<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 04:32:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-93250 — vxlan: mdb: Fix use-after-free in vxlan_mdb_flush()</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-93250</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;vxlan: mdb: Fix use-after-free in vxlan_mdb_flush()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;vxlan_mdb_flush() iterates over the MDB entries using
hlist_for_each_entry_safe(), which only tolerates the removal of the
current entry. Contrary to the comment above the loop, the removal of an
entry can trigger the removal of another entry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Flushing the remotes of a (*, G) entry also removes the (S, G) entries
that were created for its source list, once they are left without
remotes:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;vxlan_mdb_remotes_flush()
-&amp;gt; vxlan_mdb_remote_del()
   -&amp;gt; vxlan_mdb_remote_srcs_del()
      -&amp;gt; vxlan_mdb_remote_src_del()
         -&amp;gt; vxlan_mdb_remote_src_fwd_del()
            -&amp;gt; __vxlan_mdb_del()
               -&amp;gt; vxlan_mdb_entry_put()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Such an entry can be located after the (*, G) entry in the list, as
vxlan_mdb_entry_get() returns an existing entry without moving it to the
head of the list. This order is obtained by adding the (S, G) entry
before the (*, G) entry, the latter with NLM_F_REPLACE, as the addition
of the source otherwise fails with -EEXIST. The (S, G) entry is then the
entry saved by hlist_for_each_entry_safe() and it is freed while the
(*, G) entry is processed. The next iteration calls hlist_del() on it
again, writing LIST_POISON1 to LIST_POISON2 [1].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Besides device deletion, the flush is also reachable from RTM_DELMDB
with NLM_F_BULK.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix by re-reading the next entry after the remotes were flushed. The
current entry cannot be removed by this flush,…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;vxlan: mdb: Fix use-after-free in vxlan_mdb_flush()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;vxlan_mdb_flush() iterates over the MDB entries using
hlist_for_each_entry_safe(), which only tolerates the removal of the
current entry. Contrary to the comment above the loop, the removal of an
entry can trigger the removal of another entry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Flushing the remotes of a (*, G) entry also removes the (S, G) entries
that were created for its source list, once they are left without
remotes:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;vxlan_mdb_remotes_flush()
-&amp;gt; vxlan_mdb_remote_del()
   -&amp;gt; vxlan_mdb_remote_srcs_del()
      -&amp;gt; vxlan_mdb_remote_src_del()
         -&amp;gt; vxlan_mdb_remote_src_fwd_del()
            -&amp;gt; __vxlan_mdb_del()
               -&amp;gt; vxlan_mdb_entry_put()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Such an entry can be located after the (*, G) entry in the list, as
vxlan_mdb_entry_get() returns an existing entry without moving it to the
head of the list. This order is obtained by adding the (S, G) entry
before the (*, G) entry, the latter with NLM_F_REPLACE, as the addition
of the source otherwise fails with -EEXIST. The (S, G) entry is then the
entry saved by hlist_for_each_entry_safe() and it is freed while the
(*, G) entry is processed. The next iteration calls hlist_del() on it
again, writing LIST_POISON1 to LIST_POISON2 [1].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Besides device deletion, the flush is also reachable from RTM_DELMDB
with NLM_F_BULK.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix by re-reading the next entry after the remotes were flushed. The
current entry cannot be removed by this flush,…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-93250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
