ghsa-jx24-phgv-935m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 02:57
Modified
2022-04-29 02:57
Details

isakmpd in OpenBSD 3.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via an ISAKMP packet with a zero-length payload, as demonstrated by the Striker ISAKMP Protocol Test Suite.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2004-0218"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2004-05-04T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "isakmpd in OpenBSD 3.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via an ISAKMP packet with a zero-length payload, as demonstrated by the Striker ISAKMP Protocol Test Suite.",
  "id": "GHSA-jx24-phgv-935m",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T02:57:21Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T02:57:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-0218"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/15518"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=108008530028019\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/11156"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/349113"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openbsd.org/errata.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.rapid7.com/advisories/R7-0018.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10028"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/alerts/2004/Mar/1009468.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.