ID CVE-2003-1026
Summary Internet Explorer 5.01 through 6 SP1 allows remote attackers to bypass zone restrictions via a javascript protocol URL in a sub-frame, which is added to the history list and executed in the top window's zone when the history.back (back) function is called, as demonstrated by BackToFramedJpu, aka the "Travel Log Cross Domain Vulnerability."
References
Vulnerable Configurations
  • Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.0
    cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:ie:5.0
  • Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.0.1
    cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:ie:5.0.1
  • Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.0.1 SP1
    cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:ie:5.0.1:sp1
  • Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.0.1 SP2
    cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:ie:5.0.1:sp2
  • Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.0.1 SP3
    cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:ie:5.0.1:sp3
  • Microsoft ie 5.5
    cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:ie:5.5
  • Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5 SP1
    cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:ie:5.5:sp1
  • Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5 SP2
    cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:ie:5.5:sp2
  • Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0
    cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:ie:6.0
  • cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:ie:6.0:sp1
    cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:ie:6.0:sp1
CVSS
Base: 9.3 (as of 01-01-2004 - 00:00)
Impact:
Exploitability:
CWE CWE-264
CAPEC
  • Accessing, Modifying or Executing Executable Files
    An attack of this type exploits a system's configuration that allows an attacker to either directly access an executable file, for example through shell access; or in a possible worst case allows an attacker to upload a file and then execute it. Web servers, ftp servers, and message oriented middleware systems which have many integration points are particularly vulnerable, because both the programmers and the administrators must be in synch regarding the interfaces and the correct privileges for each interface.
  • Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files
    An attack of this type exploits a system's trust in configuration and resource files, when the executable loads the resource (such as an image file or configuration file) the attacker has modified the file to either execute malicious code directly or manipulate the target process (e.g. application server) to execute based on the malicious configuration parameters. Since systems are increasingly interrelated mashing up resources from local and remote sources the possibility of this attack occurring is high. The attack can be directed at a client system, such as causing buffer overrun through loading seemingly benign image files, as in Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-028 where specially crafted JPEG files could cause a buffer overrun once loaded into the browser. Another example targets clients reading pdf files. In this case the attacker simply appends javascript to the end of a legitimate url for a pdf (http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/danger-danger-danger/) http://path/to/pdf/file.pdf#whatever_name_you_want=javascript:your_code_here The client assumes that they are reading a pdf, but the attacker has modified the resource and loaded executable javascript into the client's browser process. The attack can also target server processes. The attacker edits the resource or configuration file, for example a web.xml file used to configure security permissions for a J2EE app server, adding role name "public" grants all users with the public role the ability to use the administration functionality. The server trusts its configuration file to be correct, but when they are manipulated, the attacker gains full control.
  • Blue Boxing
    This type of attack against older telephone switches and trunks has been around for decades. A tone is sent by an adversary to impersonate a supervisor signal which has the effect of rerouting or usurping command of the line. While the US infrastructure proper may not contain widespread vulnerabilities to this type of attack, many companies are connected globally through call centers and business process outsourcing. These international systems may be operated in countries which have not upgraded Telco infrastructure and so are vulnerable to Blue boxing. Blue boxing is a result of failure on the part of the system to enforce strong authorization for administrative functions. While the infrastructure is different than standard current applications like web applications, there are historical lessons to be learned to upgrade the access control for administrative functions.
  • Restful Privilege Elevation
    Rest uses standard HTTP (Get, Put, Delete) style permissions methods, but these are not necessarily correlated generally with back end programs. Strict interpretation of HTTP get methods means that these HTTP Get services should not be used to delete information on the server, but there is no access control mechanism to back up this logic. This means that unless the services are properly ACL'd and the application's service implementation are following these guidelines then an HTTP request can easily execute a delete or update on the server side. The attacker identifies a HTTP Get URL such as http://victimsite/updateOrder, which calls out to a program to update orders on a database or other resource. The URL is not idempotent so the request can be submitted multiple times by the attacker, additionally, the attacker may be able to exploit the URL published as a Get method that actually performs updates (instead of merely retrieving data). This may result in malicious or inadvertent altering of data on the server.
