{"vulnerability": "CVE-2022-2070", "sightings": [{"uuid": "87543268-e070-42de-9d50-2845759aa9e5", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20708", "type": "seen", "source": "MISP/07558840-57f8-473d-a30e-1463330cf52f", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2022-04-05T19:09:37.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "be10d8e1-f96a-4e6c-8e27-66c31fe09b4a", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20700", "type": "seen", "source": "MISP/3c19819c-1dac-4ef2-bfed-be5efa7e0123", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2023-06-14T21:10:04.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "37399a0b-d465-4be2-8077-6dd0f76feaf6", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20701", "type": "seen", "source": "MISP/3c19819c-1dac-4ef2-bfed-be5efa7e0123", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2023-06-14T21:10:04.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "359119a1-f2ca-49a2-8f8b-5b51f64b0514", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20703", "type": "seen", "source": "MISP/3c19819c-1dac-4ef2-bfed-be5efa7e0123", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2023-06-14T21:10:04.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "e1982e5f-a3b1-41b7-9c52-d2eac5938408", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20708", "type": "seen", "source": "MISP/3c19819c-1dac-4ef2-bfed-be5efa7e0123", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2023-06-14T21:10:04.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "d46ebc21-f9c3-4f02-a279-f3623e632bc8", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20701", "type": "seen", "source": "https://feedsin.space/feed/CISAKevBot/items/2971360", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2024-12-24T20:28:10.403577Z"}, {"uuid": "ae8c7cad-11bd-4182-bcc8-fca2c5d0a9cd", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20703", "type": "seen", "source": "https://feedsin.space/feed/CISAKevBot/items/2971361", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2024-12-24T20:28:11.226483Z"}, {"uuid": "6917d869-1da5-48c1-bcce-98ef93d89170", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20708", "type": "seen", "source": "https://feedsin.space/feed/CISAKevBot/items/2971362", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2024-12-24T20:28:12.434011Z"}, {"uuid": "4c62ef34-ff28-44e8-ab64-1dea62b75170", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20700", "type": "seen", "source": "https://feedsin.space/feed/CISAKevBot/items/2971359", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2024-12-24T20:28:09.283409Z"}, {"uuid": "ff3c915c-9c6c-4289-a999-f92062b46119", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20705", "type": "seen", "source": "MISP/a1e796df-2ad8-4c8d-8b69-737a004e72dd", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2025-02-06T03:13:45.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "78048370-8e16-44d5-bb67-25731bf21aee", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20707", "type": "seen", "source": "MISP/a1e796df-2ad8-4c8d-8b69-737a004e72dd", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2025-02-06T03:13:45.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "823dc989-16d0-4711-80b4-a01089b063ea", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20705", "type": "seen", "source": "MISP/a1e796df-2ad8-4c8d-8b69-737a004e72dd", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2025-02-23T04:10:42.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "6984ff86-b3f1-4b68-b10d-538057af0792", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20707", "type": "seen", "source": "MISP/a1e796df-2ad8-4c8d-8b69-737a004e72dd", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2025-02-23T04:10:42.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "c32ee908-5f92-404b-9849-664e29acd672", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20700", "type": "seen", "source": "MISP/3c19819c-1dac-4ef2-bfed-be5efa7e0123", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2025-02-23T02:10:33.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "544e3499-4618-450d-b2f3-353d542bb055", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20703", "type": "seen", "source": "MISP/3c19819c-1dac-4ef2-bfed-be5efa7e0123", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2025-02-23T02:10:33.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "682c3305-c23a-48da-8750-8b14713c29f8", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20701", "type": "seen", "source": "MISP/3c19819c-1dac-4ef2-bfed-be5efa7e0123", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2025-02-23T02:10:33.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "b6ccf3cc-04ab-48dc-a4e9-635815124193", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20708", "type": "seen", "source": "MISP/3c19819c-1dac-4ef2-bfed-be5efa7e0123", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2025-02-23T02:10:33.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "5e38a4a9-fd51-4628-8d53-4f50346a3c79", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-2070", "type": "seen", "source": "https://bsky.app/profile/beikokucyber.bsky.social/post/3lq433m3t222u", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2025-05-26T21:02:14.823834Z"}, {"uuid": "d035947e-953b-41c0-9500-d69200dce88b", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20705", "type": "seen", "source": "https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/blob/master/modules/exploits/linux/http/cisco_rv340_lan.rb", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2023-02-14T00:13:40.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "d84c0066-1319-4253-80d9-4aa72333a470", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20707", "type": "seen", "source": "https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/blob/master/modules/exploits/linux/http/cisco_rv340_lan.rb", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2023-02-14T00:13:40.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "659b1970-bf4d-42f1-aad3-16257830d159", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20705", "type": "seen", "source": "https://bsky.app/profile/beikokucyber.bsky.social/post/3ly226qmlht2t", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2025-09-04T21:02:22.207111Z"}, {"uuid": "240ed126-187d-43b9-adcb-b0258e8ad1d3", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "af0120d0-3dac-4a6a-974b-a9f33d2a9846", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20708", "type": "exploited", "source": "https://vulnerability.circl.lu/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog/28b70e5e-8c50-4651-8c3e-e869f1e07308", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2026-02-02T12:28:11.262642Z"}, {"uuid": "729cde48-ae48-491e-90e4-8be948b846ba", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "af0120d0-3dac-4a6a-974b-a9f33d2a9846", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20701", "type": "exploited", "source": "https://vulnerability.circl.lu/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog/1128272a-1c30-4c3f-a40b-2008eee9cecb", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2026-02-02T12:28:11.484036Z"}, {"uuid": "ade18bbd-a7f0-4869-888a-5b8a43a61609", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "af0120d0-3dac-4a6a-974b-a9f33d2a9846", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20700", "type": "exploited", "source": "https://vulnerability.circl.lu/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog/09482c32-82c4-43f7-bebb-82f918b541b0", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2026-02-02T12:28:11.578442Z"}, {"uuid": "aecfe11e-645b-45e3-9403-7cc172df1fe7", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "af0120d0-3dac-4a6a-974b-a9f33d2a9846", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20703", "type": "exploited", "source": "https://vulnerability.circl.lu/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog/dcfe1baa-b637-4b9b-9c9b-eaa21c4307ab", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2026-02-02T12:28:11.367498Z"}, {"uuid": "7a38233f-0692-445a-b94e-a0c70d3a21e0", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20700", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/arpsyndicate/1024", "content": "#ExploitObserverAlert\n\nCVE-2022-20700\n\nDESCRIPTION: Exploit Observer has 1 entries related to CVE-2022-20700. Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Small Business RV160, RV260, RV340, and RV345 Series Routers could allow an attacker to do any of the following: Execute arbitrary code Elevate privileges Execute arbitrary commands Bypass authentication and authorization protections Fetch and run unsigned software Cause denial of service (DoS) For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.\n\nFIRST-EPSS: 0.004840000\nNVD-IS: 5.9\nNVD-ES: 3.9", "creation_timestamp": "2023-12-03T20:41:34.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "9e53a948-cfe7-46ca-a7aa-21dba26d8dfe", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20703", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/arpsyndicate/1007", "content": "#ExploitObserverAlert\n\nCVE-2022-20703\n\nDESCRIPTION: Exploit Observer has 3 entries related to CVE-2022-20703. Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Small Business RV160, RV260, RV340, and RV345 Series Routers could allow an attacker to do any of the following: Execute arbitrary code Elevate privileges Execute arbitrary commands Bypass authentication and authorization protections Fetch and run unsigned software Cause denial of service (DoS) For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.\n\nFIRST-EPSS: 0.007340000\nNVD-IS: 5.9\nNVD-ES: 2.5", "creation_timestamp": "2023-12-03T19:09:26.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "ffdbe01c-02f5-4764-9b67-cd4f3646a668", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20708", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/arpsyndicate/974", "content": "#ExploitObserverAlert\n\nCVE-2022-20708\n\nDESCRIPTION: Exploit Observer has 2 entries related to CVE-2022-20708. Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Small Business RV160, RV260, RV340, and RV345 Series Routers could allow an attacker to do any of the following: Execute arbitrary code Elevate privileges Execute arbitrary commands Bypass authentication and authorization protections Fetch and run unsigned software Cause denial of service (DoS) For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.\n\nFIRST-EPSS: 0.010830000\nNVD-IS: 5.9\nNVD-ES: 3.9", "creation_timestamp": "2023-12-03T16:12:00.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "8885600b-6d30-4494-a4c2-478f3ea966ae", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20703", "type": "published-proof-of-concept", "source": "https://t.me/true_secator/2591", "content": "\u0420\u0430\u0437\u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u0447\u0438\u043a\u0438 Cisco \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043a\u0438 \u0432 VPN-\u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0430\u0445 Small Business \u0441\u0435\u0440\u0438\u0439 RV160, RV260, RV340 \u0438 RV345. \u041d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u0438\u0437 \u043d\u0438\u0445 \u043c\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u043a \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044e \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043a\u043e\u0434\u0430 \u0441 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u044f\u043c\u0438 root.\n\n\u0421\u0430\u043c\u0430\u044f \u0441\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0435\u0437\u043d\u0430\u044f \u0434\u044b\u0440\u0430 \u2014 \u044d\u0442\u043e \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043a\u0430 \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043a\u043e\u0434\u0430 CVE-2022-20699 (\u0441 \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e\u0439 CVSS 10,0).\u00a0\u0423\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0432 \u043c\u043e\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435 SSL VPN \u0433\u0438\u0433\u0430\u0431\u0438\u0442\u043d\u044b\u0445 VPN-\u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0432 Cisco Small Business RV340, RV340W, RV345 \u0438 RV345P \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0437\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0443, \u043d\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0448\u0435\u0434\u0448\u0435\u043c\u0443 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043a\u0443 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u043b\u0438\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438, \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043a\u043e\u0434 \u043d\u0430 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u043c \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435.\n\n\u041e\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0447\u0438\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u044f\u0432\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f \u043d\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0430\u044f \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043a\u0430 \u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0446, \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u044f\u0435\u043c\u0430\u044f \u043f\u0440\u0438 \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u043a\u0435 \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 HTTP-\u0437\u0430\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u043e\u0432. \u0417\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u0432\u043e\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c\u0441\u044f \u044d\u0442\u043e\u0439 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c\u044e, \u043e\u0442\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0432 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u043e\u0441\u043d\u044b\u0435 HTTP-\u0437\u0430\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u044b \u043d\u0430 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0435 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e, \u0432\u044b\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u0430\u044e\u0449\u0435\u0435 \u0432 \u0440\u043e\u043b\u0438 \u0448\u043b\u044e\u0437\u0430 SSL VPN.\u00a0\u0423\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0448\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u043e\u0439\u0442 \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0437\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0443 \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043a\u043e\u0434 \u0441 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u044f\u043c\u0438 root.\n\n\u041a\u043e\u043c\u043f\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u043b\u0430 \u0434\u0432\u0435 \u043a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0431\u043b\u0435\u043c\u044b \u0432 \u0432\u0435\u0431-\u0438\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0444\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0435 \u0443\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0430\u043c\u0438 Small Business RV: CVE-2022-20700 (\u0441 \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e\u0439 CVSS 10) \u0438 CVE-2022-20701 (\u0441 \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e\u0439 CVSS 9,0).\n\n\u042d\u0442\u0438 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u0430\u043d\u044b \u0441 \u043d\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u044d\u0444\u0444\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c\u044e \u043c\u0435\u0445\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0437\u043c\u043e\u0432 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438.\u00a0\u0417\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u0432\u043e\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c\u0441\u044f \u0431\u0430\u0433\u0430\u043c\u0438, \u043e\u0442\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0432 \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434\u044b \u043d\u0430 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0435 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e.\u00a0\u0423\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0448\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u043e\u0439\u0442 \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0437\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0443 \u043f\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0441\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0438 \u0434\u043e root \u0438 \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u044f\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434\u044b \u0432 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0439 \u0441\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u0435\u00bb.\u00a0\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u0435\u0442 \u0440\u0435\u043a\u043e\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0434\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044e.\n\n\u0421\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0438 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438\u0445 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u044b \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u043a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 CVE-2022-20708 (\u0441 \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e\u0439 CVSS 10,0) \u0438 CVE-2022-20703 (\u0441 \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e\u0439 CVSS 9,3), \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u0431\u044b\u043b\u0438 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u0430\u043d\u044b \u0441 \u0432\u043d\u0435\u0434\u0440\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434 \u0438 \u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434\u043e\u043c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043a\u0438 \u0446\u0438\u0444\u0440\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0438 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0442\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e.\n\n\u041f\u0440\u043e\u043a\u0430\u0447\u0435\u043d\u044b \u0438 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438\u0435 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0432\u044b\u0441\u043e\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u0438 \u0441\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u0435\u0439 \u0441\u0442\u0435\u043f\u0435\u043d\u0438 \u0441\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0435\u0437\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044f\u043b\u0438 \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043a\u043e\u0434 \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434\u044b, \u0432\u044b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0441\u043e\u0441\u0442\u043e\u044f\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043e\u0442\u043a\u0430\u0437\u0430 \u0432 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u043b\u0443\u0436\u0438\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0438 (DoS), \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0430\u0434\u043c\u0438\u043d\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0438, \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u043c\u043e\u0442\u0440\u0435\u0442\u044c \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0438\u043d\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044e, \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0437\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0437\u0430\u0433\u0440\u0443\u0437\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0444\u0430\u0439\u043b\u044b.\n\n\u041d\u0435\u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u043e \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0440\u0435\u0435 \u043d\u0430\u043a\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043e\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043b\u0438\u043d\u0435\u0439\u043a\u0438 Cisco Small Business, \u0432\u0435\u0434\u044c PoC \u043f\u043e\u0434 \u043d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0445 \u0441\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0435\u0437\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0431\u0430\u0433\u0438 \u0443\u0436\u0435 \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u0435\u043d \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438. \u041f\u0440\u0438 \u044d\u0442\u043e\u043c \u043e\u0442\u043c\u0435\u0442\u0438\u043c, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043f\u0443\u0442\u0438 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0440\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u044d\u0442\u0438\u0445 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0431\u043b\u0435\u043c \u043e\u0442\u0441\u0443\u0442\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u044e\u0442.", "creation_timestamp": "2022-02-04T11:26:32.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "9f7eb8a3-f123-459d-8274-255dc79dd3a5", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20700", "type": "published-proof-of-concept", "source": "https://t.me/true_secator/2591", "content": "\u0420\u0430\u0437\u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u0447\u0438\u043a\u0438 Cisco \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043a\u0438 \u0432 VPN-\u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0430\u0445 Small Business \u0441\u0435\u0440\u0438\u0439 RV160, RV260, RV340 \u0438 RV345. \u041d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u0438\u0437 \u043d\u0438\u0445 \u043c\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u043a \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044e \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043a\u043e\u0434\u0430 \u0441 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u044f\u043c\u0438 root.