ghsa-828v-j88x-385j
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:33
Modified
2022-05-17 03:33
Details

FortiOS 5.0.x before 5.0.12 and 5.2.x before 5.2.4 supports anonymous, export, RC4, and possibly other weak ciphers when using TLS to connect to FortiGuard servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS content by modifying packets.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-2323"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2015-08-11T14:59:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "FortiOS 5.0.x before 5.0.12 and 5.2.x before 5.2.4 supports anonymous, export, RC4, and possibly other weak ciphers when using TLS to connect to FortiGuard servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS content by modifying packets.",
  "id": "GHSA-828v-j88x-385j",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T03:33:57Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T03:33:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-2323"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://fortiguard.com/advisory/2015-07-24-weak-ciphers-suites-are-presented-towards-fortiguard-servers"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-IR-15-021"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033092"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.