Payloads
    Applications often need to transform data in and out of the XML format by using an XML parser. It may be possible for an attacker to inject data that may have an adverse effect on the XML parser when it is being processed. By supplying oversized payloads in input vectors that will be processed by the XML parser, an attacker can cause the XML parser to consume more resources while processing, causing excessive memory consumption and CPU utilization, and potentially cause execution of arbitrary code. An attacker's goal is to leverage parser failure to his or her advantage. In many cases this type of an attack will result in a denial of service due to an application becoming unstable, freezing, or crash. However it is possible to cause a crash resulting in arbitrary code execution, leading to a jump from the data plane to the control plane [R.231.1].
  • Filter Failure through Buffer Overflow
    In this attack, the idea is to cause an active filter to fail by causing an oversized transaction. An attacker may try to feed overly long input strings to the program in an attempt to overwhelm the filter (by causing a buffer overflow) and hoping that the filter does not fail securely (i.e. the user input is let into the system unfiltered).
  • Cross-Site Scripting via Encoded URI Schemes
    An attack of this type exploits the ability of most browsers to interpret "data", "javascript" or other URI schemes as client-side executable content placeholders. This attack consists of passing a malicious URI in an anchor tag HREF attribute or any other similar attributes in other HTML tags. Such malicious URI contains, for example, a base64 encoded HTML content with an embedded cross-site scripting payload. The attack is executed when the browser interprets the malicious content i.e., for example, when the victim clicks on the malicious link.
  • XML Injection
    An attacker utilizes crafted XML user-controllable input to probe, attack, and inject data into the XML database, using techniques similar to SQL injection. The user-controllable input can allow for unauthorized viewing of data, bypassing authentication or the front-end application for direct XML database access, and possibly altering database information.
  • Environment Variable Manipulation
    An attacker manipulates environment variables used by an application to perform a variety of possible attacks. Changing variable values is usually undertaken as part of another attack; for example, a path traversal (inserting relative path modifiers) or buffer overflow (enlarging a variable value beyond an application's ability to store it).
  • Global variable manipulation
    An attacker manipulates global variables used by an application to perform a variety of possible attacks. Changing variable values is usually undertaken as part of another attack; for example, a path traversal (inserting relative path modifiers) or buffer overflow (enlarging a variable value beyond an application's ability to store it).
  • Leverage Alternate Encoding
    This attack leverages the possibility to encode potentially harmful input and submit it to applications not expecting or effective at validating this encoding standard making input filtering difficult.
  • Fuzzing
    Fuzzing is a software testing method that feeds randomly constructed input to the system and looks for an indication that a failure in response to that input has occurred. Fuzzing treats the system as a black box and is totally free from any preconceptions or assumptions about the system. An attacker can leverage fuzzing to try to identify weaknesses in the system. For instance fuzzing can help an attacker discover certain assumptions made in the system about user input. Fuzzing gives an attacker a quick way of potentially uncovering some of these assumptions without really knowing anything about the internals of the system. These assumptions can then be turned against the system by specially crafting user input that may allow an attacker to achieve his goals.
  • Using Leading 'Ghost' Character Sequences to Bypass Input Filters
    An attacker intentionally introduces leading characters that enable getting the input past the filters. The API that is being targeted, ignores the leading "ghost" characters, and therefore processes the attackers' input. This occurs when the targeted API will accept input data in several syntactic forms and interpret it in the equivalent semantic way, while the filter does not take into account the full spectrum of the syntactic forms acceptable to the targeted API. Some APIs will strip certain leading characters from a string of parameters. Perhaps these characters are considered redundant, and for this reason they are removed. Another possibility is the parser logic at the beginning of analysis is specialized in some way that causes some characters to be removed. The attacker can specify multiple types of alternative encodings at the beginning of a string as a set of probes. One commonly used possibility involves adding ghost characters--extra characters that don't affect the validity of the request at the API layer. If the attacker has access to the API libraries being targeted, certain attack ideas can be tested directly in advance. Once alternative ghost encodings emerge through testing, the attacker can move from lab-based API testing to testing real-world service implementations.
  • Accessing/Intercepting/Modifying HTTP Cookies
    This attack relies on the use of HTTP Cookies to store credentials, state information and other critical data on client systems. The first form of this attack involves accessing HTTP Cookies to mine for potentially sensitive data contained therein. The second form of this attack involves intercepting this data as it is transmitted from client to server. This intercepted information is then used by the attacker to impersonate the remote user/session. The third form is when the cookie's content is modified by the attacker before it is sent back to the server. Here the attacker seeks to convince the target server to operate on this falsified information.
  • Embedding Scripts in HTTP Query Strings
    A variant of cross-site scripting called "reflected" cross-site scripting, the HTTP Query Strings attack consists of passing a malicious script inside an otherwise valid HTTP request query string. This is of significant concern for sites that rely on dynamic, user-generated content such as bulletin boards, news sites, blogs, and web enabled administration GUIs. The malicious script may steal session data, browse history, probe files, or otherwise execute attacks on the client side. Once the attacker has prepared the malicious HTTP query it is sent to a victim user (perhaps by email, IM, or posted on an online forum), who clicks on a normal looking link that contains a poison query string. This technique can be made more effective through the use of services like http://tinyurl.com/, which makes very small URLs that will redirect to very large, complex ones. The victim will not know what he is really clicking on.