\n\n\u0421\u0430\u043c\u0430\u044f \u0441\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0435\u0437\u043d\u0430\u044f \u0434\u044b\u0440\u0430 \u2014 \u044d\u0442\u043e \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043a\u0430 \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043a\u043e\u0434\u0430 CVE-2022-20699 (\u0441 \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e\u0439 CVSS 10,0).\u00a0\u0423\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0432 \u043c\u043e\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435 SSL VPN \u0433\u0438\u0433\u0430\u0431\u0438\u0442\u043d\u044b\u0445 VPN-\u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0432 Cisco Small Business RV340, RV340W, RV345 \u0438 RV345P \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0437\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0443, \u043d\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0448\u0435\u0434\u0448\u0435\u043c\u0443 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043a\u0443 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u043b\u0438\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438, \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043a\u043e\u0434 \u043d\u0430 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u043c \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435.\n\n\u041e\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0447\u0438\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u044f\u0432\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f \u043d\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0430\u044f \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043a\u0430 \u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0446, \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u044f\u0435\u043c\u0430\u044f \u043f\u0440\u0438 \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u043a\u0435 \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 HTTP-\u0437\u0430\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u043e\u0432. \u0417\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u0432\u043e\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c\u0441\u044f \u044d\u0442\u043e\u0439 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c\u044e, \u043e\u0442\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0432 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u043e\u0441\u043d\u044b\u0435 HTTP-\u0437\u0430\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u044b \u043d\u0430 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0435 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e, \u0432\u044b\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u0430\u044e\u0449\u0435\u0435 \u0432 \u0440\u043e\u043b\u0438 \u0448\u043b\u044e\u0437\u0430 SSL VPN.\u00a0\u0423\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0448\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u043e\u0439\u0442 \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0437\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0443 \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043a\u043e\u0434 \u0441 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u044f\u043c\u0438 root.\n\n\u041a\u043e\u043c\u043f\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u043b\u0430 \u0434\u0432\u0435 \u043a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0431\u043b\u0435\u043c\u044b \u0432 \u0432\u0435\u0431-\u0438\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0444\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0435 \u0443\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0430\u043c\u0438 Small Business RV: CVE-2022-20700 (\u0441 \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e\u0439 CVSS 10) \u0438 CVE-2022-20701 (\u0441 \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e\u0439 CVSS 9,0).\n\n\u042d\u0442\u0438 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u0430\u043d\u044b \u0441 \u043d\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u044d\u0444\u0444\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c\u044e \u043c\u0435\u0445\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0437\u043c\u043e\u0432 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438.\u00a0\u0417\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u0432\u043e\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c\u0441\u044f \u0431\u0430\u0433\u0430\u043c\u0438, \u043e\u0442\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0432 \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434\u044b \u043d\u0430 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0435 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e.\u00a0\u0423\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0448\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u043e\u0439\u0442 \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0437\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0443 \u043f\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0441\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0438 \u0434\u043e root \u0438 \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u044f\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434\u044b \u0432 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0439 \u0441\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u0435\u00bb.\u00a0\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u0435\u0442 \u0440\u0435\u043a\u043e\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0434\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044e.\n\n\u0421\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0438 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438\u0445 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u044b \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u043a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 CVE-2022-20708 (\u0441 \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e\u0439 CVSS 10,0) \u0438 CVE-2022-20703 (\u0441 \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e\u0439 CVSS 9,3), \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u0431\u044b\u043b\u0438 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u0430\u043d\u044b \u0441 \u0432\u043d\u0435\u0434\u0440\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434 \u0438 \u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434\u043e\u043c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043a\u0438 \u0446\u0438\u0444\u0440\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0438 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0442\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e.\n\n\u041f\u0440\u043e\u043a\u0430\u0447\u0435\u043d\u044b \u0438 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438\u0435 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0432\u044b\u0441\u043e\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u0438 \u0441\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u0435\u0439 \u0441\u0442\u0435\u043f\u0435\u043d\u0438 \u0441\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0435\u0437\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044f\u043b\u0438 \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043a\u043e\u0434 \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434\u044b, \u0432\u044b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0441\u043e\u0441\u0442\u043e\u044f\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043e\u0442\u043a\u0430\u0437\u0430 \u0432 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u043b\u0443\u0436\u0438\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0438 (DoS), \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0430\u0434\u043c\u0438\u043d\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0438, \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u043c\u043e\u0442\u0440\u0435\u0442\u044c \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0438\u043d\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044e, \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0437\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0437\u0430\u0433\u0440\u0443\u0437\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0444\u0430\u0439\u043b\u044b.\n\n\u041d\u0435\u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u043e \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0440\u0435\u0435 \u043d\u0430\u043a\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043e\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043b\u0438\u043d\u0435\u0439\u043a\u0438 Cisco Small Business, \u0432\u0435\u0434\u044c PoC \u043f\u043e\u0434 \u043d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0445 \u0441\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0435\u0437\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0431\u0430\u0433\u0438 \u0443\u0436\u0435 \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u0435\u043d \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438. \u041f\u0440\u0438 \u044d\u0442\u043e\u043c \u043e\u0442\u043c\u0435\u0442\u0438\u043c, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043f\u0443\u0442\u0438 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0440\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u044d\u0442\u0438\u0445 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0431\u043b\u0435\u043c \u043e\u0442\u0441\u0443\u0442\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u044e\u0442.", "creation_timestamp": "2022-02-04T11:26:32.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "eae6846b-fc0e-4969-b3a6-a345303ad93e", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20701", "type": "published-proof-of-concept", "source": "https://t.me/true_secator/2591", "content": "\u0420\u0430\u0437\u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u0447\u0438\u043a\u0438 Cisco \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043a\u0438 \u0432 VPN-\u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0430\u0445 Small Business \u0441\u0435\u0440\u0438\u0439 RV160, RV260, RV340 \u0438 RV345. \u041d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u0438\u0437 \u043d\u0438\u0445 \u043c\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u043a \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044e \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043a\u043e\u0434\u0430 \u0441 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u044f\u043c\u0438 root.\n\n\u0421\u0430\u043c\u0430\u044f \u0441\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0435\u0437\u043d\u0430\u044f \u0434\u044b\u0440\u0430 \u2014 \u044d\u0442\u043e \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043a\u0430 \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043a\u043e\u0434\u0430 CVE-2022-20699 (\u0441 \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e\u0439 CVSS 10,0).\u00a0\u0423\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0432 \u043c\u043e\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435 SSL VPN \u0433\u0438\u0433\u0430\u0431\u0438\u0442\u043d\u044b\u0445 VPN-\u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0432 Cisco Small Business RV340, RV340W, RV345 \u0438 RV345P \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0437\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0443, \u043d\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0448\u0435\u0434\u0448\u0435\u043c\u0443 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043a\u0443 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u043b\u0438\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438, \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043a\u043e\u0434 \u043d\u0430 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u043c \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435.\n\n\u041e\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0447\u0438\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u044f\u0432\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f \u043d\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0430\u044f \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043a\u0430 \u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0446, \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u044f\u0435\u043c\u0430\u044f \u043f\u0440\u0438 \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u043a\u0435 \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 HTTP-\u0437\u0430\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u043e\u0432. \u0417\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u0432\u043e\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c\u0441\u044f \u044d\u0442\u043e\u0439 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c\u044e, \u043e\u0442\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0432 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u043e\u0441\u043d\u044b\u0435 HTTP-\u0437\u0430\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u044b \u043d\u0430 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0435 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e, \u0432\u044b\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u0430\u044e\u0449\u0435\u0435 \u0432 \u0440\u043e\u043b\u0438 \u0448\u043b\u044e\u0437\u0430 SSL VPN.\u00a0\u0423\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0448\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u043e\u0439\u0442 \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0437\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0443 \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043a\u043e\u0434 \u0441 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u044f\u043c\u0438 root.\n\n\u041a\u043e\u043c\u043f\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u043b\u0430 \u0434\u0432\u0435 \u043a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0431\u043b\u0435\u043c\u044b \u0432 \u0432\u0435\u0431-\u0438\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0444\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0435 \u0443\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0430\u043c\u0438 Small Business RV: CVE-2022-20700 (\u0441 \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e\u0439 CVSS 10) \u0438 CVE-2022-20701 (\u0441 \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e\u0439 CVSS 9,0).\n\n\u042d\u0442\u0438 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u0430\u043d\u044b \u0441 \u043d\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u044d\u0444\u0444\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c\u044e \u043c\u0435\u0445\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0437\u043c\u043e\u0432 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438.\u00a0\u0417\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u0432\u043e\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c\u0441\u044f \u0431\u0430\u0433\u0430\u043c\u0438, \u043e\u0442\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0432 \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434\u044b \u043d\u0430 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0435 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e.\u00a0\u0423\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0448\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u043e\u0439\u0442 \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0437\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0443 \u043f\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0441\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0438 \u0434\u043e root \u0438 \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u044f\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434\u044b \u0432 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0439 \u0441\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u0435\u00bb.\u00a0\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u0435\u0442 \u0440\u0435\u043a\u043e\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0434\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044e.\n\n\u0421\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0438 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438\u0445 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u044b \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u043a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 CVE-2022-20708 (\u0441 \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e\u0439 CVSS 10,0) \u0438 CVE-2022-20703 (\u0441 \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e\u0439 CVSS 9,3), \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u0431\u044b\u043b\u0438 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u0430\u043d\u044b \u0441 \u0432\u043d\u0435\u0434\u0440\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434 \u0438 \u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434\u043e\u043c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043a\u0438 \u0446\u0438\u0444\u0440\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0438 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0442\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e.\n\n\u041f\u0440\u043e\u043a\u0430\u0447\u0435\u043d\u044b \u0438 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438\u0435 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0432\u044b\u0441\u043e\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u0438 \u0441\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u0435\u0439 \u0441\u0442\u0435\u043f\u0435\u043d\u0438 \u0441\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0435\u0437\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044f\u043b\u0438 \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043a\u043e\u0434 \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434\u044b, \u0432\u044b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0441\u043e\u0441\u0442\u043e\u044f\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043e\u0442\u043a\u0430\u0437\u0430 \u0432 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u043b\u0443\u0436\u0438\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0438 (DoS), \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0430\u0434\u043c\u0438\u043d\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0438, \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u043c\u043e\u0442\u0440\u0435\u0442\u044c \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0438\u043d\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044e, \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0437\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0437\u0430\u0433\u0440\u0443\u0437\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0444\u0430\u0439\u043b\u044b.\n\n\u041d\u0435\u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u043e \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0440\u0435\u0435 \u043d\u0430\u043a\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043e\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043b\u0438\u043d\u0435\u0439\u043a\u0438 Cisco Small Business, \u0432\u0435\u0434\u044c PoC \u043f\u043e\u0434 \u043d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0445 \u0441\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0435\u0437\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0431\u0430\u0433\u0438 \u0443\u0436\u0435 \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u0435\u043d \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438. \u041f\u0440\u0438 \u044d\u0442\u043e\u043c \u043e\u0442\u043c\u0435\u0442\u0438\u043c, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043f\u0443\u0442\u0438 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0440\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u044d\u0442\u0438\u0445 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0431\u043b\u0435\u043c \u043e\u0442\u0441\u0443\u0442\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u044e\u0442.", "creation_timestamp": "2022-02-04T11:26:32.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "23023a9c-c356-4089-999e-e9fe89674e6e", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20708", "type": "published-proof-of-concept", "source": "https://t.me/true_secator/2591", "content": "\u0420\u0430\u0437\u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u0447\u0438\u043a\u0438 Cisco \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043a\u0438 \u0432 VPN-\u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0430\u0445 Small Business \u0441\u0435\u0440\u0438\u0439 RV160, RV260, RV340 \u0438 RV345. \u041d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u0438\u0437 \u043d\u0438\u0445 \u043c\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u043a \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044e \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043a\u043e\u0434\u0430 \u0441 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u044f\u043c\u0438 root.\n\n\u0421\u0430\u043c\u0430\u044f \u0441\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0435\u0437\u043d\u0430\u044f \u0434\u044b\u0440\u0430 \u2014 \u044d\u0442\u043e \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043a\u0430 \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043a\u043e\u0434\u0430 CVE-2022-20699 (\u0441 \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e\u0439 CVSS 10,0).\u00a0\u0423\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0432 \u043c\u043e\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435 SSL VPN \u0433\u0438\u0433\u0430\u0431\u0438\u0442\u043d\u044b\u0445 VPN-\u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0432 Cisco Small Business RV340, RV340W, RV345 \u0438 RV345P \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0437\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0443, \u043d\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0448\u0435\u0434\u0448\u0435\u043c\u0443 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043a\u0443 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u043b\u0438\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438, \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043a\u043e\u0434 \u043d\u0430 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u043c \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435.