<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 18:59:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2023-52625 — drm/amd/display: Refactor DMCUB enter/exit idle interface</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-52625</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;drm/amd/display: Refactor DMCUB enter/exit idle interface&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Why]
We can hang in place trying to send commands when the DMCUB isn&amp;#39;t
powered on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[How]
We need to exit out of the idle state prior to sending a command,
but the process that performs the exit also invokes a command itself.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fixing this issue involves the following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. Using a software state to track whether or not we need to start
   the process to exit idle or notify idle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s possible for the hardware to have exited an idle state without
driver knowledge, but entering one is always restricted to a driver
allow - which makes the SW state vs HW state mismatch issue purely one
of optimization, which should seldomly be hit, if at all.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. Refactor any instances of exit/notify idle to use a single wrapper
   that maintains this SW state.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This works simialr to dc_allow_idle_optimizations, but works at the
DMCUB level and makes sure the state is marked prior to any notify/exit
idle so we don&amp;#39;t enter an infinite loop.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. Make sure we exit out of idle prior to sending any commands or
   waiting for DMCUB idle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch takes care of 1/2. A future patch will take care of wrapping
DMCUB command submission with calls to this new interface.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;drm/amd/display: Refactor DMCUB enter/exit idle interface&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Why]
We can hang in place trying to send commands when the DMCUB isn&amp;#39;t
powered on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[How]
We need to exit out of the idle state prior to sending a command,
but the process that performs the exit also invokes a command itself.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fixing this issue involves the following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. Using a software state to track whether or not we need to start
   the process to exit idle or notify idle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s possible for the hardware to have exited an idle state without
driver knowledge, but entering one is always restricted to a driver
allow - which makes the SW state vs HW state mismatch issue purely one
of optimization, which should seldomly be hit, if at all.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. Refactor any instances of exit/notify idle to use a single wrapper
   that maintains this SW state.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This works simialr to dc_allow_idle_optimizations, but works at the
DMCUB level and makes sure the state is marked prior to any notify/exit
idle so we don&amp;#39;t enter an infinite loop.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. Make sure we exit out of idle prior to sending any commands or
   waiting for DMCUB idle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch takes care of 1/2. A future patch will take care of wrapping
DMCUB command submission with calls to this new interface.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-52625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