  • MIME Conversion
    An attacker exploits a weakness in the MIME conversion routine to cause a buffer overflow and gain control over the mail server machine. The MIME system is designed to allow various different information formats to be interpreted and sent via e-mail. Attack points exist when data are converted to MIME compatible format and back.
  • Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
    An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
  • Buffer Overflow via Symbolic Links
    This type of attack leverages the use of symbolic links to cause buffer overflows. An attacker can try to create or manipulate a symbolic link file such that its contents result in out of bounds data. When the target software processes the symbolic link file, it could potentially overflow internal buffers with insufficient bounds checking.
  • Overflow Variables and Tags
    This type of attack leverages the use of tags or variables from a formatted configuration data to cause buffer overflow. The attacker crafts a malicious HTML page or configuration file that includes oversized strings, thus causing an overflow.
  • Buffer Overflow via Parameter Expansion
    In this attack, the target software is given input that the attacker knows will be modified and expanded in size during processing. This attack relies on the target software failing to anticipate that the expanded data may exceed some internal limit, thereby creating a buffer overflow.
  • Signature Spoof
    An attacker generates a message or datablock that causes the recipient to believe that the message or datablock was generated and cryptographically signed by an authoritative or reputable source, misleading a victim or victim operating system into performing malicious actions.
  • XML Client-Side Attack
    Client applications such as web browsers that process HTML data often need to transform data in and out of the XML format by using an XML parser. It may be possible for an attacker to inject data that may have an adverse effect on the XML parser when it is being processed. These adverse effects may include the parser crashing, consuming too much of a resource, executing too slowly, executing code supplied by an attacker, allowing usage of unintended system functionality, etc. An attacker's goal is to leverage parser failure to his or her advantage. In some cases it may be possible to jump from the data plane to the control plane via bad data being passed to an XML parser. [R.484.1]
  • Embedding NULL Bytes
    An attacker embeds one or more null bytes in input to the target software. This attack relies on the usage of a null-valued byte as a string terminator in many environments. The goal is for certain components of the target software to stop processing the input when it encounters the null byte(s).
  • Postfix, Null Terminate, and Backslash
    If a string is passed through a filter of some kind, then a terminal NULL may not be valid. Using alternate representation of NULL allows an attacker to embed the NULL mid-string while postfixing the proper data so that the filter is avoided. One example is a filter that looks for a trailing slash character. If a string insertion is possible, but the slash must exist, an alternate encoding of NULL in mid-string may be used.
  • Simple Script Injection
    An attacker embeds malicious scripts in content that will be served to web browsers. The goal of the attack is for the target software, the client-side browser, to execute the script with the users' privilege level. An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that are brought on by allowing remote hosts to execute code and scripts. Web browsers, for example, have some simple security controls in place, but if a remote attacker is allowed to execute scripts (through injecting them in to user-generated content like bulletin boards) then these controls may be bypassed. Further, these attacks are very difficult for an end user to detect.
  • Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation Logic
    This attack targets the encoding of the URL combined with the encoding of the slash characters. An attacker can take advantage of the multiple way of encoding an URL and abuse the interpretation of the URL. An URL may contain special character that need special syntax handling in order to be interpreted. Special characters are represented using a percentage character followed by two digits representing the octet code of the original character (%HEX-CODE). For instance US-ASCII space character would be represented with %20. This is often referred as escaped ending or percent-encoding. Since the server decodes the URL from the requests, it may restrict the access to some URL paths by validating and filtering out the URL requests it received. An attacker will try to craft an URL with a sequence of special characters which once interpreted by the server will be equivalent to a forbidden URL. It can be difficult to protect against this attack since the URL can contain other format of encoding such as UTF-8 encoding, Unicode-encoding, etc.
  • SQL Injection
    This attack exploits target software that constructs SQL statements based on user input. An attacker crafts input strings so that when the target software constructs SQL statements based on the input, the resulting SQL statement performs actions other than those the application intended. SQL Injection results from failure of the application to appropriately validate input. When specially crafted user-controlled input consisting of SQL syntax is used without proper validation as part of SQL queries, it is possible to glean information from the database in ways not envisaged during application design. Depending upon the database and the design of the application, it may also be possible to leverage injection to have the database execute system-related commands of the attackers' choice. SQL Injection enables an attacker to talk directly to the database, thus bypassing the application completely. Successful injection can cause information disclosure as well as ability to add or modify data in the database. In order to successfully inject SQL and retrieve information from a database, an attacker:
  • String Format Overflow in syslog()
    This attack targets the format string vulnerabilities in the syslog() function. An attacker would typically inject malicious input in the format string parameter of the syslog function. This is a common problem, and many public vulnerabilities and associated exploits have been posted.
  • Blind SQL Injection
    Blind SQL Injection results from an insufficient mitigation for SQL Injection. Although suppressing database error messages are considered best practice, the suppression alone is not sufficient to prevent SQL Injection. Blind SQL Injection is a form of SQL Injection that overcomes the lack of error messages. Without the error messages that facilitate SQL Injection, the attacker constructs input strings that probe the target through simple Boolean SQL expressions. The attacker can determine if the syntax and structure of the injection was successful based on whether the query was executed or not. Applied iteratively, the attacker determines how and where the target is vulnerable to SQL Injection. For example, an attacker may try entering something like "username' AND 1=1; --" in an input field. If the result is the same as when the attacker entered "username" in the field, then the attacker knows that the application is vulnerable to SQL Injection. The attacker can then ask yes/no questions from the database server to extract information from it. For example, the attacker can extract table names from a database using the following types of queries: If the above query executes properly, then the attacker knows that the first character in a table name in the database is a letter between m and z. If it doesn't, then the attacker knows that the character must be between a and l (assuming of course that table names only contain alphabetic characters). By performing a binary search on all character positions, the attacker can determine all table names in the database. Subsequently, the attacker may execute an actual attack and send something like:
  • Using Unicode Encoding to Bypass Validation Logic
    An attacker may provide a Unicode string to a system component that is not Unicode aware and use that to circumvent the filter or cause the classifying mechanism to fail to properly understanding the request. That may allow the attacker to slip malicious data past the content filter and/or possibly cause the application to route the request incorrectly.