\n\n\u041e\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0447\u0438\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u044f\u0432\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f \u043d\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0430\u044f \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043a\u0430 \u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0446, \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u044f\u0435\u043c\u0430\u044f \u043f\u0440\u0438 \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u043a\u0435 \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 HTTP-\u0437\u0430\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u043e\u0432. \u0417\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u0432\u043e\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c\u0441\u044f \u044d\u0442\u043e\u0439 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c\u044e, \u043e\u0442\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0432 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u043e\u0441\u043d\u044b\u0435 HTTP-\u0437\u0430\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u044b \u043d\u0430 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0435 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e, \u0432\u044b\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u0430\u044e\u0449\u0435\u0435 \u0432 \u0440\u043e\u043b\u0438 \u0448\u043b\u044e\u0437\u0430 SSL VPN.\u00a0\u0423\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0448\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u043e\u0439\u0442 \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0437\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0443 \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043a\u043e\u0434 \u0441 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u044f\u043c\u0438 root.\n\n\u041a\u043e\u043c\u043f\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u043b\u0430 \u0434\u0432\u0435 \u043a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0431\u043b\u0435\u043c\u044b \u0432 \u0432\u0435\u0431-\u0438\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0444\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0435 \u0443\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0430\u043c\u0438 Small Business RV: CVE-2022-20700 (\u0441 \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e\u0439 CVSS 10) \u0438 CVE-2022-20701 (\u0441 \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e\u0439 CVSS 9,0).\n\n\u042d\u0442\u0438 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u0430\u043d\u044b \u0441 \u043d\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u044d\u0444\u0444\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c\u044e \u043c\u0435\u0445\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0437\u043c\u043e\u0432 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438.\u00a0\u0417\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u0432\u043e\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c\u0441\u044f \u0431\u0430\u0433\u0430\u043c\u0438, \u043e\u0442\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0432 \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434\u044b \u043d\u0430 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0435 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e.\u00a0\u0423\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0448\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u043e\u0439\u0442 \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0437\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0443 \u043f\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0441\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0438 \u0434\u043e root \u0438 \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u044f\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434\u044b \u0432 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0439 \u0441\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u0435\u00bb.\u00a0\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u0435\u0442 \u0440\u0435\u043a\u043e\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0434\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044e.\n\n\u0421\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0438 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438\u0445 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u044b \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u043a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 CVE-2022-20708 (\u0441 \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e\u0439 CVSS 10,0) \u0438 CVE-2022-20703 (\u0441 \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e\u0439 CVSS 9,3), \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u0431\u044b\u043b\u0438 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u0430\u043d\u044b \u0441 \u0432\u043d\u0435\u0434\u0440\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434 \u0438 \u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434\u043e\u043c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043a\u0438 \u0446\u0438\u0444\u0440\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0438 \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0442\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e.\n\n\u041f\u0440\u043e\u043a\u0430\u0447\u0435\u043d\u044b \u0438 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438\u0435 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0432\u044b\u0441\u043e\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u0438 \u0441\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u0435\u0439 \u0441\u0442\u0435\u043f\u0435\u043d\u0438 \u0441\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0435\u0437\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044f\u043b\u0438 \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043a\u043e\u0434 \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434\u044b, \u0432\u044b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0441\u043e\u0441\u0442\u043e\u044f\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043e\u0442\u043a\u0430\u0437\u0430 \u0432 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u043b\u0443\u0436\u0438\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0438 (DoS), \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0430\u0434\u043c\u0438\u043d\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0438, \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u043c\u043e\u0442\u0440\u0435\u0442\u044c \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0438\u043d\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044e, \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0437\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0437\u0430\u0433\u0440\u0443\u0437\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0444\u0430\u0439\u043b\u044b.\n\n\u041d\u0435\u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u043e \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0440\u0435\u0435 \u043d\u0430\u043a\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043e\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043b\u0438\u043d\u0435\u0439\u043a\u0438 Cisco Small Business, \u0432\u0435\u0434\u044c PoC \u043f\u043e\u0434 \u043d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0445 \u0441\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0435\u0437\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0431\u0430\u0433\u0438 \u0443\u0436\u0435 \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u0435\u043d \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438. \u041f\u0440\u0438 \u044d\u0442\u043e\u043c \u043e\u0442\u043c\u0435\u0442\u0438\u043c, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043f\u0443\u0442\u0438 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0440\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u044d\u0442\u0438\u0445 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0431\u043b\u0435\u043c \u043e\u0442\u0441\u0443\u0442\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u044e\u0442.", "creation_timestamp": "2022-02-04T11:26:32.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "ddfb5ca4-e40c-4e97-8abe-e7903b753a64", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20708", "type": "published-proof-of-concept", "source": "https://t.me/NeKaspersky/1769", "content": "Cisco \u0432\u044b\u043f\u0443\u0441\u0442\u0438\u043b\u0430 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043a\u0443\u0447\u0438 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0441\u0435\u0440\u0438\u0438 \u0440\u043e\u0443\u0442\u0435\u0440\u043e\u0432 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043c\u0430\u043b\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0431\u0438\u0437\u043d\u0435\u0441\u0430 (RV). \u041d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0435 \u0438\u0437 \u043d\u0438\u0445 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043a\u043e\u043d\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043b\u044c \u043d\u0430\u0434 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u043c \u0431\u0435\u0437 \u0444\u0438\u0437\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u0430 \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0430\u0443\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0444\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438.\n\n\u0412 \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0439 \u0441\u043b\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0430\u043f\u0434\u0435\u0439\u0442\u044b \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442 15 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439, 5 \u0438\u0437 \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0445 \u043a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435, \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043a\u0443 \u0430\u0442\u0430\u043a\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0435 \u043c\u043e\u0433\u0443\u0442 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0438\u0445 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f root \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434 \u043d\u0430 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435. \u0417\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a, \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0439 \u044d\u0442\u0438 \u043d\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u043a\u0438, \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u043e\u0431\u043e\u0439\u0442\u0438 \u0430\u0443\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0444\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044e \u0438 \u0432\u044b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043e\u0442\u043a\u0430\u0437 \u0432 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u043b\u0443\u0436\u0438\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0438 (DoS).\n\n\u041d\u0430\u0438\u0431\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0435 \u0441\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0435\u0437\u043d\u044b\u043c\u0438 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044f\u043c\u0438 \u044f\u0432\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f:\n\u2022 CVE-2022-20699: RCE \u0432 \u043c\u043e\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435 SSL VPN, \u0432\u044b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u043d\u043d\u0430\u044f \u043d\u0435\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0446 \u0434\u0438\u0430\u043f\u0430\u0437\u043e\u043d\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0438 \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u043a\u0435 \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 HTTP-\u0437\u0430\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u043e\u0432. (10,0 \u043f\u043e \u0448\u043a\u0430\u043b\u0435 \u043a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438);\n\u2022 CVE-2022-20700 \u0438 CVE-2022-20701: \u043f\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0439 \u0432 \u0432\u0435\u0431-\u0438\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0444\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0435 \u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0430 \u0438\u0437-\u0437\u0430 \u0431\u0430\u0433\u043e\u0432 \u0432 \u043c\u0435\u0445\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0437\u043c\u0430\u0445 \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 (10,0 \u0438 9,0);\n\u2022 CVE-2022-20703: \u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043a\u0438 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0438 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043a\u0435 \u0441\u043e\u0444\u0442\u0430 \u0438\u0437 \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0437\u0430 (9,3);\n\u2022 CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20749: \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0432 web-\u0438\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0444\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0432, \u0432\u0435\u0434\u0443\u0449\u0438\u0435 \u043a RCE, \u0432\u044b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u043d\u044b \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043a\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u0432 \u0432\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0434\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0432\u0432\u043e\u0434\u0430 (10,0, 7,3 \u0438 7,3);\n\n\u041f\u043e\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0437\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 PSIRT Cisco \u0437\u0430\u044f\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0438\u043c \u0438\u0437\u0432\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043d\u043e \u043e \u0441\u0443\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0438 PoC \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043d\u0435\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043a\u0438\u0445 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439, \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0432 \u044d\u0442\u0438\u0445 \u043e\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\u0445. \u0423\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c CVE-2022-20699 \u0431\u044b\u043b\u0430 \u043e\u0431\u043d\u0430\u0440\u0443\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0430 \u0438 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0430 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434\u043e\u0439 Flashback \u0432\u043e \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0445\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0440\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043a\u043e\u043d\u043a\u0443\u0440\u0441\u0430 Pwn2Own Austin 2021. \u041e\u043d\u0438 \u043e\u0431\u0435\u0449\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0441\u044c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u0435\u043c\u043e\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u043e\u0439\u0442 \u0438 \u043e\u043f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c POC \u0432 \u0440\u0430\u043c\u043a\u0430\u0445 \u0432\u044b\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043d\u0430 OffensiveCon 2022.\n@NeKaspersky", "creation_timestamp": "2022-02-05T15:10:07.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "79c4b7bd-b1b4-4e4d-a821-b738cf870440", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20700", "type": "published-proof-of-concept", "source": "https://t.me/NeKaspersky/1769", "content": "Cisco \u0432\u044b\u043f\u0443\u0441\u0442\u0438\u043b\u0430 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043a\u0443\u0447\u0438 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0441\u0435\u0440\u0438\u0438 \u0440\u043e\u0443\u0442\u0435\u0440\u043e\u0432 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043c\u0430\u043b\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0431\u0438\u0437\u043d\u0435\u0441\u0430 (RV). \u041d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0435 \u0438\u0437 \u043d\u0438\u0445 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043a\u043e\u043d\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043b\u044c \u043d\u0430\u0434 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u043c \u0431\u0435\u0437 \u0444\u0438\u0437\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u0430 \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0430\u0443\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0444\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438.\n\n\u0412 \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0439 \u0441\u043b\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0430\u043f\u0434\u0435\u0439\u0442\u044b \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442 15 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439, 5 \u0438\u0437 \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0445 \u043a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435, \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043a\u0443 \u0430\u0442\u0430\u043a\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0435 \u043c\u043e\u0433\u0443\u0442 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0438\u0445 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f root \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434 \u043d\u0430 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435. \u0417\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a, \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0439 \u044d\u0442\u0438 \u043d\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u043a\u0438, \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u043e\u0431\u043e\u0439\u0442\u0438 \u0430\u0443\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0444\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044e \u0438 \u0432\u044b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043e\u0442\u043a\u0430\u0437 \u0432 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u043b\u0443\u0436\u0438\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0438 (DoS).\n\n\u041d\u0430\u0438\u0431\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0435 \u0441\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0435\u0437\u043d\u044b\u043c\u0438 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044f\u043c\u0438 \u044f\u0432\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f:\n\u2022 CVE-2022-20699: RCE \u0432 \u043c\u043e\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435 SSL VPN, \u0432\u044b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u043d\u043d\u0430\u044f \u043d\u0435\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0446 \u0434\u0438\u0430\u043f\u0430\u0437\u043e\u043d\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0438 \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u043a\u0435 \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 HTTP-\u0437\u0430\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u043e\u0432. (10,0 \u043f\u043e \u0448\u043a\u0430\u043b\u0435 \u043a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438);\n\u2022 CVE-2022-20700 \u0438 CVE-2022-20701: \u043f\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0439 \u0432 \u0432\u0435\u0431-\u0438\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0444\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0435 \u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0430 \u0438\u0437-\u0437\u0430 \u0431\u0430\u0433\u043e\u0432 \u0432 \u043c\u0435\u0445\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0437\u043c\u0430\u0445 \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 (10,0 \u0438 9,0);\n\u2022 CVE-2022-20703: \u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043a\u0438 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0438 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043a\u0435 \u0441\u043e\u0444\u0442\u0430 \u0438\u0437 \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0437\u0430 (9,3);\n\u2022 CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20749: \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0432 web-\u0438\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0444\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0432, \u0432\u0435\u0434\u0443\u0449\u0438\u0435 \u043a RCE, \u0432\u044b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u043d\u044b \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043a\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u0432 \u0432\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0434\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0432\u0432\u043e\u0434\u0430 (10,0, 7,3 \u0438 7,3);\n\n\u041f\u043e\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0437\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 PSIRT Cisco \u0437\u0430\u044f\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0438\u043c \u0438\u0437\u0432\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043d\u043e \u043e \u0441\u0443\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0438 PoC \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043d\u0435\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043a\u0438\u0445 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439, \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0432 \u044d\u0442\u0438\u0445 \u043e\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\u0445. \u0423\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c CVE-2022-20699 \u0431\u044b\u043b\u0430 \u043e\u0431\u043d\u0430\u0440\u0443\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0430 \u0438 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0430 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434\u043e\u0439 Flashback \u0432\u043e \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0445\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0440\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043a\u043e\u043d\u043a\u0443\u0440\u0441\u0430 Pwn2Own Austin 2021. \u041e\u043d\u0438 \u043e\u0431\u0435\u0449\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0441\u044c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u0435\u043c\u043e\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u043e\u0439\u0442 \u0438 \u043e\u043f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c POC \u0432 \u0440\u0430\u043c\u043a\u0430\u0445 \u0432\u044b\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043d\u0430 OffensiveCon 2022.