<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 06:56:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-wc8c-qw6v-h7f6 — @hono/node-server has authorization bypass for protected static paths via encoded slashes in Serve Static Middleware</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-wc8c-qw6v-h7f6</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; npm: @hono/node-server&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When using @hono/node-server&amp;#39;s static file serving together with route-based middleware protections (e.g. protecting `/admin/*`), inconsistent URL decoding can allow protected static resources to be accessed without authorization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In particular, paths containing encoded slashes (`%2F`) may be evaluated differently by routing/middleware matching versus static file path resolution, enabling a bypass where middleware does not run but the static file is still served.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The routing layer and the node-server static handler normalize request paths differently. The router preserves `%2F` as a literal string when matching routes, while the static handler decodes `%2F` into `/` before resolving the filesystem path.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Example request:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- `/admin%2Fsecret.html`&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This may:
- fail to match middleware intended for `/admin/*`, but
- still be resolved by the static handler as `/admin/secret.html` under the configured static root.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This does not allow access outside the configured static root and is not a path traversal vulnerability.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An unauthenticated attacker could bypass route-based authorization protections for protected static resources by supplying paths containing encoded slashes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Applications relying solely on route-based middleware to protect static subpaths under the same static root may have exposed those resources.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; npm: @hono/node-server&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When using @hono/node-server&amp;#39;s static file serving together with route-based middleware protections (e.g. protecting `/admin/*`), inconsistent URL decoding can allow protected static resources to be accessed without authorization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In particular, paths containing encoded slashes (`%2F`) may be evaluated differently by routing/middleware matching versus static file path resolution, enabling a bypass where middleware does not run but the static file is still served.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The routing layer and the node-server static handler normalize request paths differently. The router preserves `%2F` as a literal string when matching routes, while the static handler decodes `%2F` into `/` before resolving the filesystem path.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Example request:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- `/admin%2Fsecret.html`&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This may:
- fail to match middleware intended for `/admin/*`, but
- still be resolved by the static handler as `/admin/secret.html` under the configured static root.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This does not allow access outside the configured static root and is not a path traversal vulnerability.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An unauthenticated attacker could bypass route-based authorization protections for protected static resources by supplying paths containing encoded slashes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Applications relying solely on route-based middleware to protect static subpaths under the same static root may have exposed those resources.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-wc8c-qw6v-h7f6</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