  • Target Programs with Elevated Privileges
    This attack targets programs running with elevated privileges. The attacker would try to leverage a bug in the running program and get arbitrary code to execute with elevated privileges. For instance an attacker would look for programs that write to the system directories or registry keys (such as HKLM, which stores a number of critical Windows environment variables). These programs are typically running with elevated privileges and have usually not been designed with security in mind. Such programs are excellent exploit targets because they yield lots of power when they break. The malicious user try to execute its code at the same level as a privileged system call.
  • Manipulating Input to File System Calls
    An attacker manipulates inputs to the target software which the target software passes to file system calls in the OS. The goal is to gain access to, and perhaps modify, areas of the file system that the target software did not intend to be accessible.
Access
VectorComplexityAuthentication
NETWORK MEDIUM NONE
Impact
ConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
COMPLETE COMPLETE COMPLETE
exploit-db via4
description MS Internet Explorer URL Injection in History List (MS04-004). CVE-2003-1026. Remote exploit for windows platform
id EDB-ID:151
last seen 2016-01-31
modified 2004-02-04
published 2004-02-04
reporter Andreas Sandblad
source https://www.exploit-db.com/download/151/
title Microsoft Internet Explorer - URL Injection in History List MS04-004
oval via4
  • accepted 2014-02-24T04:03:24.834-05:00
    class vulnerability
    contributors
    • name Andrew Buttner
      organization The MITRE Corporation
    • name Andrew Buttner
      organization The MITRE Corporation
    • name Christine Walzer
      organization The MITRE Corporation
    • name Robert L. Hollis
      organization ThreatGuard, Inc.
    • name Maria Mikhno
      organization ALTX-SOFT
    description Internet Explorer 5.01 through 6 SP1 allows remote attackers to bypass zone restrictions via a javascript protocol URL in a sub-frame, which is added to the history list and executed in the top window's zone when the history.back (back) function is called, as demonstrated by BackToFramedJpu, aka the "Travel Log Cross Domain Vulnerability."
    family windows
    id oval:org.mitre.oval:def:630
    status accepted
    submitted 2004-02-03T12:00:00.000-04:00
    title IE v5.01,SP2 Travel Log Cross Domain Vulnerability
    version 67
  • accepted 2014-02-24T04:03:24.990-05:00
    class vulnerability
    contributors
    • name Andrew Buttner
      organization The MITRE Corporation
    • name Andrew Buttner
      organization The MITRE Corporation
    • name Christine Walzer
      organization The MITRE Corporation
    • name Robert L. Hollis
      organization ThreatGuard, Inc.
    • name Maria Mikhno
      organization ALTX-SOFT
    description Internet Explorer 5.01 through 6 SP1 allows remote attackers to bypass zone restrictions via a javascript protocol URL in a sub-frame, which is added to the history list and executed in the top window's zone when the history.back (back) function is called, as demonstrated by BackToFramedJpu, aka the "Travel Log Cross Domain Vulnerability."
    family windows
    id oval:org.mitre.oval:def:643
    status accepted
    submitted 2004-02-03T12:00:00.000-04:00
    title IE v5.01,SP3 Travel Log Cross Domain Vulnerability
    version 67
  • accepted 2014-02-24T04:03:25.473-05:00
    class vulnerability
    contributors
    • name Andrew Buttner
      organization The MITRE Corporation
    • name Andrew Buttner
      organization The MITRE Corporation
    • name Christine Walzer
      organization The MITRE Corporation
    • name Robert L. Hollis
      organization ThreatGuard, Inc.
    • name Maria Mikhno
      organization ALTX-SOFT
    description Internet Explorer 5.01 through 6 SP1 allows remote attackers to bypass zone restrictions via a javascript protocol URL in a sub-frame, which is added to the history list and executed in the top window's zone when the history.back (back) function is called, as demonstrated by BackToFramedJpu, aka the "Travel Log Cross Domain Vulnerability."
    family windows
    id oval:org.mitre.oval:def:687
    status accepted
    submitted 2004-02-03T12:00:00.000-04:00
    title IE v5.01,SP4 Travel Log Cross Domain Vulnerability
    version 67
  • accepted 2014-02-24T04:03:25.546-05:00
    class vulnerability
    contributors
    • name Andrew Buttner
      organization The MITRE Corporation
    • name Andrew Buttner
      organization The MITRE Corporation
    • name Maria Mikhno
      organization ALTX-SOFT
    description Internet Explorer 5.01 through 6 SP1 allows remote attackers to bypass zone restrictions via a javascript protocol URL in a sub-frame, which is added to the history list and executed in the top window's zone when the history.back (back) function is called, as demonstrated by BackToFramedJpu, aka the "Travel Log Cross Domain Vulnerability."