  • URL Encoding
    This attack targets the encoding of the URL. An attacker can take advantage of the multiple way of encoding an URL and abuse the interpretation of the URL. An URL may contain special character that need special syntax handling in order to be interpreted. Special characters are represented using a percentage character followed by two digits representing the octet code of the original character (%HEX-CODE). For instance US-ASCII space character would be represented with %20. This is often referred as escaped ending or percent-encoding. Since the server decodes the URL from the requests, it may restrict the access to some URL paths by validating and filtering out the URL requests it received. An attacker will try to craft an URL with a sequence of special characters which once interpreted by the server will be equivalent to a forbidden URL. It can be difficult to protect against this attack since the URL can contain other format of encoding such as UTF-8 encoding, Unicode-encoding, etc. The attacker could also subvert the meaning of the URL string request by encoding the data being sent to the server through a GET request. For instance an attacker may subvert the meaning of parameters used in a SQL request and sent through the URL string (See Example section).
  • User-Controlled Filename
    An attack of this type involves an attacker inserting malicious characters (such as a XSS redirection) into a filename, directly or indirectly that is then used by the target software to generate HTML text or other potentially executable content. Many websites rely on user-generated content and dynamically build resources like files, filenames, and URL links directly from user supplied data. In this attack pattern, the attacker uploads code that can execute in the client browser and/or redirect the client browser to a site that the attacker owns. All XSS attack payload variants can be used to pass and exploit these vulnerabilities.
  • Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate Encoding
    This attack targets the use of the backslash in alternate encoding. An attacker can provide a backslash as a leading character and causes a parser to believe that the next character is special. This is called an escape. By using that trick, the attacker tries to exploit alternate ways to encode the same character which leads to filter problems and opens avenues to attack.
  • Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding
    This attack targets the encoding of the Slash characters. An attacker would try to exploit common filtering problems related to the use of the slashes characters to gain access to resources on the target host. Directory-driven systems, such as file systems and databases, typically use the slash character to indicate traversal between directories or other container components. For murky historical reasons, PCs (and, as a result, Microsoft OSs) choose to use a backslash, whereas the UNIX world typically makes use of the forward slash. The schizophrenic result is that many MS-based systems are required to understand both forms of the slash. This gives the attacker many opportunities to discover and abuse a number of common filtering problems. The goal of this pattern is to discover server software that only applies filters to one version, but not the other.
  • Buffer Overflow in an API Call
    This attack targets libraries or shared code modules which are vulnerable to buffer overflow attacks. An attacker who has access to an API may try to embed malicious code in the API function call and exploit a buffer overflow vulnerability in the function's implementation. All clients that make use of the code library thus become vulnerable by association. This has a very broad effect on security across a system, usually affecting more than one software process.
  • Using UTF-8 Encoding to Bypass Validation Logic
    This attack is a specific variation on leveraging alternate encodings to bypass validation logic. This attack leverages the possibility to encode potentially harmful input in UTF-8 and submit it to applications not expecting or effective at validating this encoding standard making input filtering difficult. UTF-8 (8-bit UCS/Unicode Transformation Format) is a variable-length character encoding for Unicode. Legal UTF-8 characters are one to four bytes long. However, early version of the UTF-8 specification got some entries wrong (in some cases it permitted overlong characters). UTF-8 encoders are supposed to use the "shortest possible" encoding, but naive decoders may accept encodings that are longer than necessary. According to the RFC 3629, a particularly subtle form of this attack can be carried out against a parser which performs security-critical validity checks against the UTF-8 encoded form of its input, but interprets certain illegal octet sequences as characters.
  • Web Logs Tampering
    Web Logs Tampering attacks involve an attacker injecting, deleting or otherwise tampering with the contents of web logs typically for the purposes of masking other malicious behavior. Additionally, writing malicious data to log files may target jobs, filters, reports, and other agents that process the logs in an asynchronous attack pattern. This pattern of attack is similar to "Log Injection-Tampering-Forging" except that in this case, the attack is targeting the logs of the web server and not the application.
  • XPath Injection
    An attacker can craft special user-controllable input consisting of XPath expressions to inject the XML database and bypass authentication or glean information that he normally would not be able to. XPath Injection enables an attacker to talk directly to the XML database, thus bypassing the application completely. XPath Injection results from the failure of an application to properly sanitize input used as part of dynamic XPath expressions used to query an XML database. In order to successfully inject XML and retrieve information from a database, an attacker:
  • AJAX Fingerprinting
    This attack utilizes the frequent client-server roundtrips in Ajax conversation to scan a system. While Ajax does not open up new vulnerabilities per se, it does optimize them from an attacker point of view. In many XSS attacks the attacker must get a "hole in one" and successfully exploit the vulnerability on the victim side the first time, once the client is redirected the attacker has many chances to engage in follow on probes, but there is only one first chance. In a widely used web application this is not a major problem because 1 in a 1,000 is good enough in a widely used application. A common first step for an attacker is to footprint the environment to understand what attacks will work. Since footprinting relies on enumeration, the conversational pattern of rapid, multiple requests and responses that are typical in Ajax applications enable an attacker to look for many vulnerabilities, well-known ports, network locations and so on.
