<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 03:34:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2022-49433 — RDMA/hfi1: Prevent use of lock before it is initialized</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2022-49433</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RDMA/hfi1: Prevent use of lock before it is initialized&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If there is a failure during probe of hfi1 before the sdma_map_lock is
initialized, the call to hfi1_free_devdata() will attempt to use a lock
that has not been initialized. If the locking correctness validator is on
then an INFO message and stack trace resembling the following may be seen:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;INFO: trying to register non-static key.
  The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe
  you didn&amp;#39;t initialize this object before use?
  turning off the locking correctness validator.
  Call Trace:
  register_lock_class+0x11b/0x880
  __lock_acquire+0xf3/0x7930
  lock_acquire+0xff/0x2d0
  _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x46/0x60
  sdma_clean+0x42a/0x660 [hfi1]
  hfi1_free_devdata+0x3a7/0x420 [hfi1]
  init_one+0x867/0x11a0 [hfi1]
  pci_device_probe+0x40e/0x8d0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The use of sdma_map_lock in sdma_clean() is for freeing the sdma_map
memory, and sdma_map is not allocated/initialized until after
sdma_map_lock has been initialized. This code only needs to be run if
sdma_map is not NULL, and so checking for that condition will avoid trying
to use the lock before it is initialized.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RDMA/hfi1: Prevent use of lock before it is initialized&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If there is a failure during probe of hfi1 before the sdma_map_lock is
initialized, the call to hfi1_free_devdata() will attempt to use a lock
that has not been initialized. If the locking correctness validator is on
then an INFO message and stack trace resembling the following may be seen:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;INFO: trying to register non-static key.
  The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe
  you didn&amp;#39;t initialize this object before use?
  turning off the locking correctness validator.
  Call Trace:
  register_lock_class+0x11b/0x880
  __lock_acquire+0xf3/0x7930
  lock_acquire+0xff/0x2d0
  _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x46/0x60
  sdma_clean+0x42a/0x660 [hfi1]
  hfi1_free_devdata+0x3a7/0x420 [hfi1]
  init_one+0x867/0x11a0 [hfi1]
  pci_device_probe+0x40e/0x8d0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The use of sdma_map_lock in sdma_clean() is for freeing the sdma_map
memory, and sdma_map is not allocated/initialized until after
sdma_map_lock has been initialized. This code only needs to be run if
sdma_map is not NULL, and so checking for that condition will avoid trying
to use the lock before it is initialized.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2022-49433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