    family windows
    id oval:org.mitre.oval:def:689
    status accepted
    submitted 2004-02-03T12:00:00.000-04:00
    title IE v5.5,SP2 Travel Log Cross Domain Vulnerability
    version 65
  • accepted 2014-02-24T04:03:26.483-05:00
    class vulnerability
    contributors
    • name Andrew Buttner
      organization The MITRE Corporation
    • name Andrew Buttner
      organization The MITRE Corporation
    • name Christine Walzer
      organization The MITRE Corporation
    • name Christine Walzer
      organization The MITRE Corporation
    • name Maria Mikhno
      organization ALTX-SOFT
    description Internet Explorer 5.01 through 6 SP1 allows remote attackers to bypass zone restrictions via a javascript protocol URL in a sub-frame, which is added to the history list and executed in the top window's zone when the history.back (back) function is called, as demonstrated by BackToFramedJpu, aka the "Travel Log Cross Domain Vulnerability."
    family windows
    id oval:org.mitre.oval:def:745
    status accepted
    submitted 2004-02-03T05:00:00.000-04:00
    title IE v6.0 (XP) Travel Log Cross Domain Vulnerability
    version 66
  • accepted 2014-02-24T04:03:27.027-05:00
    class vulnerability
    contributors
    • name Andrew Buttner
      organization The MITRE Corporation
    • name Andrew Buttner
      organization The MITRE Corporation
    • name Christine Walzer
      organization The MITRE Corporation
    • name Robert L. Hollis
      organization ThreatGuard, Inc.
    • name Maria Mikhno
      organization ALTX-SOFT
    description Internet Explorer 5.01 through 6 SP1 allows remote attackers to bypass zone restrictions via a javascript protocol URL in a sub-frame, which is added to the history list and executed in the top window's zone when the history.back (back) function is called, as demonstrated by BackToFramedJpu, aka the "Travel Log Cross Domain Vulnerability."
    family windows
    id oval:org.mitre.oval:def:774
    status accepted
    submitted 2004-02-03T12:00:00.000-04:00
    title IE v6.0,SP1 Travel Log Cross Domain Vulnerability
    version 67
  • accepted 2014-02-24T04:03:27.815-05:00
    class vulnerability
    contributors
    • name Andrew Buttner
      organization The MITRE Corporation
    • name Andrew Buttner
      organization The MITRE Corporation
    • name Harvey Rubinovitz
      organization The MITRE Corporation
    • name Christine Walzer
      organization The MITRE Corporation
    • name Robert L. Hollis
      organization ThreatGuard, Inc.
    • name Maria Mikhno
      organization ALTX-SOFT
    description Internet Explorer 5.01 through 6 SP1 allows remote attackers to bypass zone restrictions via a javascript protocol URL in a sub-frame, which is added to the history list and executed in the top window's zone when the history.back (back) function is called, as demonstrated by BackToFramedJpu, aka the "Travel Log Cross Domain Vulnerability."
    family windows
    id oval:org.mitre.oval:def:805
    status accepted
    submitted 2004-02-03T12:00:00.000-04:00
    title IE v6.0,SP1 (Server 2003) Travel Log Cross Domain Vulnerability
    version 68
packetstorm via4
data source https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/download/32621/JSinject.txt
id PACKETSTORM:32621
last seen 2016-12-05
published 2004-02-03
reporter Andreas Sandblad
source https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/32621/JSinject.txt.html
title JSinject.txt
refmap via4
bugtraq
  • 20031125 BackToFramedJpu - a successor of BackToJpu attack
  • 20031201 Comments on 5 IE vulnerabilities
cert TA04-033A
cert-vn VU#784102
misc http://www.safecenter.net/UMBRELLAWEBV4/BackToFramedJpu
ms MS04-004
xf ie-subframe-xss(13846)
Last major update 17-10-2016 - 22:39
Published 20-01-2004 - 00:00
Last modified 12-10-2018 - 17:33
Back to Top