<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 19:52:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2020-13757</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2020-13757</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Python-RSA before 4.1 ignores leading &amp;#39;\0&amp;#39; bytes during decryption of ciphertext. This could conceivably have a security-relevant impact, e.g., by helping an attacker to infer that an application uses Python-RSA, or if the length of accepted ciphertext affects application behavior (such as by causing excessive memory allocation).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Python-RSA before 4.1 ignores leading &amp;#39;\0&amp;#39; bytes during decryption of ciphertext. This could conceivably have a security-relevant impact, e.g., by helping an attacker to infer that an application uses Python-RSA, or if the length of accepted ciphertext affects application behavior (such as by causing excessive memory allocation).&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2020-13757</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-537h-rv9q-vvph — Python-RSA decryption of ciphertext leads to DoS</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-537h-rv9q-vvph</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: rsa&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Python-RSA before 4.1 ignores leading &amp;#39;\0&amp;#39; bytes during decryption of ciphertext. This could conceivably have a security-relevant impact, e.g., by helping an attacker to infer that an application uses Python-RSA, or if the length of accepted ciphertext affects application behavior (such as by causing excessive memory allocation).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: rsa&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Python-RSA before 4.1 ignores leading &amp;#39;\0&amp;#39; bytes during decryption of ciphertext. This could conceivably have a security-relevant impact, e.g., by helping an attacker to infer that an application uses Python-RSA, or if the length of accepted ciphertext affects application behavior (such as by causing excessive memory allocation).&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-537h-rv9q-vvph</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PYSEC-2020-99</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/pysec-2020-99</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: rsa&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Python-RSA before 4.1 ignores leading &amp;#39;\0&amp;#39; bytes during decryption of ciphertext. This could conceivably have a security-relevant impact, e.g., by helping an attacker to infer that an application uses Python-RSA, or if the length of accepted ciphertext affects application behavior (such as by causing excessive memory allocation).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: rsa&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Python-RSA before 4.1 ignores leading &amp;#39;\0&amp;#39; bytes during decryption of ciphertext. This could conceivably have a security-relevant impact, e.g., by helping an attacker to infer that an application uses Python-RSA, or if the length of accepted ciphertext affects application behavior (such as by causing excessive memory allocation).&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/pysec-2020-99</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
