ID CVE-2017-5637
Summary Two four letter word commands "wchp/wchc" are CPU intensive and could cause spike of CPU utilization on Apache ZooKeeper server if abused, which leads to the server unable to serve legitimate client requests. Apache ZooKeeper thru version 3.4.9 and 3.5.2 suffer from this issue, fixed in 3.4.10, 3.5.3, and later.
References
Vulnerable Configurations
  • cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.4.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.4.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.5.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.5.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.4.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.4.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:apache:zookeeper:3.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
CVSS
Base: 5.0 (as of 20-07-2021 - 23:15)
Impact:
Exploitability:
CWE CWE-306
CAPEC
  • Cross Site Request Forgery
    An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.
  • Choosing Message Identifier
    This pattern of attack is defined by the selection of messages distributed over via multicast or public information channels that are intended for another client by determining the parameter value assigned to that client. This attack allows the adversary to gain access to potentially privileged information, and to possibly perpetrate other attacks through the distribution means by impersonation. If the channel/message being manipulated is an input rather than output mechanism for the system, (such as a command bus), this style of attack could be used to change the adversary's identifier to more a privileged one.
  • Using Unpublished APIs
    An adversary searches for and invokes APIs that the target system designers did not intend to be publicly available. If these APIs fail to authenticate requests the attacker may be able to invoke functionality they are not authorized for.
  • Force the System to Reset Values
    An attacker forces the target into a previous state in order to leverage potential weaknesses in the target dependent upon a prior configuration or state-dependent factors. Even in cases where an attacker may not be able to directly control the configuration of the targeted application, they may be able to reset the configuration to a prior state since many applications implement reset functions. Since these functions are usually intended as emergency features to return an application to a stable configuration if the current configuration degrades functionality, they may not be as strongly secured as other configuration options. The resetting of values is dangerous as it may enable undesired functionality, disable services, or modify access controls. At the very least this is a nuisance attack since the administrator will need to re-apply their configuration. At worst, this attack can open avenues for powerful attacks against the application, and, if it isn't obvious that the configuration has been reset, these vulnerabilities may be present a long time before they are notices.
Access
VectorComplexityAuthentication
NETWORK LOW NONE
Impact
ConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
NONE NONE PARTIAL
cvss-vector via4 AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
redhat via4
advisories
  • rhsa
    id RHSA-2017:2477
  • rhsa
    id RHSA-2017:3354
  • rhsa
    id RHSA-2017:3355
refmap via4
bid 98814
confirm https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2693
debian DSA-3871
misc https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2020.html
mlist
  • [activemq-issues] 20190820 [jira] [Created] (AMQ-7279) Security Vulnerabilities in Libraries - jackson-databind-2.9.8.jar, tomcat-servlet-api-8.0.53.jar, tomcat-websocket-api-8.0.53.jar, zookeeper-3.4.6.jar, guava-18.0.jar, jetty-all-9.2.26.v20180806.jar, scala-library-2.11.0.jar
  • [dev] 20171009 [SECURITY] CVE-2017-5637: DOS attack on wchp/wchc four letter words (4lw)
  • [nifi-commits] 20191113 svn commit: r1869773 - /nifi/site/trunk/security.html
  • [nifi-commits] 20200123 svn commit: r1873083 - /nifi/site/trunk/security.html
Last major update 20-07-2021 - 23:15
Published 10-10-2017 - 01:30
Last modified 20-07-2021 - 23:15
Back to Top