https://vulnerability.circl.lu Contains only the most 10 recent entries. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Tue, 29 Sep 2026 04:32:18 +0000 https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-97434 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>dpaa2-switch: fix handling of NAPI on the remove path</p> <p>All the NAPI instances for a DPSW device are attached to the first switch port&#39;s net_device but shared by all ports. The NAPI instances get disabled only once the last port goes down.</p> <p>This causes an issue on the .remove() path where each port is unregistered and freed one at a time, causing the NAPI instances to be deleted even though they are not disabled.</p> <p>In order to avoid this, split up the unregister_netdev() calls from the free_netdev() so that we make sure all ports go down before we attempt a deletion of NAPI instances. Also, make the netif_napi_del() explicit as it is on the .probe() path.</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>dpaa2-switch: fix handling of NAPI on the remove path</p> <p>All the NAPI instances for a DPSW device are attached to the first switch port&#39;s net_device but shared by all ports. The NAPI instances get disabled only once the last port goes down.</p> <p>This causes an issue on the .remove() path where each port is unregistered and freed one at a time, causing the NAPI instances to be deleted even though they are not disabled.</p> <p>In order to avoid this, split up the unregister_netdev() calls from the free_netdev() so that we make sure all ports go down before we attempt a deletion of NAPI instances. Also, make the netif_napi_del() explicit as it is on the .probe() path.</p> https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-97434