  • Embedding Script (XSS) in HTTP Headers
    An attack of this type exploits web applications that generate web content, such as links in a HTML page, based on unvalidated or improperly validated data submitted by other actors. XSS in HTTP Headers attacks target the HTTP headers which are hidden from most users and may not be validated by web applications.
  • OS Command Injection
    In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.
  • Buffer Overflow in Local Command-Line Utilities
    This attack targets command-line utilities available in a number of shells. An attacker can leverage a vulnerability found in a command-line utility to escalate privilege to root.
  • XSS in IMG Tags
    Image tags are an often overlooked, but convenient, means for a Cross Site Scripting attack. The attacker can inject script contents into an image (IMG) tag in order to steal information from a victim's browser and execute malicious scripts.
  • XML Parser Attack
    Applications often need to transform data in and out of the XML format by using an XML parser. It may be possible for an attacker to inject data that may have an adverse effect on the XML parser when it is being processed. These adverse effects may include the parser crashing, consuming too much of a resource, executing too slowly, executing code supplied by an attacker, allowing usage of unintended system functionality, etc. An attacker's goal is to leverage parser failure to his or her advantage. In some cases it may be possible to jump from the data plane to the control plane via bad data being passed to an XML parser. [R.99.1]
Access
VectorComplexityAuthentication
ADJACENT_NETWORK HIGH NONE
Impact
ConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
NONE NONE COMPLETE
nessus via4
  • NASL family Ubuntu Local Security Checks
    NASL id UBUNTU_USN-1193-1.NASL
    description Timo Warns discovered that the GUID partition parsing routines did not correctly validate certain structures. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted block device to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1577) Phil Oester discovered that the network bonding system did not correctly handle large queues. On some systems, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1581) Ben Hutchings reported a flaw in the kernel's handling of corrupt LDM partitions. A local user could exploit this to cause a denial of service or escalate privileges. (CVE-2011-2182) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that taskstats listeners were not correctly handled. A local attacker could exploit this to exhaust memory and CPU resources, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2484) Sami Liedes discovered that ext4 did not correctly handle missing root inodes. A local attacker could trigger the mount of a specially crafted filesystem to cause the system to crash, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2493) A flaw was discovered in the Linux kernel's AppArmor security interface when invalid information was written to it. An unprivileged local user could use this to cause a denial of service on the system. (CVE-2011-3619) Scot Doyle discovered that the bridge networking interface incorrectly handled certain network packets. A remote attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-4087) A bug was found in the way headroom check was performed in udp6_ufo_fragment() function. A remote attacker could use this flaw to crash the system. (CVE-2011-4326). Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Ubuntu security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-12-01
    plugin id 55923
    published 2011-08-20
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=55923
    title Ubuntu 11.04 : linux vulnerabilities (USN-1193-1)
  • NASL family Scientific Linux Local Security Checks
    NASL id SL_20110519_KERNEL_ON_SL6_X.NASL
    description The kernel packages contain the Linux kernel, the core of any Linux operating system. This update fixes the following security issues : - Multiple buffer overflow flaws were found in the Linux kernel's Management Module Support for Message Passing Technology (MPT) based controllers. A local, unprivileged user could use these flaws to cause a denial of service, an information leak, or escalate their privileges. (CVE-2011-1494, CVE-2011-1495, Important) - A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's Ethernet bonding driver implementation. Packets coming in from network devices that have more than 16 receive queues to a bonding interface could cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1581, Important) - A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's networking subsystem. If the number of packets received exceeded the receiver's buffer limit, they were queued in a backlog, consuming memory, instead of being discarded. A remote attacker could abuse this flaw to cause a denial of service (out-of-memory condition). (CVE-2010-4251, Moderate) - A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's Transparent Huge Pages (THP) implementation. A local, unprivileged user could abuse this flaw to allow the user stack (when it is using huge pages) to grow and cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-0999, Moderate) - A flaw was found in the transmit methods (xmit) for the loopback and InfiniBand transports in the Linux kernel's Reliable Datagram Sockets (RDS) implementation. A local, unprivileged user could use this flaw to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1023, Moderate) - A flaw in the Linux kernel's Event Poll (epoll) implementation could allow a local, unprivileged user to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1082, Moderate) - An inconsistency was found in the interaction between the Linux kernel's method for allocating NFSv4 (Network File System version 4) ACL data and the method by which it was freed. This inconsistency led to a kernel panic which could be triggered by a local, unprivileged user with files owned by said user on an NFSv4 share. (CVE-2011-1090, Moderate) - A missing validation check was found in the Linux kernel's mac_partition() implementation, used for supporting file systems created on Mac OS operating systems. A local attacker could use this flaw to cause a denial of service by mounting a disk that contains specially crafted partitions. (CVE-2011-1010, Low) - A buffer overflow flaw in the DEC Alpha OSF partition implementation in the Linux kernel could allow a local attacker to cause an information leak by mounting a disk that contains specially crafted partition tables. (CVE-2011-1163, Low) - Missing validations of null-terminated string data structure elements in the do_replace(), compat_do_replace(), do_ipt_get_ctl(), do_ip6t_get_ctl(), and do_arpt_get_ctl() functions could allow a local user who has the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability to cause an information leak. (CVE-2011-1170, CVE-2011-1171, CVE-2011-1172, Low) This update also fixes several hundred bugs and adds enhancements. The system must be rebooted for this update to take effect.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-12-31
    plugin id 61041
    published 2012-08-01
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=61041
    title Scientific Linux Security Update : kernel on SL6.x i386/x86_64
  • NASL family Ubuntu Local Security Checks
    NASL id UBUNTU_USN-1212-1.NASL