\n@NeKaspersky", "creation_timestamp": "2022-02-05T15:10:07.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "88f3d8e3-0b5a-4794-9ffe-d6c7e12e65a7", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20707", "type": "published-proof-of-concept", "source": "https://t.me/NeKaspersky/1769", "content": "Cisco \u0432\u044b\u043f\u0443\u0441\u0442\u0438\u043b\u0430 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043a\u0443\u0447\u0438 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0441\u0435\u0440\u0438\u0438 \u0440\u043e\u0443\u0442\u0435\u0440\u043e\u0432 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043c\u0430\u043b\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0431\u0438\u0437\u043d\u0435\u0441\u0430 (RV). \u041d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0435 \u0438\u0437 \u043d\u0438\u0445 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043a\u043e\u043d\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043b\u044c \u043d\u0430\u0434 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u043c \u0431\u0435\u0437 \u0444\u0438\u0437\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u0430 \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0430\u0443\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0444\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438.\n\n\u0412 \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0439 \u0441\u043b\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0430\u043f\u0434\u0435\u0439\u0442\u044b \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442 15 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439, 5 \u0438\u0437 \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0445 \u043a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435, \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043a\u0443 \u0430\u0442\u0430\u043a\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0435 \u043c\u043e\u0433\u0443\u0442 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0438\u0445 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f root \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434 \u043d\u0430 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435. \u0417\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a, \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0439 \u044d\u0442\u0438 \u043d\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u043a\u0438, \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u043e\u0431\u043e\u0439\u0442\u0438 \u0430\u0443\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0444\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044e \u0438 \u0432\u044b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043e\u0442\u043a\u0430\u0437 \u0432 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u043b\u0443\u0436\u0438\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0438 (DoS).\n\n\u041d\u0430\u0438\u0431\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0435 \u0441\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0435\u0437\u043d\u044b\u043c\u0438 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044f\u043c\u0438 \u044f\u0432\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f:\n\u2022 CVE-2022-20699: RCE \u0432 \u043c\u043e\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435 SSL VPN, \u0432\u044b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u043d\u043d\u0430\u044f \u043d\u0435\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0446 \u0434\u0438\u0430\u043f\u0430\u0437\u043e\u043d\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0438 \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u043a\u0435 \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 HTTP-\u0437\u0430\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u043e\u0432. (10,0 \u043f\u043e \u0448\u043a\u0430\u043b\u0435 \u043a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438);\n\u2022 CVE-2022-20700 \u0438 CVE-2022-20701: \u043f\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0439 \u0432 \u0432\u0435\u0431-\u0438\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0444\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0435 \u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0430 \u0438\u0437-\u0437\u0430 \u0431\u0430\u0433\u043e\u0432 \u0432 \u043c\u0435\u0445\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0437\u043c\u0430\u0445 \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 (10,0 \u0438 9,0);\n\u2022 CVE-2022-20703: \u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043a\u0438 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0438 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043a\u0435 \u0441\u043e\u0444\u0442\u0430 \u0438\u0437 \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0437\u0430 (9,3);\n\u2022 CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20749: \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0432 web-\u0438\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0444\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0432, \u0432\u0435\u0434\u0443\u0449\u0438\u0435 \u043a RCE, \u0432\u044b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u043d\u044b \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043a\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u0432 \u0432\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0434\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0432\u0432\u043e\u0434\u0430 (10,0, 7,3 \u0438 7,3);\n\n\u041f\u043e\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0437\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 PSIRT Cisco \u0437\u0430\u044f\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0438\u043c \u0438\u0437\u0432\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043d\u043e \u043e \u0441\u0443\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0438 PoC \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043d\u0435\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043a\u0438\u0445 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439, \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0432 \u044d\u0442\u0438\u0445 \u043e\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\u0445. \u0423\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c CVE-2022-20699 \u0431\u044b\u043b\u0430 \u043e\u0431\u043d\u0430\u0440\u0443\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0430 \u0438 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0430 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434\u043e\u0439 Flashback \u0432\u043e \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0445\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0440\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043a\u043e\u043d\u043a\u0443\u0440\u0441\u0430 Pwn2Own Austin 2021. \u041e\u043d\u0438 \u043e\u0431\u0435\u0449\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0441\u044c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u0435\u043c\u043e\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u043e\u0439\u0442 \u0438 \u043e\u043f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c POC \u0432 \u0440\u0430\u043c\u043a\u0430\u0445 \u0432\u044b\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043d\u0430 OffensiveCon 2022.\n@NeKaspersky", "creation_timestamp": "2022-02-05T15:10:07.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "da029872-78d6-4999-be64-d35b1b4a7b1f", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20703", "type": "published-proof-of-concept", "source": "https://t.me/NeKaspersky/1769", "content": "Cisco \u0432\u044b\u043f\u0443\u0441\u0442\u0438\u043b\u0430 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043a\u0443\u0447\u0438 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0441\u0435\u0440\u0438\u0438 \u0440\u043e\u0443\u0442\u0435\u0440\u043e\u0432 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043c\u0430\u043b\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0431\u0438\u0437\u043d\u0435\u0441\u0430 (RV). \u041d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0435 \u0438\u0437 \u043d\u0438\u0445 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043a\u043e\u043d\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043b\u044c \u043d\u0430\u0434 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u043c \u0431\u0435\u0437 \u0444\u0438\u0437\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u0430 \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0430\u0443\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0444\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438.\n\n\u0412 \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0439 \u0441\u043b\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0430\u043f\u0434\u0435\u0439\u0442\u044b \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442 15 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439, 5 \u0438\u0437 \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0445 \u043a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435, \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043a\u0443 \u0430\u0442\u0430\u043a\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0435 \u043c\u043e\u0433\u0443\u0442 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0438\u0445 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f root \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434 \u043d\u0430 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435. \u0417\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a, \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0439 \u044d\u0442\u0438 \u043d\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u043a\u0438, \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u043e\u0431\u043e\u0439\u0442\u0438 \u0430\u0443\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0444\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044e \u0438 \u0432\u044b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043e\u0442\u043a\u0430\u0437 \u0432 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u043b\u0443\u0436\u0438\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0438 (DoS).\n\n\u041d\u0430\u0438\u0431\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0435 \u0441\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0435\u0437\u043d\u044b\u043c\u0438 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044f\u043c\u0438 \u044f\u0432\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f:\n\u2022 CVE-2022-20699: RCE \u0432 \u043c\u043e\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435 SSL VPN, \u0432\u044b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u043d\u043d\u0430\u044f \u043d\u0435\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0446 \u0434\u0438\u0430\u043f\u0430\u0437\u043e\u043d\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0438 \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u043a\u0435 \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 HTTP-\u0437\u0430\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u043e\u0432. (10,0 \u043f\u043e \u0448\u043a\u0430\u043b\u0435 \u043a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438);\n\u2022 CVE-2022-20700 \u0438 CVE-2022-20701: \u043f\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0439 \u0432 \u0432\u0435\u0431-\u0438\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0444\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0435 \u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0430 \u0438\u0437-\u0437\u0430 \u0431\u0430\u0433\u043e\u0432 \u0432 \u043c\u0435\u0445\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0437\u043c\u0430\u0445 \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 (10,0 \u0438 9,0);\n\u2022 CVE-2022-20703: \u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043a\u0438 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0438 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043a\u0435 \u0441\u043e\u0444\u0442\u0430 \u0438\u0437 \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0437\u0430 (9,3);\n\u2022 CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20749: \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0432 web-\u0438\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0444\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0432, \u0432\u0435\u0434\u0443\u0449\u0438\u0435 \u043a RCE, \u0432\u044b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u043d\u044b \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043a\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u0432 \u0432\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0434\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0432\u0432\u043e\u0434\u0430 (10,0, 7,3 \u0438 7,3);\n\n\u041f\u043e\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0437\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 PSIRT Cisco \u0437\u0430\u044f\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0438\u043c \u0438\u0437\u0432\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043d\u043e \u043e \u0441\u0443\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0438 PoC \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043d\u0435\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043a\u0438\u0445 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439, \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0432 \u044d\u0442\u0438\u0445 \u043e\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\u0445. \u0423\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c CVE-2022-20699 \u0431\u044b\u043b\u0430 \u043e\u0431\u043d\u0430\u0440\u0443\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0430 \u0438 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0430 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434\u043e\u0439 Flashback \u0432\u043e \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0445\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0440\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043a\u043e\u043d\u043a\u0443\u0440\u0441\u0430 Pwn2Own Austin 2021. \u041e\u043d\u0438 \u043e\u0431\u0435\u0449\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0441\u044c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u0435\u043c\u043e\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u043e\u0439\u0442 \u0438 \u043e\u043f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c POC \u0432 \u0440\u0430\u043c\u043a\u0430\u0445 \u0432\u044b\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043d\u0430 OffensiveCon 2022.\n@NeKaspersky", "creation_timestamp": "2022-02-05T15:10:07.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "2c960c15-49bd-4378-936f-8413eb8d07d6", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20701", "type": "published-proof-of-concept", "source": "https://t.me/NeKaspersky/1769", "content": "Cisco \u0432\u044b\u043f\u0443\u0441\u0442\u0438\u043b\u0430 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043a\u0443\u0447\u0438 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0441\u0435\u0440\u0438\u0438 \u0440\u043e\u0443\u0442\u0435\u0440\u043e\u0432 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043c\u0430\u043b\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0431\u0438\u0437\u043d\u0435\u0441\u0430 (RV). \u041d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0435 \u0438\u0437 \u043d\u0438\u0445 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043a\u043e\u043d\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043b\u044c \u043d\u0430\u0434 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u043c \u0431\u0435\u0437 \u0444\u0438\u0437\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u0430 \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0430\u0443\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0444\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438.\n\n\u0412 \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0439 \u0441\u043b\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0430\u043f\u0434\u0435\u0439\u0442\u044b \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442 15 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439, 5 \u0438\u0437 \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0445 \u043a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435, \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043a\u0443 \u0430\u0442\u0430\u043a\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0435 \u043c\u043e\u0433\u0443\u0442 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0438\u0445 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f root \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434 \u043d\u0430 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435. \u0417\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a, \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0439 \u044d\u0442\u0438 \u043d\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u043a\u0438, \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u043e\u0431\u043e\u0439\u0442\u0438 \u0430\u0443\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0444\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044e \u0438 \u0432\u044b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043e\u0442\u043a\u0430\u0437 \u0432 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u043b\u0443\u0436\u0438\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0438 (DoS).\n\n\u041d\u0430\u0438\u0431\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0435 \u0441\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0435\u0437\u043d\u044b\u043c\u0438 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044f\u043c\u0438 \u044f\u0432\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f:\n\u2022 CVE-2022-20699: RCE \u0432 \u043c\u043e\u0434\u0443\u043b\u0435 SSL VPN, \u0432\u044b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u043d\u043d\u0430\u044f \u043d\u0435\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0446 \u0434\u0438\u0430\u043f\u0430\u0437\u043e\u043d\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0438 \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u043a\u0435 \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 HTTP-\u0437\u0430\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u043e\u0432. (10,0 \u043f\u043e \u0448\u043a\u0430\u043b\u0435 \u043a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438);\n\u2022 CVE-2022-20700 \u0438 CVE-2022-20701: \u043f\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0439 \u0432 \u0432\u0435\u0431-\u0438\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0444\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0435 \u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0430 \u0438\u0437-\u0437\u0430 \u0431\u0430\u0433\u043e\u0432 \u0432 \u043c\u0435\u0445\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0437\u043c\u0430\u0445 \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 (10,0 \u0438 9,0);\n\u2022 CVE-2022-20703: \u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043a\u0438 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0438 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043a\u0435 \u0441\u043e\u0444\u0442\u0430 \u0438\u0437 \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0437\u0430 (9,3);\n\u2022 CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20749: \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0432 web-\u0438\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0444\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0432, \u0432\u0435\u0434\u0443\u0449\u0438\u0435 \u043a RCE, \u0432\u044b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u043d\u044b \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043a\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u0432 \u0432\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0434\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0432\u0432\u043e\u0434\u0430 (10,0, 7,3 \u0438 7,3);\n\n\u041f\u043e\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0437\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 PSIRT Cisco \u0437\u0430\u044f\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0438\u043c \u0438\u0437\u0432\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043d\u043e \u043e \u0441\u0443\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0438 PoC \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043d\u0435\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043a\u0438\u0445 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439, \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0432 \u044d\u0442\u0438\u0445 \u043e\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\u0445. \u0423\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c CVE-2022-20699 \u0431\u044b\u043b\u0430 \u043e\u0431\u043d\u0430\u0440\u0443\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0430 \u0438 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0430 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0434\u043e\u0439 Flashback \u0432\u043e \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0445\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0440\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043a\u043e\u043d\u043a\u0443\u0440\u0441\u0430 Pwn2Own Austin 2021. \u041e\u043d\u0438 \u043e\u0431\u0435\u0449\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0441\u044c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u0435\u043c\u043e\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u043e\u0439\u0442 \u0438 \u043e\u043f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c POC \u0432 \u0440\u0430\u043c\u043a\u0430\u0445 \u0432\u044b\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043d\u0430 OffensiveCon 2022.