<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 23:39:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-98215 — selinux: preserve user SID across nested backing files</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-98215</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;selinux: preserve user SID across nested backing files&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SELinux saves the user file SID in a backing-file security blob so it
remains available after mmap() replaces vma-&amp;gt;vm_file with a backing file.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For nested backing files (overlayfs over overlayfs, or FUSE passthrough
backed by overlayfs), user_file may itself be a backing file.  Its
fsec-&amp;gt;sid is the SID of the mounter that opened it, rather than the user
that opened the top-level file.  mprotect() then checks fd { use } against
the mounter SID.  This can incorrectly deny access without a domain
transition, or check the wrong target SID after one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Copy the saved user SID when user_file is a backing file.  Keep using the
regular file SID for the first backing layer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With two nested overlayfs mounts and SELinux enforcing,
mprotect(PROT_READ) returns EACCES with an fd { use } denial against the
mounter SID.  With this change, mprotect() succeeds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tested on arm64 QEMU with a small BusyBox initramfs and a purpose-built
SELinux policy.  The original test was also repeated with Fedora Cloud
Base 44 userspace and gave the same result.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;selinux: preserve user SID across nested backing files&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SELinux saves the user file SID in a backing-file security blob so it
remains available after mmap() replaces vma-&amp;gt;vm_file with a backing file.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For nested backing files (overlayfs over overlayfs, or FUSE passthrough
backed by overlayfs), user_file may itself be a backing file.  Its
fsec-&amp;gt;sid is the SID of the mounter that opened it, rather than the user
that opened the top-level file.  mprotect() then checks fd { use } against
the mounter SID.  This can incorrectly deny access without a domain
transition, or check the wrong target SID after one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Copy the saved user SID when user_file is a backing file.  Keep using the
regular file SID for the first backing layer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With two nested overlayfs mounts and SELinux enforcing,
mprotect(PROT_READ) returns EACCES with an fd { use } denial against the
mounter SID.  With this change, mprotect() succeeds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tested on arm64 QEMU with a small BusyBox initramfs and a purpose-built
SELinux policy.  The original test was also repeated with Fedora Cloud
Base 44 userspace and gave the same result.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-98215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