    description Goldwyn Rodrigues discovered that the OCFS2 filesystem did not correctly clear memory when writing certain file holes. A local attacker could exploit this to read uninitialized data from the disk, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-0463) Timo Warns discovered that the LDM disk partition handling code did not correctly handle certain values. By inserting a specially crafted disk device, a local attacker could exploit this to gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1017) It was discovered that the /proc filesystem did not correctly handle permission changes when programs executed. A local attacker could hold open files to examine details about programs running with higher privileges, potentially increasing the chances of exploiting additional vulnerabilities. (CVE-2011-1020) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Bluetooth stack did not correctly clear memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1078) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Bluetooth stack did not correctly check that device name strings were NULL terminated. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service, or leak contents of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1079) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that bridge network filtering did not check that name fields were NULL terminated. A local attacker could exploit this to leak contents of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1080) Peter Huewe discovered that the TPM device did not correctly initialize memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel heap memory contents, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1160) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the netfilter code did not check certain strings copied from userspace. A local attacker with netfilter access could exploit this to read kernel memory or crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1170, CVE-2011-1171, CVE-2011-1172, CVE-2011-2534) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Acorn Universal Networking driver did not correctly initialize memory. A remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1173) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the IRDA subsystem did not correctly check certain field sizes. If a system was using IRDA, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system or gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1180) Julien Tinnes discovered that the kernel did not correctly validate the signal structure from tkill(). A local attacker could exploit this to send signals to arbitrary threads, possibly bypassing expected restrictions. (CVE-2011-1182) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the X.25 Rose network stack did not correctly handle certain fields. If a system was running with Rose enabled, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1493) Dan Rosenberg discovered that MPT devices did not correctly validate certain values in ioctl calls. If these drivers were loaded, a local attacker could exploit this to read arbitrary kernel memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1494, CVE-2011-1495) Timo Warns discovered that the GUID partition parsing routines did not correctly validate certain structures. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted block device to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1577) Phil Oester discovered that the network bonding system did not correctly handle large queues. On some systems, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1581) Tavis Ormandy discovered that the pidmap function did not correctly handle large requests. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1593) Oliver Hartkopp and Dave Jones discovered that the CAN network driver did not correctly validate certain socket structures. If this driver was loaded, a local attacker could crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1598, CVE-2011-1748) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the AGP driver did not check certain ioctl values. A local attacker with access to the video subsystem could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service, or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1745, CVE-2011-2022) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the AGP driver did not check the size of certain memory allocations. A local attacker with access to the video subsystem could exploit this to run the system out of memory, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1746) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the DCCP stack did not correctly handle certain packet structures. A remote attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1770) Ben Greear discovered that CIFS did not correctly handle direct I/O. A local attacker with access to a CIFS partition could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1771) Vasiliy Kulikov and Dan Rosenberg discovered that ecryptfs did not correctly check the origin of mount points. A local attacker could exploit this to trick the system into unmounting arbitrary mount points, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1833) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that taskstats listeners were not correctly handled. A local attacker could expoit this to exhaust memory and CPU resources, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2484) It was discovered that Bluetooth l2cap and rfcomm did not correctly initialize structures. A local attacker could exploit this to read portions of the kernel stack, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-2492) Sami Liedes discovered that ext4 did not correctly handle missing root inodes. A local attacker could trigger the mount of a specially crafted filesystem to cause the system to crash, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2493) It was discovered that GFS2 did not correctly check block sizes. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2689) Fernando Gont discovered that the IPv6 stack used predictable fragment identification numbers. A remote attacker could exploit this to exhaust network resources, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2699) The performance counter subsystem did not correctly handle certain counters. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2918)
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-06-29
    plugin id 56257
    published 2011-09-22
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=56257
    title USN-1212-1 : linux-ti-omap4 vulnerabilities
  • NASL family Ubuntu Local Security Checks
    NASL id UBUNTU_USN-1256-1.NASL
    description It was discovered that the /proc filesystem did not correctly handle permission changes when programs executed. A local attacker could hold open files to examine details about programs running with higher privileges, potentially increasing the chances of exploiting additional vulnerabilities. (CVE-2011-1020) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Bluetooth stack did not correctly clear memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1078) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Bluetooth stack did not correctly check that device name strings were NULL terminated. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service, or leak contents of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1079) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that bridge network filtering did not check that name fields were NULL terminated. A local attacker could exploit this to leak contents of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1080) Johan Hovold discovered that the DCCP network stack did not correctly handle certain packet combinations. A remote attacker could send specially crafted network traffic that would crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1093) Peter Huewe discovered that the TPM device did not correctly initialize memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel heap memory contents, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1160) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the IRDA subsystem did not correctly check certain field sizes. If a system was using IRDA, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system or gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1180) Ryan Sweat discovered that the GRO code did not correctly validate memory. In some configurations on systems using VLANs, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1478) It was discovered that the security fix for CVE-2010-4250 introduced a regression. A remote attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1479) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the X.25 Rose network stack did not correctly handle certain fields. If a system was running with Rose enabled, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1493) It was discovered that the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) implementation incorrectly calculated lengths. If the net.sctp.addip_enable variable was turned on, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system. (CVE-2011-1573) Ryan Sweat discovered that the kernel incorrectly handled certain VLAN packets. On some systems, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1576) Timo Warns discovered that the GUID partition parsing routines did not correctly validate certain structures. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted block device to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1577) Phil Oester discovered that the network bonding system did not correctly handle large queues. On some systems, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1581) It was discovered that CIFS incorrectly handled authentication. When a user had a CIFS share mounted that required authentication, a local user could mount the same share without knowing the correct password. (CVE-2011-1585) It was discovered that the GRE protocol incorrectly handled netns initialization. A remote attacker could send a packet while the ip_gre module was loading, and crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1767) It was discovered that the IP/IP protocol incorrectly handled netns initialization. A remote attacker could send a packet while the ipip module was loading, and crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1768) Ben Greear discovered that CIFS did not correctly handle direct I/O. A local attacker with access to a CIFS partition could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1771) Timo Warns discovered that the EFI GUID partition table was not correctly parsed. A physically local attacker that could insert mountable devices could exploit this to crash the system or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1776) Vasiliy Kulikov and Dan Rosenberg discovered that ecryptfs did not correctly check the origin of mount points. A local attacker could exploit this to trick the system into unmounting arbitrary mount points, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1833) Ben Hutchings reported a flaw in the kernel's handling of corrupt LDM partitions. A local user could exploit this to cause a denial of service or escalate privileges. (CVE-2011-2182) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the IPv4 diagnostic routines did not correctly validate certain requests. A local attacker could exploit this to consume CPU resources, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2213) It was discovered that an mmap() call with the MAP_PRIVATE flag on '/dev/zero' was incorrectly handled. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2479) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that taskstats listeners were not correctly handled. A local attacker could exploit this to exhaust memory and CPU resources, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2484) It was discovered that Bluetooth l2cap and rfcomm did not correctly initialize structures. A local attacker could exploit this to read portions of the kernel stack, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-2492) Sami Liedes discovered that ext4 did not correctly handle missing root inodes. A local attacker could trigger the mount of a specially crafted filesystem to cause the system to crash, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2493) Robert Swiecki discovered that mapping extensions were incorrectly handled. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2496) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the Bluetooth stack incorrectly handled certain L2CAP requests. If a system was using Bluetooth, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system or gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-2497) Ben Pfaff discovered that Classless Queuing Disciplines (qdiscs) were being incorrectly handled. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2525) It was discovered that GFS2 did not correctly check block sizes. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2689) It was discovered that the EXT4 filesystem contained multiple off-by-one flaws. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2695) Fernando Gont discovered that the IPv6 stack used predictable fragment identification numbers. A remote attacker could exploit this to exhaust network resources, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2699) Mauro Carvalho Chehab discovered that the si4713 radio driver did not correctly check the length of memory copies. If this hardware was available, a local attacker could exploit this to crash the system or gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-2700) Herbert Xu discovered that certain fields were incorrectly handled when Generic Receive Offload (CVE-2011-2723) The performance counter subsystem did not correctly handle certain counters. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2918) Time Warns discovered that long symlinks were incorrectly handled on Be filesystems. A local attacker could exploit this with a malformed Be filesystem and crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2928) Qianfeng Zhang discovered that the bridge networking interface incorrectly handled certain network packets. A remote attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2942) Dan Kaminsky discovered that the kernel incorrectly handled random sequence number generation. An attacker could use this flaw to possibly predict sequence numbers and inject packets. (CVE-2011-3188) Darren Lavender discovered that the CIFS client incorrectly handled certain large values. A remote attacker with a malicious server could exploit this to crash the system or possibly execute arbitrary code as the root user. (CVE-2011-3191) Yasuaki Ishimatsu discovered a flaw in the kernel's clock implementation. A local unprivileged attacker could exploit this causing a denial of service. (CVE-2011-3209) Yogesh Sharma discovered that CIFS did not correctly handle UNCs that had no prefixpaths. A local attacker with access to a CIFS partition could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-3363) A flaw was discovered in the Linux kernel's AppArmor security interface when invalid information was written to it. An unprivileged local user could use this to cause a denial of service on the system. (CVE-2011-3619) A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's /proc/*/*map* interface. A local, unprivileged user could exploit this flaw to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-3637) Scot Doyle discovered that the bridge networking interface incorrectly handled certain network packets. A remote attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-4087) A bug was found in the way headroom check was performed in udp6_ufo_fragment() function. A remote attacker could use this flaw to crash the system. (CVE-2011-4326) Ben Hutchings discovered several flaws in the Linux Rose (X.25 PLP) layer. A local user or a remote user on an X.25 network could exploit these flaws to execute arbitrary code as root. (CVE-2011-4914). Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Ubuntu security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-12-01