\n@NeKaspersky", "creation_timestamp": "2022-02-05T15:10:07.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "39961e25-5f8e-4d6b-b850-9b2a93851e3a", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-2070", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/cibsecurity/50359", "content": "\u203c CVE-2022-2070 \u203c\n\nIn Grandstream GSD3710 in its 1.0.11.13 version, it's possible to overflow the stack since it doesn't check the param length before using the sscanf instruction. Because of that, an attacker could create a socket and connect with a remote IP:port by opening a shell and getting full access to the system. The exploit affects daemons dbmng and logsrv that are running on ports 8000 and 8001 by default.\n\n\ud83d\udcd6 Read\n\nvia \"National Vulnerability Database\".", "creation_timestamp": "2022-09-23T20:43:47.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "a9666979-ce4a-4668-9692-0503da1df51f", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20703", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/cibsecurity/37240", "content": "\u203c CVE-2022-20703 \u203c\n\nMultiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Small Business RV160, RV260, RV340, and RV345 Series Routers could allow an attacker to do any of the following: Execute arbitrary code Elevate privileges Execute arbitrary commands Bypass authentication and authorization protections Fetch and run unsigned software Cause denial of service (DoS) For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.\n\n\ud83d\udcd6 Read\n\nvia \"National Vulnerability Database\".", "creation_timestamp": "2022-02-10T20:17:17.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "c3de749b-a837-46f7-affc-7fd32c9ad436", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20701", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/cibsecurity/37229", "content": "\u203c CVE-2022-20701 \u203c\n\nMultiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Small Business RV160, RV260, RV340, and RV345 Series Routers could allow an attacker to do any of the following: Execute arbitrary code Elevate privileges Execute arbitrary commands Bypass authentication and authorization protections Fetch and run unsigned software Cause denial of service (DoS) For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.\n\n\ud83d\udcd6 Read\n\nvia \"National Vulnerability Database\".", "creation_timestamp": "2022-02-10T20:16:59.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "fab084da-fae9-4096-a22a-f392cd6be660", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20708", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/cibsecurity/37235", "content": "\u203c CVE-2022-20708 \u203c\n\nMultiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Small Business RV160, RV260, RV340, and RV345 Series Routers could allow an attacker to do any of the following: Execute arbitrary code Elevate privileges Execute arbitrary commands Bypass authentication and authorization protections Fetch and run unsigned software Cause denial of service (DoS) For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.\n\n\ud83d\udcd6 Read\n\nvia \"National Vulnerability Database\".", "creation_timestamp": "2022-02-10T20:17:10.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "a1fe2ba8-ec29-47c2-8a75-1a6294b12f51", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20707", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/cibsecurity/37232", "content": "\u203c CVE-2022-20707 \u203c\n\nMultiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Small Business RV160, RV260, RV340, and RV345 Series Routers could allow an attacker to do any of the following: Execute arbitrary code Elevate privileges Execute arbitrary commands Bypass authentication and authorization protections Fetch and run unsigned software Cause denial of service (DoS) For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.\n\n\ud83d\udcd6 Read\n\nvia \"National Vulnerability Database\".", "creation_timestamp": "2022-02-10T20:17:04.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "877279fc-aba9-4328-ae07-b2f26b07c182", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20706", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/cibsecurity/37247", "content": "\u203c CVE-2022-20706 \u203c\n\nMultiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Small Business RV160, RV260, RV340, and RV345 Series Routers could allow an attacker to do any of the following: Execute arbitrary code Elevate privileges Execute arbitrary commands Bypass authentication and authorization protections Fetch and run unsigned software Cause denial of service (DoS) For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.\n\n\ud83d\udcd6 Read\n\nvia \"National Vulnerability Database\".", "creation_timestamp": "2022-02-10T20:17:27.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "7b9d057c-ab66-41f7-9443-f3389f7daee1", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20702", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/cibsecurity/37245", "content": "\u203c CVE-2022-20702 \u203c\n\nMultiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Small Business RV160, RV260, RV340, and RV345 Series Routers could allow an attacker to do any of the following: Execute arbitrary code Elevate privileges Execute arbitrary commands Bypass authentication and authorization protections Fetch and run unsigned software Cause denial of service (DoS) For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.\n\n\ud83d\udcd6 Read\n\nvia \"National Vulnerability Database\".", "creation_timestamp": "2022-02-10T20:17:24.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "a5761000-601f-4f06-867c-4ffc4b068081", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20704", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/cibsecurity/37244", "content": "\u203c CVE-2022-20704 \u203c\n\nMultiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Small Business RV160, RV260, RV340, and RV345 Series Routers could allow an attacker to do any of the following: Execute arbitrary code Elevate privileges Execute arbitrary commands Bypass authentication and authorization protections Fetch and run unsigned software Cause denial of service (DoS) For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.\n\n\ud83d\udcd6 Read\n\nvia \"National Vulnerability Database\".", "creation_timestamp": "2022-02-10T20:17:23.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "f128589e-a3ca-42b4-a045-a64b1f3e0a07", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20709", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/cibsecurity/37234", "content": "\u203c CVE-2022-20709 \u203c\n\nMultiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Small Business RV160, RV260, RV340, and RV345 Series Routers could allow an attacker to do any of the following: Execute arbitrary code Elevate privileges Execute arbitrary commands Bypass authentication and authorization protections Fetch and run unsigned software Cause denial of service (DoS) For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.\n\n\ud83d\udcd6 Read\n\nvia \"National Vulnerability Database\".", "creation_timestamp": "2022-02-10T20:17:08.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "315691c6-a0f6-40d4-bc94-e16294f93c12", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "caeb2787-0d58-4236-9039-7c86c3e566f3", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20700", "type": "exploited", "source": "https://vulnerability.circl.lu/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog/9acaa909-e644-41cb-b136-db3e0b2399e8", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2026-06-19T12:47:37.052295Z"}, {"uuid": "01213fa0-2224-46a5-aca9-7b583f009786", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "caeb2787-0d58-4236-9039-7c86c3e566f3", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20708", "type": "exploited", "source": "https://vulnerability.circl.lu/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog/8e9dba6e-1f52-4c33-b1c1-25099a6f8bbd", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2026-06-19T12:47:37.253887Z"}, {"uuid": "c5d2e5ab-99c7-45d6-a9f7-97991ce47c16", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "caeb2787-0d58-4236-9039-7c86c3e566f3", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20703", "type": "exploited", "source": "https://vulnerability.circl.lu/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog/b5a98b73-f302-4347-b495-66b8b2fa3cfb", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2026-06-19T12:47:37.183096Z"}, {"uuid": "731cdd95-55b3-4565-99eb-49506cb11c8d", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "caeb2787-0d58-4236-9039-7c86c3e566f3", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20701", "type": "exploited", "source": "https://vulnerability.circl.lu/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog/3267b2fe-0b30-438a-9b77-81beb2c6115f", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2026-06-19T12:47:37.114036Z"}, {"uuid": "8429e3fe-bddb-4a0c-bce9-a22d9a9160c1", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "caeb2787-0d58-4236-9039-7c86c3e566f3", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20700", "type": "exploited", "source": "https://vulnerability.circl.lu/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog/b170236b-2db2-475d-b6c9-837d8cab7bbf", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2026-06-23T14:05:05.748537Z"}, {"uuid": "d2686d29-f311-431d-89ca-cf8285cb1fbf", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "caeb2787-0d58-4236-9039-7c86c3e566f3", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20701", "type": "exploited", "source": "https://vulnerability.circl.lu/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog/afe7f7ac-e389-4f9d-a188-b953b18405f3", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2026-06-23T14:05:05.824300Z"}, {"uuid": "26d7b3b9-c13d-4688-a4b6-cb2a4bac223a", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "caeb2787-0d58-4236-9039-7c86c3e566f3", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20703", "type": "exploited", "source": "https://vulnerability.circl.lu/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog/b21eb7d7-8cde-4213-9838-c161a90eadca", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2026-06-23T14:05:05.898144Z"}, {"uuid": "227e219e-617f-4fce-af22-bd1bee09b2fb", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "caeb2787-0d58-4236-9039-7c86c3e566f3", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20708", "type": "exploited", "source": "https://vulnerability.circl.lu/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog/294c824b-fb2a-40b1-a442-c7be780eae74", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2026-06-23T14:05:05.972886Z"}, {"uuid": "2951c3f2-8a34-4b70-b5cc-4c4556fa2d9a", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20702", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/41421", "content": "Black Hat Ethical Hacking\nCisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation available\n\nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Untitled-design-2-1.png Cisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation availablePost Views: 106 https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/BECOME-A-PATRON-AND-UNLOCK-EXCLUSIVE-VIDEOS-1.png Reading Time: 1 Minute\nCisco has released patches for multiple vulnerabilities in the Small Business RV Series router platform that could allow remote attackers to gain complete control over the device, in many cases, without authentication.\nIn total, there are fifteen vulnerabilities fixed by these security updates, with five of them rated as Critical as threat actors can use them to gain \u2018root\u2019 privileges or remotely execute commands on the device.\n\nAccording to the advisory, an attacker exploiting these flaws could execute arbitrary code, elevate privileges, run commands, bypass authentication protections, retrieve and execute unsigned software, and cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.\nSee Also: Complete Offensive Security and Ethical Hacking Course Numerous critical flawsCisco\u2019s advisory notes that multiple security vulnerabilities have been classified as \u2018Critical\u2019 due to the ease of exploitation and potential for abuse.\n\nThe most significant vulnerabilities in terms of their severity are:\n\nCVE-2022-20699: A code execution flaw in the SSL VPN module caused by an insufficient boundary check when processing specific HTTP requests. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\n\nCVE-2022-20700\u00a0and CVE-2022-20701: Privilege escalation (up to root) flaws in the router\u2019s web-based management interface, which suffers from insufficient authorization enforcement mechanisms. (CVSS v3 score 10.0 and 9.0 respectively)\n\nCVE-2022-20703: A signature verification bypass vulnerability in the software image verification feature, relying on the improper verification of software images installed on the affected device. (CVSS v3 score 9.3)\n\nCVE-2022-20708: Command injection flaw in the web-based management interface of the routers, which suffers from insufficient user-supplied input validation. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\nSee Also: Windows vulnerability with new public exploits lets you become admin Cisco warns that some of these vulnerabilities need to be chained together to exploit an RV series router.\n\n\u201cSome of the vulnerabilities are dependent on one another. Exploitation of one of the vulnerabilities may be required to exploit another vulnerability,\u201d explains the Cisco advisory.\n\nThe vulnerabilities tracked CVE-2022-20700, CVE-2022-20701, CVE-2022-20702, CVE-2022-20703, CVE-2022-20704, CVE-2022-20705, CVE-2022-20706, CVE-2022-20710, and CVE-2022-20712 affect:\n\n* RV160 VPN Routers\n* RV160W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV260 VPN Routers\n* RV260P VPN Routers with PoE\n* RV260W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nThe CVE-2022-20699, CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20709, CVE-2022-20711, and CVE-2022-20749 vulnerabilities only affect the following Cisco products:\n\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nSee Also: Recon Tool: WitnessMe Even if your product isn\u2019t affected by any critical vulnerabilities, there\u2019s always a chance that threat actors will chain several less severe flaws to achieve high-impact attacks.\n\nIf you\u2019re using any of the products listed above, i[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-01T20:01:56.721028Z"}, {"uuid": "a11b8076-24f6-443b-8579-99d7829cd231", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20705", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/41421", "content": "Black Hat Ethical Hacking\nCisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation available\n\nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Untitled-design-2-1.png Cisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation availablePost Views: 106 https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/BECOME-A-PATRON-AND-UNLOCK-EXCLUSIVE-VIDEOS-1.png Reading Time: 1 Minute\nCisco has released patches for multiple vulnerabilities in the Small Business RV Series router platform that could allow remote attackers to gain complete control over the device, in many cases, without authentication.\nIn total, there are fifteen vulnerabilities fixed by these security updates, with five of them rated as Critical as threat actors can use them to gain \u2018root\u2019 privileges or remotely execute commands on the device.\n\nAccording to the advisory, an attacker exploiting these flaws could execute arbitrary code, elevate privileges, run commands, bypass authentication protections, retrieve and execute unsigned software, and cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.\nSee Also: Complete Offensive Security and Ethical Hacking Course Numerous critical flawsCisco\u2019s advisory notes that multiple security vulnerabilities have been classified as \u2018Critical\u2019 due to the ease of exploitation and potential for abuse.\n\nThe most significant vulnerabilities in terms of their severity are:\n\nCVE-2022-20699: A code execution flaw in the SSL VPN module caused by an insufficient boundary check when processing specific HTTP requests. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\n\nCVE-2022-20700\u00a0and CVE-2022-20701: Privilege escalation (up to root) flaws in the router\u2019s web-based management interface, which suffers from insufficient authorization enforcement mechanisms. (CVSS v3 score 10.0 and 9.0 respectively)\n\nCVE-2022-20703: A signature verification bypass vulnerability in the software image verification feature, relying on the improper verification of software images installed on the affected device. (CVSS v3 score 9.3)\n\nCVE-2022-20708: Command injection flaw in the web-based management interface of the routers, which suffers from insufficient user-supplied input validation. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\nSee Also: Windows vulnerability with new public exploits lets you become admin Cisco warns that some of these vulnerabilities need to be chained together to exploit an RV series router.\n\n\u201cSome of the vulnerabilities are dependent on one another. Exploitation of one of the vulnerabilities may be required to exploit another vulnerability,\u201d explains the Cisco advisory.\n\nThe vulnerabilities tracked CVE-2022-20700, CVE-2022-20701, CVE-2022-20702, CVE-2022-20703, CVE-2022-20704, CVE-2022-20705, CVE-2022-20706, CVE-2022-20710, and CVE-2022-20712 affect:\n\n* RV160 VPN Routers\n* RV160W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV260 VPN Routers\n* RV260P VPN Routers with PoE\n* RV260W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nThe CVE-2022-20699, CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20709, CVE-2022-20711, and CVE-2022-20749 vulnerabilities only affect the following Cisco products:\n\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nSee Also: Recon Tool: WitnessMe Even if your product isn\u2019t affected by any critical vulnerabilities, there\u2019s always a chance that threat actors will chain several less severe flaws to achieve high-impact attacks.\n\nIf you\u2019re using any of the products listed above, i[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-01T20:01:56.868907Z"}, {"uuid": "4480b49e-3643-4e92-bcef-3eb7ccba5e87", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20706", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/41421", "content": "Black Hat Ethical Hacking\nCisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation available\n\nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Untitled-design-2-1.png Cisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation availablePost Views: 106 https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/BECOME-A-PATRON-AND-UNLOCK-EXCLUSIVE-VIDEOS-1.png Reading Time: 1 Minute\nCisco has released patches for multiple vulnerabilities in the Small Business RV Series router platform that could allow remote attackers to gain complete control over the device, in many cases, without authentication.\nIn total, there are fifteen vulnerabilities fixed by these security updates, with five of them rated as Critical as threat actors can use them to gain \u2018root\u2019 privileges or remotely execute commands on the device.\n\nAccording to the advisory, an attacker exploiting these flaws could execute arbitrary code, elevate privileges, run commands, bypass authentication protections, retrieve and execute unsigned software, and cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.\nSee Also: Complete Offensive Security and Ethical Hacking Course Numerous critical flawsCisco\u2019s advisory notes that multiple security vulnerabilities have been classified as \u2018Critical\u2019 due to the ease of exploitation and potential for abuse.\n\nThe most significant vulnerabilities in terms of their severity are:\n\nCVE-2022-20699: A code execution flaw in the SSL VPN module caused by an insufficient boundary check when processing specific HTTP requests. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\n\nCVE-2022-20700\u00a0and CVE-2022-20701: Privilege escalation (up to root) flaws in the router\u2019s web-based management interface, which suffers from insufficient authorization enforcement mechanisms. (CVSS v3 score 10.0 and 9.0 respectively)\n\nCVE-2022-20703: A signature verification bypass vulnerability in the software image verification feature, relying on the improper verification of software images installed on the affected device. (CVSS v3 score 9.3)\n\nCVE-2022-20708: Command injection flaw in the web-based management interface of the routers, which suffers from insufficient user-supplied input validation. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\nSee Also: Windows vulnerability with new public exploits lets you become admin Cisco warns that some of these vulnerabilities need to be chained together to exploit an RV series router.\n\n\u201cSome of the vulnerabilities are dependent on one another. Exploitation of one of the vulnerabilities may be required to exploit another vulnerability,\u201d explains the Cisco advisory.