<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 02:35:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2019-16786 — HTTP Request Smuggling: Invalid Transfer-Encoding in Waitress</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2019-16786</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Pylons Waitress&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Waitress through version 1.3.1 would parse the Transfer-Encoding header and only look for a single string value, if that value was not chunked it would fall through and use the Content-Length header instead. According to the HTTP standard Transfer-Encoding should be a comma separated list, with the inner-most encoding first, followed by any further transfer codings, ending with chunked. Requests sent with: &amp;#34;Transfer-Encoding: gzip, chunked&amp;#34; would incorrectly get ignored, and the request would use a Content-Length header instead to determine the body size of the HTTP message. This could allow for Waitress to treat a single request as multiple requests in the case of HTTP pipelining. This issue is fixed in Waitress 1.4.0.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Pylons Waitress&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Waitress through version 1.3.1 would parse the Transfer-Encoding header and only look for a single string value, if that value was not chunked it would fall through and use the Content-Length header instead. According to the HTTP standard Transfer-Encoding should be a comma separated list, with the inner-most encoding first, followed by any further transfer codings, ending with chunked. Requests sent with: &amp;#34;Transfer-Encoding: gzip, chunked&amp;#34; would incorrectly get ignored, and the request would use a Content-Length header instead to determine the body size of the HTTP message. This could allow for Waitress to treat a single request as multiple requests in the case of HTTP pipelining. This issue is fixed in Waitress 1.4.0.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2019-16786</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-g2xc-35jw-c63p — HTTP Request Smuggling: Invalid Transfer-Encoding in Waitress</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-g2xc-35jw-c63p</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: waitress&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Waitress would parse the `Transfer-Encoding` header and only look for a single string value, if that value was not `chunked` it would fall through and use the `Content-Length` header instead.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to the HTTP standard `Transfer-Encoding` should be a comma separated list, with the inner-most encoding first, followed by any further transfer codings, ending with `chunked`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Requests sent with:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```
Transfer-Encoding: gzip, chunked
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Would incorrectly get ignored, and the request would use a `Content-Length` header instead to determine the body size of the HTTP message.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This could allow for Waitress to treat a single request as multiple requests in the case of HTTP pipelining.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue is fixed in Waitress 1.4.0. This brings a range of changes to harden Waitress against potential HTTP request confusions, and may change the behaviour of Waitress behind non-conformist proxies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Waitress will now return a 501 Not Implemented error if the `Transfer-Encoding` is not `chunked` or contains multiple elements. Waitress does not support any transfer codings such as `gzip` or `deflate`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Pylons Project recommends upgrading as soon as possible, while validating that the changes in Waitress don&amp;amp;#39;t cause any changes in behavior.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Workarounds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Various reverse proxies may have protections against sending potentially bad HTTP requests to the backend, and or hardening against potential issues like this. If the reverse proxy doesn&amp;amp;#39;t use HTTP/1.…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: waitress&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Waitress would parse the `Transfer-Encoding` header and only look for a single string value, if that value was not `chunked` it would fall through and use the `Content-Length` header instead.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to the HTTP standard `Transfer-Encoding` should be a comma separated list, with the inner-most encoding first, followed by any further transfer codings, ending with `chunked`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Requests sent with:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```
Transfer-Encoding: gzip, chunked
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Would incorrectly get ignored, and the request would use a `Content-Length` header instead to determine the body size of the HTTP message.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This could allow for Waitress to treat a single request as multiple requests in the case of HTTP pipelining.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue is fixed in Waitress 1.4.0. This brings a range of changes to harden Waitress against potential HTTP request confusions, and may change the behaviour of Waitress behind non-conformist proxies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Waitress will now return a 501 Not Implemented error if the `Transfer-Encoding` is not `chunked` or contains multiple elements. Waitress does not support any transfer codings such as `gzip` or `deflate`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Pylons Project recommends upgrading as soon as possible, while validating that the changes in Waitress don&amp;amp;#39;t cause any changes in behavior.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Workarounds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Various reverse proxies may have protections against sending potentially bad HTTP requests to the backend, and or hardening against potential issues like this. If the reverse proxy doesn&amp;amp;#39;t use HTTP/1.…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-g2xc-35jw-c63p</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PYSEC-2019-137</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/pysec-2019-137</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: waitress&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Waitress through version 1.3.1 would parse the Transfer-Encoding header and only look for a single string value, if that value was not chunked it would fall through and use the Content-Length header instead. According to the HTTP standard Transfer-Encoding should be a comma separated list, with the inner-most encoding first, followed by any further transfer codings, ending with chunked. Requests sent with: &amp;#34;Transfer-Encoding: gzip, chunked&amp;#34; would incorrectly get ignored, and the request would use a Content-Length header instead to determine the body size of the HTTP message. This could allow for Waitress to treat a single request as multiple requests in the case of HTTP pipelining. This issue is fixed in Waitress 1.4.0.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: waitress&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Waitress through version 1.3.1 would parse the Transfer-Encoding header and only look for a single string value, if that value was not chunked it would fall through and use the Content-Length header instead. According to the HTTP standard Transfer-Encoding should be a comma separated list, with the inner-most encoding first, followed by any further transfer codings, ending with chunked. Requests sent with: &amp;#34;Transfer-Encoding: gzip, chunked&amp;#34; would incorrectly get ignored, and the request would use a Content-Length header instead to determine the body size of the HTTP message. This could allow for Waitress to treat a single request as multiple requests in the case of HTTP pipelining. This issue is fixed in Waitress 1.4.0.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/pysec-2019-137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