    plugin id 56768
    published 2011-11-10
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=56768
    title Ubuntu 10.04 LTS : linux-lts-backport-natty vulnerabilities (USN-1256-1)
  • NASL family SuSE Local Security Checks
    NASL id SUSE_11_4_KERNEL-110426.NASL
    description The openSUSE 11.4 kernel was updated to 2.6.37.6 fixing lots of bugs and security issues. Following security issues have been fixed: CVE-2011-1493: In the rose networking stack, when parsing the FAC_NATIONAL_DIGIS facilities field, it was possible for a remote host to provide more digipeaters than expected, resulting in heap corruption. Check against ROSE_MAX_DIGIS to prevent overflows, and abort facilities parsing on failure. CVE-2011-1182: Local attackers could send signals to their programs that looked like coming from the kernel, potentially gaining privileges in the context of setuid programs. CVE-2011-1478: An issue in the core GRO code where an skb belonging to an unknown VLAN is reused could result in a NULL pointer dereference. CVE-2011-1476: Specially crafted requests may be written to /dev/sequencer resulting in an underflow when calculating a size for a copy_from_user() operation in the driver for MIDI interfaces. On x86, this just returns an error, but it could have caused memory corruption on other architectures. Other malformed requests could have resulted in the use of uninitialized variables. CVE-2011-1477: Due to a failure to validate user-supplied indexes in the driver for Yamaha YM3812 and OPL-3 chips, a specially crafted ioctl request could have been sent to /dev/sequencer, resulting in reading and writing beyond the bounds of heap buffers, and potentially allowing privilege escalation. CVE-2011-0191: A information leak in the XFS geometry calls could be used by local attackers to gain access to kernel information. CVE-2011-0711: A stack memory information leak in the xfs FSGEOMETRY_V1 ioctl was fixed. CVE-2011-0521: The dvb_ca_ioctl function in drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/av7110_ca.c in the Linux kernel did not check the sign of a certain integer field, which allowed local users to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a negative value. CVE-2011-1010: The code for evaluating Mac partitions (in fs/partitions/mac.c) contained a bug that could crash the kernel for certain corrupted Mac partitions. CVE-2011-0712: Multiple buffer overflows in the caiaq Native Instruments USB audio functionality in the Linux kernel might have allowed attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact via a long USB device name, related to (1) the snd_usb_caiaq_audio_init function in sound/usb/caiaq/audio.c and (2) the snd_usb_caiaq_midi_init function in sound/usb/caiaq/midi.c. CVE-2011-1013: A signedness issue in the drm ioctl handling could be used by local attackers to potentially overflow kernel buffers and execute code. CVE-2011-1082: The epoll subsystem in Linux did not prevent users from creating circular epoll file structures, potentially leading to a denial of service (kernel deadlock). CVE-2010-4650: A kernel buffer overflow in the cuse server module was fixed, which might have allowed local privilege escalation. However only CUSE servers could exploit it and /dev/cuse is normally restricted to root. CVE-2011-1093: A bug was fixed in the DCCP networking stack where the order of dccp_rcv_state_process() still permitted reception even after closing the socket. A Reset after close thus causes a NULL pointer dereference by not preventing operations on an already torn-down socket. CVE-2011-1163: The code for evaluating OSF partitions (in fs/partitions/osf.c) contained a bug that leaks data from kernel heap memory to userspace for certain corrupted OSF partitions. CVE-2011-1012: The code for evaluating LDM partitions (in fs/partitions/ldm.c) contained a bug that could crash the kernel for certain corrupted LDM partitions. CVE-2011-1581: Doing bridging with devices with more than 16 receive queues could crash the kernel. CVE-2011-1160: Kernel information via the TPM devices could by used by local attackers to read kernel memory. CVE-2011-1577: The Linux kernel automatically evaluated partition tables of storage devices. The code for evaluating EFI GUID partitions (in fs/partitions/efi.c) contained a bug that causes a kernel oops on certain corrupted GUID partition tables, which might be used by local attackers to crash the kernel or potentially execute code. CVE-2011-1180: In the IrDA module, length fields provided by a peer for names and attributes may be longer than the destination array sizes and were not checked, this allowed local attackers (close to the irda port) to potentially corrupt memory. CVE-2011-1016: The Radeon GPU drivers in the Linux kernel did not properly validate data related to the AA resolve registers, which allowed local users to write to arbitrary memory locations associated with (1) Video RAM (aka VRAM) or (2) the Graphics Translation Table (GTT) via crafted values.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-11-10
    plugin id 75879
    published 2014-06-13
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=75879
    title openSUSE Security Update : kernel (openSUSE-SU-2011:0416-1)
  • NASL family Red Hat Local Security Checks
    NASL id REDHAT-RHSA-2011-0542.NASL
    description Updated kernel packages that fix multiple security issues, address several hundred bugs and add numerous enhancements are now available as part of the ongoing support and maintenance of Red Hat Enterprise Linux version 6. This is the first regular update. The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this update as having important security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section. The kernel packages contain the Linux kernel, the core of any Linux operating system. This update fixes the following security issues : * Multiple buffer overflow flaws were found in the Linux kernel's Management Module Support for Message Passing Technology (MPT) based controllers. A local, unprivileged user could use these flaws to cause a denial of service, an information leak, or escalate their privileges. (CVE-2011-1494, CVE-2011-1495, Important) * A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's Ethernet bonding driver implementation. Packets coming in from network devices that have more than 16 receive queues to a bonding interface could cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1581, Important) * A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's networking subsystem. If the number of packets received exceeded the receiver's buffer limit, they were queued in a backlog, consuming memory, instead of being discarded. A remote attacker could abuse this flaw to cause a denial of service (out-of-memory condition). (CVE-2010-4251, Moderate) * A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's Transparent Huge Pages (THP) implementation. A local, unprivileged user could abuse this flaw to allow the user stack (when it is using huge pages) to grow and cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-0999, Moderate) * A flaw was found in the transmit methods (xmit) for the loopback and InfiniBand transports in the Linux kernel's Reliable Datagram Sockets (RDS) implementation. A local, unprivileged user could use this flaw to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1023, Moderate) * A flaw in the Linux kernel's Event Poll (epoll) implementation could allow a local, unprivileged user to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1082, Moderate) * An inconsistency was found in the interaction between the Linux kernel's method for allocating NFSv4 (Network File System version 4) ACL data and the method by which it was freed. This inconsistency led to a kernel panic which could be triggered by a local, unprivileged user with files owned by said user on an NFSv4 share. (CVE-2011-1090, Moderate) * A missing validation check was found in the Linux kernel's mac_partition() implementation, used for supporting file systems created on Mac OS operating systems. A local attacker could use this flaw to cause a denial of service by mounting a disk that contains specially crafted partitions. (CVE-2011-1010, Low) * A buffer overflow flaw in the DEC Alpha OSF partition implementation in the Linux kernel could allow a local attacker to cause an information leak by mounting a disk that contains specially crafted partition tables. (CVE-2011-1163, Low) * Missing validations of null-terminated string data structure elements in the do_replace(), compat_do_replace(), do_ipt_get_ctl(), do_ip6t_get_ctl(), and do_arpt_get_ctl() functions could allow a local user who has the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability to cause an information leak. (CVE-2011-1170, CVE-2011-1171, CVE-2011-1172, Low) Red Hat would like to thank Dan Rosenberg for reporting CVE-2011-1494 and CVE-2011-1495; Nelson Elhage for reporting CVE-2011-1082; Timo Warns for reporting CVE-2011-1010 and CVE-2011-1163; and Vasiliy Kulikov for reporting CVE-2011-1170, CVE-2011-1171, and CVE-2011-1172. This update also fixes several hundred bugs and adds enhancements. Refer to the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.1 Release Notes for information on the most significant of these changes, and the Technical Notes for further information, both linked to in the References. All Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 users are advised to install these updated packages, which correct these issues, and fix the bugs and add the enhancements noted in the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.1 Release Notes and Technical Notes. The system must be rebooted for this update to take effect.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-11-26
    plugin id 54590
    published 2011-05-20
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=54590
    title RHEL 6 : kernel (RHSA-2011:0542)
redhat via4
advisories
bugzilla
id 696376
title server BUG() on receipt of bad NFSv4 lock request
oval
AND
  • OR
    • comment Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Client is installed
      oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20100842001
    • comment Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Server is installed
      oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20100842002
    • comment Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Workstation is installed
      oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20100842003
    • comment Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 ComputeNode is installed
      oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20100842004
  • OR
    • AND
      • comment kernel is earlier than 0:2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20110542005
      • comment kernel is signed with Red Hat redhatrelease2 key
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20100842006
    • AND
      • comment kernel-bootwrapper is earlier than 0:2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20110542009
      • comment kernel-bootwrapper is signed with Red Hat redhatrelease2 key
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20100842010
    • AND
      • comment kernel-debug is earlier than 0:2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20110542017
      • comment kernel-debug is signed with Red Hat redhatrelease2 key
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20100842012
    • AND
      • comment kernel-debug-devel is earlier than 0:2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20110542015
      • comment kernel-debug-devel is signed with Red Hat redhatrelease2 key
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20100842014
    • AND
      • comment kernel-devel is earlier than 0:2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20110542013
      • comment kernel-devel is signed with Red Hat redhatrelease2 key
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20100842016
    • AND
      • comment kernel-doc is earlier than 0:2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20110542025
      • comment kernel-doc is signed with Red Hat redhatrelease2 key
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20100842024
    • AND
      • comment kernel-firmware is earlier than 0:2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20110542023
      • comment kernel-firmware is signed with Red Hat redhatrelease2 key
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20100842026
    • AND
      • comment kernel-headers is earlier than 0:2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20110542007
      • comment kernel-headers is signed with Red Hat redhatrelease2 key
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20100842008
    • AND
      • comment kernel-kdump is earlier than 0:2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20110542021
      • comment kernel-kdump is signed with Red Hat redhatrelease2 key
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20100842018
    • AND
      • comment kernel-kdump-devel is earlier than 0:2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20110542019
      • comment kernel-kdump-devel is signed with Red Hat redhatrelease2 key
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20100842020
    • AND
      • comment perf is earlier than 0:2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20110542011
      • comment perf is signed with Red Hat redhatrelease2 key
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20100842022
rhsa
id RHSA-2011:0542
released 2011-05-19
severity Important
title RHSA-2011:0542: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.1 kernel security, bug fix and enhancement update (Important)
rpms
  • kernel-0:2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
  • kernel-bootwrapper-0:2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
  • kernel-debug-0:2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
  • kernel-debug-devel-0:2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
  • kernel-devel-0:2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
  • kernel-doc-0:2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
  • kernel-firmware-0:2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
  • kernel-headers-0:2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
  • kernel-kdump-0:2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
  • kernel-kdump-devel-0:2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
  • perf-0:2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
refmap via4
confirm
mlist
  • [oss-security] 20110413 CVE request - kernel: bonding: Incorrect TX queue offset
  • [oss-security] 20110413 Re: CVE request - kernel: bonding: Incorrect TX queue offset
sectrack 1025558
Last major update 19-03-2012 - 00:00
Published 26-05-2011 - 12:55
Back to Top