\n\nThe vulnerabilities tracked CVE-2022-20700, CVE-2022-20701, CVE-2022-20702, CVE-2022-20703, CVE-2022-20704, CVE-2022-20705, CVE-2022-20706, CVE-2022-20710, and CVE-2022-20712 affect:\n\n* RV160 VPN Routers\n* RV160W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV260 VPN Routers\n* RV260P VPN Routers with PoE\n* RV260W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nThe CVE-2022-20699, CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20709, CVE-2022-20711, and CVE-2022-20749 vulnerabilities only affect the following Cisco products:\n\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nSee Also: Recon Tool: WitnessMe Even if your product isn\u2019t affected by any critical vulnerabilities, there\u2019s always a chance that threat actors will chain several less severe flaws to achieve high-impact attacks.\n\nIf you\u2019re using any of the products listed above, i[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-01T20:01:56.902407Z"}, {"uuid": "29787495-d35b-4b4e-af60-88da9f99377c", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20704", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/41421", "content": "Black Hat Ethical Hacking\nCisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation available\n\nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Untitled-design-2-1.png Cisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation availablePost Views: 106 https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/BECOME-A-PATRON-AND-UNLOCK-EXCLUSIVE-VIDEOS-1.png Reading Time: 1 Minute\nCisco has released patches for multiple vulnerabilities in the Small Business RV Series router platform that could allow remote attackers to gain complete control over the device, in many cases, without authentication.\nIn total, there are fifteen vulnerabilities fixed by these security updates, with five of them rated as Critical as threat actors can use them to gain \u2018root\u2019 privileges or remotely execute commands on the device.\n\nAccording to the advisory, an attacker exploiting these flaws could execute arbitrary code, elevate privileges, run commands, bypass authentication protections, retrieve and execute unsigned software, and cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.\nSee Also: Complete Offensive Security and Ethical Hacking Course Numerous critical flawsCisco\u2019s advisory notes that multiple security vulnerabilities have been classified as \u2018Critical\u2019 due to the ease of exploitation and potential for abuse.\n\nThe most significant vulnerabilities in terms of their severity are:\n\nCVE-2022-20699: A code execution flaw in the SSL VPN module caused by an insufficient boundary check when processing specific HTTP requests. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\n\nCVE-2022-20700\u00a0and CVE-2022-20701: Privilege escalation (up to root) flaws in the router\u2019s web-based management interface, which suffers from insufficient authorization enforcement mechanisms. (CVSS v3 score 10.0 and 9.0 respectively)\n\nCVE-2022-20703: A signature verification bypass vulnerability in the software image verification feature, relying on the improper verification of software images installed on the affected device. (CVSS v3 score 9.3)\n\nCVE-2022-20708: Command injection flaw in the web-based management interface of the routers, which suffers from insufficient user-supplied input validation. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\nSee Also: Windows vulnerability with new public exploits lets you become admin Cisco warns that some of these vulnerabilities need to be chained together to exploit an RV series router.\n\n\u201cSome of the vulnerabilities are dependent on one another. Exploitation of one of the vulnerabilities may be required to exploit another vulnerability,\u201d explains the Cisco advisory.\n\nThe vulnerabilities tracked CVE-2022-20700, CVE-2022-20701, CVE-2022-20702, CVE-2022-20703, CVE-2022-20704, CVE-2022-20705, CVE-2022-20706, CVE-2022-20710, and CVE-2022-20712 affect:\n\n* RV160 VPN Routers\n* RV160W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV260 VPN Routers\n* RV260P VPN Routers with PoE\n* RV260W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nThe CVE-2022-20699, CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20709, CVE-2022-20711, and CVE-2022-20749 vulnerabilities only affect the following Cisco products:\n\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nSee Also: Recon Tool: WitnessMe Even if your product isn\u2019t affected by any critical vulnerabilities, there\u2019s always a chance that threat actors will chain several less severe flaws to achieve high-impact attacks.\n\nIf you\u2019re using any of the products listed above, i[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-01T20:01:56.935602Z"}, {"uuid": "063fb59d-5e30-493d-b604-7d117798626e", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20701", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/41421", "content": "Black Hat Ethical Hacking\nCisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation available\n\nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Untitled-design-2-1.png Cisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation availablePost Views: 106 https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/BECOME-A-PATRON-AND-UNLOCK-EXCLUSIVE-VIDEOS-1.png Reading Time: 1 Minute\nCisco has released patches for multiple vulnerabilities in the Small Business RV Series router platform that could allow remote attackers to gain complete control over the device, in many cases, without authentication.\nIn total, there are fifteen vulnerabilities fixed by these security updates, with five of them rated as Critical as threat actors can use them to gain \u2018root\u2019 privileges or remotely execute commands on the device.\n\nAccording to the advisory, an attacker exploiting these flaws could execute arbitrary code, elevate privileges, run commands, bypass authentication protections, retrieve and execute unsigned software, and cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.\nSee Also: Complete Offensive Security and Ethical Hacking Course Numerous critical flawsCisco\u2019s advisory notes that multiple security vulnerabilities have been classified as \u2018Critical\u2019 due to the ease of exploitation and potential for abuse.\n\nThe most significant vulnerabilities in terms of their severity are:\n\nCVE-2022-20699: A code execution flaw in the SSL VPN module caused by an insufficient boundary check when processing specific HTTP requests. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\n\nCVE-2022-20700\u00a0and CVE-2022-20701: Privilege escalation (up to root) flaws in the router\u2019s web-based management interface, which suffers from insufficient authorization enforcement mechanisms. (CVSS v3 score 10.0 and 9.0 respectively)\n\nCVE-2022-20703: A signature verification bypass vulnerability in the software image verification feature, relying on the improper verification of software images installed on the affected device. (CVSS v3 score 9.3)\n\nCVE-2022-20708: Command injection flaw in the web-based management interface of the routers, which suffers from insufficient user-supplied input validation. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\nSee Also: Windows vulnerability with new public exploits lets you become admin Cisco warns that some of these vulnerabilities need to be chained together to exploit an RV series router.\n\n\u201cSome of the vulnerabilities are dependent on one another. Exploitation of one of the vulnerabilities may be required to exploit another vulnerability,\u201d explains the Cisco advisory.\n\nThe vulnerabilities tracked CVE-2022-20700, CVE-2022-20701, CVE-2022-20702, CVE-2022-20703, CVE-2022-20704, CVE-2022-20705, CVE-2022-20706, CVE-2022-20710, and CVE-2022-20712 affect:\n\n* RV160 VPN Routers\n* RV160W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV260 VPN Routers\n* RV260P VPN Routers with PoE\n* RV260W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nThe CVE-2022-20699, CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20709, CVE-2022-20711, and CVE-2022-20749 vulnerabilities only affect the following Cisco products:\n\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nSee Also: Recon Tool: WitnessMe Even if your product isn\u2019t affected by any critical vulnerabilities, there\u2019s always a chance that threat actors will chain several less severe flaws to achieve high-impact attacks.\n\nIf you\u2019re using any of the products listed above, i[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-01T20:01:57.001061Z"}, {"uuid": "f8ecf175-ef2b-47d1-913e-ad2c5f5753b5", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20707", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/41421", "content": "Black Hat Ethical Hacking\nCisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation available\n\nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Untitled-design-2-1.png Cisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation availablePost Views: 106 https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/BECOME-A-PATRON-AND-UNLOCK-EXCLUSIVE-VIDEOS-1.png Reading Time: 1 Minute\nCisco has released patches for multiple vulnerabilities in the Small Business RV Series router platform that could allow remote attackers to gain complete control over the device, in many cases, without authentication.\nIn total, there are fifteen vulnerabilities fixed by these security updates, with five of them rated as Critical as threat actors can use them to gain \u2018root\u2019 privileges or remotely execute commands on the device.\n\nAccording to the advisory, an attacker exploiting these flaws could execute arbitrary code, elevate privileges, run commands, bypass authentication protections, retrieve and execute unsigned software, and cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.\nSee Also: Complete Offensive Security and Ethical Hacking Course Numerous critical flawsCisco\u2019s advisory notes that multiple security vulnerabilities have been classified as \u2018Critical\u2019 due to the ease of exploitation and potential for abuse.\n\nThe most significant vulnerabilities in terms of their severity are:\n\nCVE-2022-20699: A code execution flaw in the SSL VPN module caused by an insufficient boundary check when processing specific HTTP requests. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\n\nCVE-2022-20700\u00a0and CVE-2022-20701: Privilege escalation (up to root) flaws in the router\u2019s web-based management interface, which suffers from insufficient authorization enforcement mechanisms. (CVSS v3 score 10.0 and 9.0 respectively)\n\nCVE-2022-20703: A signature verification bypass vulnerability in the software image verification feature, relying on the improper verification of software images installed on the affected device. (CVSS v3 score 9.3)\n\nCVE-2022-20708: Command injection flaw in the web-based management interface of the routers, which suffers from insufficient user-supplied input validation. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\nSee Also: Windows vulnerability with new public exploits lets you become admin Cisco warns that some of these vulnerabilities need to be chained together to exploit an RV series router.\n\n\u201cSome of the vulnerabilities are dependent on one another. Exploitation of one of the vulnerabilities may be required to exploit another vulnerability,\u201d explains the Cisco advisory.\n\nThe vulnerabilities tracked CVE-2022-20700, CVE-2022-20701, CVE-2022-20702, CVE-2022-20703, CVE-2022-20704, CVE-2022-20705, CVE-2022-20706, CVE-2022-20710, and CVE-2022-20712 affect:\n\n* RV160 VPN Routers\n* RV160W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV260 VPN Routers\n* RV260P VPN Routers with PoE\n* RV260W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nThe CVE-2022-20699, CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20709, CVE-2022-20711, and CVE-2022-20749 vulnerabilities only affect the following Cisco products:\n\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nSee Also: Recon Tool: WitnessMe Even if your product isn\u2019t affected by any critical vulnerabilities, there\u2019s always a chance that threat actors will chain several less severe flaws to achieve high-impact attacks.\n\nIf you\u2019re using any of the products listed above, i[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-01T20:01:57.063760Z"}, {"uuid": "394f5e80-1651-4a7a-b036-d0fff1b8ecb3", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20703", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/41421", "content": "Black Hat Ethical Hacking\nCisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation available\n\nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Untitled-design-2-1.png Cisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation availablePost Views: 106 https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/BECOME-A-PATRON-AND-UNLOCK-EXCLUSIVE-VIDEOS-1.png Reading Time: 1 Minute\nCisco has released patches for multiple vulnerabilities in the Small Business RV Series router platform that could allow remote attackers to gain complete control over the device, in many cases, without authentication.\nIn total, there are fifteen vulnerabilities fixed by these security updates, with five of them rated as Critical as threat actors can use them to gain \u2018root\u2019 privileges or remotely execute commands on the device.\n\nAccording to the advisory, an attacker exploiting these flaws could execute arbitrary code, elevate privileges, run commands, bypass authentication protections, retrieve and execute unsigned software, and cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.\nSee Also: Complete Offensive Security and Ethical Hacking Course Numerous critical flawsCisco\u2019s advisory notes that multiple security vulnerabilities have been classified as \u2018Critical\u2019 due to the ease of exploitation and potential for abuse.\n\nThe most significant vulnerabilities in terms of their severity are:\n\nCVE-2022-20699: A code execution flaw in the SSL VPN module caused by an insufficient boundary check when processing specific HTTP requests. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\n\nCVE-2022-20700\u00a0and CVE-2022-20701: Privilege escalation (up to root) flaws in the router\u2019s web-based management interface, which suffers from insufficient authorization enforcement mechanisms. (CVSS v3 score 10.0 and 9.0 respectively)\n\nCVE-2022-20703: A signature verification bypass vulnerability in the software image verification feature, relying on the improper verification of software images installed on the affected device. (CVSS v3 score 9.3)\n\nCVE-2022-20708: Command injection flaw in the web-based management interface of the routers, which suffers from insufficient user-supplied input validation. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\nSee Also: Windows vulnerability with new public exploits lets you become admin Cisco warns that some of these vulnerabilities need to be chained together to exploit an RV series router.\n\n\u201cSome of the vulnerabilities are dependent on one another. Exploitation of one of the vulnerabilities may be required to exploit another vulnerability,\u201d explains the Cisco advisory.\n\nThe vulnerabilities tracked CVE-2022-20700, CVE-2022-20701, CVE-2022-20702, CVE-2022-20703, CVE-2022-20704, CVE-2022-20705, CVE-2022-20706, CVE-2022-20710, and CVE-2022-20712 affect:\n\n* RV160 VPN Routers\n* RV160W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV260 VPN Routers\n* RV260P VPN Routers with PoE\n* RV260W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nThe CVE-2022-20699, CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20709, CVE-2022-20711, and CVE-2022-20749 vulnerabilities only affect the following Cisco products:\n\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nSee Also: Recon Tool: WitnessMe Even if your product isn\u2019t affected by any critical vulnerabilities, there\u2019s always a chance that threat actors will chain several less severe flaws to achieve high-impact attacks.\n\nIf you\u2019re using any of the products listed above, i[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-01T20:01:57.093787Z"}, {"uuid": "14af4850-e99d-4fc8-82bb-0fa85127ae55", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20708", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/41421", "content": "Black Hat Ethical Hacking\nCisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation available\n\nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Untitled-design-2-1.png Cisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation availablePost Views: 106 https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/BECOME-A-PATRON-AND-UNLOCK-EXCLUSIVE-VIDEOS-1.png Reading Time: 1 Minute\nCisco has released patches for multiple vulnerabilities in the Small Business RV Series router platform that could allow remote attackers to gain complete control over the device, in many cases, without authentication.\nIn total, there are fifteen vulnerabilities fixed by these security updates, with five of them rated as Critical as threat actors can use them to gain \u2018root\u2019 privileges or remotely execute commands on the device.\n\nAccording to the advisory, an attacker exploiting these flaws could execute arbitrary code, elevate privileges, run commands, bypass authentication protections, retrieve and execute unsigned software, and cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.\nSee Also: Complete Offensive Security and Ethical Hacking Course Numerous critical flawsCisco\u2019s advisory notes that multiple security vulnerabilities have been classified as \u2018Critical\u2019 due to the ease of exploitation and potential for abuse.\n\nThe most significant vulnerabilities in terms of their severity are:\n\nCVE-2022-20699: A code execution flaw in the SSL VPN module caused by an insufficient boundary check when processing specific HTTP requests. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\n\nCVE-2022-20700\u00a0and CVE-2022-20701: Privilege escalation (up to root) flaws in the router\u2019s web-based management interface, which suffers from insufficient authorization enforcement mechanisms. (CVSS v3 score 10.0 and 9.0 respectively)\n\nCVE-2022-20703: A signature verification bypass vulnerability in the software image verification feature, relying on the improper verification of software images installed on the affected device. (CVSS v3 score 9.3)\n\nCVE-2022-20708: Command injection flaw in the web-based management interface of the routers, which suffers from insufficient user-supplied input validation. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\nSee Also: Windows vulnerability with new public exploits lets you become admin Cisco warns that some of these vulnerabilities need to be chained together to exploit an RV series router.\n\n\u201cSome of the vulnerabilities are dependent on one another. Exploitation of one of the vulnerabilities may be required to exploit another vulnerability,\u201d explains the Cisco advisory.\n\nThe vulnerabilities tracked CVE-2022-20700, CVE-2022-20701, CVE-2022-20702, CVE-2022-20703, CVE-2022-20704, CVE-2022-20705, CVE-2022-20706, CVE-2022-20710, and CVE-2022-20712 affect:\n\n* RV160 VPN Routers\n* RV160W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV260 VPN Routers\n* RV260P VPN Routers with PoE\n* RV260W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nThe CVE-2022-20699, CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20709, CVE-2022-20711, and CVE-2022-20749 vulnerabilities only affect the following Cisco products:\n\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nSee Also: Recon Tool: WitnessMe Even if your product isn\u2019t affected by any critical vulnerabilities, there\u2019s always a chance that threat actors will chain several less severe flaws to achieve high-impact attacks.\n\nIf you\u2019re using any of the products listed above, i[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-01T20:01:57.125206Z"}, {"uuid": "9257d28a-79df-4d94-a0c8-cc7c08202ab2", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20700", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/41421", "content": "Black Hat Ethical Hacking\nCisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation available\n\nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Untitled-design-2-1.png Cisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation availablePost Views: 106 https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/BECOME-A-PATRON-AND-UNLOCK-EXCLUSIVE-VIDEOS-1.png Reading Time: 1 Minute\nCisco has released patches for multiple vulnerabilities in the Small Business RV Series router platform that could allow remote attackers to gain complete control over the device, in many cases, without authentication.\nIn total, there are fifteen vulnerabilities fixed by these security updates, with five of them rated as Critical as threat actors can use them to gain \u2018root\u2019 privileges or remotely execute commands on the device.\n\nAccording to the advisory, an attacker exploiting these flaws could execute arbitrary code, elevate privileges, run commands, bypass authentication protections, retrieve and execute unsigned software, and cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.\nSee Also: Complete Offensive Security and Ethical Hacking Course Numerous critical flawsCisco\u2019s advisory notes that multiple security vulnerabilities have been classified as \u2018Critical\u2019 due to the ease of exploitation and potential for abuse.\n\nThe most significant vulnerabilities in terms of their severity are:\n\nCVE-2022-20699: A code execution flaw in the SSL VPN module caused by an insufficient boundary check when processing specific HTTP requests. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\n\nCVE-2022-20700\u00a0and CVE-2022-20701: Privilege escalation (up to root) flaws in the router\u2019s web-based management interface, which suffers from insufficient authorization enforcement mechanisms. (CVSS v3 score 10.0 and 9.0 respectively)\n\nCVE-2022-20703: A signature verification bypass vulnerability in the software image verification feature, relying on the improper verification of software images installed on the affected device. (CVSS v3 score 9.3)\n\nCVE-2022-20708: Command injection flaw in the web-based management interface of the routers, which suffers from insufficient user-supplied input validation. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\nSee Also: Windows vulnerability with new public exploits lets you become admin Cisco warns that some of these vulnerabilities need to be chained together to exploit an RV series router.\n\n\u201cSome of the vulnerabilities are dependent on one another. Exploitation of one of the vulnerabilities may be required to exploit another vulnerability,\u201d explains the Cisco advisory.\n\nThe vulnerabilities tracked CVE-2022-20700, CVE-2022-20701, CVE-2022-20702, CVE-2022-20703, CVE-2022-20704, CVE-2022-20705, CVE-2022-20706, CVE-2022-20710, and CVE-2022-20712 affect:\n\n* RV160 VPN Routers\n* RV160W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV260 VPN Routers\n* RV260P VPN Routers with PoE\n* RV260W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nThe CVE-2022-20699, CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20709, CVE-2022-20711, and CVE-2022-20749 vulnerabilities only affect the following Cisco products:\n\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nSee Also: Recon Tool: WitnessMe Even if your product isn\u2019t affected by any critical vulnerabilities, there\u2019s always a chance that threat actors will chain several less severe flaws to achieve high-impact attacks.\n\nIf you\u2019re using any of the products listed above, i[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-01T20:01:57.189797Z"}, {"uuid": "c34243a4-d2c5-4c3c-9aa7-f216d01f3349", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20709", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/41421", "content": "Black Hat Ethical Hacking\nCisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation available\n\nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Untitled-design-2-1.png Cisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation availablePost Views: 106 https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/BECOME-A-PATRON-AND-UNLOCK-EXCLUSIVE-VIDEOS-1.png Reading Time: 1 Minute\nCisco has released patches for multiple vulnerabilities in the Small Business RV Series router platform that could allow remote attackers to gain complete control over the device, in many cases, without authentication.\nIn total, there are fifteen vulnerabilities fixed by these security updates, with five of them rated as Critical as threat actors can use them to gain \u2018root\u2019 privileges or remotely execute commands on the device.\n\nAccording to the advisory, an attacker exploiting these flaws could execute arbitrary code, elevate privileges, run commands, bypass authentication protections, retrieve and execute unsigned software, and cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.\nSee Also: Complete Offensive Security and Ethical Hacking Course Numerous critical flawsCisco\u2019s advisory notes that multiple security vulnerabilities have been classified as \u2018Critical\u2019 due to the ease of exploitation and potential for abuse.\n\nThe most significant vulnerabilities in terms of their severity are:\n\nCVE-2022-20699: A code execution flaw in the SSL VPN module caused by an insufficient boundary check when processing specific HTTP requests. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\n\nCVE-2022-20700\u00a0and CVE-2022-20701: Privilege escalation (up to root) flaws in the router\u2019s web-based management interface, which suffers from insufficient authorization enforcement mechanisms. (CVSS v3 score 10.0 and 9.0 respectively)\n\nCVE-2022-20703: A signature verification bypass vulnerability in the software image verification feature, relying on the improper verification of software images installed on the affected device. (CVSS v3 score 9.3)\n\nCVE-2022-20708: Command injection flaw in the web-based management interface of the routers, which suffers from insufficient user-supplied input validation. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\nSee Also: Windows vulnerability with new public exploits lets you become admin Cisco warns that some of these vulnerabilities need to be chained together to exploit an RV series router.\n\n\u201cSome of the vulnerabilities are dependent on one another. Exploitation of one of the vulnerabilities may be required to exploit another vulnerability,\u201d explains the Cisco advisory.\n\nThe vulnerabilities tracked CVE-2022-20700, CVE-2022-20701, CVE-2022-20702, CVE-2022-20703, CVE-2022-20704, CVE-2022-20705, CVE-2022-20706, CVE-2022-20710, and CVE-2022-20712 affect:\n\n* RV160 VPN Routers\n* RV160W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV260 VPN Routers\n* RV260P VPN Routers with PoE\n* RV260W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nThe CVE-2022-20699, CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20709, CVE-2022-20711, and CVE-2022-20749 vulnerabilities only affect the following Cisco products:\n\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nSee Also: Recon Tool: WitnessMe Even if your product isn\u2019t affected by any critical vulnerabilities, there\u2019s always a chance that threat actors will chain several less severe flaws to achieve high-impact attacks.\n\nIf you\u2019re using any of the products listed above, i[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-01T20:01:57.225155Z"}, {"uuid": "7ce32f20-5c60-49a4-a9aa-192cae5698f4", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20705", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/41421", "content": "Black Hat Ethical Hacking\nCisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation available\n\nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Untitled-design-2-1.png Cisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation availablePost Views: 106 https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/BECOME-A-PATRON-AND-UNLOCK-EXCLUSIVE-VIDEOS-1.png Reading Time: 1 Minute\nCisco has released patches for multiple vulnerabilities in the Small Business RV Series router platform that could allow remote attackers to gain complete control over the device, in many cases, without authentication.\nIn total, there are fifteen vulnerabilities fixed by these security updates, with five of them rated as Critical as threat actors can use them to gain \u2018root\u2019 privileges or remotely execute commands on the device.\n\nAccording to the advisory, an attacker exploiting these flaws could execute arbitrary code, elevate privileges, run commands, bypass authentication protections, retrieve and execute unsigned software, and cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.\nSee Also: Complete Offensive Security and Ethical Hacking Course Numerous critical flawsCisco\u2019s advisory notes that multiple security vulnerabilities have been classified as \u2018Critical\u2019 due to the ease of exploitation and potential for abuse.\n\nThe most significant vulnerabilities in terms of their severity are:\n\nCVE-2022-20699: A code execution flaw in the SSL VPN module caused by an insufficient boundary check when processing specific HTTP requests. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\n\nCVE-2022-20700\u00a0and CVE-2022-20701: Privilege escalation (up to root) flaws in the router\u2019s web-based management interface, which suffers from insufficient authorization enforcement mechanisms. (CVSS v3 score 10.0 and 9.0 respectively)\n\nCVE-2022-20703: A signature verification bypass vulnerability in the software image verification feature, relying on the improper verification of software images installed on the affected device. (CVSS v3 score 9.3)\n\nCVE-2022-20708: Command injection flaw in the web-based management interface of the routers, which suffers from insufficient user-supplied input validation. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\nSee Also: Windows vulnerability with new public exploits lets you become admin Cisco warns that some of these vulnerabilities need to be chained together to exploit an RV series router.\n\n\u201cSome of the vulnerabilities are dependent on one another. Exploitation of one of the vulnerabilities may be required to exploit another vulnerability,\u201d explains the Cisco advisory.\n\nThe vulnerabilities tracked CVE-2022-20700, CVE-2022-20701, CVE-2022-20702, CVE-2022-20703, CVE-2022-20704, CVE-2022-20705, CVE-2022-20706, CVE-2022-20710, and CVE-2022-20712 affect:\n\n* RV160 VPN Routers\n* RV160W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV260 VPN Routers\n* RV260P VPN Routers with PoE\n* RV260W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nThe CVE-2022-20699, CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20709, CVE-2022-20711, and CVE-2022-20749 vulnerabilities only affect the following Cisco products:\n\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nSee Also: Recon Tool: WitnessMe Even if your product isn\u2019t affected by any critical vulnerabilities, there\u2019s always a chance that threat actors will chain several less severe flaws to achieve high-impact attacks.\n\nIf you\u2019re using any of the products listed above, i[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-02T01:02:18.354428Z"}, {"uuid": "10050954-a880-48b7-bfbe-9cd3e08f75b2", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20704", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/41421", "content": "Black Hat Ethical Hacking\nCisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation available\n\nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Untitled-design-2-1.png Cisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation availablePost Views: 106 https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/BECOME-A-PATRON-AND-UNLOCK-EXCLUSIVE-VIDEOS-1.png Reading Time: 1 Minute\nCisco has released patches for multiple vulnerabilities in the Small Business RV Series router platform that could allow remote attackers to gain complete control over the device, in many cases, without authentication.\nIn total, there are fifteen vulnerabilities fixed by these security updates, with five of them rated as Critical as threat actors can use them to gain \u2018root\u2019 privileges or remotely execute commands on the device.\n\nAccording to the advisory, an attacker exploiting these flaws could execute arbitrary code, elevate privileges, run commands, bypass authentication protections, retrieve and execute unsigned software, and cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.\nSee Also: Complete Offensive Security and Ethical Hacking Course Numerous critical flawsCisco\u2019s advisory notes that multiple security vulnerabilities have been classified as \u2018Critical\u2019 due to the ease of exploitation and potential for abuse.\n\nThe most significant vulnerabilities in terms of their severity are:\n\nCVE-2022-20699: A code execution flaw in the SSL VPN module caused by an insufficient boundary check when processing specific HTTP requests. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\n\nCVE-2022-20700\u00a0and CVE-2022-20701: Privilege escalation (up to root) flaws in the router\u2019s web-based management interface, which suffers from insufficient authorization enforcement mechanisms. (CVSS v3 score 10.0 and 9.0 respectively)\n\nCVE-2022-20703: A signature verification bypass vulnerability in the software image verification feature, relying on the improper verification of software images installed on the affected device. (CVSS v3 score 9.3)\n\nCVE-2022-20708: Command injection flaw in the web-based management interface of the routers, which suffers from insufficient user-supplied input validation. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\nSee Also: Windows vulnerability with new public exploits lets you become admin Cisco warns that some of these vulnerabilities need to be chained together to exploit an RV series router.\n\n\u201cSome of the vulnerabilities are dependent on one another. Exploitation of one of the vulnerabilities may be required to exploit another vulnerability,\u201d explains the Cisco advisory.\n\nThe vulnerabilities tracked CVE-2022-20700, CVE-2022-20701, CVE-2022-20702, CVE-2022-20703, CVE-2022-20704, CVE-2022-20705, CVE-2022-20706, CVE-2022-20710, and CVE-2022-20712 affect:\n\n* RV160 VPN Routers\n* RV160W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV260 VPN Routers\n* RV260P VPN Routers with PoE\n* RV260W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nThe CVE-2022-20699, CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20709, CVE-2022-20711, and CVE-2022-20749 vulnerabilities only affect the following Cisco products:\n\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nSee Also: Recon Tool: WitnessMe Even if your product isn\u2019t affected by any critical vulnerabilities, there\u2019s always a chance that threat actors will chain several less severe flaws to achieve high-impact attacks.\n\nIf you\u2019re using any of the products listed above, i[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-02T01:02:18.443413Z"}, {"uuid": "8e6a1a80-3301-418b-a6e7-32550b5483b2", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20701", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/41421", "content": "Black Hat Ethical Hacking\nCisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation available\n\nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Untitled-design-2-1.png Cisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation availablePost Views: 106 https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/BECOME-A-PATRON-AND-UNLOCK-EXCLUSIVE-VIDEOS-1.png Reading Time: 1 Minute\nCisco has released patches for multiple vulnerabilities in the Small Business RV Series router platform that could allow remote attackers to gain complete control over the device, in many cases, without authentication.\nIn total, there are fifteen vulnerabilities fixed by these security updates, with five of them rated as Critical as threat actors can use them to gain \u2018root\u2019 privileges or remotely execute commands on the device.\n\nAccording to the advisory, an attacker exploiting these flaws could execute arbitrary code, elevate privileges, run commands, bypass authentication protections, retrieve and execute unsigned software, and cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.\nSee Also: Complete Offensive Security and Ethical Hacking Course Numerous critical flawsCisco\u2019s advisory notes that multiple security vulnerabilities have been classified as \u2018Critical\u2019 due to the ease of exploitation and potential for abuse.\n\nThe most significant vulnerabilities in terms of their severity are:\n\nCVE-2022-20699: A code execution flaw in the SSL VPN module caused by an insufficient boundary check when processing specific HTTP requests. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\n\nCVE-2022-20700\u00a0and CVE-2022-20701: Privilege escalation (up to root) flaws in the router\u2019s web-based management interface, which suffers from insufficient authorization enforcement mechanisms. (CVSS v3 score 10.0 and 9.0 respectively)\n\nCVE-2022-20703: A signature verification bypass vulnerability in the software image verification feature, relying on the improper verification of software images installed on the affected device. (CVSS v3 score 9.3)\n\nCVE-2022-20708: Command injection flaw in the web-based management interface of the routers, which suffers from insufficient user-supplied input validation. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\nSee Also: Windows vulnerability with new public exploits lets you become admin Cisco warns that some of these vulnerabilities need to be chained together to exploit an RV series router.\n\n\u201cSome of the vulnerabilities are dependent on one another. Exploitation of one of the vulnerabilities may be required to exploit another vulnerability,\u201d explains the Cisco advisory.\n\nThe vulnerabilities tracked CVE-2022-20700, CVE-2022-20701, CVE-2022-20702, CVE-2022-20703, CVE-2022-20704, CVE-2022-20705, CVE-2022-20706, CVE-2022-20710, and CVE-2022-20712 affect:\n\n* RV160 VPN Routers\n* RV160W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV260 VPN Routers\n* RV260P VPN Routers with PoE\n* RV260W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nThe CVE-2022-20699, CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20709, CVE-2022-20711, and CVE-2022-20749 vulnerabilities only affect the following Cisco products:\n\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nSee Also: Recon Tool: WitnessMe Even if your product isn\u2019t affected by any critical vulnerabilities, there\u2019s always a chance that threat actors will chain several less severe flaws to achieve high-impact attacks.\n\nIf you\u2019re using any of the products listed above, i[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-02T01:02:18.524116Z"}, {"uuid": "ee8a6a41-8ae0-4932-ba09-3cacde735ba3", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20707", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/41421", "content": "Black Hat Ethical Hacking\nCisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation available\n\nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Untitled-design-2-1.png Cisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation availablePost Views: 106 https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/BECOME-A-PATRON-AND-UNLOCK-EXCLUSIVE-VIDEOS-1.png Reading Time: 1 Minute\nCisco has released patches for multiple vulnerabilities in the Small Business RV Series router platform that could allow remote attackers to gain complete control over the device, in many cases, without authentication.\nIn total, there are fifteen vulnerabilities fixed by these security updates, with five of them rated as Critical as threat actors can use them to gain \u2018root\u2019 privileges or remotely execute commands on the device.\n\nAccording to the advisory, an attacker exploiting these flaws could execute arbitrary code, elevate privileges, run commands, bypass authentication protections, retrieve and execute unsigned software, and cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.\nSee Also: Complete Offensive Security and Ethical Hacking Course Numerous critical flawsCisco\u2019s advisory notes that multiple security vulnerabilities have been classified as \u2018Critical\u2019 due to the ease of exploitation and potential for abuse.\n\nThe most significant vulnerabilities in terms of their severity are:\n\nCVE-2022-20699: A code execution flaw in the SSL VPN module caused by an insufficient boundary check when processing specific HTTP requests. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\n\nCVE-2022-20700\u00a0and CVE-2022-20701: Privilege escalation (up to root) flaws in the router\u2019s web-based management interface, which suffers from insufficient authorization enforcement mechanisms. (CVSS v3 score 10.0 and 9.0 respectively)\n\nCVE-2022-20703: A signature verification bypass vulnerability in the software image verification feature, relying on the improper verification of software images installed on the affected device. (CVSS v3 score 9.3)\n\nCVE-2022-20708: Command injection flaw in the web-based management interface of the routers, which suffers from insufficient user-supplied input validation. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\nSee Also: Windows vulnerability with new public exploits lets you become admin Cisco warns that some of these vulnerabilities need to be chained together to exploit an RV series router.\n\n\u201cSome of the vulnerabilities are dependent on one another. Exploitation of one of the vulnerabilities may be required to exploit another vulnerability,\u201d explains the Cisco advisory.\n\nThe vulnerabilities tracked CVE-2022-20700, CVE-2022-20701, CVE-2022-20702, CVE-2022-20703, CVE-2022-20704, CVE-2022-20705, CVE-2022-20706, CVE-2022-20710, and CVE-2022-20712 affect:\n\n* RV160 VPN Routers\n* RV160W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV260 VPN Routers\n* RV260P VPN Routers with PoE\n* RV260W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nThe CVE-2022-20699, CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20709, CVE-2022-20711, and CVE-2022-20749 vulnerabilities only affect the following Cisco products:\n\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nSee Also: Recon Tool: WitnessMe Even if your product isn\u2019t affected by any critical vulnerabilities, there\u2019s always a chance that threat actors will chain several less severe flaws to achieve high-impact attacks.\n\nIf you\u2019re using any of the products listed above, i[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-02T01:02:18.589983Z"}, {"uuid": "55b947e3-5064-45f7-8249-86f20fa05538", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20703", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/41421", "content": "Black Hat Ethical Hacking\nCisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation available\n\nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Untitled-design-2-1.png Cisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation availablePost Views: 106 https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/BECOME-A-PATRON-AND-UNLOCK-EXCLUSIVE-VIDEOS-1.png Reading Time: 1 Minute\nCisco has released patches for multiple vulnerabilities in the Small Business RV Series router platform that could allow remote attackers to gain complete control over the device, in many cases, without authentication.\nIn total, there are fifteen vulnerabilities fixed by these security updates, with five of them rated as Critical as threat actors can use them to gain \u2018root\u2019 privileges or remotely execute commands on the device.\n\nAccording to the advisory, an attacker exploiting these flaws could execute arbitrary code, elevate privileges, run commands, bypass authentication protections, retrieve and execute unsigned software, and cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.