<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 10:45:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-89718 — zram: fix out-of-bounds access in writeback_store()</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-89718</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;zram: fix out-of-bounds access in writeback_store()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch series &amp;#34;zram: fix stale scan bounds after reinitialization&amp;#34;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both writeback_store() and read_block_state() derive their table scan
bounds from zram-&amp;gt;disksize before acquiring dev_lock.  If the device is
reset and reinitialized with a smaller disksize between that read and lock
acquisition, the bound can describe the old table while the scan operates
on the new one.  This can lead to out-of-bounds slot accesses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Move both bound calculations under dev_lock so each bound remains
consistent with the table throughout its scan.  Keep the fixes separate
because the affected interfaces originate from different commits and can
be backported independently.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch (of 2):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;writeback_store() calculates the table scan bounds before taking dev_lock.
A reset followed by reconfiguration with a smaller disksize can therefore
replace zram-&amp;gt;table while writeback_store() is waiting for the lock.  Once
it acquires the lock, it sees an initialized device but scans the new
table using the old upper bound, resulting in an out-of-bounds access.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Calculate the number of pages while holding dev_lock so the scan bound
matches the table protected by the lock.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;zram: fix out-of-bounds access in writeback_store()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch series &amp;#34;zram: fix stale scan bounds after reinitialization&amp;#34;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both writeback_store() and read_block_state() derive their table scan
bounds from zram-&amp;gt;disksize before acquiring dev_lock.  If the device is
reset and reinitialized with a smaller disksize between that read and lock
acquisition, the bound can describe the old table while the scan operates
on the new one.  This can lead to out-of-bounds slot accesses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Move both bound calculations under dev_lock so each bound remains
consistent with the table throughout its scan.  Keep the fixes separate
because the affected interfaces originate from different commits and can
be backported independently.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch (of 2):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;writeback_store() calculates the table scan bounds before taking dev_lock.
A reset followed by reconfiguration with a smaller disksize can therefore
replace zram-&amp;gt;table while writeback_store() is waiting for the lock.  Once
it acquires the lock, it sees an initialized device but scans the new
table using the old upper bound, resulting in an out-of-bounds access.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Calculate the number of pages while holding dev_lock so the scan bound
matches the table protected by the lock.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-89718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
