<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 14:33:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-80587 — mptcp: avoid combining some incoming suboptions</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-80587</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mptcp: avoid combining some incoming suboptions&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some MPTCP suboptions are mutually exclusive according to the RFC8684,
but also because in different places, the code doesn&amp;#39;t expect some
combinations to be present. That&amp;#39;s specially true for suboptions that
would be present twice, but with different attributes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new restrictions are the same as the ones applied on the output
side, with mptcp_write_options. The same rules can be reused with a
small fix: an MP_FASTCLOSE can be used with a DSS when the sender picks
this option [1], which is not the case on Linux. Here are the rules:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which options can be used together?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;X: mutually exclusive
  O: often used together
  C: can be used together in some cases
  P: could be used together but we prefer not to (optimisations)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;| Opt: | MPC  | MPJ  | DSS  | ADD  |  RM  | PRIO | FAIL |  FC  |
  |------|------|------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
  | MPC  |------|------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
  | MPJ  |  X   |------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
  | DSS  |  X   |  X   |------|------|------|------|------|------|
  | ADD  |  X   |  X   |  P   |------|------|------|------|------|
  | RM   |  C   |  C   |  C   |  P   |------|------|------|------|
  | PRIO |  X   |  C   |  C   |  C   |  C   |------|------|------|
  | FAIL |  X   |  X   |  C   |  X   |  X   |  X   |------|------|
  | FC   |  X   |  X   |  P   |  X   |  X…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mptcp: avoid combining some incoming suboptions&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some MPTCP suboptions are mutually exclusive according to the RFC8684,
but also because in different places, the code doesn&amp;#39;t expect some
combinations to be present. That&amp;#39;s specially true for suboptions that
would be present twice, but with different attributes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new restrictions are the same as the ones applied on the output
side, with mptcp_write_options. The same rules can be reused with a
small fix: an MP_FASTCLOSE can be used with a DSS when the sender picks
this option [1], which is not the case on Linux. Here are the rules:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which options can be used together?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;X: mutually exclusive
  O: often used together
  C: can be used together in some cases
  P: could be used together but we prefer not to (optimisations)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;| Opt: | MPC  | MPJ  | DSS  | ADD  |  RM  | PRIO | FAIL |  FC  |
  |------|------|------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
  | MPC  |------|------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
  | MPJ  |  X   |------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
  | DSS  |  X   |  X   |------|------|------|------|------|------|
  | ADD  |  X   |  X   |  P   |------|------|------|------|------|
  | RM   |  C   |  C   |  C   |  P   |------|------|------|------|
  | PRIO |  X   |  C   |  C   |  C   |  C   |------|------|------|
  | FAIL |  X   |  X   |  C   |  X   |  X   |  X   |------|------|
  | FC   |  X   |  X   |  P   |  X   |  X…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-80587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