\nSee Also: Complete Offensive Security and Ethical Hacking Course Numerous critical flawsCisco\u2019s advisory notes that multiple security vulnerabilities have been classified as \u2018Critical\u2019 due to the ease of exploitation and potential for abuse.\n\nThe most significant vulnerabilities in terms of their severity are:\n\nCVE-2022-20699: A code execution flaw in the SSL VPN module caused by an insufficient boundary check when processing specific HTTP requests. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\n\nCVE-2022-20700\u00a0and CVE-2022-20701: Privilege escalation (up to root) flaws in the router\u2019s web-based management interface, which suffers from insufficient authorization enforcement mechanisms. (CVSS v3 score 10.0 and 9.0 respectively)\n\nCVE-2022-20703: A signature verification bypass vulnerability in the software image verification feature, relying on the improper verification of software images installed on the affected device. (CVSS v3 score 9.3)\n\nCVE-2022-20708: Command injection flaw in the web-based management interface of the routers, which suffers from insufficient user-supplied input validation. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\nSee Also: Windows vulnerability with new public exploits lets you become admin Cisco warns that some of these vulnerabilities need to be chained together to exploit an RV series router.\n\n\u201cSome of the vulnerabilities are dependent on one another. Exploitation of one of the vulnerabilities may be required to exploit another vulnerability,\u201d explains the Cisco advisory.\n\nThe vulnerabilities tracked CVE-2022-20700, CVE-2022-20701, CVE-2022-20702, CVE-2022-20703, CVE-2022-20704, CVE-2022-20705, CVE-2022-20706, CVE-2022-20710, and CVE-2022-20712 affect:\n\n* RV160 VPN Routers\n* RV160W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV260 VPN Routers\n* RV260P VPN Routers with PoE\n* RV260W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nThe CVE-2022-20699, CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20709, CVE-2022-20711, and CVE-2022-20749 vulnerabilities only affect the following Cisco products:\n\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nSee Also: Recon Tool: WitnessMe Even if your product isn\u2019t affected by any critical vulnerabilities, there\u2019s always a chance that threat actors will chain several less severe flaws to achieve high-impact attacks.\n\nIf you\u2019re using any of the products listed above, i[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-02T01:02:18.626427Z"}, {"uuid": "41274eab-6dd1-4f22-81ac-38b6065b54e9", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20708", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/41421", "content": "Black Hat Ethical Hacking\nCisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation available\n\nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Untitled-design-2-1.png Cisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation availablePost Views: 106 https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/BECOME-A-PATRON-AND-UNLOCK-EXCLUSIVE-VIDEOS-1.png Reading Time: 1 Minute\nCisco has released patches for multiple vulnerabilities in the Small Business RV Series router platform that could allow remote attackers to gain complete control over the device, in many cases, without authentication.\nIn total, there are fifteen vulnerabilities fixed by these security updates, with five of them rated as Critical as threat actors can use them to gain \u2018root\u2019 privileges or remotely execute commands on the device.\n\nAccording to the advisory, an attacker exploiting these flaws could execute arbitrary code, elevate privileges, run commands, bypass authentication protections, retrieve and execute unsigned software, and cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.\nSee Also: Complete Offensive Security and Ethical Hacking Course Numerous critical flawsCisco\u2019s advisory notes that multiple security vulnerabilities have been classified as \u2018Critical\u2019 due to the ease of exploitation and potential for abuse.\n\nThe most significant vulnerabilities in terms of their severity are:\n\nCVE-2022-20699: A code execution flaw in the SSL VPN module caused by an insufficient boundary check when processing specific HTTP requests. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\n\nCVE-2022-20700\u00a0and CVE-2022-20701: Privilege escalation (up to root) flaws in the router\u2019s web-based management interface, which suffers from insufficient authorization enforcement mechanisms. (CVSS v3 score 10.0 and 9.0 respectively)\n\nCVE-2022-20703: A signature verification bypass vulnerability in the software image verification feature, relying on the improper verification of software images installed on the affected device. (CVSS v3 score 9.3)\n\nCVE-2022-20708: Command injection flaw in the web-based management interface of the routers, which suffers from insufficient user-supplied input validation. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\nSee Also: Windows vulnerability with new public exploits lets you become admin Cisco warns that some of these vulnerabilities need to be chained together to exploit an RV series router.\n\n\u201cSome of the vulnerabilities are dependent on one another. Exploitation of one of the vulnerabilities may be required to exploit another vulnerability,\u201d explains the Cisco advisory.\n\nThe vulnerabilities tracked CVE-2022-20700, CVE-2022-20701, CVE-2022-20702, CVE-2022-20703, CVE-2022-20704, CVE-2022-20705, CVE-2022-20706, CVE-2022-20710, and CVE-2022-20712 affect:\n\n* RV160 VPN Routers\n* RV160W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV260 VPN Routers\n* RV260P VPN Routers with PoE\n* RV260W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nThe CVE-2022-20699, CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20709, CVE-2022-20711, and CVE-2022-20749 vulnerabilities only affect the following Cisco products:\n\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nSee Also: Recon Tool: WitnessMe Even if your product isn\u2019t affected by any critical vulnerabilities, there\u2019s always a chance that threat actors will chain several less severe flaws to achieve high-impact attacks.\n\nIf you\u2019re using any of the products listed above, i[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-02T01:02:18.664526Z"}, {"uuid": "a0d3d2f2-1369-4bd0-a64b-0c36ff14f806", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20700", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/41421", "content": "Black Hat Ethical Hacking\nCisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation available\n\nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Untitled-design-2-1.png Cisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation availablePost Views: 106 https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/BECOME-A-PATRON-AND-UNLOCK-EXCLUSIVE-VIDEOS-1.png Reading Time: 1 Minute\nCisco has released patches for multiple vulnerabilities in the Small Business RV Series router platform that could allow remote attackers to gain complete control over the device, in many cases, without authentication.\nIn total, there are fifteen vulnerabilities fixed by these security updates, with five of them rated as Critical as threat actors can use them to gain \u2018root\u2019 privileges or remotely execute commands on the device.\n\nAccording to the advisory, an attacker exploiting these flaws could execute arbitrary code, elevate privileges, run commands, bypass authentication protections, retrieve and execute unsigned software, and cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.\nSee Also: Complete Offensive Security and Ethical Hacking Course Numerous critical flawsCisco\u2019s advisory notes that multiple security vulnerabilities have been classified as \u2018Critical\u2019 due to the ease of exploitation and potential for abuse.\n\nThe most significant vulnerabilities in terms of their severity are:\n\nCVE-2022-20699: A code execution flaw in the SSL VPN module caused by an insufficient boundary check when processing specific HTTP requests. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\n\nCVE-2022-20700\u00a0and CVE-2022-20701: Privilege escalation (up to root) flaws in the router\u2019s web-based management interface, which suffers from insufficient authorization enforcement mechanisms. (CVSS v3 score 10.0 and 9.0 respectively)\n\nCVE-2022-20703: A signature verification bypass vulnerability in the software image verification feature, relying on the improper verification of software images installed on the affected device. (CVSS v3 score 9.3)\n\nCVE-2022-20708: Command injection flaw in the web-based management interface of the routers, which suffers from insufficient user-supplied input validation. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\nSee Also: Windows vulnerability with new public exploits lets you become admin Cisco warns that some of these vulnerabilities need to be chained together to exploit an RV series router.\n\n\u201cSome of the vulnerabilities are dependent on one another. Exploitation of one of the vulnerabilities may be required to exploit another vulnerability,\u201d explains the Cisco advisory.\n\nThe vulnerabilities tracked CVE-2022-20700, CVE-2022-20701, CVE-2022-20702, CVE-2022-20703, CVE-2022-20704, CVE-2022-20705, CVE-2022-20706, CVE-2022-20710, and CVE-2022-20712 affect:\n\n* RV160 VPN Routers\n* RV160W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV260 VPN Routers\n* RV260P VPN Routers with PoE\n* RV260W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nThe CVE-2022-20699, CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20709, CVE-2022-20711, and CVE-2022-20749 vulnerabilities only affect the following Cisco products:\n\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nSee Also: Recon Tool: WitnessMe Even if your product isn\u2019t affected by any critical vulnerabilities, there\u2019s always a chance that threat actors will chain several less severe flaws to achieve high-impact attacks.\n\nIf you\u2019re using any of the products listed above, i[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-02T01:02:18.737344Z"}, {"uuid": "bb107301-c5ac-480b-84bf-2f44c58288c3", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20709", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/41421", "content": "Black Hat Ethical Hacking\nCisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation available\n\nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Untitled-design-2-1.png Cisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation availablePost Views: 106 https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/BECOME-A-PATRON-AND-UNLOCK-EXCLUSIVE-VIDEOS-1.png Reading Time: 1 Minute\nCisco has released patches for multiple vulnerabilities in the Small Business RV Series router platform that could allow remote attackers to gain complete control over the device, in many cases, without authentication.\nIn total, there are fifteen vulnerabilities fixed by these security updates, with five of them rated as Critical as threat actors can use them to gain \u2018root\u2019 privileges or remotely execute commands on the device.\n\nAccording to the advisory, an attacker exploiting these flaws could execute arbitrary code, elevate privileges, run commands, bypass authentication protections, retrieve and execute unsigned software, and cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.\nSee Also: Complete Offensive Security and Ethical Hacking Course Numerous critical flawsCisco\u2019s advisory notes that multiple security vulnerabilities have been classified as \u2018Critical\u2019 due to the ease of exploitation and potential for abuse.\n\nThe most significant vulnerabilities in terms of their severity are:\n\nCVE-2022-20699: A code execution flaw in the SSL VPN module caused by an insufficient boundary check when processing specific HTTP requests. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\n\nCVE-2022-20700\u00a0and CVE-2022-20701: Privilege escalation (up to root) flaws in the router\u2019s web-based management interface, which suffers from insufficient authorization enforcement mechanisms. (CVSS v3 score 10.0 and 9.0 respectively)\n\nCVE-2022-20703: A signature verification bypass vulnerability in the software image verification feature, relying on the improper verification of software images installed on the affected device. (CVSS v3 score 9.3)\n\nCVE-2022-20708: Command injection flaw in the web-based management interface of the routers, which suffers from insufficient user-supplied input validation. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\nSee Also: Windows vulnerability with new public exploits lets you become admin Cisco warns that some of these vulnerabilities need to be chained together to exploit an RV series router.\n\n\u201cSome of the vulnerabilities are dependent on one another. Exploitation of one of the vulnerabilities may be required to exploit another vulnerability,\u201d explains the Cisco advisory.\n\nThe vulnerabilities tracked CVE-2022-20700, CVE-2022-20701, CVE-2022-20702, CVE-2022-20703, CVE-2022-20704, CVE-2022-20705, CVE-2022-20706, CVE-2022-20710, and CVE-2022-20712 affect:\n\n* RV160 VPN Routers\n* RV160W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV260 VPN Routers\n* RV260P VPN Routers with PoE\n* RV260W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nThe CVE-2022-20699, CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20709, CVE-2022-20711, and CVE-2022-20749 vulnerabilities only affect the following Cisco products:\n\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nSee Also: Recon Tool: WitnessMe Even if your product isn\u2019t affected by any critical vulnerabilities, there\u2019s always a chance that threat actors will chain several less severe flaws to achieve high-impact attacks.\n\nIf you\u2019re using any of the products listed above, i[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-02T01:02:18.771783Z"}, {"uuid": "ea58d331-0ec6-4236-89fb-ecc8e72a96a3", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20702", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/41421", "content": "Black Hat Ethical Hacking\nCisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation available\n\nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Untitled-design-2-1.png Cisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation availablePost Views: 106 https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/BECOME-A-PATRON-AND-UNLOCK-EXCLUSIVE-VIDEOS-1.png Reading Time: 1 Minute\nCisco has released patches for multiple vulnerabilities in the Small Business RV Series router platform that could allow remote attackers to gain complete control over the device, in many cases, without authentication.\nIn total, there are fifteen vulnerabilities fixed by these security updates, with five of them rated as Critical as threat actors can use them to gain \u2018root\u2019 privileges or remotely execute commands on the device.\n\nAccording to the advisory, an attacker exploiting these flaws could execute arbitrary code, elevate privileges, run commands, bypass authentication protections, retrieve and execute unsigned software, and cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.\nSee Also: Complete Offensive Security and Ethical Hacking Course Numerous critical flawsCisco\u2019s advisory notes that multiple security vulnerabilities have been classified as \u2018Critical\u2019 due to the ease of exploitation and potential for abuse.\n\nThe most significant vulnerabilities in terms of their severity are:\n\nCVE-2022-20699: A code execution flaw in the SSL VPN module caused by an insufficient boundary check when processing specific HTTP requests. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\n\nCVE-2022-20700\u00a0and CVE-2022-20701: Privilege escalation (up to root) flaws in the router\u2019s web-based management interface, which suffers from insufficient authorization enforcement mechanisms. (CVSS v3 score 10.0 and 9.0 respectively)\n\nCVE-2022-20703: A signature verification bypass vulnerability in the software image verification feature, relying on the improper verification of software images installed on the affected device. (CVSS v3 score 9.3)\n\nCVE-2022-20708: Command injection flaw in the web-based management interface of the routers, which suffers from insufficient user-supplied input validation. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\nSee Also: Windows vulnerability with new public exploits lets you become admin Cisco warns that some of these vulnerabilities need to be chained together to exploit an RV series router.\n\n\u201cSome of the vulnerabilities are dependent on one another. Exploitation of one of the vulnerabilities may be required to exploit another vulnerability,\u201d explains the Cisco advisory.\n\nThe vulnerabilities tracked CVE-2022-20700, CVE-2022-20701, CVE-2022-20702, CVE-2022-20703, CVE-2022-20704, CVE-2022-20705, CVE-2022-20706, CVE-2022-20710, and CVE-2022-20712 affect:\n\n* RV160 VPN Routers\n* RV160W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV260 VPN Routers\n* RV260P VPN Routers with PoE\n* RV260W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nThe CVE-2022-20699, CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20709, CVE-2022-20711, and CVE-2022-20749 vulnerabilities only affect the following Cisco products:\n\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nSee Also: Recon Tool: WitnessMe Even if your product isn\u2019t affected by any critical vulnerabilities, there\u2019s always a chance that threat actors will chain several less severe flaws to achieve high-impact attacks.\n\nIf you\u2019re using any of the products listed above, i[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-02T01:02:18.040422Z"}, {"uuid": "b1c700b7-2c6b-4d08-b6f8-1a1daf1f7c17", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-20706", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/41421", "content": "Black Hat Ethical Hacking\nCisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation available\n\nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Untitled-design-2-1.png Cisco patches critical vulnerabilities in SMB routers, exploitation availablePost Views: 106 https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/BECOME-A-PATRON-AND-UNLOCK-EXCLUSIVE-VIDEOS-1.png Reading Time: 1 Minute\nCisco has released patches for multiple vulnerabilities in the Small Business RV Series router platform that could allow remote attackers to gain complete control over the device, in many cases, without authentication.\nIn total, there are fifteen vulnerabilities fixed by these security updates, with five of them rated as Critical as threat actors can use them to gain \u2018root\u2019 privileges or remotely execute commands on the device.\n\nAccording to the advisory, an attacker exploiting these flaws could execute arbitrary code, elevate privileges, run commands, bypass authentication protections, retrieve and execute unsigned software, and cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.\nSee Also: Complete Offensive Security and Ethical Hacking Course Numerous critical flawsCisco\u2019s advisory notes that multiple security vulnerabilities have been classified as \u2018Critical\u2019 due to the ease of exploitation and potential for abuse.\n\nThe most significant vulnerabilities in terms of their severity are:\n\nCVE-2022-20699: A code execution flaw in the SSL VPN module caused by an insufficient boundary check when processing specific HTTP requests. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\n\nCVE-2022-20700\u00a0and CVE-2022-20701: Privilege escalation (up to root) flaws in the router\u2019s web-based management interface, which suffers from insufficient authorization enforcement mechanisms. (CVSS v3 score 10.0 and 9.0 respectively)\n\nCVE-2022-20703: A signature verification bypass vulnerability in the software image verification feature, relying on the improper verification of software images installed on the affected device. (CVSS v3 score 9.3)\n\nCVE-2022-20708: Command injection flaw in the web-based management interface of the routers, which suffers from insufficient user-supplied input validation. (CVSS v3 score 10.0)\nSee Also: Windows vulnerability with new public exploits lets you become admin Cisco warns that some of these vulnerabilities need to be chained together to exploit an RV series router.\n\n\u201cSome of the vulnerabilities are dependent on one another. Exploitation of one of the vulnerabilities may be required to exploit another vulnerability,\u201d explains the Cisco advisory.\n\nThe vulnerabilities tracked CVE-2022-20700, CVE-2022-20701, CVE-2022-20702, CVE-2022-20703, CVE-2022-20704, CVE-2022-20705, CVE-2022-20706, CVE-2022-20710, and CVE-2022-20712 affect:\n\n* RV160 VPN Routers\n* RV160W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV260 VPN Routers\n* RV260P VPN Routers with PoE\n* RV260W Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nThe CVE-2022-20699, CVE-2022-20707, CVE-2022-20708, CVE-2022-20709, CVE-2022-20711, and CVE-2022-20749 vulnerabilities only affect the following Cisco products:\n\n* RV340 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV340W Dual WAN Gigabit Wireless-AC VPN Routers\n* RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers\n* RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit POE VPN Routers\nSee Also: Recon Tool: WitnessMe Even if your product isn\u2019t affected by any critical vulnerabilities, there\u2019s always a chance that threat actors will chain several less severe flaws to achieve high-impact attacks.\n\nIf you\u2019re using any of the products listed above, i[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-02T01:02:18.399805Z"}]}