<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 15:43:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-54872 — Timing Side-Channel in Scalar Multiplication for Non-NIST EC Curves</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-54872</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; OpenSSL&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: The generic elliptic-curve scalar multiplication used for
ECDSA and SM2 signature operations with curves that do not have a dedicated
implementation leaks information about the secret nonce through timing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: An attacker able to measure signing times may learn
information about the per-signature secret nonce, which over many signatures
can, via a lattice / Hidden Number Problem attack, lead to recovery of the
private key.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CWE: CWE-208: Observable Timing Discrepancy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Description: The generic elliptic-curve scalar multiplication used for
curves that do not have a dedicated constant-time implementation pads the
secret scalar with non-constant-time BIGNUM operations, so the time taken
depends on the value of the secret scalar derived from the ECDSA and SM2 nonce.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The leak is very small; observing it requires a large number of
measurements. The effect is largest for curves whose group order lies
on a machine-word boundary, such as brainpoolP384r1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Applications using ECDSA signing over the Brainpool and other generic prime
curves, and SM2 signing on platforms that use the generic implementation,
are vulnerable to this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The NIST curves P-256, P-384 and P-521 use dedicated constant-time
implementations and are not affected.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FIPS Impact: no
The FIPS modules are not affected: the approved NIST curves used in the FIPS
provider have dedicated constant-time implementations and do not use the
affected code path.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; OpenSSL&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: The generic elliptic-curve scalar multiplication used for
ECDSA and SM2 signature operations with curves that do not have a dedicated
implementation leaks information about the secret nonce through timing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: An attacker able to measure signing times may learn
information about the per-signature secret nonce, which over many signatures
can, via a lattice / Hidden Number Problem attack, lead to recovery of the
private key.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CWE: CWE-208: Observable Timing Discrepancy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Description: The generic elliptic-curve scalar multiplication used for
curves that do not have a dedicated constant-time implementation pads the
secret scalar with non-constant-time BIGNUM operations, so the time taken
depends on the value of the secret scalar derived from the ECDSA and SM2 nonce.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The leak is very small; observing it requires a large number of
measurements. The effect is largest for curves whose group order lies
on a machine-word boundary, such as brainpoolP384r1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Applications using ECDSA signing over the Brainpool and other generic prime
curves, and SM2 signing on platforms that use the generic implementation,
are vulnerable to this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The NIST curves P-256, P-384 and P-521 use dedicated constant-time
implementations and are not affected.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FIPS Impact: no
The FIPS modules are not affected: the approved NIST curves used in the FIPS
provider have dedicated constant-time implementations and do not use the
affected code path.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-54872</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>USN-8847-1 — openssl vulnerabilities</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/usn-8847-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: openssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled certain certificate
revocation list distribution point names. An attacker could possibly use
this issue to cause OpenSSL to consume excessive memory, resulting in a
denial of service. (CVE-2026-35189)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled QUIC unvalidated
amplification credit accounting. An attacker could possibly use this
issue to cause a denial of service. This issue only affected
Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-35191)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly implemented scalar
multiplication for non-NIST elliptic curves. An attacker could possibly
use this issue to perform a timing side-channel attack and obtain
sensitive information. (CVE-2026-54872)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly implemented SM2 scalar
multiplication on ARM64 and RISC-V architectures. An attacker could
possibly use this issue to perform a timing side-channel attack and
obtain sensitive information. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS.
(CVE-2026-54875)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled SSL context switching
during a TLS handshake. An attacker could possibly use this issue to
cause an out-of-bounds read, resulting in a denial of service or
obtaining sensitive information. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS.
(CVE-2026-72897)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly enforced QUIC connection-
level flow control for streams. An attacker could possibly use this
issue to cause OpenSSL to consume excess…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: openssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled certain certificate
revocation list distribution point names. An attacker could possibly use
this issue to cause OpenSSL to consume excessive memory, resulting in a
denial of service. (CVE-2026-35189)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled QUIC unvalidated
amplification credit accounting. An attacker could possibly use this
issue to cause a denial of service. This issue only affected
Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-35191)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly implemented scalar
multiplication for non-NIST elliptic curves. An attacker could possibly
use this issue to perform a timing side-channel attack and obtain
sensitive information. (CVE-2026-54872)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly implemented SM2 scalar
multiplication on ARM64 and RISC-V architectures. An attacker could
possibly use this issue to perform a timing side-channel attack and
obtain sensitive information. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS.
(CVE-2026-54875)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled SSL context switching
during a TLS handshake. An attacker could possibly use this issue to
cause an out-of-bounds read, resulting in a denial of service or
obtaining sensitive information. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS.
(CVE-2026-72897)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly enforced QUIC connection-
level flow control for streams. An attacker could possibly use this
issue to cause OpenSSL to consume excess…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/usn-8847-1</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
